Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Could Fine Gael be pushed to the right?

1468910

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mod: closing this as it is no longer on-topic.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mod: reopening this upon request.
    Should it veer off topic again, I will not hesitate in closing it permanently.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    Surprised to see FF making noises about how people who work for a living should actually be rewarded for same. Could the tide actually be starting to turn on the welfare lifestyle? Oh sorry, I forgot, can't say things like that or you're a Nazi.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2025/09/22/prioritise-working-people-on-social-housing-waiting-lists-says-fianna-fails-robert-troy/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It will be interesting to see what happens after this Presidential election. The gap in politics is on the right - that is where people feel they are not represented. It will probably be easier for FF to move in that direction, but FG would have to see a change in leader and some time in opposition to head in that direction.

    An election platform of reform of income tax to incentivise work, tightened controls on social welfare, a tough but fair immigration reform as in other EU countries, a reduction in red tape for business and landlords, more urban than rural in focus, that could get to 30% support for a FG or FF, basically tacking on some of the disenfranchised right to the existing party support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    Anti-immigration is traditionally a left wing view and freedom of movement is traditiinally a right wing view.

    At the height of socialism in 50s to 80s there was very little diversity/immigration in any of the socialist states. In contrast "right wing" countries like the UK and USA were very diverse and encouraged immigration.

    You could argue that FG are currently to the right on immigration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, and free trade is traditionally a right-wing view, yet the right wing in both UK (Brexit) and US (Trump tariffs) have turned against free trade.

    We are in an era similar to the 1930s where positions are changing and the risk of tyranny comes from a number of directions. Left-wing politicians have traditionally favoured free speech, yet all of the SLAPPs in Ireland come from PBP and SF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    This is why the reductive left-wing and right-wing labels are all but useless.

    SF has a thin veneer of social-liberal-leftism but is at heart an ethno-nationalist party which is in most countries the reserve of the far right

    This is why their supporters heaped abuse on Heather Humphreys for being a Presbyterian. Yet they claim their overriding goal is to unite the island???

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,049 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    On the question itself, they should, but they won't.

    The upper echelons of FG are stuck trying to please those who want to vote for the Social Democrats and the D4 types in RTE.

    FG have all but abandoned their core voters. What actual policy items speak to these voters?
    Generally, people vote for FG because they appear to run the country a bit better than others, but after many years in power, they are just tired and out of ideas. They should have opted to stay out of government and go back to the basics.

    There is a vacuum on the centre-right, and if FG doesn't fill it, you can be sure someone else more nefarious will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    Far left is normally mono cultural. Far right tends to be more along the lines of people being allowed to live how they want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    As long as you're a nationalistic white heterosexual Christian-professing male, yeah, you can live how you want 🙄

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    Not true. Think about when socialism was at its peak. Where would you rather live,

    New York or Moscow

    London or Beijing

    West Berlin or East Berlin

    History tells us that socialism is very bad for minorities and more right leaning countries respect minority rights.

    Combine natiionalism and socialism - as what happened in Germany in the 30s/40s and you get death camps for miniorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Not true. Think about when socialism was at its peak. Where would you rather live,
    New York or Moscow
    London or Beijing
    West Berlin or East Berlin

    Not everybody had the possibility to make that choice then, nor do they now. Clearly there were and are more opportunities in a wealthier society, and in a great many cases wealthy societies came about by robbing the resources of other countries (colonies) at the point of a gun. Ireland being a case in point.

    History tells us that socialism is very bad for minorities and more right leaning countries respect minority rights.

    Again not true, or was England socialist when it destroyed the Gaelic minorities in Scotland, Man and Ireland? How is their Cornish minority doing today? and even their Welsh minority is in a fairly precarious situation. Or maybe you forgot that type of minority and only mean gays, trans and other internal minorities?
    Franco's Spain, which was definitely right-leaning - you might consider how minorities were treated there, whether of the national or social variety; other than the wealthy minority of course, whose "rights" were certainly protected.

    Combine natiionalism and socialism - as what happened in Germany in the 30s/40s and you get death camps for miniorities.

    Beyond using the word "socialist" in its title, you might explain in what way Nazi Germany was a socialist society. It was long ago explained to me that it was run in tandem by far-right politicians and big business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    You've heard the expression "....if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck etc etc....."

    The word Nazi means national socialist (i.e. racist socialist) Nazi Getmany had all the characteristics of a socialist state i.e. the State controls the people, people are cogs in the machinery of the State, no free speach, conformity, a ruling socialist party, minorities or anyone different targeted, heavily policed - big into military/secret police etc., human life devalued. distrust of foreigners etc etc.

    Socialist States are great at saying things and doing the opposite e.g. the GDR was neither democratic nor a replublic. The biggest violators of human rights tend to be socialist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,886 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Socialism and communism are not the same thing.

    And the nazis weren't socialist either, they were fascist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    Communism is just a more extreme form of socialism. Nazi is just a racist form of socialism. All are on the left of the political spectrum.

    On the right of the spectrum, the State serves the people. On the left, the people serve the State. While Ireland is socially liberal and very much to the right on individual rights, immigrstion and business (open economy encoursging immigration) it has a lot of charactetistics of a left leaning State e.g. punative personal taxation (we spend a huge % of our working week earning money for the state), wealth redistribution, high dependency on the state by many sectors of society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,886 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Absolute claptrap. Nazism is on the left? Come off it.

    Right wing politics. Is about smaller states. Not the state working for people. It's left wing that favours larger state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭dmakc


    Having seen Emer Higgins and the Limerick County TD (name escapes me, the one who can't define his own malinformation policy) seperate reaction videos, I dont think we'll be seeing any shift or lessons learned from FG



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Nazism has nothing whatsoever to do with socialism, they knew that when they picked the name it was just in vogue at the time.

    Though, by all means, go find some neo-nazis and explain to them how they are actually socialists and see how you get on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Was New York, London or West Berlin governed by the far right at the time?

    BTW being critical of the right is not an endorsement of communism. 🙄

    And then the old "the Nazis were socialists" crap.

    History tells us that socialism is very bad for minorities and more right leaning countries respect minority rights.

    Absolute and utter pony. Hungary is governed by the far right. Media is controlled by the government and pride parades are banned.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It is absolute claptrap.

    The right-wingers always talk about a smaller state, yet favour huge militaries and want to police what consenting adults do in their bedrooms.

    Also @csirl Ireland's personal taxation burden is about average by European standards.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    I never said any were far right, but all were firmly to the right of the spectrum. A far right government would have very little government interference in peoples lives and no welfare. None of these countries were that far right.

    Government control is a charactetistic of the left. Hungary is not right wing - Government trying to bring back the USSR!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Not much point trying to have a discussion with someone who redefines words to suit their own bizarre takes

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭rock22


    "West Berlin or East Berlin"

    I think West Berlin was in the hands of the SPD under Wille Brandt for most of that time. (SPD a socialist party)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    I started this thread and am mildly gratified to see that it's alive again after having faded into inactivity. Although I'm disappointed to see that it has gone down yet another tedious rabbit hole of pointless debate about the exact meaning of the words right, left, far right, socialist etc.

    My intention in starting this thread was to see what PRACTICAL ACTION could be taken to stem and reverse the problems caused by the incompetence and inaction of successive Governments on crime, welfare reform and our de facto open door immigration policy. My query was whether a dedicated cohort of activists could effect democratic policy change within Fine Gael to advocate and effect more robust policies in all of these areas. Sadly no one seems to have any opinion on this outside of the usual suspects trying to smear my suggestions as the ravings of a wannabe National Party sympathiser, which is nonsense. Like it or not, last week's events at Citywest (not to mention the revelations from the trials of the lovely Puska family) are only a taster of what's in store for us in the coming decades until people start at least acknowledging that there are problems with current crime, welfare and immigration policies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Isn't it interesting that an OP who uses the word right in the title of the thread is worried about the precise meaning of the word. And related words like left & socialist. I would have thought the meaning of words was pretty important in this context.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    So very true.

    Scholz's SPD was far to the right of Willy Brandt's SPD.

    Willy Brandt's SPD was far to the right of the original SPD - which was what the Communist party called themselves at the beginning of the 20th century.

    Pretty much all parties that get into power move to the right. Two of the main reasons are financial considerations, and the power-hungry attaching themselves to a vehicle that can satisfy their ambitions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,753 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    completely agree, we re never gonna truly address the underlining issues that causes things such as long term unemployment, crime, immigration, such as long term unmet needs and significant trauma, so we re going to continue to see an escalation of these problems and their outcomes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    You are describing an authoritarian regime, and attaching the word socialist to it.

    There have been authoritarian regimes of the right and the left, I mentioned Franco's Spain, I could have mentioned Salazar's Portugal, Pilsudski's Poland, Pinochet's Chile and a host of others, which were all fascist regimes similar to Mussolini's Italy - and to Hitler's Germany in its initial phase before it went ballistic.

    None of the regimes I have mentioned were in the slightest way socialist. The rulers always depended on the big corporations and the banks for their support; it was a two-way process, a symbiotic process where the regime and big business fed off each other.

    Fine Gael grew out of a movement - the Blue Shirts - and arose when a couple of other groups including Cumann na nGaedhal - coalesced with them to form Fine Gael. It was a fairly hard-right party, the party of the business class, big farmers, the professional classes and the remaining unionists south of the border. At times it was quite unhappy with democracy and free speech - and big into "law & order" and control. In recent years it has moved away from that image although from time to time we still see the iron fist behind the glove.

    Another main policy of FG has been the use of emigration as a form of social control - in the 50s, 80s and againwhen they came to power after the 2008 crash. This is at variance with FF (who I have no time for) who have presided over ending emigration and the return of emigrants.

    If FG ever gained a majority in the Dáil, I have no doubt that we would see hard right policies put in place, but I can't see that majority happening.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭csirl


    I honestly dont see a UK National Party type political party gaining traction in Ireland. Far too fringe and Irish people have never bought into the racist conspiracy theory stuff.

    Moving in this direction killed the conservatives in the UK and would kill FG in Ireland. What Ireland is missing is a secular, socially liberal, ecomonically free market/lower government spending party. Thats a direction FG could move in to dustinguish themselves from FF.



Advertisement