Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

LUAS Network + Future Expansion

11213141517

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,165 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Would Lucan not be best served by a Luas on the N4 with buses feeding in to both that line and the heavy rail line?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I've done a big update on this on the rail part of my IrishMotorways site (yes there is a rail part too).

    http://irishmotorwayinfo.com/inex/rail/

    It summarises everything we learned from the NTA's presentation, though I think the NDP review will rejig some of that.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,464 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I wanted to make a point about improving Red Line operation. We really should be consolidating some stations together as they were built far too close in some instances to please locals.

    Drimnagh and Goldenbridge - should be closed and a new station built halfway with a new pedestrian bridge over the canal. This will serve future development in St. Michael's Estate and still be very close to the areas served by the existing stations.

    Rialto and Fatima - should be closed and a new station built halfway. When the NCH opens I think a lot of passenger activity here will be people coming to and from the hospital.

    In both cases closing two and building one new station instead of picking one to be closed will play better with locals as no one will feel like their rail service is being taken away. At Fatima we also need to keep in mind that depending on Lucan Luas alignment chosen, rail may continue east of here.

    If they pick shared running with Red Line for Lucan Line (which I agree isn't a good idea) then speeding up the Red Line will become even more important.

    The time savings will be small but on a central section and particularly with shared running they will be worth it. Rule of thumb is that every tram stop adds 1 minute to the journey time but this feels like a lowball estimate to me especially at rush hour. I'd say more like 1.5 mins. So if you number of tram stops by two due to consolidation you save 2-3 mins on the journey time through this section.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I’m not here defending Lucan Luas as a priority. My point was that this obsession with running all of these services into SSG or OCS. The “majority of users” (which is what you said) won’t be from Lucan, but people along the line can connect in with other modes along the way.

    There isn’t actually an obvious alternative to the Red Line. The obvious one would in fact be by College Green, which clearly is off the table (I’d actually like one myself).

    So there’s three other choices really. I actually have no issue with any of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,374 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Surely Lucan would be best served by having dedicated QBC’s feeding into kishogue railway station to the south and Clonsilla to the North.
    The railway that Kishogue is on (can’t remember the name of this route?) is quad tracked to hueston station where you have the PPT and RL LUAS

    The railway that clonsilla is on connects with GL LUAS at broom bridge station and goes right into the CC.

    Expanding parking at clonsilla and improving PT service to both of these stations by providing high frequency and high capacity busses operating in QBCs throughout Lucan is the most efficient way of getting people to use PT as opposed to building another rail line out that direction.

    The frequency and capacity of the existing heavy rail lines would also have to improve to meet demand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Does anyone have any expectations on how the revised NDP will shift/change the future plans of PT going forward?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Red line was built on the reserved alignment for a future dart. If you ask me, that makes it about as primed for upgrade to metro as the Green line south of Charlemont. They should just turn the inner city part of the red line into the central part of a lucan luas, while building a new east-west metro tunnel in the city centre for a future metrolink line 2 that incorporates the outer parts of the red line with a new inner city undergound.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,972 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    No one really knows yet, but I would view a retrenchment away from large investments in PT as an impossibility.

    At a guess, I'd say it'll be the last NDP, with a few roads with higher priority, and higher priority to Western rail projects. That's down to FF/FG talking so much about how the greens are responsible for roads being deprioritised, and the ministers involved (Sean Carney is minister of state for transport, and a bit western rail guy).

    In other words, it'll be fiddling at the edges, nothing more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭dazberry


    Some interesting points here, but I can't help feel that we're sort of optimising for the wrong problem here. Anyway I've been out with the google distance tool so all measurements are very approximate.

    So firstly in the Blackhorse to Suir Road section. Drimnagh to Goldenbridge is 253m, so yes that's crazy short and I would have been of the opinion originally that there is one stop too many on that canal segment. I lived near Blackhorse when the route was being decided and I distinctly remember some of the route updates (i.e. political flyers) with the general level of political points scoring and meddling. So while not privy to the decision process further along the canal, I'm not surprised.

    But having said that, after reading spacetweek's post I went and looked back, and it sort of struck me. Both stops are at ingress/egress points to Drimnagh and Inchicore. Could they not have split the difference? Well not really, because you have to remember the canal was sort of a desolate place back then, isolated and rife with anti-social behaviour, that was never going to be a sell. Could we do it now? I don't think so - while greatly improved it's still somewhat isolated in parts, if it was a must perhaps move Drimnagh up ~50m and remove Goldenbridge, that gives 626m between each stop, but again a hard sell and a lot of expense.

    Rialto and Fatima are 261m apart, so not much better. But Rialto is right at the Children's hospital, and Fatima has access into the MISA and the main hospital (during the day when the gate is open), and a lot of traffic from the various schools off James St, so I wouldn't be inclined to try and consolidate those either.

    So in both cases, given the catchments and general access I'd try to not to move or consolidate. But as I said I think this is trying to optimise the wrong problem. The real problem IMO is Blackhorse and to a lesser extent Suir Road.

    Blackhorse is likely the biggest problem, because if trams backup there, only one can exit the canal towards the Naas Rd with each sequence of traffic lights. There is some sort of priority for incoming trams that sometimes cause the inbound filter on to Davitt Rd to skip a turn, but on exit it's still a problem. I've seen this first hand with 4 trams queued, and each had to wait for the sequence.


    The Blackhorse road junction was terrible from day one, IMO a lot of compromises were made on the red line, and while we got the stilts over the redcow eventually :D there are still a lot of "legacy issues". If Lucan Luas joins with the red line at that point, it makes the layout a factor more complicated, and it's too crucial a point to just stick down an extra bit of track, a few traffic lights and paint a few yellow boxes. Suir Road suffers to a lesser extent, in general it's cars blocking the tracks with some accidents on occasion.

    So should Luas Lucan share the red line canal section?


    For: Assuming a spur after Fatima (or Suir Rd)

    • I believe there is enough "raw" capacity on the section
    • It integrates two lines as opposed to two separate lines (big win)
    • More operational options or commuting options with the spur
    • Slightly more resiliency after Fatima with spur

    Against:

    • Blackhorse flow control and traffic interaction (biggest problem IMO)
    • Delays or accidents at Suir Rd
    • Single point of failure between Blackhorse → Fatima
    • Unless rework of turnback at Heuston as trams can no longer terminate at Blackhorse


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    If that was the case, if a lucan integration with the red line was proposed, would it not make sense that the "big ticket" junctions there get replaced as part of it? Blackhorse and Suir Road would both be a nightmare to re-engineer for grade separation but it would be needed to achieve the intended throughput?

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭dazberry


    Fair point, if possible @riddlinrussell I'd hope those in the know could find viable solutions if they exist, notably at Blackhorse. There are on-going plans around the Suir Road junction on the DCC website (here) - but any Luas references (Improve safety of LUAS travelling through the junction, Maintain LUAS and bus priority through the junction) strike me as more an after-thought to sell the changes as opposed to any real improvement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,745 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    How long are we looking at the luas to the point being down? weeks? months?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,791 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If the bridge is structurally compromised - and I can't see how it won't be - try months to a year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,745 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    That's what I'm thinking and it takes so long to get anything done here



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,972 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    In fairness, when something major goes wrong, they're usually pretty quick at cracking on and fixing it. Like that time the dart bridge fell into the sea, that was fixed in three months or so.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,972 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Luas are saying the service changes may "last a period of time".

    Looks like months anyway.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    How much traffic does the Connolly/Bus Aras section to the Point take?

    Will they run a bus connection?

    Any idea as to how much damage was done to the bridge?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,886 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    trams are pretty busy any time I use them, but it's not a huge distance, a lot of people will just walk it.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There are already the high frequency G Spine bus routes G1 and G2 along North Wall Quay to and from Castleforbes Road (3 mins walk from The Point) and the 151 eastbound (westbound it comes along Upper Sheriff St and Seville Place).

    They should be more than enough for people who don’t want to walk.

    Regarding the last question, I think that you need to be realistic - they’ve only finished putting the fire out. The infrastructural damage hasn’t even been assessed yet - it’s impossible to answer that at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,404 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Biggest impact though will be for those that take it from Connolly as far as Abbey Streey/Bus Aras and vice versa. It gets mobbed at Connolly and then the Abbey Street stop outbound is always very busy,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,886 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The line is open between Connolly and Tallaght / Saggart.

    The G1 & G2 cover the closed section.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,404 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Connolly to Bus Aras is open? I obviously was mixing up my train stations with Heuston and Connolly, a minor enough inconvenience so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,805 ✭✭✭jd


    Just a correction there - it a presentation by TII not the NTA.

    I asked my local TD Rob O Donoghue to ask about a possible Northwood extension, he got a follow up reply from Hugh Cregan after the initial Dail question.


    Subject: RE: PQ Referred: 38781/25, for answer 15/07/2025, Written from - Robert O'Donoghue 

    Dear Deputy,

     

    I refer to the matter you raised in Parliamentary Question No. 269 of 15 July last, which has been referred to the National Transport Authority (NTA) for reply.

     

    We have no current plans to extend the Luas Finglas Project (Luas Green Line) to the proposed Metrolink stations at Northwood or Ballymun.

     

    The Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area, as approved by the Minister for Transport in January 2023, provides the statutory basis for investment in transport infrastructure and services for Dublin up to 2042. The proposals therein were derived on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of forecast transport demand over the next 20 years. In the case of Finglas and Ballymun, the analysis confirmed that both areas would be required to be served by the pre-existing proposals. In the case of Finglas, it was determined that demand on this corridor would be accommodated by a combination of high-frequency bus and Luas, the latter of which would also cater for some longer-distance demand via a Park and Ride at St. Margaret’s Road. In the case of Ballymun, the MetroLink which will also serve the major town of Swords and Dublin Airport has long been planned to be routed through this suburb with a stop in the Town Centre, and will be complemented by the BusConnects network.

     

    Extending Luas Finglas, which is approximately 4km in length by a further 3km eastwards from Charlestown to Ballymun was not considered for the following reasons:

     

    •                     It would add significantly to the cost of the project;

    •                     The demand for travel between Finglas and Ballymun would be unlikely to justify investment in light rail and is currently being met by the N6 and N4 bus services; and

    •                     Demand from Ballymun to the City Centre will be met by MetroLink and the recently approved BusConnects project.

     

    Both Luas Finglas and MetroLink have been through extensive public consultation processes and changes to their routings, alignments and detailed designs over the last number of years. Railway Order applications have been made to An Bord Pleanála and in the case of MetroLink, an oral hearing has occurred. As both projects are currently under consideration by An Bord Pleanála, no material changes to either can be made. The NTA, as the Approving Authority, in collaboration with the Sponsoring Agency, Transport Infrastructure Ireland, intend to deliver both rail projects once the Railway Orders are approved, subject to funding availability.

     

    Under the Dublin Transport Authority Act, the Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area is reviewed every 6 years.

     

    I trust that the above information is of assistance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭Daith


    Interesting reply but most people would be viewing it as a Green Line line link to Metrolink on the Northside rather than a Finglas to Ballymun link.

    A change in Bus Service to link Finglas with Northwood could work of course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    The F1 could be extended slightly to Northwood in the interim, as of the F spine launch it will be going as far as IKEA anyways. You may need to move the E1 to terminate at the proposed D4 terminus to free up space, but that would in turn provide Northwood with a much needed link between Ballymun and the Swords Road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭Daith


    I think the Finglas Luas will end up connecting to Northwood at some stage , especially as we're going to see Broombridge expand with housing and the Jamestown Business centre area. The N4 and N6 don't serve a lot of Finglas but obviously could be modified.

    if people in Finglas wanted to get public transport to the Airport then then they'd get the F buses to Glasnevin station which isn't too bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    I hope that when the N8 is launched it could also be modified from original proposal to stop at Charleston SC.

    Don't really think Luas connection is needed between Finglas and Northwood as I assume demand may be quite thin, plus with Dart+ Broombridge station is to get more services so I think capacity will be manageable



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    I don't think many people are suggesting there is massive demand between Finglas and Northwood themselves. As mentioned, this is covered off by the N6 bus currently.

    However, when the Finglas luas is built and the Metrolink station at Northwood is taking shape, people will start saying, why can't we add just 3km of light rail to link the Green line up to Metrolink. Rail to Rail connections are far more popular around the world in cities, and this will be a no brainer.

    You will bring the whole Northside of the Green line to a simple change over at Northwood to connect to / from the airport and Swords. That will be Phibsborough, Cabra, Broombridge, all of Finglas and beyond to Northwood with a tie in to Metrolink.

    I do feel that they want Metrolink under construction first though. We don't want Metrolink canned in favour of an extension to the Airport!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,572 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I'm not at all surprised by the above response.

    I don't think the NTA/TII want even the mere suggestion of bringing the Green Line Luas anywhere near the airport, ahead of Metrolink opening. They don't want anyone to get any ideas that it might be a cheap alternative to Metrolink.

    I think the goal is to get Metrolink built and extend the Luas to Finglas at roughly the same time. Once Metrolink is open and it is a massive success, I think there will be massive pressure for them to extend the Luas to meet Metrolink.

    I think best case scenario, is that planning for this wouldn't start until well after Finglas extension is complete and Metrolink is well under way (TBM's in the ground). Worst case scenario is it wouldn't start until after Metrolink opens.



Advertisement