Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

N25 - Midleton to Youghal [planning and design to commence 2023]

145679

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Ah! That makes sense, actually. Sorry about the confusion. Mogeely-Castlemartyr-Ladysbridge would make a good zone for development, but only if the rail link was in place first. Without it, they’d just be creating another Carrigaline and adding to Cork City’s traffic problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Mogeely probably needs a decade worth of infrastructure planning/development before large scale housing construction can happen. It might be something for the 2040s and it'll take until then to deliver all the further progressed development plans between Tivoli and Midleton.

    Further development could happen on the eastern side of Midleton and Ballinacura if a new distributor road was built, linking to a Midleton East train station. It would also take a lot of pressure off the LVR. I said here a couple of years ago that such a road should be planned. It could be delivered relatively quickly, certainly much faster than trying to develop small villages to justify a rail extension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep I think we're all aligned. The County Council is missing a lot of big-picture planning here though. East of Midleton, Mogeely, between Carrigtwohill and Midleton are all poorly planned, not well exploiting the location at all. Youghal's very poorly exploited too. It has a beach, a port, it could easily have a rail line, they should be encouraging investment into the area IMO.

    What's planned between Carrigtwohill and Midleton is currently quite poor, more a sprawl of both towns than an overall integrated plan. What's now planned North of Carrigtwohill is a good bit better in fairness. I think the current development plan is up in 2028 so maybe there will be a new round of public consultation in 18-24 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    I did mention elsewhere on this thread that at such junctions where significant traffic volumes are present, there is a reduced speed limit with the widespread use of fixed speed cameras to ensure compliance with the speed limit through the junction

    BTW, Sweden has the lowest road deaths per capita in the EU, and also a lower number of fatalities per billion vehicle-km than Ireland. Lessons to be learned there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Sweden is a very different country to Ireland, though. Outside of the urban areas, the country is very sparsely populated - especially the northern half. There are far fewer roads in rural areas, but they’re good, consistent roads, with very few side entrances. This is inherently safer than what we have: a large number of small lanes with inconsistent width and profile, with many domestic and commercial entrances directly onto the road.

    Ireland’s unique rural settlement pattern, where people live as far from each other as they can while staying near to the local town/city makes that approach to road provision impossible. In Sweden (and other continental countries) where rural housing is clustered into villages of 20~100 houses, once you’ve built a good road between two villages, the engineering part of the safety problem is fixed; here, between two villages there are probably three routes, all with houses along them, all with vocal proponents, all of whom demand a fully serviced road to their house; and then there’s all the people living on the roads off those roads…

    We’re starting from the worst possible place when it comes to road safety. I’m surprised at how highly we actually rank in road safety (we’re in the second tier of countries, with NL, DE, FR), given how poor most of the road network is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    Midleton is expanding westwards, not eastwards. A new rail station west of Midleton, near Water Rock, is part of the current plan.

    I don't understand the idea of a P&R to the east of Midleton, if anything, a P&R in Mogeely in conjunction with a rail extension from Midleton would seem to be the best answer.

    Thanks to our 19th-century Victorian engineers, all the bridges and the permanent way are wide enough to accommodate a twin track or a single track alongside a greenway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    It would be a lot easier to add a station ~1km west of Midleton than ~7km further west, not only is there the construction costs but also operational consideration s. Mogeely is a tiny village, it doesn't have anything like the infrastructure required for the population to justify a train station.

    The eastern side of Midleton and Ballinacura are probably close to justifying the train traveling two minutes further already and function as a P&R for people further east , plus there is potential for further growth around an already large town. It could be done by 2030 if they wanted, Mogeely would be more like 2040.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Improved access to Midleton station from the east would help a lot - right now, you have to go through town to get to it, which is something of a deterrent. The idea of a new station 2km east of it isn’t a bad one either, as it would solve another problem of Midleton station: the parking fills very quickly.

    Another station west of Midleton at Ballyrichard/Ballyadam, accessible from N25, would facilitiate a more sustainable development of that area than Cork County Council’s rejected plan for the road. This would also provide a P+R location for traffic from south of Midleton.

    On the thread topic, development of Mogeely may not be as far in the future as you say. The only plausible route of a new N25 would be north of Castlemartyr, and that will accelerate the development of Mogeely itself by improving its road access to/from Cork. Mogeely is only 2km from Castlemartyr, but the road between them is poor. If the new road had an intermediate junction (which it might, in conjunction with widening the Mogeely Road, to keep Ladysbridge Road traffic off the east-west main street), then that would put Mogeely at less than 1.5 km from the new road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    Main Street, Midleton, runs roughly north-south. To the east, the major expansion of the Irish Distillers plant has more or less cut off any residential development to the east of the town.

    Development to the south of the town in the Ballinacurra area is currently severely restricted by bad congestion at the Lakeview Roundabout, from which there are up to 3km queues on the R630 during commute times every day. A major redevelopment of the R630/N25 roundabout would be necessary to facilitate further expansion south of the town.

    A high-capacity feeder bus from Ballinacurra to the existing rail station, with a dedicated bus lane if space can be found, could form part of the solution.

    Expansion east of the town would need to be east of the Irish Distillers plant in the direction of Mogeely, which brings the extension of the railway eastwards to Mogeely back into the equation.

    Existing rail will serve the expansion westwards.

    A caveat on including rail as an effective solution to commuting from East Cork, and overcrowding on the N25, in any solution is effective and reliable onward bus connections from Kent Station to all areas of the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    As things stand, it unlikely that a Castlemartyr bypass will be built by 2030. After it is built, you need to develop other infrastructure (particularly water and sewage but also more roads, schools, etc.). After that, you need to build a couple of hundred houses. These things aren't even at design stage yet and all resources are tied up for the foreseeable future trying to deliver all the infrastructure required for the thousands of more viable units closer to Cork, plus then deliver the units themselves. Mogeely isn't going to justify a rail service for a very long time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    A major upgrade of the Lakeview Roundabout isn't going to be possible without significant CPOing on all sides. I honestly don't think it will ever happen. A more realistic solution is a new road east of the town going north and south of the N25. That opens up plenty of development land, serving existing and new populations of Midleton and Ballinacura plus acts as a P&R for people further east, accessing the station via the new road.

    The only "upgrade" I could see at Lakeview would be the N25 being put on an overpass with no junction, leaving the R630 to run north/south below. That would only be possible if alternative access to the N25 is provided, which is back to a new road to the east. A high-capacity feeder bus from Ballinacurra to the existing rail station will not be possible without major restrictions on other traffic, making it pretty much impossible. You could however have a high-capacity feeder bus to a new rail station if a new road with bus lanes is built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I agree with 2030-31 as a completion date, but there’s no reason why developers would wait until the road is completed before even beginning developments to take advantage of it. Cork County Council has a terrible habit of not planning things ahead, but elsewhere in the country (I’m thinking particularly of Waterford), lands were serviced and housing developments would start at the same time as new road construction, so that by the time the road was finished, the housing was there too.

    I don’t see Mogeely as the next development zone here, though. As you suggested above, the eastern side of Midleton at Broomfield is a lot more sensible place for development, and that would support a second, "Midleton East" station 2km or so from the main Midleton station, which would function as a local service and a P+R for traffic coming from the east.

    Ballinacurra, south of the current N25 roundabout, has very poor access to the rail station, as you have to cross the Lakeview roundabout then battle to the far side of Midleton. I think a better option for people from here would be a new station at Ballyadam (between Midleton and Glounthaune), which should be built anyway if the council is to have any hope of zoning this area for housing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Agreed on the previous posts. If we're putting in a new major N25 interchange East of Midleton (and I think we should), then there MIGHT be scope for a distributor network southwards to the East of Ballinacurra, allowing expansion of that "suburb" too. Maybe even a deviation to the rail network. Two new stops: the new "Midleton East" P&R and a Ballinacurra station. No need for feeder buses at all then really, and you unlock development land on 3 sides of Midleton. At a minimum anyway with a new N25 interchange we should be talking about stuff like active transport and infrastructure for a feeder bus to the new "Midleton East" P&R. Maybe develop with high density on the existing Midleton train station car park?

    Back to this forum's focus, it seems obvious to me that closing Lakeview, creating a new Midleton East junction and a Midleton East distributor are important next steps. Almost as high a priority as upgrading the N25 to Youghal, for me.

    Once again my justification is that I don't think the expansion of Youghal as a Cork "commuter" town is the right thing to do. People are commuting from there because there's not enough local jobs in Youghal and not enough housing further West. We need to invest directly in Youghal and in the infrastructure that unlocks large volumes of housing further West.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    The Castlemartyr bypass is now gone to tender, its feasibility study having been completed a while back.

    Currently, there seems to be significant site excavations along the finalised route, indicating initial groundworks are now progressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Back to this forum's focus, it seems obvious to me that closing Lakeview, creating a new Midleton East junction and a Midleton East distributor are important next steps.

    Yep and I've said it here a couple of times here over the past few years, the issue of the Lakeview Roundabout is probably what's holding up improvements to the N25 east of there. Imagine spending €100m to increase capacity on the road and having the increased volume of cars go through that roundabout!

    The focus should be on a distributor east of Midleton, that takes pressure off Lakeview, allowing something to be done there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    A simple, quick and inexpensive solution to the Lakeview Roundabout issue would be as follows: I've seen quite a few examples in my travels throughout Europe.

    Firstly, the N25 would need to have a short section of 2+2 dual carriageway constructed for about 500m to the east of the roundabout.

    With the completion of the eastern section of the 2+2 dual carriageway

    Lane 2 in both directions could be taken over the roundabout on a pre-fabricated 1+1 dual carriageway flyover. I've seen both concrete and steel examples.

    Lane 1 in both directions could enter the existing roundabout to serve entry/exit to/from the N25 and R630.

    Removing N25 through traffic off the roundabout would improve the current untenable situation enormously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I could be mistaken but I believe earlier in the thread people have advised that the space simply isn't available for this. I'd also question the cost/benefit of this against a new Midleton East junction. The new junction would facilitate some more compact and sustainable development, whereas increasing capacity through the existing junction likely can't do that quite as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    For Lakeview, a flyover with a limited-access junction beneath would be worth considering. Something like this:

    image.png

    Traffic travelling west here can’t turn north or south. Traffic from North or South of this junction cannot go East. Any traffic from the East that wants to get into Midleton or Ballincurra should get off at the proposed new roundabout east of Midleton instead.

    Trying to allow the East-South and East-North movements here would require slip-roads to be built to the east of the current Lakeview roundabout, and there simply isn’t room for them. There’s just about enough room to build a 2+2 road as it is, and that’s it unless you want to go down the route of expensive CPOs and a lot of difficult earthworks.

    For completeness, here’s how I’d deal with the entrances between Lakeview and the proposed Eastern roundabout:

    image.png

    The expensive thing is an underpass joining Midleton Downes estate to Ashlin road by going under N25. No doubt people in that estate will complain viciously about their cul de sac becoming a through road, but is it really worse than having their kids go out onto N25 at Rocky Rd, as is the case now. Connecting the Rocky Road (Right of this image) east to the new roundabout would improve access, and it’s probably in a development plan somewhere as it opens up that whole area for housing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭Gunner3629


    This must be all happening in the background, as we haven’t had official word on progress in some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,473 ✭✭✭mcburns07


    Are those excavation works not just related to the Celtic interconnector? I don’t think there’s even a design done yet let alone work started, can’t see it happening for another few years yet myself and I’m living locally so I hope I’m wrong!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Not sure if you've taken the existing N25 underpass at Rocky Road into account here but otherwise a lot of what you're describing plenty of sense to me.

    But I'd even prefer not to bother with a junction at Lakeview personally. Aside from one petrol station it's all just housing until Ballinacurra. So I think I'd prefer to see the traffic really reduced to "local traffic only" and possibly use some of the available road width for a local area scheme. It's nearly 20m wide in places there. And yes of course I do realise that the local homeowners would protest in favour of keeping heavy traffic through their area, rather than having a 5 minute extra drive to the N25!

    There's something to be said for building up Ballinacurra in general too. It has the feel of a little old village that's been completely lost. The big old malting factory is just falling down which is a real shame.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Nah, sorry, feasibility is completed but there is no route known in the public. Its quite a few years until we are even close to tendering for any construction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes, I keep the pedestrian underpass at Rocky Rd, but block road access and move it east to the new Youghal Road/N25 junction or to the the road underpass I indicated.

    I kept limited access at Lakeview for traffic to/from Cork because the alternative is to have all drivers from Cloyne and environs drive into Midleton, then east toward the Youghal Road/N25 roundabout junction to turn back west onto the stretch of 2+2 road between it and west of Lakeview. Better to have them join at a point where the road is already widening. But keeping the main East-West traffic away will help make it easier to get between Ballincurra and Midleton. (I also brought the cycle and pedestrian way back down to ground level, so that it might be used)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    That makes sense. I was thinking instead that the new Eastern junction could connect directly south to Ballinacurra: a Southern distributor road to match/reflect the Northern one. Joining to the existing Whitegate road roughly where the big farm shed is across from Charleston house maybe.

    I know it's a lot of extra cost, but you'd finally connect all of the South of Midleton towards the train station this way too, and with a good distributor you'd unlock development of thousands of homes and possibly rejuvenate Ballinacurra as a proper village again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I was thinking instead that the new Eastern junction could connect directly south to Ballinacurra: a Southern distributor road to match/reflect the Northern one.

    I think that would have to be the case. The roundabout can then be removed and you have a local north/south only road with no access to the N25. The new road can have bus lanes meaning people can use buses to connect to a new Midleton East train station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    Considering a simple straight line Castlemartyr bypass is probably three decades in gestation, a greenfield new road system for the Midleton area is unlikely to see the light of day for another three decades.

    The current excessive queueing at all entrances to the Lakeview Roundabout is not sustainable, even in the short term.

    As said, a simple 1+1 flyover picking up Lane 2 to cater for through N25 traffic could be installed relatively quickly and at a relatively modest cost, this would remove a significant portion of traffic from the roundabout. Lane 1 traffic could continue to access the existing roundabout as is

    Such a flyover would leave the existing roundabout as it is to serve traffic leaving/joining the N25/R630 in all directions, without the need for on/off ramps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭Gunner3629


    Is a flyover even technically possible here given the narrow nature of the Castlemarytr exit and the private dwelling so close to the existing road.

    image.png image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,762 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    No, it's not.

    I've had plenty of time to study this in person...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The point of a new road east of Midleton would be to relieve the Lakeview Roundabout and make public transport viable for a lot more people. The Castlemartyr bypass would only make the Lakeview Roundabout worse. They are completely different propositions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I've looked as well, if you don't include sliproads at all (do a Midleton East junction and just run an N25 flyover over Lakeview) then agreed, you have to do some CPOing. Its tight but doable with a 2+2 and only a few CPOs.

    Edit: Weren't those houses at Lakeview the reason the DC didn't go further east back in the 1980s when the Midleton bypass was built? I remember a comment on here years ago saying that there was "trouble with the CPOs".



Advertisement