Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

N25 - Midleton to Youghal [planning and design to commence 2023]

1456810

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,744 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    No you are not.

    Out of Cork, the N20, N22, N25, N28 and N71 are all above the threshold for dualling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭Paddico


    Any updates on plans and design?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes you are missing something.

    M9 is a more important route, nationally, as it connects Waterford to Dublin via Kilkenny, Carlow and onward to M7, the major approach road to Dublin. N25 is less important, as it connects Waterford with Cork (okay, Rosslare harbour with Cork!), a much smaller population centre, and only Dungarvan and Youghal in between.

    Traffic volume on M9 might be lower, but the type of traffic is very different. M9’s is more evenly spread throughout the day - also note that the “% HGV” is twice that of N25. That section of N25, on the other hand, has extreme peaks in morning and evening, but is very quiet at other times (I know, because I regularly use this road, and I make sure to avoid those peak times).

    The plan for this part of N25 is a 2+2 dual carriageway, but the very high traffic on this road is not a sign of population growth that must be accommodated so much as a dysfunctional housing market that has forced people who work or study in Cork to live very far away from the city (that annual figure will drop a little as the year progresses and the months without students are included in the total). The only thing driving traffic growth on this road is a lack of housing closer to Cork



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,030 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Every road is important for the people who use it. So I’m not following how one road can be more important than another even though fewer people use it. You say it’s more important “nationally” but I’m not clear what that word actually means in this context because a nation is ultimately just a collection of people. And if the N25 is important to (i.e. used by) more individuals than the M9, that surely makes it collectively a more important road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That’s not how it works, and you know it. If it was, there would be no wide roads outside of Dublin, Meath, Louth, Wicklow and Kildare, because that’s where “more individuals” live.

    The “National” in National Road means that it is important to the transport needs of people all across the country. There’s no special context here: “National” as in “National Concert Hall”, “National Development Plan”, “National Gallery”, “National Archives” - for the use of all people in the country (seriously, when you’re trying to redefine the meaning of words, you need a stronger argument). N25 is a national road, but it connects smaller centres than N9, so is of less importance nationally. That’s the beginning and end of it.

    That section of N25 has long needed an upgrade to bypass Castlemartyr, which has become an unhealthy place to live due to constant traffic, but it is primarirly a commuter corridor from the Mogeely-Castlemartyr-Garryvoe outer commuter belt to Cork City: 30% of traffic here is gone after Castlemartryr. The road is going to be upgraded, but if you’re holding out hope for a motorway, don’t. This will be a 2+2.

    This should have been started a long time ago, but Cork County Council decided to champion a widening and extra residential access on the current N25 from Midleton to Glounthaune (that went against their own environmental and land use rules, but sure whatever…) rather than addressing this road. It’s good that this project is finally getting attention, but it should have been started 5 years ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,030 ✭✭✭cantalach


    You threw out the word nationally as a sort of trump card to magically override the empirical reality that the data are showing. If you’re going to claim that something is nationally more important there needs to be evidence to support that. I don’t see the evidence.

    25-30 years ago, civil servants living in Dublin made a determination as to which of the N roads were more important than others. Funds duly flowed and we now have a gloriously centralised motorway network - completely over-spec’d in many places - and mostly crap roads elsewhere. So I can’t help but wonder if the determination of those Dublin-based civil servants might have been a little blinkered, and that the daily traffic flows are what really defines importance.

    On a more technical point, you say the N25 is less important because it connects smaller population centres and you assert that this is, “the beginning and end of it.” Not even close. One of the most basic and yet useful formulae in road planning is the gravity model. This relates the required capacity for a road between two population centres to:

    (Pop. A * Pop. B) / Dist. Squared

    In other words, the distance between two centres has a much greater influence than the population of either centre. Cork, Carrigtwohill, Midleton, Castlemartyr, Killeagh, and Youghal are very close together. You can’t just say “smaller centres” and drop the mic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Why is N9 a motorway and N25 not?

    = How many people live on both ends of these roads?

    = How many people live in the catchment of these roads?

    = How much of the traffic is heavy freight versus passenger cars.

    That last one is important.

    I really don’t have dog in this fight. In fact, I use N25 far, far more than I ever use M9. You are the one who came up with a bogus argument based on single-point traffic figures. We all know M9 south is over provisioned, but the Northern end is not, and it is continuity with this, plus the relatively high HGV share using this route that tipped to balance for it to be a motorway all the way. The middle of N25 gets pretty quiet too, you know.

    It is a national network, not a local one, and N25 is only heavily trafficked in the part that serves as a local route into and out of Cork city. Cork County Council has a long history of funnelling Cork City’s local traffic onto National roads in order to shift these roads out of its own budget: they even lobbied for the Cobh road to be upgraded to a National route!

    Any danger we might talk about the actual N25, rather than complaining that someone else got something you think they didn’t deserve?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,030 ✭✭✭cantalach


    I really don’t understand the relevance of the number of people living at either end of the M9 or in the catchment area. Even if it was 25 million it wouldn’t matter if none of them ever drove on the road. You equate the importance of a road with the theoretical potential for traffic (all those people in Dublin) where I equate it with actual traffic. But hey, I acknowledge the freight issue. That’s a relevant data point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Catchment is the primary metric that is considered when building any transport corridor. And you're still looking at things solely from the point of view of private motorists... they are not the most important users of the road network in terms of the operation of the country... almost every single thing you buy in this country has been delivered by road.

    Waterford is a city and a port. Its connection to the major population centres on this island is important. Until 2009 that connection was N9, a road that makes the current N20 look like a freeway. That road and its alignment was so inadequate that a completely new route was needed. That route was built as what is now a motorway so that it would not need to be revisited for a very long time (there was a bit of string pulling to get it moved up the schedule, but "high quality dual carriageway" was always the most likely plan.. HQDC roads were all then redesignated as motorways).

    By contrast, N25 in East Cork has always been a "good" road, with the exception of needing to go through Castlemartyr and, to a lesser extent, Killeagh. That reduced the need for a complete replacement. A bypass of Castlemartyr would dramatically reduce journey times, but it keeps getting postponed... the County Council has never pushed for it, so TII isn't going to prioritise it off its own bat.

    Given that the traffic has eased considerably since mid-June, a better fix for the current traffic would be affordable student accommodation. Accommodation in general is the biggest driver of Corks outer traffic problems: the jobs are all around the city, but people are having to go as far away as Youghal just to be able to afford a roof over their heads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭annfield1978


    Tender for Consultants to take scheme through TII PMGs Phases 1 to 4 has come out via a Framework



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Excellent. Once money is being handed over, there’s more chance of a scheme continuing.

    Is there any clue about the scope of the project at this point?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    I live in the area and bypassing Castlemartyr only will just move the 2km+ queues onto Killeagh if that village isn't bypassed as part of the same project.

    One need only stand at the bridge in Castlemartyr to witness that nearly all the traffic continues eastbound.

    As an aside, why isn't the alternating 2+1 idea, without a wire separation, adopted here? It's so commonplace on single-carriageway roads in Europe, where it significantly aids traffic flow by facilitating the safe overtaking of slow vehicles at regular intervals. First, we need to review the need for continuous wide hard shoulders to create the safe space required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    2+1 without a barrier is a death-trap. Countries that used them are phasing them out. By the way, any new 2+1 build will not use a wire, but instead the same kind of barrier as used in modern 2+2 builds.

    A wide single carriagway can be retrofitted to 2+1, but the problem is the large number of exits.

    Regarding Castlemartyr, the issue isn’t the volume of traffic, but the mixing of flows. The lights at the bridge are the root cause of the delays in both directions, but they’re needed because it’s the only way to control the flow in such a small space. If you bypass Castlemartyr, and provide a high-capacity junction to handle that mixing, then the problem does not move to Killeagh. Killeagh’s traffic-lights are on a pedestrian crossing, and have a very short red cycle.

    The biggest cause of delay westbound through Killeagh is actually people trying to bypass Castlemartyr by turning right for Mogeely. Eastbound it’s always pretty free flowing.

    This is moot anyway, because any scheme to do one will do the other too: both towns form opposite dog-legs on N25, so the “bypasses” will end up being shorter than the current road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Most of the traffic may go eastbound but its the cars turning right cause significant blockage. I've often been unable to go straight on at a green light as I'm blocked by those cars. Normally don't hit much traffic in killeagh compared to Castlemartyr.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    Here's the answer for retrofitting a safe 2+1 on our existing single carraigeway roads.

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/4tg1BK4yFJpcfVc57

    Note the changeover incorporated into a junction. also, the overall width is less than our system of including two wide hard shoulders. BTW, why do we have such wide hard shoulders in this country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    We don't need Swedish examples as there are complete 2+1 schemes here, both new built (n2) and retrofit (n24, n20).

    That example would be lethal on N25, by the way. Camera surveys done on N20 show that drivers speed up at the end of a "2" section to try pass slower cars before the lane drops. The configuration you show will have those fast cars meeting cross traffic, also at speed to try clear the junction.

    They can get away with this in Sweden because the 2+1 road is used for quiet, rural stretches (the location you chose is in an area of very low population), and they have very few side entrances and junctions... unlike here (Swedish rural housing clusters in small villages and towns - the “road frontage” phenomenon is almost uniquely Irish).

    2+1 is a safety design; it is not intended to address capacity. It will be used here for roads with traffic that will never justify a 2+2, for instance on parts of N24 Cahir-Limerick Junction, which is a really quiet road. N25 Castlemartyr-Midleton is not a suitable candidate for this.

    We have wide shoulders to allow slow traffic to pull over to allow other vehicles to pass. Specifically, this is to prevent tractors creating long tailbacks.

    Post edited by KrisW1001 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭Gunner3629


    While the full upgrade of the N25 from Midleton to Youghal is a welcome and necessary project, it remains frustrating that a more immediate and cost-effective solution—such as a bypass of Castlemartyr—was not implemented a decade or more ago. Castlemartyr has long been the primary source of congestion on this route, and a targeted bypass would have significantly improved traffic flow and reduced daily disruption for motorists.

    The current plan, though beneficial in the long term, involves a much broader scope, longer timelines, and significantly higher costs. Even with recent signs of progress, the possibility of waiting another five years is unacceptable given the daily traffic volumes and the years of frustration endured by road users.

    I also know many people who would consider living in Youghal and the surrounding area but are discouraged by the traffic situation. Addressing this issue would not only improve mobility but also unlock the potential for growth across East Cork—making towns like Youghal more attractive for residents, businesses, and tourism.

    While Killeagh does experience some congestion, it is not nearly as severe as Castlemartyr. In fact, as other people have said, most of Killeagh’s traffic issues stem from drivers diverting through Mogeely to avoid Castlemartyr, only to rejoin the N25 in the village. This highlights how the lack of a bypass in Castlemartyr has ripple effects on surrounding villages.

    This is not just a transport issue—it’s a regional development opportunity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Ideally, the planned extension of the rail line to a P+R stop at Mogeely should be resurrected. The new road needs to be built for the health of people living in Castlemartyr, which is constantly filled with traffic.. it would be a shame if the new road caused an increase in traffic, because that's the last thing the rest of n25 closer to Cork needs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep I'm in strong agreement here. Extend rail to Mogeely with a nice big P&R and also build loads of housing around it. It's a long old stretch but it's a good (very) long-term investment. I know there's bigger rail priorities on the commuter/suburban network, but this one would alleviate some N25 traffic so I'd love to see it considered as a "second wave" of Cork commuter rail network.

    As far as I'm concerned Youghal needs industry and amenities, not a road. I really wouldn't like to encourage development of Youghal based on commuting to Cork. It's a greater distance than Amsterdam-Utrecht.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Why extend the rail service to Mogeely when a P&R east of Midleton does the same job at a fraction of the cost?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Midleton station isn't easy to get to from N25, but Mogeely, which was earmarked as a special Development Zone, would be because the most likely Castlemartyr bypass will run equidistant between Castlemartyr and Mogeely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,471 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I was talking about a new P&R east of Midleton. Even with a Castlemartyr bypass, Mogeely would need significant investment in roads, in addition to the 7km of rail line. I can't see how Mogeely would be suitable for significant population increase given it's size now, it would take decades to develop. Much easier to develop east of Midleton which already has a growing population and a P&R there can serve the small population further east.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Both can be done.I mentioned Mogeely because it was marked for development in one of the county plans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 691 ✭✭✭eastie17


    too late, there’s a greenway now so that’s that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That doesn't prevent the rail line being reinstated. In other greenways the land remains in the possession of Irish Rail, hard to see how this would be different, especially when extension to Mogeely is in a long term development plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Nah, greenway cost is a minute fraction of the cost of reinstating a railway line. Both are possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    The difference is that Mogeely can be pretty much planned now from scratch as a town and it already has some industry.

    I'm in favour of a "Midleton East" P&R too but it would be dependent on resolving a number of Midleton East issues, like a new Eastern distributor for starters.

    Neither are going to happen any time soon anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 421 ✭✭Frostybrew


    Which planned extension of the rail line to Mogeely? I don't ever remember seeing any plans of this nature. Do you have a link?

    Likewise, I don't ever remember Mogeely being marked as a special development zone. There are extensive areas of land zoned around other east cork towns, but nothing for Mogeely.

    If they do exist I would be interested in seeing plans for Mogeely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I read about a Mogeely SDZ somewhere a couple of years ago... may have been someone on here said it. I'll have a dig and see what I find.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 421 ✭✭Frostybrew


    Lol. I think that might have been me. I was suggesting that a Mogeely Castlemartyr Ladysbridge SDZ might be possible in the long term, in conjunction with a reopening of the rail line to Youghal. It was in relation to a discussion on the viability of extending the rail line to Youghal, probably in the thread on the conversion of the disused line to a greenway.

    Apologies for the confusion, it was mere speculation on my part. I do however think such an SDZ in this area would be a good long term option once the existing zoned land in other East Cork towns has been developed.



Advertisement