Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1509510512514515518

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭BusGuy


    We don’t need anymore frequent LUAS trams anymore, as at peak times, there’s a LUAS tram every 1 to 2 minutes. So the Luas is good as is for now.

    If you are going to have a depot, you are going to have to have buses, and for that you are going to need drivers. At this point, DB has 1,100 - 1,200 buses, and I don’t think this is really enough for 2-5 min freq. buses. DB can’t be withdrawing buses, regardless of age, because they won’t have how to drive the new routes, as these 2006/2007/2008/2009 buses really make up 50% of DB’s fleet.


    DB already stored so much AXs, it would be good to see them back in use, it would help with making BusConnects faster to deliver.

    I would love to but, really at this point the government should use their brains. Like they are caring for their own citizens, so they should be really listening to them, not protests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Just to point out - this article has nothing to do with Dublin. It's in relation to the Bus Connects rollout in Cork and the construction of a new (temporary) depot in Tivoli Docks to allow for the existing depot (Capwell - which is struggling for space currently) to get the necessary infrastructure installed for the eventual electrification of the fleet in Cork.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭davetherave


    That's nothing to do with the D spine, or Dublin Bus, or GAI. It's a temporary Bus Eireann depot in Cork City.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Arhanedus


    Well, the Luas is still rammed in city centre despite the 2-3 minute frequencies at peak hours. While the frequency can't really be increased any further, it does show that demand is clearly there.

    However, I didn't mean increasing the Luas frequencies - I meant converting some of the spine routes into new tram lines. The N11 corridor already has a bus every 3-4 minutes during rush hour, so you might as well make it into another Luas line if demand keeps increasing. Eventually, even the very high frequencies on the E1 and E2 might no longer be enough as new developments are built and more people start to use public transport.

    Yes, we have 1100+ buses and thousands of drivers, but they're all being used, and a lot of routes still struggle with capacity at rush hour. So yes, we need even more buses and drivers to expand frequencies, and that is part of why BusConnects is taking so long to roll out - it is very hard to find more and more bus drivers.

    If some of these routes were instead tram lines, then much fewer vehicles would be required to transport the same number of people (due to higher pax capacity per tram), and therefore all these buses could instead be used to expand services elsewhere, while the old buses could be withdrawn/sold/whatever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,930 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I was delighted & a bit confused when that headline about the new bus depot in Cork came up here in this thread.

    At least it's some good news for the people of Cork. However; I knew by looking at the Bus Eireann buses in the photo above the headline that it was reporting on the new building project for the new bus depot in Tivoli Docks.

    Why do some posters put that stuff up on here in this thread when it relates to BusConnects in Dublin only?

    Also is there any news about the new bus depot being built in Ballycoolin? Is that depot still a WIP or is it nearly finished?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    The luas is actually rammed by design. Even in off-peak times when there is no reason for the luas to be as packed as it is, the service still gets jammed. That's not because it is at capacity, it is because the luas operators choose to operate the luas at frequencies with gaps of up to 15 minutes (I've even observed such gaps during peak time) when the system is designed to run at 2/3 minute frequencies. Not only that, they don't really bother with short-running luas services in the city centre, despite the system being designed to facilitate that from Heuston onwards also. Meanwhile with BC we continue to try and cram frequency for a level of demand that a city bus service is incapable of meeting, we've failed to plan and build transit appropriate to the size of city Dublin has become and we somehow think that throwing more bus services at the problem will solve it. In the time it has taken to plan and roll out BC, we could have done the same for a more city-wide Luas network and it would be ready to build by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,259 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yep, always surpised the Luas doesn't do a Heuston to Connolly short run at peak times. You could be at Smithfield at peak times and the Luas is jammed both ways.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    BusConencts is a big success and is certainly not a failed project or will be cancelled or anything crazy like that!

    In 2024, passenger numbers in areas where the new network has been implemented have increased by 48%. By comparison non BusConnects routes saw "only" a 8% increase.

    I won't disagree that many of those BusConnects corridors should really be Luas lines, but it will take a decade or more to build a network of Luas lines, we will continue to need BusConnects and it's capacity increases until Metrolink, DART+ and more Luas lines are built.

    I would also point out that the infrastructure side of BusConnects will lay the ground work for those future Luas lines. Basically those high quality dedicated bus corridors will simply get updated to Luas lines in future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭PlatformNine


    An important point to remember about BC is that the upgrades and bus priority measures delivered through the CBC scheme will directly benifit the delivery of future Luas projects. For a lot of the Luas Proposals the CBCs are a needed to deliver a Luas line that lets trams get into CC without being stuck in private car traffic.

    While I do think it would have been nice to fast track additional Luas lines to be delivered along side their CBC counterpart, the timeline required for that was likely never going to make it possible. At least not without massively delaying the delivery of the scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭PlatformNine


    From my experience the Green line is perfectly fine off-peak and can manage the evening peak (although "for how much longer" is a good question), but the morning peak is frequently packed, especially on the last stretch between SSG and Dundrum. The Red line is similar, how I find it tends to struggle during both peaks, and also inbound most of saturday with a lot of people travelling to Jervis. This actually why they DO frequently hav peak time Heuston-Connolly services, and if I am ever only travelling inbetween the two I typically wait a few extra minutes (maybe 5 max).

    Most of the time when you see large gaps during peak time, its not due to poor scheduling, but more likely the service was delayed, typically from someone trying to hold the door, poor priority measures (particularly for the red line), a taxi or HGV blocking the tram to unload passengers/goods, or a number of thing adding up. However these are all frequently things that effect bus services as well and a large reason why the CBCs are needed to make the bus network much more functional.

    I also think you are underestimating how long any rail allignment is going to take compared to a scheme like the CBCs. Yes the CBCs have been massively delayed, but so would any Luas proposals. And in addition to this, the CBCs are necessary for the delivery of the future Luas allignments, without them, any Luas line would make the red line between Hueston and Connolly look like an express service.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,950 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    "BusGuy" making tired, car-brained comments is not something I was expecting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    BC is a big success?
    How can you possibly say that when a core part of BC is to build the infrastructure that forms large critical parts of BC?
    No CBCs built, no integrated ticketing, half the CBCs in JRs- big success it is not!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    You don't think a 48% increase in passenger numbers is a big success, that is an extraordinary number.

    We do have integrated ticketing, that is what the 90 minute ticket is!

    The new orbital routes have been a massive success as have the 24/7 routes. The radial BC routes also seem to have been a big success with a big increase in capacity and passenger numbers.

    The 90 minute ticket, €2 fare and half price tickets for young people have all been a big success.

    Of course not all done and lots more to do, but you honestly can't say that the parts that have already been done haven't been a big success!

    I have plenty of complaints about BC myself, taking too long to roll out, cancelling Swiftway BRT, etc. but in the bigger picture, you have to say that what has been implemented so far has been very successful and it shows that the overall vision and strategy is correct, which is a good sign for the next phases.

    What is the alternative, cancel BusConnects and have no increase in bus services for the next 10 years?

    That would be a disaster and a stupid repeat of Swiftway. We need to just get on with it and continue with the plan and start planning for future upgrades to Luas.

    As an aside, I'm not too concerned about the corridors in JR, they have enough approved corridors to start working on that I assume the rest will pass JR before they would cause delays to the plan anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,950 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    What further integratation of ticketing are you expecting than what we have from Monday 28th?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,784 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Totally agree.

    Just to point out though that what is happening now is the first phase of the implementation of the new national fares strategy.

    It’s not part of BusConnects - the next phase will be in May when the four new Dublin commuter zones are applied to Bus Éireann and GAI regional services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,784 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    With the Green Line between Parnell and Sandyford at peak times on weekdays, the best strategy southbound is to aim for trams bound for Brides Glen as they generally start at Parnell and will have a lighter load, and northbound to aim for Broombridge bound trams as they generally start at Sandyford (there are some exceptions of course). I can certainly say that I have never failed to board those trams and frequently get a seat.

    That’s why the service pattern is the way it is as it focuses capacity where it is needed most.

    Part of the problem has also been that Transdev are not immune to the driver recruitment problems that all operators face, and this means that adding additional services isn’t as straightforward as some seem to think it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    48% increase is more than likley down to Dublins population exploding- this increase would have happened anyway.

    We don’t have a ticketing app that we can use across heavy rail, bus and LUAS- this should be what we are aiming for and this is true integrated ticketing.

    Is that the orbital routes that are constantly stuck in traffic at peak times with no plans to build QBCs to address this?
    The radial BC routes also don’t have continuous QBCs so suffer from being unreliable.

    I agree the 90 min ticket and €2 fare are great but this is hardly groundbreaking reinventing the wheel stuff is it?

    Parts of BC have been a success but I take issue with you saying BC has been a massive success- it hasn’t- we haven’t built one QBC and we are 8 years into this project! (Taking 2017 as programme launch) That’s ludicrous.

    No one is suggesting cancelling BC, but it hasn’t not been the roaring success you seem to think it’s been



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Integrated ticketing using an app so that you can log on and off the bus rail and LUAS system is what we should be aiming for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,201 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    48% increase on BC routes. Non-BC routes is just around 10% increase. If there would be an increase due to a booming population, a percentage distribution across the routes would be more equal. Of course that increase is partially because of the growing population, but that's not the main reason as I explained my logic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,784 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The new orbital and local bus routes have been massive game changers in terms of providing new connectivity and extending the reach of the public transport network.

    They transform where you can go using public transport across the city.

    The corridors will deliver further improvements and yes they are important in terms of delivering faster journey times, but the expansion of the network together with the extended operating hours, 90 minute multi-modal travel and capping are transformational.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Are you saying people are leaving their cars at home to take the bus on these BC routes where there is a 48% increase?

    Has the 48% increase on BC routes led to a reduction in traffic on these routes?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,757 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    It would be if BC and non BC routes are treated equally. With extra services, 24 hour routes, new routes, designed timetables within the last 15 years and attention, you would be worried if there was not an increase.

    If your area has not been BusConnected, very little happens to your route to attract passengers or solve problems. A 24 hr route on non BusConnected routes, might be popular. We do know this but it does not happen.

    And then suddenly you get the service when you are BusConnected and BC gets the praise for the idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,201 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Increased frequency and new links created a better capacity and overall PT becomes more attractive. Some people might have left their cars behind if they saw getting a bus is convenient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,784 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That is simply not true.

    Quite a few non-BusConnects routes got service increases during Covid as it happens - particularly on Sundays.

    Others have received more buses to keep the service running to schedules where they have been suffering reliability problems due to congestion over recent years - that may not be obvious to people as the timetable hasn’t changed in terms of numbers of departures but it is an improvement in terms of a more resilient schedule.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,201 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Of course. Most political project are done in the way that the results would prove the project being successful. Cynical, but this is the reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,784 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    And other routes have had journey time reductions. Swings and roundabouts but my point was that non-BC routes have been attended to which is what the other poster claimed hadn’t happened.

    With due respect by the sounds of it I don’t think that you realise how much of an improvement all of these new orbital and local bus routes have made across the suburbs of the city in terms of frequency, providing alternatives to travelling through the city, and offering much wider connectivity.

    Can I just ask here - how often do you actually use the bus service and have you used many of the new routes across the city or do you just use your local radial route?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    LX I’ll be honest I very rarely use PT as my job means I’ve to travel out of Dublin to various remote site throughout Leinster and wider Ireland.
    However what I have noted is that when I’m stuck in traffic leaving Dublin, it’s usually within site of or directly behind a jam packed bus that is also stuck in traffic.
    It will generally be on a road with a wide grass verge and trees either side that would make an ideal bus lane but hasn’t even been considered or would take decades to get built.

    On the occasions I do use PT to head into the CC the bus I use, 15 or 15B, are usually snarled up in traffic in a few different spots where bus gates and bus only roads would be the answer- all of these measures are proposed by BC since back in 2017, but measures that are now stuck in a JR for the next 2 years plus- maybe they’ll be implemented by 2035 but I’m not confident.

    If I’m walking around the locality at peak times in the morning, I see jam packed busses with just enough room to let people on in the Ballyboden area so I can imagine what’s it’s like further on towards the CC.

    I see an app (TFI app) that has actually made the bus experience worse when compared to the Dublin bus app which was so much better.

    The 15 going to a 24 hr bus route is great but hardly ground breaking.

    Maybe there has been massive improvements to the bus service elsewhere in the city to bring all other bus routes on a par to the bus service that operates on the N11 (46A?) but certainly not in DSW or clondalkin (an area I have friends in who are of a similar opinion as me).



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    We don’t have a ticketing app that we can use across heavy rail, bus and LUAS- this should be what we are aiming for and this is true integrated ticketing.

    That isn't what you said, you said integrated ticketing and the leap card and 90 minute ticketing and integration of monthly and annual fares is integrated ticketing. It has been delivered and has been highly successful. Everyone loves the €2 90 minute ticket.

    Integrated ticketing has a special meaning in public transport and it doesn't even need technology, you can even do it with paper tickets and validators as has been common in other European countries for decades.

    What you are talking about is a separate project called next gen ticketing. And yes that is also part of BusConnects and the contract for it has been awarded, work on it is ongoing and it is to be delivered over the next few years.

    I would agree that NGT is taking too long to roll out, but it is coming.

    Is that the orbital routes that are constantly stuck in traffic at peak times with no plans to build QBCs to address this?
    The radial BC routes also don’t have continuous QBCs so suffer from being unreliable.

    I use two of them and they are absolutely a game changer. In fact I've been using them 3 to 4 times a day all this week and they have been superb. Brilliant service.

    These are trips that were simple impossible for me to take 5 years ago. A trip that back then the only option would have been to take a bus into town and back out. The trip I take is about 10 minutes via the orbital bus, would take at least 1 hour 5 years ago.

    While they don't have QBC's, it isn't as big of a deal as they are usually going perpendicular to peak hour traffic. And of course I'm massively saving over having to get a bus into and back out of town to make the same trip. So even if a bit slower, overall a big time saver.

    I really can't stress enough how amazing these are.

    No one is suggesting cancelling BC, but it hasn’t not been the roaring success you seem to think it’s been

    But that is exactly what the poster a few posts before you was suggesting and what I'm responding too. That poster literally said BusConnects should be cancelled!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭PlatformNine


    That's not really what integrated ticketing means, that would be more under the umbrella of "next-generation ticketing" and that is in the works and the tender was awarded last year. Additionally, having some level of mobile app functionality is their goal, as well is being able to tag-on/off with a bank card. Integrated ticketing is just the ability to easily move between modes of transport, and various trips, and that is exactly what the 90 minute fare and the incoming fare structure is.

    However implementing forms of ticketing simply takes a lot of time, as there is a very large amount of work to do. The mobile app may need to be completely overhauled, the servers running the system will need a large amount of work, the majority if not all readers on all busses, train stations, Luas stops, etc, will likely need to get replaced. It is a very large task that is going to take place over the next few years, and accord to the minister of transport (here) we should be getting a finalised timeline soon.



Advertisement