Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1506507508509511

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 Arhanedus


    I don't really see the Luas and Metrolink having a major impact on the bus routes, as they don't go exactly the same places, even if certain parts of the route will be duplicated. Besides, the 7 duplicates a decent chunk of the southside DART line and yet it still exists and can get very busy, especially when the trains aren't running.

    But at the same time, as LXFlyer said, this most likely won't even be a problem for another decade, so we'll have to wait until we actually get closer to either project being launched.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,608 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Sure, but the quays have far more space for all that, then the Luas tracks in front of Trinity do.

    If you add the A in with the E and F, you are basically doubling the number of buses using the Luas tracks versus just the E and F (E and F have two routes each, the A has 4). Seems pretty tight to me.

    Really I don't mind either way, I would assume the experts in the NTA would model both options, quays versus Luas tracks and go with whichever works best. Certainly the space is limited in the city center, something I've worried about the whole BusConnects project, where we actually put all these buses!

    Yes, that is also why I was thinking the F spine could possibly move, as it's route is shared with the Luas and future Luas extension to Finglas on the North side that will go by Trinity anyway, so perhaps better to route it away from Trinity to spread the options.

    Once Metrolink comes, I would expect a big reorg of these routes. While I don't think any would completely go away, you could see a reduction in frequency or re-routing to take in different areas along the way.

    Of course that is far off in the future. A nice problem to have when we get to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,877 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    ^^^^^^^

    The F-Spine actually has 3 routes. The 9 that goes outside Trinity will be replaced with the F3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭BusGuy


    Does anyone know if there will be a new route starting on the 27th of April? There is a new route on Bus Times that only has 1 departure, late at night. This could be a new 11N as it follows the 11 route to O'Connell Street.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    To be fair, there is also a supposed Dublin bus route showing on bus times, looks like the same routing as the last 11 service to OCS



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,022 ✭✭✭thomasj


    It looks like a route variation of the last 11 from Sandyford to OCS. If you look at the 11 route timetable on bus times you'll notice that the 23.30 timetabled departure from Sandyford on Sundays has been removed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,976 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    How many busses per min are planned to use the LUAS tracks in front of trinity when all three spines are at peak output?

    Edit from @bk on the college green plaza thread:

    • 3 minutes of the A
    • 4 minutes for the E
    • 5 minutes for the F
    • Luas Green line 3 to 4 minutes.

    So that's:

    20 busses per hour on the A

    15 busses per hour on the E

    12 busses per hour on the F

    So 47 busses per hour, interacting with 15 LUAS an hour in that same corridor.

    Now add in the pedestrian crossings going off every 3-4 mins.
    How’s that gonna work?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭PlatformNine


    wall of text so a brief tl;dr: 47 busses isn't right, I think the number is 67 services an hour and could increase. In context that number isn't that bad, there are probably over 100 DB services an hour through CG already, mind you 100 services an hour is one bus passing every 36 seconds. CG plaza will streamline that corridor and if anything will increase capacity, especially since its removing the right turn onto Dame Street.

    It will work better than you think. The important thing to remember is that by simplifying the junction at CG, it will allow much better flow and much more busses and pedestrians through the area. I think there would only need to be 2 phases in the traffic signal cycle after the plaza, one for pedestriants to cross, the other for vehicles. In particular removing the right turn onto Dame Street should help a lot and help keep things moving.

    Also I think 47 isn't the right number and it's likely a bit more busses than that because you didn't count the 19, 71, 72, and 85. Which the later three are all currently planned to use CG and run with 2, 2, and 6 busses per hour respectively(only the 85 is planned to use CG post-plaza with 6 services an hour). With the 19 running with 6 busses an hour at peak that is an additional 12 services or 59 busses total. There is also the 73 as well with 6 services an hour that's planned to use CG, but I don't think it makes very much sense to route it through CG post-plaza and I think it will likely be routed along the quays(It's already planned that the 73 will use the Quays). In addition to that there are some additional peak services not counted for the E spine, I counted and I think at peak there are 23 services in one direction or an additional 8 services, but still only 15 in the other. So that is 67 busses in an hour! There will be even more if they schedule additional peak services on the A and F spine, which I imagine they will, especially for the A2.

    I could start getting into BE and coach service frequency through CG, maybe even taxi numbers, however I am going to stop counting while I still have my sanity. Because all of this is to say is that when you qoute any number of future BC routes planned to pass through CG, it doesn't mean anything if you aren't giving any context. You need to compare that number to the amount of current non-BC routes using CG, and let me tell you, even I was surprised by the number when I started counting.

    Doing my best to count all the non-BC routes, and I didn't count all the variants for my sanity as some variants have their own timetable while others don't.

    going straight through CG there are 10 routes: 4, 7, 11, 26, 33D, 37, 38, 39, 40, 70.

    and turning at CG there are 18 routes: 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 27, 49, 54A, 56A, 65, 68, 77A, 83, 122, 123, 140, 142, 150.

    I could bother to actually count the number of services… but I don't think I need to and I really don't want to. With 26 routes and thats not counting the 19, E1, and E2, if they only averaged 3 services an hour it would already be higher than the 67 services I counted. I don't need to sort through >26(because of variants) timetables to know that they average more than that, especially when I already know a number of those routes operate at a high frequency. For example the 15s alone are 23 services and the 39s another 13.

    If I had to guess there is probably well over 100 DB services using CG during the peak hour. The reality is 100 services an hour isn't even a big number, it's not even 2 busses a minute per direction and would mean on average there is one bus passing through CG every 36 seconds. And again going back to what I said at the start, CG plaza is likely going to increase the capacity through CG, not reduce it.

    Post edited by PlatformNine on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,877 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    There was a standoff between a gunman & bus driver in Mountjoy Square on Friday night.

    Dublin Bus have said that the driver was a non Irish national. He was in a bus that was not in service during the incident.

    Dublin Bus have also said that the 7, 7a & 13 routes which normally depart from Mountjoy Square will be rerouted to bus stops in O'Connell St & Parnell Square East for departures after 7pm until further notice.

    The 7 & 7a routes will depart from stop no. 4725 on O'Connell St. The 13 will depart from stop 261 on Parnell Square East.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,697 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The 71, 72 and 73 will all use the Quays via Winetavern Street and won’t be passing College Green.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I looked at the map at the top of the previous page (I had forgotten that was there when writing my post), I figured the 73 was routed along the Quays so I didn't add that to the figure. But I didn't realise the 71 and 72 would be, it is just 4 services an hour though, so it isn't a large difference.

    I was surprised at first that the 71 and 72 were being routed that way, but I kept looking at the current CC map and I think I see why now. At least from the routes that are on the map (so not counting P and X routes) the 71, 72, and 73 appear to be the only routes planned to make a turn at OCB after BC is fully implemented, more specifically the northbound right turn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,697 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    You have to factor in the removal of turns at O’Connell Bridge and that given Parliament Street isn’t an option, which is what the revised plan assumed, that routing via the Quays is the only option that works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,877 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I was reading on Reddit a little while ago that there was a RTC at Wyckham Way roundabout in Dundrum during rush hour on Friday evening. There were two cars blocking some lanes of traffic around the roundabout at the time. Both cars blocking the lanes at the roundabout were ford models.

    The post below on X said that the collision happened on the middle lane after the roundabout. Although the post didn't give any details about which side of the roundabout the collision had occurred.

    https://x.com/LiveDrive/status/1912927146315513863

    There are a few bus routes that drive around that roundabout in Dundrum. I wouldn't be surprised if the BC routes like the L25 & 74 were hit with heavy delays in traffic as a result of this collision which happened during rush hour. The same situation could apply to the non BC routes that are hit with heavy delays as well. I would also imply that if there was any knock on effects with heavy traffic within the Dundrum area; a lot of the roads going into Dundrum could have been gridlocked with it while coming from areas like Balally, Balinteer, Sandyford Rd, Taney Rd, Churchtown Rd & Dundrum Rd at that time of the evening.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,608 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Excellent post and I agree completely on your estimates. The BusConnects frequency I gave were only for the lettered BusConnects routes and not the unlettered ones that will use the green. Also the numbers are based on the frequency tables on the BusConnects site, but that was published back in 2021 and I’d assume already out of date. Given how quickly demand has grown, I wouldn’t be surprised if in reality the frequencies will be higher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,976 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Great.

    So higher frequencies of busses- 2 busses per minute using that corridor, one bus every 30 seconds, and that had to interact with a LUAS every 3 mins and then the pedestrian crossings in top of that plus sprinkle the taxis on top.

    How is this going to work at all? I’m quite skeptical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 GRUF


    F spine is going to include a number of small infrastructural changes, namely bus lanes along Cuffe Street and St Stephen's Green. Hume Street is gonna go to a contraflow bus lane, and there will be a smattering of cycle bollards and junction formalisation to go with it along the route between Kevin Street and Merrion Square.

    Also D Spine is due to launch in November 2025 but its early days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,697 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The number of buses using College Green will still be far less than now as already posted, along with the elimination of the right turn onto Dame St.

    There is no indication yet that the frequencies will change dramatically from those in the BusConnects plan - they have been implemented pretty much at the same levels so far and added to that the driver and bus resource issues will have an impact.

    It is perfectly manageable for 2 buses a minute to fit in.

    I think you’re getting unnecesarily concerned.

    Why not stand there some morning/evening and I think you’ll count far more buses than that!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Im personally hoping/expecting they will. Correct me if I am wrong but the extra peak time services for the E1 have been quite succesful, and I would be surprised if the A and D spines don't get extra peak tme services, especially the A2 which is looking to become the main city airport bus, and the D1 which looks to be replacing the 15 and maybe some variants.

    Though it does make me wonder what their plan with their peak time spine routes (A9, D9, etc) is. Im aware the H9 was pulled from service because of low passenger numbers, but am I bit curious why they chose to implement the added E1 services as short services rather than as the E9(even though it is a different route). Maybe they will choose to abandon the 9 routes and continue with how they have done it with the E1. Though if they are introducing variants of routes I would personally like it to be more obvious, same with the Wadelai Park 19s (although I have heard they are transporting mostly air). I know one of the goals of BC was to get rid of all the odd variants to make things more clear, but having 2 versions of the same route, particularly if its ending early rather than just starting early, I think can be confusing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I think you have missed the point a bit. Despite however many busses that BC planning to run through CG, its less than there are currently. BC with routes as currently implemented and those as planned to be implemented, will not break 70 services per minute in each direction, or just over a bus per minute. The current CG corridor is doing far more than that, again likely over 100, but with a turn added in that can cause congestion.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,608 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, the E spine is already far surpassing the frequency tables that were included in BusConnects. The frequency table is saying a frequency of 4 minutes at peak times, however with the peak time additions, the frequency of the E is now already a much lower 2.6 minutes frequency!

    As you say, I’d be surprised if the A2, etc. might not see similar frequency boosts.

    Even if it doesn’t happen day 1, I find it hard to believe that say in 5 years from now as the population continues to grow and demand for buses continues to grow that extra capacity won’t be added! It seems to me we don’t have any other choice at least until Metrolink is built and some new Luas lines to take the pressure off.

    Also I completely agree with you on the naming of the extra peak time short routes. They should include some indicator, perhaps “E1S”, s for short, “E1C” or something like that. I know it is there in the destination name, however I can see sleepy people in the morning just glancing at the E1 and not really looking at the destination, specially as there are so relatively few of these short services. It kind of goes against the concept of simplicity of BusConnects IMO. I fully support the addition of these extra departures, but they need to be better named.

    As an aside, I could see extra A2 departures operating to just O’Connnell Street, like the 16C currently does, thus avoiding adding strain on College Green.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,976 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Yeah I didn’t realise we were actually REDUCING the amount of bus services going through that corridor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 Arhanedus


    I can definitely see the other spines also getting these "shorts" to increase frequency on the busiest sections.

    The E1 (and E2) is quite busy throughout the day, but the shorts do help with capacity during rush hour. I started taking the dart more often because the buses are usually very slow in my experience, but the few times I've been on the E1 between Bray and city centre, I didn't see people be unable to get on the bus the way it would happen on the 145/155 as soon as one or two buses were cancelled.

    Also I do agree that they should make the shorts stand out more somehow - from time to time I see people get turned away from an E1 short at Westmoreland, because they didn't realise that the bus only goes to Parnell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 Arhanedus


    Also, has there been any news about the supposed extension of the L14 to Brides Glen? I remember hearing about it a couple months ago and then nothing since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,697 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,697 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Many of those southside short workings were actually already there pre-BusConnects (but not in the public timetable) and it was my fear that the lack of any reference to them in the run up to the launch was going to result in serious capacity problems.

    That thankfully didn’t happen and they are in place to fill the busy school and college runs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭BusGuy


    IMG_2206.jpeg

    I guess this is relating to the D-Spine… 80 more people out of the population. Like driving a bus is no easy job, so why are GAI and DB pushing people to drive a bus, because of 1 transport project that is going to definitely fail in some years..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭BusGuy


    Just to note here that we are losing trees and basically everything, because all the NTA want is to ride a bus, oh my god. The BusConnects project will be closed down by the government sometime in the future, by the way this is going. Nobody is going to take the bus to the city becuase of a few reasons:

    1: If people take the bus, and go shopping, where are they supposed to place their shopping if the like bag space is taken? On a car, you can fit more, in the baggage hold at the back.

    2: I don’t like to wait 1 hour here in the Windy Arbour region for the 44 arrives if I miss my 10:30 one. It is the same walking time from my house to Dundrum, and the same time where you go from Dundrum Road, Millmount Terrace, to Dundrum South bus stop. The 44 schedule needs to be improved ASAP. The Ranelagh and the Roebuck Road are significantly downgraded because of Phase 5b. If there ever is a BusConnects protest, I’m attending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭Fizzy Duck




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 Arhanedus


    We are going to need more and more buses and bus drivers to keep up with the rising demand for public transport, because rail infrastructure is nowhere to be found for now.

    In an ideal world, many of these spines should be Luas lines. But getting that done is very difficult here, so instead we're stuck with having to use a lot of buses until that infrastructure appears one day (if ever).

    So for now we do need new bus drivers for BusConnects - although the project does have its issues, it does provide for increased frequencies in many areas, thereby making public transport a more viable option for commuting.
    Constructing a new depot isn't that mad - all these buses do have to be stored somewhere while not in service, and existing depots can only hold a finite amount of them.



Advertisement