Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

1313314316318319322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,187 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Australia's only threat is Indonesia. and a half dozen Canberras were enough to keep them in check.

    The other nations you mentioned recognise that nuclear weapons would make their situation worse not better.

    No terrorist organisation, never mind a nation state, will bother wasting their time on "dirty bombs" because they're not worth a damn. Will kill half a dozen people on a "good" day.

    Post edited by Hotblack Desiato on

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    German foreign minister 'leaked' news that the quickly assembled EU meeting about the new political situation around the Ukraine war resulted in an immense weapons assistance package for Ukraine of previously unspoken dimensions. The number of 700 billion was mentioned and originally it was said this must not be communicated before the elections in Germany next Sunday.

    https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/wirtschaft-verantwortung/baerbock-verplappert-sich-nach-der-wahl-milliarden-fuer-ukraine-li.2295623

    IMO this is absolutely insane. I can only assume that before the war is over due to the political shift in the US the giant scam must quickly be finalised. Clearly no shame, a giant public money package must be funnelled into the arms industry. Whether this brings us on the brink or not who cares. EU seems absolutely adamant there can be no peace and seemingly they are prepared to go all the way.

    After the bank rescue and the giant scams which came with covid and to which van der Leyen to this day refuses to answer it's apparently the arms industry's turn now. The robbing of public money continues either way and no purpose seems immoral enough and all masks have slipped. I don't even know how they think they have legitimation to do this. Macron continues to construe new governments that have no resemblance with their latest election results. Scholz is facing an election next Sunday which will most likely see him ousted. The lunatics are running the asylum and the electorate is helpless to do anything about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,117 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Excellent news.


    Don’t let Putin off the hook now his army is crumbling.


    Time to turn the screw.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Good! About time they stood up to Putin (and Trump)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    So you're prepared to go to war with Russia then? And face another huge debt for it more like after 2008? Which may or may not matter anyway when things start flying. You're thinking we should go all in?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,117 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Ukraine is at war with Russia.


    Im all for backing Ukraine with whatever it takes to defend itself from illegal aggression and occupation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    And how about the new US government who clearly think that the Biden administration played a much bigger and sinister role in this war than anyone else is willing to admit or even discuss? You think this should just be ignored and who cares Trump is a Kremlin guy anyway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Ukraine is losing this war and has been losing it from the start. It should never have come to this. And now the EU wants to flog a dead horse with another huge public money package, our money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Russia is at war with Europe, energy war, hybrid war and an invasion in Ukraine.

    We walked into this and enabled this by attempting to endlessly appease Putin, which doesn't stop him, only encourages him. Now we're paying for it. If Ukrainians weren't dying it would be someone else in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    It is happening because of Ukraine wanting into NATO. And we self inflicted the so-called energy war, sanctions remember? Pipeline blown up and no one wants to know who did it, remember? Where and when was Putin appeased?

    What is going on? Black is white, war is peace, the West cannot do wrong, all was happy western shiny values democracy stuff until Putin went mad? Do people really believe this Orwell stuff?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Putin did wrong invading his neighbour that had given up on nuclear weapons in return for a peace agreement. Europe should back Ukraine to the utmost including war with Russia if that's what it takes. They should have done it earlier and it would be over by now Trump or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Putin wanted to invade Ukraine, however he couldn't do that if Ukraine was in NATO. As a type of perverse reasoning he used that to justify invading Ukraine. Hitler used the same trick to validate invading neighbours, claiming their defensive alliance was "threatening" and "encircling" Nazi Germany.

    As for the energy war, you're right it was partially self inflicted. For example, Germany's literal doctrine was to make Russia and Germany so economically intertwined that any future war was impossible. We ignored all the warning signs and grew fat on cheap Russian energy. Even after 2014, we pulled a few half measures so as not to "anger" Putin. Obama was reluctant as hell to do anything that might provoke Putin.

    >What is going on?

    Putin invaded Ukraine. Hitler invaded Poland. Europe, to relative degrees, appeased it's way into both situations. Hindsight is 20/20.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,644 ✭✭✭yagan


    We're here because Russia tried to go all in on Ukraine, and if let will try again with the baltic states.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,345 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Look at the fate of Belarus, a corrupt tyranny, a dictator propped up by Russian military… that is the fate Russia has in mind for Ukraine, Baltics, Moldova, Georgia etc
    Russia sent in its military there, there was no prospect of Belarus would join NATO, merely that it would no longer be a vassal state.

    Russian violations of Budapest agreement with Ukraine started Ukraine was considering a treaty with the EU.

    Positive proof Russia's attempts to dominate its neighbours have nothing to do with NATO.

    It wishes to be surrounded by vassal states, not neutrals. The considered actions of Sweden and Finland in looking to join NATO is further proof of this - they recognised that Russia would not respect their neutral status with a pro-Western\EU polity.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ukraine was CONSTITUTIONALLY NEUTRAL before Russia invaded it in 2014. This is the height of nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    The height of nonsense is confusing 2014 with 2022.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Indeed. A country attempting to join a defensive alliance after they have been invaded seems eminently sensible. It also suggests that the invasion is happening because of said desire is completely ahistorical nonsense.

    "You attempted to defend yourself after we invaded you the first time, therefore we had to invade you more fully the second time" is quite transparently a ridiculous argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 ✭✭✭satguy


    The US and NATO had their eye on some missile sites, right up against the Ukraine border with Russia.

    That clown Zelensky could see big handouts for missile sites, and was all in.

    Putin and Russia had other ideas,, and now Ukraine is down a million men, and the US is down $600 Billion.

    So it all worked out in the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    It is not nonsense it is at the core of the entire conflict. Of course you may not know this since you seem to have decided to not listen to anything Russia says.

    Also you may not know this either but a country cannot join NATO while actively engaged in a war defensively or not. It's in the NATO rules.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mod: quit with the sniping.
    I've already deleted a number of posts and issued a warning. Any more warnings will be accompanied by immediate bannings.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,500 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    The good news however is that Russia's economy however is royally messed up now that between the loss of men of fighting age (and the recruitment drives now have to offer over $40k sign on bonuses and even then they only get alcoholics and drug addicts) and the pivot of the factories to war material output they will not recover as a country. They were already in a downward spiral before this and their invasion has accelerated this even further (if you want to have some fun look at Gazproms profits from 2020 to date).

    Bonus fun fact; I'd not be surprised to see China invade Siberia as payback for what they have lost with in days before a peace treaty is taking effect. Not like Russia are going to have any forces to talk about to put up a fight and China can take back actual land it has lost as part of it's recovery from the century of humiliation. Yes they love to talk about Taiwan etc. but they also produced Sun Tzu's Art of War…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Christ that 'other' thread has a lot to answer for. The stuff people are openly spinning these days is mind blowing. Presumably the same people who accuse others of 'misinformation'. For the people who think Russia's army is crumbling and the Ukrainian endsieg is just around the corner I fear your Telegram does not correspond with what the mainstream thinks how things are going.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,407 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    NATO rules are at the behest of its members. We had the same russia enablers saying how Sweden and Finland would never be able to join due to a variety of rules and now idiot putin has a massively enlarged NATO border. His only way out of Ukraine is with a DMZ and his tail firmly tucked away leaving russia with a self inflicted demographic crisis.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I listen to most things Russia says, I just don't take them at face value because that would be silly. It would, for example, be ridiculous to take the claim that NATO expansion was a key factor at face value when a) Ukraine was nowhere near joining NATO, b) Ukraine was constitutionally committed to independence before Russia invaded in 2014, c) Russia removed forces from their actual new NATO border with Finland.

    It's also not in the NATO rules that a country at war can not join. It is both far more complicated and far simpler than that. The complicated bit is around how they approach territorial disputes, not their existence. And the simpler bit is that you join NATO by every member state saying you can and there is no disbarring rule to stop accession of someone they want.

    Anyway, at the core of the entire conflict is a chauvinistic, revanchist, wannabe imperial overlord Russia that is lashing out at its neighbours who are attempting to build a better future for themselves by aligning with the West. It really is that simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,265 ✭✭✭Good loser


    Biden has a lot to answer for; he was far too timid in his dealings with Putin.

    If he had put a squadron of F35's in Kiev airport the week before the invasion it would never have happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Probably true but if he did he would be castigated as a war mongering interfering overreactor by many in Europe and the US too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The record is always the same

    To dumb it right down, at the core of every defender of Putin is someone who believes that it's someone's, anyone else's fault but Putin's. Including the Ukrainians for daring to exist.

    When we see these individual's other views - no problem 100% blaming the Bush for Iraq, no problem 100% blaming Netanyahu, but when it comes to Putin, a dictator with extraordinary powers and a rubber stamping parliament, suddenly he has no agency to engage in imperialism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,261 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    When one sees the representatives of Trump and Putin meeting in Saudi Arabia today (and with Musk heaping praise on the Russians last night), can anyone believe for a moment that Ukraine are the bad guys in all this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    It looking like the EU has Russia and the US as enemies now?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,261 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It certainly looks like the US has become an 'adversary' under Trump at this point - somebody you couldn't really call a friend or ally.



Advertisement