Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1190191193195196723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,910 ✭✭✭eire4




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,892 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I'm really not sure that's the case. If the oath sworn was fine as it was, they wouldn't have changed it in the middle of the civil war to make it such that it was to the US constitution, and not to the US (which, to be sure, was a plural of individual states in the oath, not the singular entity as we tend to use it as today). In their view, the states were no longer united, so there was no longer a body to which to maintain allegiance. If it were obvious where the allegiance should have lain, there would have been no need to make any changes. Consider it a bit like the UK's European Commissioner who took an oath.. but then no longer had any reason to continue to abide by it after January 2020.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,112 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The haters won't like this. Looks like Trump has had some success with Netanyahu pushing him to a ceasefire before he takes office. Apparently the ceasefire will be announced tomorrow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Does this sound like a probable statement…

    that they'd let us impede humanitarian aid

    Maybe wait for the actual ceasefire.

    And how does having two presidents work? In the event of a major crisis how do they decide who handles it? /s

    Edit to point out sarcasm. Trump is just making Presidential noises before he is entitled.

    Post edited by looksee on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,588 ✭✭✭testtech05


    I suspect if Trump is heavily involved he would want everyone to know, there is no way he is helping to try push through a cease fire just before he takes office and giving Biden the credit as the sitting president.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Ah yes, a bit more investigation reveals:

    US President Joe Biden expressed similar optimism in a speech Monday focused on foreign policy, saying the United States was “pressing hard to close this.”

    “The deal we have structured would free the hostages, halt the fighting, provide security to Israel, and allow us to significantly surge humanitarian assistance to the Palestinians who suffered terribly in this war that Hamas started. They have been through hell,” Biden said.

    Meanwhile, President-elect Donald Trump told Newsmax that his understanding is that “there’s been a handshake and they’re getting it finished.” Trump’s incoming special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff previously told reporters he was working alongside Biden administration officials during the negotiations, and hoped to get a temporary ceasefire deal enacted before Trump’s inauguration on Monday.(CNN)

    Trump is not involved and his 'incoming' hanger on Special Envoy is taking credit on his behalf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,646 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Biden gets whatever credit is due if the ceasefire happens before the inauguration…(words I'd hoped not to ever utter again)…next week. Convicted Felon Orange Smegma gets credit should it take place after the inauguration. Basically, once the Chief Justice swears him in, the new POTUS takes over. He can issue executive orders immediately and start rounding up immigrants and impose tariffs while depriving more citizens of their rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,215 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Jack Smith's report on Jan 6th now released. No doubt it will just five DJT cause for another abusive rant.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/14/politics/special-counsel-smith-report-trump-2020-election-subversion/index.html

    Good to see that earlier attempts by Judge Cannon to bury it have failed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,042 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Strongly anticipate his followers will pop up here rubbishing the report, saying that it's biased etc. when everyone knows that not only is it true, but they wouldn't give two sh1ts if it was all true.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,866 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    What's remarkable about this apparent deal of deals is the way Sky and other news agencies reported that the head of Israeli intelligence was being sent to the talks spot to represent Israel. To me, that means Israel's hand was forced by a strong push not just from Biden but also by another US friend behind the scenes. Trump's Envoy also went to the area to ensure the deal was committed-to by Benny. Coincidentally Bidens administration let the world know it would be sending military aid to Israel at the same time Sky was "leaking" the news of whom was representing Israel at the talks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,416 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I think getting a ceasefire in place is more important than political one-upmanship, I don't think anyone will be salty about how it happens as long as it happens soon.

    However, kermit's post itself was absolutely dripping in salt, as usual, not a great attempt at a wind up (and looks very desperate).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    ……. post itself was absolutely dripping in salt, as usual, not a great attempt at a wind up (and looks very desperate).

    But that's all they are interested in; the poster has even admitted this. There's no depth to what they post it's how they can frame it to their 'advantage' for the next sly dig.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭bog master


    Reminds me of the Iran hostages at the end of Carter's term. Reagan's people managed to convince the Iranians to not release the hostages until Reagan was sworn in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Has anyone been watching Lisa Hilton's documentary on BBC4 about the trial of King Charles by the Rump Parliament and Oliver Cromwell(1648 I think)

    The parallels with Trump's failed impeachment seem interesting to me.

    If Trump wants to act like a King I hope that he can be brought down like a King too.

    Really fascinating and immersive documentary (part 3 tonight at 12 or 12.20)

    The Parliamentarians had just won the Civil War and wanted to hold Charles accountable but there was no law suited to putting a Monarch on trial who owed his authority to a supposed Deity -and had no peers to be the jury.

    He was also no slouch when defending his case from the dock and had plenty of supporters in the community even though the Civil War had knocked the stuffing out of the country.

    Great Drama at the forefront of their own information revolution too.

    Lisa Hilton is a good presenter as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,112 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    There is no "sly digs". Donald Trump is the democratically elected leader of the free world and he should get credit where it's due.

    He should be criticised for his faults but I would argue the anti-Trumpism should be directed at the incompetent Democrats. Not only did they lose to him twice they have failed in all their legal and other political avenues as well.

    That's where the anger should be directed, not primarily at Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    But he did attempt to overthrow a legitimate election, and he did illegally take classified documents. That's the problem, that's where the anger should be directed. Not the legal systems failure to hold him to account (because he managed to dodgily postpone the trials which gave him time to get re-elected).

    He should be serving sentences for both these crimes, not preparing to sit his corpulent frame back behind the resolute desk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,471 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    What was "the haters aren't going to like this" about then? Totally needless and pointless remark.

    In this particular instance, there are indications Trump was deliberately trying to hold up ceasefire so that he could claim credit for it.

    Trump is the one carrying out vile acts, coming out with offensive racist drivel on campaign, lying to get elected, trying to steal the last election, whipping up the January 6th mob riots, being a sex pest \ rapist. That is where anger should be directed.

    The Democrats can be faulted \ criticised for failing to stop Trump and get their act together and message across, but it is a totally different sort of criticism. That is where constructive criticism should be directed.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,042 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "He should be criticised for his faults…. "

    The floor is yours……

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,112 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    And who is at fault for him being behind the resolute desk? Is it Donald Trump or the Democrats?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,910 ✭✭✭eire4


    He fought against the US and did his best to bring about the end of the US so IMHO he was very much a traitor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Donald Trump is the democratically elected leader of the free world

    No he isn't. It's easy to see how impressionable you are when you parrot phrases like this

    Donald Trump is the democratically elected leader of the free world

    Now this is laughable; we shouldn't be so harsh on poor Donald. We should criticise the others who ran against him.

    You also continue to view these scenarios as very simplistically as two-sided with those critical of Trump as automatic supporters of the Democrats.

    But as long as he pisses off the 'right' people, you're good.

    "the haters aren't going to like this" 

    Was nothing but childish one-up-manship devoid of any real depth of knowledge about what you'd posted (again). It was a chance for some immature point scoring.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,659 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Trump is not the leader of the free world. The free world didn't vote, Americans did. I've seen some seriously demented drivel from the MAGA types over the years but this trope is particularly daft. As for who's to blame, that's the Americans who voted for him, a man with a raft of felony convictions, over a qualified black woman.

    What a dump of a country.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,112 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Firstly he is the leader of the free world and secondly criticising the Democrats here is not "point scoring", it's deserved criticism.

    This man they call a buffoon and a criminal - yeah they lost to him twice. This time around the republicans also control both houses.

    Plenty of Democrat supporters and others on the left just cannot bring themselves to acknowledge the failures of their leadership and why Trump got re-elected. The tunnel vision hatred of Trump seems to blind them from serious self assessment as to why? It's not just supporters, it's elected politicians.

    I maintain it's the Democratic party who are at fault for Trump's election, not Trump himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Firstly he is the leader of the free world 

    Firstly For the second time; he isn't.

    criticising the Democrats here is not "point scoring", it's deserved criticism.

    Except you're getting muddled up in your own nonsense; childish 'point scoring' was the "haters aren't going to like this" bit you'd failed to understand yet threw it up any way as a simple sly dig, you know to 'piss off the right people' but now it's backfired.

    Plenty of Democrat supporters and others on the left just cannot bring themselves to acknowledge the failures of their leadership and why Trump got re-elected. The tunnel vision hatred of Trump seems to blind them from serious self assessment as to why? It's not just supporters, it's elected politicians.

    This isn't the profound gotcha you think it is; there's been plenty of criticism of the Democrats/Biden/Harris for the mess of a campaign they ran as well as issues with how they govern. Again it's just the simplistic and convenient argument you think you can lean on but it's extremely weak.

    and others on the left

    Showing your colours; this is the simplistic view of your point - the so called "right people" that you like to see pissed off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,112 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    He has plenty of haters out there as you well know and he does piss off the right people - those entitled folks at the top of the Democratic party and their corporate cheerleaders. Remember Hilary? - it was her turn. Same with Kamala - it was her turn too.

    Nope.

    You'll have to endure the next four years and as you're doing that just remember it's the incompetent out-of-touch leadership of the Democrats that's the reason why.

    Everytime you see him speak as the leader of the free world, all those decisions made you vehemently disagree with, all the buffoonish statements, corruption, clowning around - all that, just remember:

    The Democrats lost to this man twice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭crusd


    How dare she use the photo released by the Carter family. This is a far more egregious offence than inciting an insurrection and conspiring to overturn the election result



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭Rawr


    So here I think we’re encountering phenomenon that I feel speaks to an interesting cohort within the MAGA-verse.

    It’s what I call the «This’ll learn dem lib-tards!» cohort. People who might perhaps have some form of political opinion for sure, but their main objective appears to be to show up anyone who might display some liberal leanings, or perhaps even anyone to the Right of hunting people for sport.

    I sense it comes from a deep sense of inadequacy and/or rejection. They want to be accepted by the world at a whole, but can’t grasp the norms of respect that many of us tend to take for granted. But instead of reflecting on this, they lash out and wish instead to burn down the society that shuns them.

    So they vote for the likes of Trump, who normalise the anti-social cruelty they never grew out of. They trumpet the values of the valueless, and declare to the world «Heh heh! This’ll annoy those liberals!»

    But under it all, there is the pang of isolation. «Why won’t they accept me?» One day these people might understand. But in the meantime we’ll continue to get a cohort of MAGA supporters in the US, and «centrists» in other places.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    @Kermit.de.frog Trump is not the leader of the free world no matter how many times you write that he is.



Advertisement