Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

LUAS Network + Future Expansion

1246710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,838 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Is it just me or are all three of those options fairly crap?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭OisinCooke


    My opinion too… for what could theoretically be the last ‘cross city’ Luas project, they should be going brave and bold with the plans, to the point where all other future Luas lines can just feed into this central core ‘circle’… Not scabbing money and fear of upsetting a few people to end up with only a so-so final result. Now is the time to be bold and make the difficult but necessary decisions. Not tunnelling under Abbey Street perhaps but definitely building the Luas up to and even across College Green.

    On a side note I was in Sevilla recently enough and saw that the tram system they have there uses a very clever gauntlet rail system in the central section which is a large predestined street of historical significance. Could something like this be done for about 100 metres through College Green to minimise space take by trams…? Wouldn’t be too much of a capacity hindrance either and even still, half of the trams could terminate at the bottom of Dame Street with the rest running through to Ringsend, to avoid capacity issues…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Lucan is too far from the centre and now too populous to be relying on an on street tram with a 1hour journey time for radial journeys. Luas is great but it should have never been relied upon to serve areas outside the M50. Those areas need a DART or metro service that can deliver sub 30 minute journey times to the centre. Swords will get that with Metrolink, parts of the Blanchardstown area will get that with DART, the same is required for Lucan, Tallaght, Clondalkin, Coolock and Rathfarnham.

    Metrolink 2 and 3 should be: Tallaght-Coolock and Lucan-Ringsend

    Then Luas needs it's central area seriously beefed up before adding new radial spurs to the existing 2 line system, a second North-South and a second East-West should be a priority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭scrabtom


    Parts of Lucan are quite close to Dart South West so they have that. The areas of Lucan that will be served by Luas Lucan are by and large just housing estates. I spend quite a lot of time in the area and it really doesn't seem high density enough to justify a metro.

    I think a Luas through the Liberties is perfectly fine. It will go to the Stephens Green area which is where a lot of jobs are.

    If they're going to build a big plaza in College Green I think a Luas line going through it would greatly hamper the utility of it. The Luas is fairly loud if you're right beside it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭The Mathematician


    When the London underground was extended into the suburbs, they were just housing estates, and much of the area is still the same.

    I think the problem we have at the moment is that a lot of people just don't realise how much better a proper metro will be compared to an on-street Luas. I have no doubt that once we get the first metro built, it will be such a success that others will follow.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Here’s a couple of ideas…

    Link 1 connects Red line to Green at College Green. The High Street to Dame Steet section could eventually be taken over by Luas Lucan, but in the meantime it provides a Heuston-Southside link.

    Link 2 provides an alternative N/S link between Red and Green - this is mainly for the benefit of Red line, which could now run to Finglas.

    Link X is where I’d like to see the Lucan line continue: Pearse station, Merrion Square, Baggot Street, then to the canal end of Leeson St to meet the future Green realignment.

    The reasoning behind this is that on-street sections in the city centre are are slower than lines in the periphery, so to reduce that bottleneck in the centre, split the services into different city-centre destinations, then re-combine them before leaving the centre.

    This kind of branching doesn’t add much end-to-end capacity, but utilisation would increase, because passengers have a greater choice of destinations available to them, and within the city, there are more access points for travel further out of the city. Also, having multiple lines in the centre means it’s possible to implement city-area services without killing long-distance capacity.

    Thoughts welcome, but do keep in mind that this was 20 minutes with a drawing program, and not some highly-researched plan..



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I like those ideas. If we build the network in the Luas 2050 Vision map, we should have some of the lines run through the centre out the far side. For example, Clarehall-Beaumont-City Centre could continue to Four Courts then become the Kimmage-Clondalkin line. All one line end to end. It would still approach the core inner city closely enough that most people wouldn't need to alight and use the Red Line to complete their journey.

    Similarly the Clongriffin-Clarehall-Connolly line could continue across the river to Pearse St where it could meet a College Green-Ringsend line. I'm coming around to the idea that the latter line would be better than 3Arena-Ringsend: no huge bridge needed across the river, serves southside destinations, busy existing route, BusConnects corridor, less long winded for Ringsend passengers than being brought over to the northside. Also it could be built in isolation from Lucan Luas if running trams through pedestrianised College Green proved to be too controversial.

    As for Metro Lucan-Ringsend, Lucan is way too low density, fully built out, and too close to the DART to ever need Metro. I wonder if there might be a case for building the Metro Heuston-Ringsend segment, but you could just do DART Tunnel.

    Remember that because Lucan Luas will intersect DART twice (at Adamstown and Kylemore stations) many people will not use it to get into the city but only as far as their nearest DART station before changing to the DART.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Lucan is about the same distance from the city as Cherrywood is, so distance wise okay and as spacetweek says it will intersect with DART. In many ways it will be much better then the Green line to the south!

    Also when people say things like "street trams", I think they underestimate how relatively high spec and high capacity or Luas lines are.

    To give an example, our two Luas lines carries more passengers as 2 of Amsterdams 5 Metro lines! 2 of the other Metro lines are only a bit higher and only one line is truly much higher.

    Our two Luas lines carry about 132,000 people per day (combined) or 66k each, while the Amsterdam Metro lines are, 60,600 / 60,800 / 73,500 / 84,000 / 100,200

    Of course Amsterdam also has an extensive cycling network and tram network, but the point is it does show the capacity in Luas and how it is closer to Metro levels then a simple "street tram".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The real point of lucan to ringsend wouldn't be just to serve lucan but rather to provide high capacity east-west route through the city centre. It could have surface running or cut and cover at its more westerly end.

    You could also make the above point about swords not needing a metro line



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭scrabtom


    Would DART Underground not provide that while providing all the other benefits to the rail network?

    Granted yes a dedicated metro going all the way to Ringsend would serve the purpose better but it seems a bit daft to build both DART Underground and a metro to Lucan when they would both have very similar routes, given how much these things cost.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,838 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I think most of us don't have to worry about Dart Underground being built in our lifetimes!

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Well yes but we don't know if we'll ever get Dart underground



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    If we don't get DU, then it would be very unlikely that we would get a East - West Metro tunnel either.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    If they're going to build a big plaza in College Green I think a Luas line going through it would greatly hamper the utility of it. The Luas is fairly loud if you're right beside it.

    Beyond the loudness of it, they are going to want to be able to close it off for events like we saw with the College Football game in Dublin. That already caused too much disruption to the Luas lines, if one assumes we will actually make use of the plaza then we need events not to shut off public transport. I think an east-west line through the green is asking for trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,773 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I somehow think that a commuter line has a greater priority than a plaza for events. We could use Newmarket Square as a Plaza, or Smithfield, there are other possible locations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I do see Luas Lucan continuing on to connect Ringsend/Irishtown as being the best way to connect those places to the Luas network. Running the Red Line back across the Liffey seems pointless and a bit of a roundabout way to do it…

    Some posters have made very very good points about College Green, and I think that while it would be excellent to have a Luas Line through it and along Dame Street, if it has to be closed, it’ll only cause more confusion and delay, as our good friend the Fat Controller would say…

    The Cork Street - Stephens Green option seems the best idea for Luas Lucan, (I’ll be honest, I really hate the Canal idea) and it actually provides a much better interchange with the Green Line rather than passengers having to walk to Westmorland from College Green to head into town. However it would make no sense to stop Lucan trams at Stephens Green if that was the end of the line as they would need turnback time which would hamper existing Green Line services. The question then stands, where do you go from Stephen’s Green?

    One option is to run it along the Green Line as far as Trinity and turn it across towards Pearse Street and head straight to Irishtown and on to Ringsend from there (Townsend Street could be used instead to link with Metro and not only DART and then run it down Sandwith St Lower and back onto Pearse Street)

    Another option is to continue east on Stephens Green north (follow the current tram siding) and follow Baggot Street to the Canal, turn onto Haddington Road, through Beggars Bush and into Ringsend via Bath Ave. this has the added bonus of not doubling the DART corridor along Pearse and having an Aviva Stadium station too however there is no direct DART connection and I’m not sure how feasible it really is land and road-take-wise…

    College Green would be ideal but if not a possibility than other options will have to be looked at…



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sure, but the entire point of College Green pedestrianisation is to make it a central plaza - there is a reason it has been the centre of events such as the football and presidential visits etc. The point of it is not to be a giant transport interchange



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I get where you are coming from, but I'm not sure I agree, the city is in desperate need of spaces like this.

    But putting that aside, I'm surprised no one has considered how complex it would be to cross the Green line here without causing chaos and disruption to the Greenline.

    The Red Line and Green Line crossing on OCS already create a lot of issues, complexity and delays, now you are adding a second crossing to the Green Line.

    And it is even more Complex then on OCS, as the Green line is split between Westmoreland St and Hawkin Street, this line would have to negotiate a College Green Plaza, cross the Green line north bound tracks, run alongside the Green line southbound tracks and then cross the southbound Green line Luas tracks!

    Now keep in mind a mess of pedestrians and cyclists in the area and it seems a horribly complex junction, that could badly impact the green line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Red Line to Poolbeg is not pointless.

    Connectivity to the new Spencer Dock station, the Green Line and Metro at O’Connell Street is pretty good. Alongside that, direct connection to the IFSC etc.

    Who knows as well, we could end up with the existing infrastructure split eventually such that you could get a Luas from Poolbeg to St Stephen’s Green direct.


    I will say that the northside will effectively have two E-W alignments in the core. Meanwhile the southside will zilch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,773 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It happens all the time in Amsterdam, and that have routes that criss-cross and change, so you could get Lucan-Dundrum for example and Broombridge-Ringsend, as well as the existing ones.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Keep in mind Amsterdam has 5 metro lines acting as the backbone of their transport network. Their tram lines are smaller and much less frequent and are largely used the same way we use buses.

    Their 14 tram lines carry 113 million passengers while just our two Luas lines carry 48 million. In aggregate their network carries many and is great, but on a per line basis, they carry far less then Luas.

    As I mentioned above, our two Luas lines carry more passengers then two of the Amsterdams Metro lines!

    I think people underestimate how high spec and high capacity our Luas is and how it is more “Metro lite” then “street tram” common in some older European cities. And that does have a big impact on design and complexity of operations.

    55m long trams, the longest in the world, carrying 300 people every 3 minutes per direction, crossing one another at a possible 45 second frequency is not a minor matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 247 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I think the yellow line is the most likely, but with I think it would be extended all the way up Sean Moore Road to terminate with the Red line after Luas Poolbeg. Though I would hope it would run south of ssg with either an elevated or cut and cover so it avoids a junction with the green line.

    In general our trams are fairly long. Looking at other Citadis or even Siemens Avenio and CAF Urbos customers, 30-35m seems to be a very common number, making even the red line trams at 44m seem long but at least not uncommon. But our 55m green line are truly a beast, only surpased by (from what I can find) some countries which link trams together (similair to what we do with the 3+4 unit 22Ks for heavy rail) and Budapest with 56m trams (sadly it looks like these went into service before the 402s were extended to 502s).

    But I can't see TII building any new lines that aren't capable of using 55m trams, and I imagine they have some plan on how to lengthen all the red line platforms in the distant future (last I checked the new red line fleet is planned as being 44m), but stations like Busaras are making it difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The Busáras stop could be moved around the corner of Store Street, to before the Garda station. This section of the street is longer, has no junctions, and would be closer to Busáras itself. I suspect this was the original choice of location, but the hotel may have objected to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,815 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Are there any detailed drawings or road maps of that Knocklyon line?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Nope, at the moment only a high level maps have been published, to give people an idea of what they are thinking of, the high level strategy, no detailed plans have been publicly published.

    I suspect these plans will change as they get into detailed planning, there are some obvious parts left out of these maps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,815 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    When you say high level map- is that the one you posted or is there a more detailed one?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 247 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I dont think they want to move the platform too far from Connolly (not that its that far just being an interchange for the stop would ideally be very close). However I think the main reason the station isn't there is becuase it could restrict the Busaras entrance. To put a platform there would make it harder for busses to enter the station, or it could lead to congestion between busses and trams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭scrabtom


    Paragraph that might be of interest to you. It seems recently they have decided a Luas is feasible based off those maps but who knows.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Just the ones from the latest GDA and the vision 2050.

    I'd sum the overall strategy as, "turn the BusConnects routes into Luas lines"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,816 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    In general our trams are fairly long.

    Some would almost say too long. Ideally we'd have more frequent shorter trams, but I suspect even LUAS are suffering from a driver shortage?

    Or is it a council-based thing that they don't want the transit corridors clogged up with trams?



Advertisement