Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

LUAS Network + Future Expansion

2456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    All those long and winding radial tram routes, ignoring the (potential and planned) much high capacity and faster heavy rail and (planned) metro routes. Bizarre if you ask me. Fair enough if there is a possible highly segregated corridor available but that's not the case in most of these examples and there are no plans to segregate the lines in the city centre anyway. The orbital Luas routes feeding in to heavy rail and metro make a lot more sense to me.

    Money is finite but I believe you would deliver far more bang for the buck with a metro line out through the south west of the city (as well as upgrading the Green line) and then feeding passengers on shorter orbital trams (and buses) into these very high capacity, frequency and speed lines.

    I won't lose too much sleep over this vision though. It'll almost certainly not materialise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭alentejo


    I would love to see several tram lines converge in college Green. There are way too many buses in Dublin City centre



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes, it would be great if the traffic reduction plans for the centre were followed with a couple of branches of the existing red/green lines that take varying routes around the centre. This is how other cities with "lots of tram lines" operate.

    Building tram lines in the centre is really expensive because of the underground services that have to be found and moved first, but perhaps, as part of a more general street improvement project, this relocation could be done in advance. Even if no tram is laid there later, it would dramatically reduce disruption to traffic when gas/electricity/water/telecoms maintenance is needed later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 741 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Also, tram lines around all of SSG would be very cool branching off to Baggot St, Leeson St and Cuffe St, as well as Harcourt and Dawson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭gjim


    Definitely post-T42, the priority should be getting buses out of the centre of the city. Currently living away from Dublin, it's something I never noticed in my years living there but whenever I return, it's striking how damaging having queues of slow moving tall and heavy vehicles is to the urban environment. Everywhere in the city adjacent to heavy flows of buses is unpleasant for pedestrians and cyclists (particularly). And it's about the least efficient use of double decker buses having them crawl through busy city streets. And despite so much street space being provided to them in the city core, they're not much use in terms of hop-on/hop-off to get around the centre since the dwell times are so long and most of the available seating involves navigating a one-way single stairwell.

    Long term the goal should be to build a network of tramlines criss-crossing between the canals and have all outer bus passengers transfer to trams at interchanges to get into the centre. The last time I used buses was in Amsterdam and this is how it worked and it's fine - you get off a bus somewhere away from the centre and wait a few minutes at the same platform for the next tram. Amsterdam has plenty of lowish density suburbs, particularly in the south which are served by buses.

    Only then, having provided decent tram capacity in the centre of Dublin, should outer extensions be considered. I'd park metrowest, most of Lucan luas and extending the green line further to Bray (the first extension was already a mistake in my opinion) until the core is sorted out. The network should be extended outward in steps from the core, not the periphery, along the busier bus routes, where heavy rail or metro is not an option or justified.

    The displaced buses can do what buses do best, provide services in low density suburbs and provide dense connectivity with rail services whether heavy, metro or trams. Despite the NTA being ultimately in charge, PT in Dublin has not been integrated aggressively enough - buses, Luas and DART/Commuter are seen as alternatives instead of being used to each's strength in a complimentary way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,774 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    An interesting point. One of the weaknesses of the BusConnects design is the lack of interconnectivity with the Maynooth line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I really like this plan and I love the idea of a College Green interchange area. While obviously I would love to see all of these Luas Lines implemented, the ones that I think make the most sense and that this part of the city needs the most are the one from Dame Street through College Green and onto Townsend Street and from the South Circular Road onto Adelaide Road as well as the Leeson Street and Stephens Green West line

    This would allow trams coming from Terenure/Harold’s Cross/Knocklyon (Pink Line) to come up Patrick Street, head left along Dame Street and then down following the Green Lines original alignment as far as Ranelagh (the last stop before the rest of the alignment becomes Metro-ified)

    Trams from James’ Street (Blue Line) can also use this to access College Green and then continue West onto Townsend Street to Tara Station (interchange with DART+ and Metro) with a potential extension to Pearse (DART+ and DU) and on to Ringsend.

    With the Metro-ification of the Green Line south of Ranelagh, Green Line trams can be rerouted from Dawson Street left down Stephens Green North and on to Stephens Green East (for an interchange with the planned Metro and DU stop there) before heading down Leeson and down the Stillorgan Dualer/N11 to Sandyford to rejoin the Green Line beyond the Metro to Brides’ Glen and Bray.

    Trams From Suir Road/Blackhorse that come along the South Circular Road and trams from Crumlin/Kimmage that come up toward the South Circular Road (Yellow Line), can can use the South Circ. alignment and continue towards Harcourt before carrying on down Adelaide Road and following the Green Line south, to Sandyford or simply just terminate on Leeson Street linking with Green Line trams.

    This is all very doable and definitely aligns with the NTA’s Post-2042 plan of Luas lines and could be very beneficial to the Luas network and City in general. Will it all happen as we forumers want it to however? That’s a whole other question entirely…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭OisinCooke


    How realistic is Luas tunnelling for short sections of busy congested road/to navigate obstacles…? I know that the tram network in Bochum, Germany (close to Dortmund, and with a population of merely 350,000 uses altogether about 7.5 kilometres of underground double track tram tunnels across its different lines to get trams through the city centre. Is this in any way a potential model for Dublin…? Even dive-unders for busy junctions, or the odd north-south Liffey Crossing…? Could be an idea…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Why doesn't saggart have a park and ride. It's the terminus stop and would be ideal for commuter to leave car if built



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Most of the benefit of such a Lucan-Ringsend metro line would be replicated by DART+ Tunnel so just do that instead.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 741 ✭✭✭loco_scolo




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Why? Lucan-Ringsend would have to be entirely underground. That's a lot of tunnel!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,816 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    Probably because Cheeverstown has parking, and is next to a much larger capacity road that connects directly to an N7 interchange. Whereas the roads to Saggart are narrower two-lane, and would also possibly negatively affect the local lower-density residential populace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭gjim


    I'm bored so started playing with crayons.

    Some ideas for densifying the Luas network in the centre. This is fantasy of course and some of these routings may not even be physically possible:

    Three new lines:

    Yellow: Glass Bottle/Irishtown, Ringsend, Pearse St (DART connection), Dame St (Green Luas), Thomas/James (Red Luas), Kilmainham, Hueston West (DART), Zoo

    Blue: Whitehall, Drumcondra (DART connection), Bolton St (Green Luas), Church St (Red Luas), Fr Matthew bridge (Purple), Christchurch (Yellow), Clanbrassil St, Harolds X, Terenure

    Purple: Donnybrook, Morehampton Rd, SSG (Green Luas), Cuff St/George's St, Dame/Parliament St (Yellow Luas), South Quays (Blue Luas), James Joyce bridge (Red Luas), Stoneybatter, Navan Rd (future DART st?), Ashtown (DART)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Why would you stop 1km from UCD?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭gjim


    I tried to keep the focus on the centre but yeah going to UCD or even further would make more sense than stopping at Donnybrook garage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,774 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Interesting.

    Like the Yellow suggestion, could be extended from Zoo to Ashtown to meet the rail and other Luas line there. Could also be extended from Kilmainham to Lucan as an alternative to current Lucan Luas plan.

    With Metrolink stopping at Whitehall, not sure how much demand for the Northside aspect of that line. Might be better starting East at Parnell Park, travelling down Malahide Road, then Griffith Avenue before following the rest of your route.

    Purple, as said already should extend to UCD and use the Eastern bypass reservation to Sandyford. At the other end as mentioned above, from Ashtown out to Dunsink, across the M50 to Abbotstown, Ballycoolin, Tyrellstown and Hollystown.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,293 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Metrolink isn’t stopping anywhere near Whitehall.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Which perfectly shows this idea of more purely city center lines is silly. It doesn’t make sense for them to stop short, just continue them onto the suburbs!

    Continue onto UCD and beyond. Continue onto Whitehall and beyond. Continue onto Blanchardstown. Your yellow line will most likely be the Lucan Luas.

    You’ve largely created a far less useful version of the post 2042 Luas network shown in the GDA! And I don’t understand what the point of that is? While it might be a small bit cheaper to build then the full length, you really wouldn’t save that much as the city center sections tend to be more expensive then the suburban sections.

    Maybe fair enough if you are stopping short of some big expensive bridge over a river, M50, etc. but I’d see no benefit in not continuing towards UCD, Whitehall, etc.

    Here is the 2042 plan, seriously let’s just do this, it shouldn’t be that hard:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭gjim


    I don't see how my proposal is a "less useful version of T42 plans"? They have almost nothing in common.

    T42 has the extension to Bray, the extension to Finglas and the Lucan Luas which is 14km of tram line that ludicrously terminates at the gates of Trinity College instead of offering through-running. Have we learnt nothing from terminating the Green line at SSG 20 years ago?

    So only 3km of the roughly 30km of planned T42 tramway actually contributes to adding radial tram capacity in the centre of the city. 90% of the added tram capacity is in the fringes of the city and 10% between the canals.

    My crayoned lines add three lines traversing the centre of the city to the existing 2. T42 adds 1/2 a cross-city line. So a sixth of the capacity in terms of moving people in and out of the centre of the city.


    I'm all for good transport options in the entire metro area, but I'm against building outer trams lines before there is core capacity. It's the same reason why it was important to build as much of the M50 first, before building the motorways approaching Dublin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The thing is that the city core doesn’t need that much more line length to be great.

    Through running the Lucan Luas a further 2km along with Metrolink, DART+ and ensuring lines can be moved between be amazing.

    You can have several combination of lines once the Green Line stops having to do the heavy lift N-S and the Red Line W-E.

    Low hanging fruit has to be taken as well in terms of extensions. Whilst not all KM are created equally in terms of utility, that is also the same for cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    This is the 2022 GDA transport plan map with Luas+Metro services only - it features the same Luas network as shown on the map @bk posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭scrabtom


    This is the one TII put out recently in their stuff about the 20 year anniversary of the Luas.

    Looks like a very ambitious plan for the 10 years between 2040 and 2050.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Surely they would envisage a 2nd or 3rd metro line by 2050



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Ah, very interesting, I hadn't seen that, thanks.

    It looks largely the same, with mostly the same radial routes, the addition of oribtal routes and a different route for Lucan Luas in the city center being the big differences.

    There are other obvious bits they are leaving out not to impact Metrolink:

    • I'd expect Orbital West to continue North to connect the Finglas line, Metrolink, Balgirffin and Clongriffin lines (plus DART).
    • I'd expect the Swords Road line to split at Collins Avenue with the other line going towards Santry.

    I'd expect they are just waiting for Metrolink to start construction before updating the plan with the above. Don't want to give anyone the idea of building these instead of Metrolink.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    So they've sh!tcanned the central corridor along Thomas/Dame which would have opened up a whole city-wide network of possibilities. Now the long term 'vision' for trams in Dublin is one single East-West tram route along the north fringe of the centre which is already over capacity.

    And three disconnected orbital routes.

    Hopeless.

    But fortunately plans in this country are rewritten every 10 years so much of this hairbrained nonsense will very likely never happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes, it's disappointing to see that small but damaging change to the Luas Lucan route...



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Do keep in mind these are just evolving high level plans. Each route will need to be studied in detail and different options looked at.

    At a high level, the core idea is converting the core BusConnects routes into Luas lines. It has become obvious that we are at the limit of what you can do with Double Decker buses and need to upgrade the core routes to Luas.



Advertisement