Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deep space 9 revisited

15678911»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,988 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Exactly, which begs the question, if the episode isn't continuing an arc, but does contribute strongly to character development, is it even fair to call it filler?

    Filler to me is something completely and utterly devoid of any importance whatsoever, so it kinda feels wrong to tag say an episode as such if it does have a strong focal point.

    Then again, there's even actual filler episodes I do like myself, like Move Along Home....contributes nothing at all, but it has that isolated weirdness that I kinda like in a serialised episode plot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,637 ✭✭✭Rawr


    It is indeed something to consider and debade a bit on. You could almost categorise some stand alone episodes as "filler" but as you say; if it contributes to character development then it deserves a better title.

    I just watched The Visitor, a major highlight in DS9 (and arguabley all of Trek). The episode's events are completely reset at the end of the episode with only Sisco alone aware of the life-long sacrifice that the alternate Jake Sisco gave to rescue him. They don't even revisit this since Sisco's relationship with his son was already pretty strong. (Which was the core theme of the episode).

    In terms of the overall story arc of DS9, you could say that this was "filler". But we can't say that because The Visitor is an absolute classic.

    I guess I'd lean towards your definintion of a stand alone episode that adds nothing and is clearly there to fill space. For me a filler usually smacks of a cheap rush-job they made with little notice or budget. Shades of Grey is the ultimate Trek filler. Although it was due to a strike at the time, that episode exsited soley to fill space, so much so most of it was just re-used clips. I think if you can detect that the episode's origin rests in the need to fill airtime, and that there's no real soul to the story…than I feal that is a Filler Episode.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    TNG could have genuine filler because it wasn't serialised, and the characters never really grew exactly. Although they could be deepened somewhat.

    But I think every bit of DS9 works even when it's bad. You watch Season 1 and sure some episodes are a slog, but they often contain character moments that do work even within something ****. They give time for the characters to grow on you, for their nuances to pop, and perhaps most importantly for the actors to connect with them.

    Obviously it would be great if they could churn out 26 A-rated episodes every season, but I still think they all offer something. I used to do selective DS9 rewatches, but this year I've done a full one, and I was surprised how much I got out of even the worst episodes (except Let He Who is Without Sin)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,485 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Yeah some of the episodes are a slog, but maybe you'll find the B plot interesting if the A plot doesn't grab you.

    And among the episodes, usually different people have a soft spot for different episodes.
    I quite like Dramatis Personae, for some people Progress hit a spot.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,215 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Filler is probably a phrase I got from TNG and Bab5 where they seem to go light on the budget for a few episodes then have a big episode with more budget.

    But ye are right some of these are gold in themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭eadrom


    The light on budget episodes are bottle episodes, not filler.

    I really don't think the concept of a "filler episode" makes much sense when talking about 90s Trek. With the exception maybe of DS9's later seasons, there were very few episodes that really tied together in any sort of continuing arc. By most definitions of "filler episode", you could probably conclude that 90%+ of TNG was filler, along with almost all of Voyager, and probably even the majority of DS9, too. The fact that you had half a season or so of DS9 with one episode leading into the next was exiting and memorable because it was the exception, not the norm.

    Otherwise it was almost always just standalone stories with a beginning, a middle, and an end, that have no real consequences on the episodes that came afterwards nor much of a care for what came before.

    And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Well I would disagree on that definition of bottle episode — to me that's specifically something shot on existing sets, mostly with main cast only, with limited special effects, and also is light on budget.

    It's hard to identify bottle episodes on Trek though because so often they're only using existing sets anyway! TNG's 'Disaster' is probably one, but it's harder to think of one in DS9. Maybe 'Civil Defence' or 'In The Cards' but even those had new sets or special guests!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,215 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Since you're making heavy weather of "fillers episodes" and not letting it go, I'll double down. Usually episodes with a minimal amount of CGI, effects, sets and actors.

    I'll say this rarely applies to ds9 because there were so many classic one off episodes one of my favourites was "...The Magnificent Ferengi..." Another is "...Trials and Tribble-ations..". Another is when they sell Sisko desk.

    But there some around religion I would happily have skipped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭eadrom


    Okay but that's almost word for word the definition of bottle episode on the site linked to (sorry if you missed the link in the other post). Produced cheaply, with a few regular cast, and existing sets:

    In episodic television, a bottle episode or bottle show is an episode produced cheaply and restricted in scope to use as few regular cast members, effects and sets as possible.

    They even specifically mention TNG as their first example:

    The TV series Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987-1994) would include bottle episodes during a season, with the intention of keeping the cost down so that other episodes could have more money for special effects.

    Anyway, bottle episode isn't the same as a filler episode. Bottle episodes aren't necessarily filler, and "filler episode" doesn't really make sense when talking about episodic television. New week, new planet, new adventure. There's very little "arc" to worry about progressing, most of the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,215 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Personally an episode stuck in someone's head as Picard kept doing, or visualised in the 1950s or moralising or some such is filler. Though I understand why they do them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,215 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Another favourite is that sailing one with Sisko and Jake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    That was a funny one. It was "sweet" but definitely wouldn't call it a favourite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,215 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Favourite of mine. Love the idea of solar sailing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I also love that one — I really love any Sisko family bonding moments and that one is full of them. Plus it shows a real shift in Ben's connection to his role as Emissary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,669 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's Only a Paper Moon is essentially a bottle episode and is a very significant one.

    Unrelated I was watching the final episodes yesterday. The ones where Odo is sick and I was really irrationally annoyed about how Odo's hair was all scraggy when he was sick. His hair is made of the same stuff as the rest of him so should degrade the same.

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭Evade


    It's the same when his "hair" gets messy, it should always stay in place



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I could never understand how they could not, over time, implement LCARS?

    The difference of the Federation terminal screen vs the Cardassian sets would really have highlighted the alien feel



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ShuttlePod One, in Enterprise, was one such bottle episode but made the character Reed an actual human



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,637 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I think they somewhat imply that the intergrated systems of the station was so very different to Federation standards that they just couldn't put in LCARS, Majel Barrett voice and all…

    It's touched upon when Zimmerman asks why DS9 doesn't have an EMH. Sisco mentions that they couldn't due to compatibility issues.

    You do see bits of LCARS here and there. From PADDs, Desk workstations, Keiko's school and various wall-mounted LCARS "white boards" that I'm guessing were shipped into rooms that didn't already have a Cardassian screen. Given the amount of trouble The Chief had with getting DS9 functional in the early days, my guess is that replacing the entire computer core was more trouble than it was worth. Also, the Bajorans had probably gotten used to Cardassian tech during the Occupation and likely had an easier time using & maintaining DS9 as it is.



Advertisement