Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1108210831085108710881855

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    To be honest I think the central contract is no longer needed.

    Previously the provinces lost their Ireland players for many games but that no longer applies since there aren't games during international windows.

    Munster are affected by having Nash and Crowley with Ireland but it isn't recognised with central contracts. Ulster with McCloskey who doesn't start but is with all the squads. Connacht with Hansen. Leinster with Jgp.

    The system is outdated and needs to be reviewed. Provinces should reap the rewards either the year their players are selected or the following year. So if Crowley plays 8 games this year then munster get 8times X amount added to their budget the next year to use how they like. Leinster get the same for all their players. They can invest in their academy or add it to wages.

    Leinster would still get the most benefit and they should. They provide the most players.

    But players like Hansen is a full time player for ireland for years before he's on a central contract. And connacht will have all the downside of that but no benefit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭custom_build


    Alooof

    You are completely contradicting yourself. On the one hand, Leinster are at an advantage and thus more competitive because there is an imbalance in the number of CC's they have.

    On the other hand you are saying that they would still be as competitive with less CC's as they have been for the last ~8 years.

    Which is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    A draft system not being feasible has hardly anything to do with provincial loyalty. It works in American football because the money offered to a player who gets drafted is far too good to turn down. It's millions of dollars for multi-year contracts. Of course anyone's going to jump at that. Talking about a draft when academy players get paid 8000 euros a year (might be an out of date figure) is pie in the sky stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    Wouldn’t it end up being the same i.e. Leinster players getting more as a total. And if it's not, who are you going to take money off to pay the other Province's more?



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,374 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    To be honest I think the central contract is no longer needed.

    Previously the provinces lost their Ireland players for many games but that no longer applies since there aren't games during international windows.

    That was NEVER the purpose of the central contract though, it was more a by product. The main reason was to keep the best players in ireland by paying them centrally beyond the provincial budget so that they weren't attracted abroad.

    But players like Hansen is a full time player for ireland for years before he's on a central contract. And connacht will have all the downside of that but no benefit.

    The stats dont bear that out though. Hasen played 1100 minutes for connacht last year. 14 games in which he was a starter in every single one. Connacht had 25 games last season, so Hansen started 56% of connachts games.

    Take mcclosy for another example. Again, 1120 minutes for ulster. starting 15 out of 15 games. Ulster had 24 games last season, SMCC started 63% of them.

    compared that to centrally contracted Hugo Keenan (selected as back who didnt get injured last season) who played 960 minutes for leinster, starting 12 from 12. Leinster had 30 games last season, so Keenan started 40%.

    so while the basic of your point is correct (provinces dont get to use test players as much) non centrally contracted players do certainly play more games for theri clubs that CC players, so the extent to "Hansen is a full time player for ireland" doesnt really bear out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    That isn't at all why the NFL draft works.

    NFL draft works because it is a monopoly and players have no choice but to go through the draft or they cannot play the top level of the sport. The terms of a player coming out of the draft now is also worse than it was in years past, where they have no right to negotiate the value of their first contract, which lasts for 4+ years.

    If IRFU brought in a draft and a young star Leinster player is 'drafted' to Munster he could just tell them to f**k off and go get paid likely more to play in the Top 14, the Premiership, or even another URC side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Yes. It would more or less end up the same. I don't have a issue with leinster getting funded more. They are the most successful province and provide the most players to Ireland.

    But it helps a situation like Nash, who started the games he was fit for but will never have a central contract. Or the years that jgp was a clear starter but paid by leinster and all the rest periods that went with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    As sydthebeat pointed out, that is a fundamental misunderstanding of the goal of central contracts.

    They are there to ensure the best Irish players remain in Ireland and under the control of the IRFU.

    In that regard, they have worked fantastically over the years and the only real material miscalculation ironically negatively impacted the baddies in Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I would think Cian Prendergast would be a good candidate. But he's on a team that is underperformed. Casey doesn't deserve it yet. Crowley will get a CC. In Munster, the best prospects at the moment would be Ahern, only if he breaks into the Irish squad. Ulster have none. Maybe McAnn down the road and fingers crossed, Wilson. I'd put money on Wilson to be the starting th for Ireland in a couple of years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Well, there's that too, but clearly the money is a huge factor, otherwise you'd have potential draftees opting to get a regular job rather than taking up the contract.

    The other thing about a potential draft in Irish rugby is that you'd be sending your hottest prospects to a set up with a less good track record of developing players. They'd end up as less good players. They don't care about that in gridiron because there's no USA national team competing in international competition you want to produce the best players possible for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You left out in that analysis that the other provinces are also reaping their underinvestment and stupid decisions over the years when it comes to their academies and player pathways.

    If Munster had gotten their act together sooner and for the last 15 years were producing talented young players at the same rate as they are currently then the gap wouldn't be as wide as it is. I'd argue that if they continue at the current pace then the gap should continue to close - a statement many Munster fans would have claimed at the end of last season and I'd say many would have said this time last week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Money is a factor but only because there isn't another league where they can earn similar. IRFU doesn't only have to worry about high paying jobs like the NFL would, but also other leagues.

    Agree with your other point. The average length of an NFL player career is 3.3 years, less than the length of their cost controlled contracts coming out of the draft.

    Irish rugby doesn't have the playing population to churn through players like that if they aren't immediately showing progress. Having an annual draft means provinces are enticed to go after the shiny new young player each year, knowing that you get another shot the following year no matter how poorly your development program is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    As exampled here with an impressive efficiency, you just don't deal with a representative sample of Irish rugby fans on this site. It's important to stress this for fans of the other provinces, who may otherwise feel that such uninformed, childish spite reflects a majority opinion. In my experience, it very much does not.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I think this is a fair and reasonable post on the topic.

    One point though - a lot of the “structural” advantages people cite about Leinster: the private schools, the population & demographics, the stadiums nearby etc to move games to and grow the gate receipts etc - all of these things have largely always been the case, or certainly have been in place for 50 years or more.

    So I don’t think they’re as significant a factor as they’re frequently ascribed to be, because Leinster haven’t historically been so dominant in terms of internationals / CC players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,011 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm not. You're conflating things.

    The significant imbalance I'm talking about begins next season. Leinster have been the most consistent club in Europe for the last 8 years before this scale of an imbalance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭custom_build


    To be fair, I am literally parroting exactly what you have said. You are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

    Is there a big enough player pool and finances in Ireland to have three teams at the level Leinster are at? Definitely not.

    So the choice is to dilute Leinster so that we have four teams at a Scottish club level. Or we continue to let Leinster develop world class talent for Ireland and themselves and hope that the other provences change their structures to be more competitive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    There's absolutely nothing spiteful or childish about that statement, it's a simple fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Sorry that facts hurt your feelings and you choose to attack the poster rather than the post. We'll see if the mods give you the soft treatment you usually get from them.

    There is clear evidence of how Munster made a complete mess of their academy system for a decade and only after they made significant changes that their system they also started producing the far higher quality we're seeing now. You must believe that is pure coincidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,011 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You're literally not. Here's what you've claimed I said:

    On the one hand, Leinster are at an advantage and thus more competitive because there is an imbalance in the number of CC's they have.

    The issue I have is with what the imbalance of CC's will be next season.

    "Will be". Not "is" currently.

    Do you see the difference?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I dealt with that in my last response to you and instead of responding to it you've just repeated it at another poster:

    As for the outlook of going 10:3, we aren't even seeing some huge shift in spending due to it - we may never will. Leinster are losing Molony, Jenkins, Ngatai, Alalaatoa (plus other squad players) and so far they are bringing in Snyman and 6 months of Barrett. I'd argue those wouldnt be far off netting from a cost perspective, if not Leinster will be paying less (though it could change with a TH signing).

    Leinster are sacrificing quantity for quality in their transactions thus far. It isn't like they taking the potential two extra central contracts and bringing in 2 extra players at a similar cost.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭custom_build


    Fair enough, hadn't factored in the scenario where two central contracts would be the downfall of Irish rugby.

    I really yearn for the good old days when everything was more equitable in Irish rugby. (last week).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,011 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You really must not be reading my posts.

    I'm not calling for equality. I'm calling for less inequality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭custom_build


    If you can't see the irony in those words you just typed, you're lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I haven't been reading all the thread, so maybe you've said this already, but how do you get to where you want to be? The best, most important players will be paid the most, no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You've saved yourself a lot of time.

    It has been done to death with them - they have been asked again and again but have no credible solution that moves the needle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    Surely Nash would have received extra for his international caps already. The more arguments I hear the more I think nothing should be changed and central contracts are working perfectly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,783 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    None of the other provinces ever had a subsidy from the IRFU that allowed them to have 9 starting players they didn't have to pay for in fairness

    Yeah the other provinces spent a few quid on NIQs on some of the rare occasions when they had a bit of cash in the bag, they've had to pay for all but 1 of their own players this coming season though so that makes it harder you know?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,436 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Munster for a period did have a poor academy structure but were always behind leinster anyway at age grade and wereonly ahead of leinster from players who cane through clubs scene(adults) in early years of pro rugby and leinster wete miles behind.

    Munster started to change their whole approach around developing players through youths and schools interpro teams around 2012/2013 and it just takes time for that to show at pro level. Their systems are now very good but thats 10 years in the making.

    Biggest issue for munster hasnt been the last 10 or ao years but the years before thatas systems ans structures are totally different and improved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Munster did when they were winning HC in the noughties



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Don’t really understand what point you’re trying to make here.

    Obviously the other provinces haven’t had this situation previously - but that’s directly because they don’t produce enough quality players.

    The current CC situation didn’t create itself - the roots of this situation where we now find ourselves were sown well over a decade ago when a lot of the current crop were coming through.



Advertisement
Advertisement