Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Site is a graveyard - How can boards save itself? [Threadbanned users in 1st post]

1252628303146

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    there’s only one forum that I know of that asks you to support your position and that’s politics if I’m not mistaken - all other forums are discussion - sure back up your claims if you want to but there’s no onus on you to do so -this is a discussion forum not a fcking university -

    in addition I note that you have conveniently ignored my example where I said of continuous requests for references over and over again and then criticising and near mocking those references when posters provide them in good faith - that was the crux of my argument- so your counter argument is meaningless in this example and anyway only appropriate to one forum- politics if even



  • Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭ Charleigh Tinkling Squadron


    we can’t (and shouldn’t) moderate that type of thing. If that makes you upset I can’t help you. Asking for evidence to support a claim and then rejecting evidence is bad faith posting and it MIGHT be actionable depending but if there’s any poster(s) who engage in such behaviour just ignore them in future.

    You’re basically saying someone should be banned because they’re slightly annoying to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    it’s reassuring that you’re listening to what’s been said in this thread - there’s a few of us who post in particular threads and frankly we thought we were all going mad -this thread has been a great opportunity to highlight low level trolling which has been a cause of many an argument and ban, but not unfortunately for the low level troll . Whatever comes of this thread I’ll be watching closely to see just how much we’ve been listened to and just how much things will change in relation to low level trolling



  • Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭ Charleigh Tinkling Squadron


    Ah here man you can’t seriously sit here and demand that mods moderate posters asking you to support claims with evidence and then complain it’s “only for the politics forum”.

    I mean come on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I see at least some boards moderators need education on what low level trolling is.
    I’ve spelt it out as clearly as I can but you for whatever reason either don’t get it or accept it .

    Oh and by the way- do you have an official boards reference you could quote for me refuting the SPECIFIC example I gave that it’s not trolling?
    Thanks (smiley face)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Again it’s the “40 times over and over” then subsequent “ mocking behaviour” description I gave you’ve conveniently decided to ignore - funny that

    I’ve seen enough mod warnings in my time to know that REFERENCES ARE NOT OBLIGATORY and also THERE IS NO OBLIGATION ON ANY POSTER TO SUPPLY THEM - so why are you saying that when I was recently asked 3 TIMES for an online link and I refused 3 times - that YOU wouldn’t do anything about that???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,150 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I don't really believe that's entirely relevant to the point I was trying to make - I was adressing a different poster about a different issue?

    But, in any case, to address your point - Is it really that onerous to be asked for evidence or links to something to support a claim? Fair enough, it isn't a court of law, but if someone is asserting something then someone with an opposing view is usually going to look for links or evidence or whatever. If I had credible evidence to back me up then I'd love to drown them in it - I'd relish it - but, on the other hand, if I didn't have evidence that stacked up, then, yeah, I can see how I would get annoyed by people asking me for it.If you were having a debate with someone down in the pub you could get asked for evidence - it's a pretty common place feature of debate.

    I absolutely agree with you that low level trolling is a feature of the site, but, most of it does fall within the rules if the poster isn't actually being abusive. Pretty hard to police that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,371 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Really a mod would need to be following the thread to see the patterns of low level trolling you are describing. Its not something that will be obvious from one or two reported posts. Dont have to follow every thread. A sample.

    If someone makes a definite statement of fact I think it is reasonable to look for evidence but from your description this seems to be demanded of expressions of opinion / concerns.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    a fair point you were replying to a different poster - apologises

    It’s good to see that a seasoned poster agrees low level trolling exists - at least that’s a start



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “Really a mod would need to be following the thread to see the pattern you are describing.”

    Thats why it’s called low level trolling - it’s hard to see it -and yes I’m referring to demands for references where posters are simply posting their opinion - not claiming black is white etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,371 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Hence my suggestion they need to follow a sample of threads. Not just reports. I know they are maxxed out and cant follow all posts in a forum.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭ Charleigh Tinkling Squadron


    you need to calm down my friend. You’ve been very hostile with all of us and it’s not conducive to positive results.

    I frankly will not engage with you any further until you wish to discuss it civilly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    so you don’t get parody either - ok

    I can see we’re never going to agree



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    Why do posters think moderators aren't aware of low-level trolling? But, as you say it's not something that's necessarily easy to moderate.

    We have a rule in the Conspiracy Theories forum that you cannot badger other posters demanding proof. If you've asked a question 2 or 3 times and haven't been given an answer you're not going to get it, so move on. Posters have been warned for repeatedly asking the same questions and demanding proof.

    If someone states something as fact they should prove it with links if possible. If someone states something as their opinion or their belief that doesn't need proof.

    Low-level trolls are on the radar. It's up to posters to not engage. If you call someone a pr1ck you'll be pulled up for it regardless of the background. We have an 'ignore' feature that can be used. You can always pretend you didn't notice a comment. If you feel someone is haranguing you or badgering you report it, with a few links and examples if you have them. Something might not be done immediately but the covert comments tend to turn more overt when they are not getting the reaction they want.



  • Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭ Charleigh Tinkling Squadron


    100%, these individuals are cute enough to stay behind the line but can push buttons enough to get other posters in trouble.

    They’re best treated like any other troll and consistently ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    no it’s not up to posters not to engage low level trolls as you have said/ it’s up to mods to listen to posters when they call out low level trolls

    Frankly your whitewash of this issue along with another moderators ill informed view of it gives me all I need to know about how this issue will be handled in the future

    Thanks for nothing - I was hoping there might be a breakthrough but you’re obviously only interested in totally low hanging fruit such as abusive name calling that a bot could probably deal with - so be it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,371 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Thats not any kind of real solution and this pushing of buttons is what is driving decent posters away. Hence this thread.

    Even if I put them on ignore I still see replies from sincere posters challenging their crap.

    To me its a bit of a cop out answer from a mod to advocate that.

    As suggested, follow a sample of theads in the forum you moderate and if you see this kind of niggling, low level trolling act on it.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,606 ✭✭✭nachouser


    I dunno, you'd probably need to spell out what you mean by low-level trolls. Or what threads they're active on and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I’m just going to quote this thread from here on in to a poster who low levels troll me and I’ll let the former mods mods caragory mods and admins all decide themselves how they deal with it - because frankly I don’t give a sh1 te anymore - they’re not listening



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    I don't know where you got that idea. I've told you they're on the radar. I told you how they were handled in one particular forum. Earlier on in the thread I mentioned a few other low level trolls who ended up crossing the line and becoming permanently sitebanned. Others are still on the site but generally keeping their nose clean, for now. Moderators are aware. They're not doing nothing.

    "Thanks for nothing"? Really? Almost 900 replies in a very civil thread. Lots of communication over and back. Lots of feedback taken on board. Lots of responses from Mods and Admins. Some forums are incredibly difficult to moderate. Some posters are intent on turning every single thread into a conflict. That can be difficult when it's not one or two posters but multiple posters on both "sides" engaging in arguing with each other rather than discussing the topic.

    There's no simple fix all solution. If there was it would be implemented. There have been great suggestions put forward here and there has been assurances that some of these suggestions will be taken on board and implemented. But if you want to believe nothing is being done and nothing will be done then I'm unlikely to change your opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    you are talking and have talked in general about “taking things on board “ - when will boards/the admins etc issue a very clear statement around the particular actions you’re going to take?

    And furthermore without getting into quoting posts which I actually hate doing, you did belittle me around my description of low level trolling as did another moderator and what is expected which is in essence either it’s “in our head” or we should “ignore it”

    Clearly my issue is low level trolling. Clearly there isn’t a “solution” - clearly I’m expected as a poster to accept 3 demands from a poster for “proof” - which is known as badgering a poster btw - clearly posters who travel from thread to thread just asking for “proof” will never be banned because “it’s too difficult to catch them”?

    Then fine - this is what I’m going to do from here on in - the next poster who badgers me in the way I’ve described in my posts today I’m just going to quote this thread to them - and I’ll let you deal with it -and I don’t expect to get banned for doing so either btw



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    I don't know if a clear statement will be made. Charters are there for rules of each forum. Moderators may update their charters. I'm not sure. The feedback is being listened to and changes are being discussed. I can't tell you more than that at the moment.

    I don't think I belittled you. It certainly wasn't my intention. I never once mentioned anything is "in your head". I did mention ignoring trolls. The phrase "don't feed the trolls" is as old as the internet, or at least as old as when broadband made the internet accessible to all. I didn't just come up with the idea!

    You're not expected to accept anything. Report posts/posters that your feel are badgering. One forum was able to stop this type of posting. There's no reason another forum can't do the same. There are many forums, many moderators and many many different types of posters. Suggestions are being taken on board and changes will be made. Different forums will do what they can with the specific problems they face.

    Nobody is being ignored or belittled.

    Post edited by Big Bag of Chips on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,938 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Belittling? That's not the way I read the feedback you received at all.

    Low level trolling is hard to spot - you appear to be a self proclaimed expert and expect Mods to be up to your percieved standard. The problem is what a poster percieves as actionable may or may not actually be actionable.

    Your last paragraph …. When you believe there is an issue, report it. From there, a Mod can look into it would be my advice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    There is a fair deal of the type of low level trolling that @Oscar_Madison describes. I have no idea how it can be dealt with as those doing it are very careful to stay civil. They engage in a circular pattern of posts that go round and round through the same cycle without ever elaborating much if at all. Answering them is like catching as slippery eel, they're immediately onto the next tangent and when that is queried, the next tangent etc etc then back to their starting position. Every now & then, a sly angle is inserted inviting others to write something they shouldn't and so on. It's easy to say, well ignore it but sooner or later, someone is drawn into the dance. So the whole thread never goes anywhere much as it's clogged up with above and the main collateral damage is a list of thread bans.

    You could argue that the pattern described above is perfectly legitimate but it has a stifling effect at the same time. There is a relationship between this repeated pattern above and what seems to be called 'soap boxing' but what it is, is harder to put a finger on.

    This is partly why I suggested long running more controversial threads could have specific moderators, as they would likely be able to spot this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,233 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I spent a number of posts trying to describe low level trolling - it’s not an easy thing to do but I think I’ve described it well enough. It’s even admitted here it’s not easy to describe so I think k my efforts aren’t half bad but they’re not the only example of low level trolling

    I was greatly challenged by at least one moderator of this site this evening on this thread and told to “calm down” - it doesn’t make you feel particularly good about yourself when you’re trying to change things for the better - I may not be the most articulate and heart can rule head but given the responses they’re the same you’d get in a moderator response to an issue on a normal thread - change what you want I don’t care - you’ve got the feedback - dump it if you wish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,576 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    I had the exact same thing happen to me.

    I contacted one of the admins, he explained I had received a warning the previous night which coincidently was about 10 minutes before some other warning was due to expire.

    Because of the points accumulation I was banned temporarily, coincidently the mod who issued them was quite correctly contradicted by me in open discussion on a forum he doesn't moderate about a week previously with regard to him breaking the law and starting a thread about it.

    I had received no notification of any infraction or warning or reason why I was banned, after I contacted the admin fella the next day the messages and idiotic excuse for the warning appeared.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,640 ✭✭✭Xander10


    To me there is a total lack of any common sense on the football forum.

    I remember you giving me a "yellow Card" for posting in a thread about the madness of managers being sack, I posted:

    "WBA sacked Bilic after beating Man City. The relegation survivor specialist, BFS came in, didn't exactly go to plan.."

    For brevity, on West Ham forums, people all the time would mention the likes of some as, BFS and FLJ, all the time and no one would feel it offensive.

    I would understand, say, a Liverpool fan, when beating Man Utd, saying, look at old Whiskey Nose..Gutted blah blah blah.

    Q.

    1. were you offend by me using BFS ?
    2. Do you think any other poster on the soccer forum was offended by that post?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,938 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    There's literally one of those low level trolls in this very thread, an obvious re-reg who has been making posts that on the surface do not break any rules, but are clearly posted to stir for reactions, just as he does elsewhere. That he didn't get any bites here is a good thing, but I would suggest it demonstrates that in a thread full of regulars most people knew exactly what he was up to and knew not to engage.

    Do I know his VPN details and can I identify him in a court of law? Of course not. But I'm not stupid and neither are most people, we can see what is happening in front of us. Remember, pattern recognition is very much a human trait.

    Its almost a microcosm of the site. He can troll away until he does get a bite but nothing can be done.

    On other sites the general population would police the behaviour by calling it out, but if I was to call him a troll here I would get warned, and he would just adore that.

    I don't expect mods to ban trolls just on my say so, but acknowledging that it does happen would be something at least.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,938 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    It is Literally in the Soccer Charter Not to use BFS as it stands for Big Fat Sam - referencing Sam Allerdyce - so I fail to see why you were surprised to get a Warning for that. As per your Q1 - I don't agree with labelling a manager in such a way - fat shaming - not sure why you would think it is okay to be honest.

    We have a Feedback Thread each year and every poster is entitled to post their feedback and any ideas where the Soccer Charter could be changed.

    Only going back 2 years for Warnings - instead of them staying pretty much permanently - came from such a Feedback thread.

    My advice is to post in this years one and take it from there.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    That he didn't get any bites here is a good thing, but I would suggest it demonstrates that in a thread full of regulars most people knew exactly what he was up to and knew not to engage.

    And it has been a while since he posted here because he was pretty much ignored.

    Maybe charters need to be reviewed. But we see how heated people get here. If we start allowing people to call "troll" on thread I'd say by tomorrow evening we'd have a number of threads on the front page with the topic completely forgotten and threads descended into pages of arguments calling each other trolls and worse.

    But, it is a suggestion and I'll let the relevant mods discuss it.

    Moderators were made aware of this thread. They have been told to read through it. It has a lot of information, suggestions and valid complaints. All suggestions aren't going to be possible in all forums but if it's decided that something could be worth changing it will be changed. The site is so broad that what works in one forum mightn't work in another.

    But all suggestions are being looked at. Some won't work at all. Some are definitely worth putting in place.

    Post edited by Big Bag of Chips on


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement