Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Site is a graveyard - How can boards save itself? [Threadbanned users in 1st post]

1212224262746

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Then you agree to disagree.

    The problem is, people come into debate forums not to debate or learn about different viewpoints, but to vent and push agendas.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 20,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Couldn't agree more. One of boards problems are those who insist their views are correct. Other posters are lost to the thread and then they are left to talk among themselves.





  • I feel there is such corruption on the site that I am going to leave, also my log-in has just been compromised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,230 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    did you just get a compromised password message from Google? I did just about an hour ago - I don’t think it was about boards per se though

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,598 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You deliberately missed my point that they had been shown to be wrong through evidence and refused to acknowledge this.

    Despite what some would like to claim on most subjects there is a right and a wrong and that is established through facts and evidence. If one party refuses to acknowledge this then they are not in a discussion but are preaching.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 26,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    Please PM me whatever evidence you have of that, and I'll get the admins on it.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,765 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Demographics are definitely a factor but the big change and all the massive problems associated with that caused a colossal slump that never recovered.

    Some forums are still reasonably busy, others I frequented daily went from very active to almost inactive. I now use Reddit a lot more than Boards, I prefer Boards but traffic isn't there for many forums post-change.

    One or two forums/threads appear busy but it's a small handful of people locked in a death spiral argument where both sides refuse to concede any points.

    There's two specific threads on Current Affairs, every 30, 40, 50 pages I drop back in just to see and it's the same posters feature every time, essentially making the exact same points ad nauseam.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I actually addressed your point carefully. There is hardly a subject where evidence is not debatable at some level. Perhaps it's true in the case of some mathematical conventions but not in the real world. The world is not black & white, right or wrong, good or bad, evil or holy - it's shades of these things. So your claim is fallacious.

    The only relevance of this is that no one should presume on any thread that they are wholly right and others are wholly wrong.



  • Posts: 6,598 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Unless a person is prepared to acknowledge documented facts there can be no debate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Fact is most people think they are right and based on today's media they are told they are always right and everyone else is wrong.

    Boards in reality is whats boards always was, is it a graveyard? no

    Will it massively improve in membership? probably no

    Could it in future? very possible

    Should boards change? I say no

    Whats the point? you end up chasing something which you will never be and lose the point of it in first place. Which has killed many websites.

    Boards should never try to be a twitter, which is a cesspool and always will be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,367 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You have jumped there from matters of fact to opinion eg black or white, good or evil, right or wrong.

    To suggest such facts or evidence only exist in mathematical conventions is nonsense.

    If someone makes a statement of fact the onus is on them to support it. Such statements can be falsified with evidence.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    No… consider the posters argument as stated above

    "Despite what some would like to claim on most subjects there is a right and a wrong and that is established through facts and evidence. If one party refuses to acknowledge this then they are not in a discussion but are preaching."

    They claim that most threads/debates on boards can be resolved through the idea that there is a right and a wrong and that is established through facts and evidence. Others can judge the value of this argument as well but as far as I'm concerned that is straightforward dogmatism and should have no place on boards. And just who is preaching here?? Certainly not I. Keeping an open mind is always advisable.

    So we shall leave it there and agree to disagree.



  • Posts: 6,598 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is exactly the sort of behaviour I am describing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,833 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    There is no fear that with the banning of posters that one poster describes , (and I think they are vastly under selling themselves on their understanding of being a dick btw ) , that that thread will become an echo chamber for the left ..the opposite is true .

    It is a draw for trolls and reregs on top of regular posters by its nature ,..right vs left .. and those who are convinced their opinions are the only correct one , with constant pile ons on posters who post against the narrative.

    It has to be said that there are some very good balanced posters there also , but they are not the issue . Any reasonable discussion is destroyed by posters who constantly dump links and try to bait other posters , insulting and discussing other posters and generally ' being a dick .'

    And it isn't all on the side that furze99 is asserting .

    Hence they trigger moderation .

    Without good moderation any differing opinion would be bullied from that thread .

    There is nothing amiss at all with the moderation on Current Affairs , that is just the opinion of those who cannot ever accept that they are ever uncivil or break the charter .

    The mods do a very fair job , just not enough mods on that busy forum to see all the abuse that some posters get Reporting is sometimes the only way to highlight the trolling and harassment of a few posters on the thread

    One of the nastiest things is the way posters perceived to be on the opposing side are discussed between others , labelled and otherwise persistently trolled with incorrect statements being attributed to them on order to bait and inflame .

    Saying people are ' thin skinned ' and 'easily insulted ' is subjective. The same posters who dole this treatment out would find it unbearable if happening repeatedly to themselves every time they post .Its harassment and an attempt to silence other posters and /or bully them from the thread .

    I think what has occurred on that thread is that those who persist posting against the narrative are the more stubborn individuals who refuse to be ground down ! And who are very careful how they post because they know that they will and are being reported for the slightest thing .

    So saying all the reporting is on one side is untrue … both sides have had warnings and bans .

    .Do I think Boards is dying ? No but death by a thousand cuts might be the future because of the Vanilla issues.

    There is a thread on feedback for those bugs which Mike comes back to regularly to update but it is very slow going and as soon as one issue is sorted it appears to cause another .

    As for younger posters ..I don't see too many having the interest to discuss politics but would have thought football , gaming , and after hours would attract more .

    As a rule I only frequent for Music and Home and have seen very little overt moderation on these sites and yet they still roll on . Not so busy on the Home front since the changeover , don't know why .

    People tend to be happier and amicable on these threads, and agree to disagree .

    So I suppose CA and Politics just are difficult because people tend to take it so seriously.

    Maybe that's the key takeaway ..we should all relax a bit ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,367 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I agree with most of that but isnt there a contradiction between saying all is ok with moderation but then expressing concern about below behaviour?

    "One of the nastiest things is the way posters perceived to be on the opposing side are discussed between others , labelled and otherwise persistently trolled with incorrect statements being attributed to them on order to bait and inflame."

    Do you think the moderation is sufficiently wise to such conduct and sanctioning it accordingly?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,833 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I think it is , but as I said there are not enough mods to see it all or see it as it is happening .

    It would need a mod reading along with every busy thread or even the most contentious ones .



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,555 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    If people can't state their own opinion/belief without attacking other posters, name calling, belittling etc then THAT is being a dick. Have the courage of your convictions to stand by the strength of your argument without needing to pile on someone else's.

    The problem, as many have stated, is the sheer volume of this type of "debate". It's disruptive and childish. It's impossible to moderate and it takes far too much time - every warning generates a PM. Deleting posts annoys posters. Warning posts annoys posters. Ignoring posts and hoping adults (!) will cop on and move on annoys posters.

    I believe moderators do what they can with the hands they are dealt.

    But I'd love to give my zero tolerance a go and see how long it would take people to cop on! We've done it on a few different threads and forums and funnily enough it gets rid of a lot of that crap. Posters feel it's worth taking the chance because they may or may not get pulled up on it. If you KNEW you were going to get pulled on uncivil, baiting posting every time you'd be less likely to engage in that type of posting.

    Nobody on here will be banned for an opinion. However, you may be warned/banned for how you express that opinion.

    And we'll always have the trolls who love to troll!

    Post edited by Big Bag of Chips on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    Warned by a mod for this, What a joke, I rest my case



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,868 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Not a joke at all.

    That was a snide comment suggesting mods were not being open and honest.

    That's EXACTLY the type of post which should be moderated, and I say that as a normal user and not a moderator



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,555 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    @Green Peter most of your posts on this thread have been exactly the type of posts people are complaining about ruining discussions. You've had a number of posts offering nothing except digs at moderators. You've mentioned "circling wagons", you've described moderators in derogatory terms (The Mayo jersey comment is unforgivable!) and said the thread is uncomfortable for moderators and will be shut down.

    You've actually contributed very little by way of workable suggestions or constructive feedback.

    This thread is not uncomfortable for moderators. In fact it is giving moderators an opportunity to explain clearly certain processes to posters that they might otherwise not understand. The thread is nowhere near being shut down. But we are asking all posters to keep it civil and stick to providing constructive feedback and suggestions.

    If you'd like to do that please do. If you're intent on just throwing in the odd oneliner dig then you can expect to be pulled up for it.

    A big complaint here has been moderators and how they interact with posters. Posters have to play their part in that too, and - don't be a dick.

    Post edited by Big Bag of Chips on


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,244 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    You're absolutely right, any name-calling or generalising should be actioned as it's attacking the poster, not the post. The same goes for people who deem X or Y as far left or woke or whatever buzzword is topical these days.

    You can point out why a person's views (ie their posts) may be seen as racist/far right/far left/proving them to be Santa Claus with a reasoned discussion of course, but you can't outright call someone names. It's breaching two rules really, the don't be a dick rule and attacking the poster instead of the post one too.

    I presume these posts that are name-calling are being reported? In fast moving forums and threads such as CA there simply isn't time for mods to read every post of every thread.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 20,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mods, CMods and admins have engaged openly on the thread. There hasn't been any circling of the wagons or any suggestion of nothing to see here.

    That kind of rhetoric isn't helpful, and must make them wonder why they're bothering. I get that there's the very odd bad mod, but attempting to dismiss them all would be the normal posters circling the wagons and ignoring their responses, it works both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,278 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I gave up wasting my time reporting posts because nothing was being actioned upon.

    If you look at the banned users on the first page immigration or anything related to trans topics you would see bias moderation if you are a regular reader of CA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,278 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    A bizarre post to be honest from reading this thread.

    It's the first time I have seen mods engage and discussing feedback.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,938 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    You might want to read again so. Alot of questions/opinions have been asked/given by plently of Mods/CMods/Admins in fairness.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,244 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Since I stopped modding that forum I'm not a regular reader tbh so I've no idea. Just providing my own opinion on how I'd view what you mentioned in your post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,278 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Apologies if I worded it badly on the phone on a walk, I was attempting to praise mods contributing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    So it's ok for you to call me a dick, I rest my case



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,660 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    In the last few years was fascinated with how saying "sleepy Joe Biden" would be a certain forum ban. So bizarre.

    Sorry state of affairs if you can't even criticize the president of a foriegn country.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement