Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Boeing 737 Max

Options
16791112

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Fair play to O'Leary, he never misses a chance to get a discount or have more aircraft delivered quickly!

    There's a reason that Ryanair is Europe's biggest and most profitable airline!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Also, given potential delays with the Max-10, it makes sense for FR to consider other Max variants. In fact, this is something they could probably have done previously had they wanted to, since there have been lots of Max-8s parked in the USA as a result of non-acceptance by other customers (in China particularly). This stock is reduced now but there may still be aircraft parked at Moses Lake WA and other sites.

    Having said that, the article does seem to focus on Ryanair's plans for the Max-10, should UA step away from its orders for that variant.

    Post edited by EchoIndia on


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Max 8s built as 8s not 8-200s still have the 189 seat limit (because they don't have the extra exit, or the space to put it in). I expect he'd want to have a wince-making discount to take the seat count hit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Suddenly the Comac 919 is very attractive now to Chinese airlines...



  • Registered Users Posts: 869 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    The FR "offer" also limits discounts other airlines can potentially wriggle out of Boeing as it holds up the floor.

    Ryanair for once made a bit of a balls up of their most recent MAX order by their standards, they waited too long after the grounding, when other airlines were making big orders and ultimately talks collapsed. Eventually they ordered the -10 but not at the discounts they are used to getting. These latest issues might bring them in for another bite.

    Post edited by HTCOne on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    At this stage where production is months/years away a delivery slot is just a 737MAX, so if another airline pulls out its no problem get a 737 Max 8200 spec, apart from the additional exits its identical to a MAX8

    The bigger problem is the MAX10, will it ever be certified, same for the MAX7. If you want a MAX7 you are better looking at A220-300 now, if MAX10, you want A321NEO and decide how big fuel tank you want.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The post I quoted referred to parked -8s as available.



  • Registered Users Posts: 45 chasing_ghosts


    I don't think O'Leary will get the discount people think he will. No doubt Boeing will find slots on the small chance that UA doesn't take those birds, but I reckon they could even simply be converted to MAX 8s/9s. But MO'L might take whatever price is offered if it means more aircraft in a shorter timespan? I'm unsure on the official delivery timeframe of the UA MAX 10s now.

    Have FR ever considered the MAX 9? I suppose they'd need a "-200" higher capacity version, which I assume would necessitate the additional emergency exit door. Without entering a discussion about plugs and bolts, would a hypothetical MAX-9200 fit into the FR ecosystem? I think due to the -10 order, multiple variants in their fleet isn't as insane as some would lead you to believe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The FR 200 is based on maximising seats but without requiring further cabin crew, its 1 per 50, so 4 for 197. So you get 8 more seats but no extra cost in staffing



  • Registered Users Posts: 869 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Another issue not widely discussed is that the former 787 and 747 lines at Everett were supposed to switch to 737-8200 and 737-10 production but the FAA have frozen these lines until the QA issues are resolved. In the next 5 years or so those lines were supposed to produce approx 1,000 airframes. These airframes have already been ordered. The longer this freeze continues (combined with -7 and -10 delays due initial certification issues) the bigger this snowball gets.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,217 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I have absolutely no doubt that he would take them as a bridging option while production is ramped up on the others. He’d probably turn around and sell some of the midlife 738NGs for a higher price to shove it down their throats afterwards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Stored 737 Max airframes at Moses Lake, October 2023. Most were for Chinese operators but it's not clear if they will all be taken up at this stage.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭john boye


    Max Deliveries to China re-started the other day so they might start getting through those parked ones.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭tomhammer..


    How much cheaper is boeing than airbus

    Is it really true that airbus won't deal with Ryanair .

    Bit of a shot in the foot if true



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    It’s not that they won’t deal with them, it’s that FR have wasted so much time playing Airbus off Boeing that Airbus have got sick of them and basically said if they want planes they won’t be going back and forth again and they’ll be paying list prices. No doubt a big order would result in a discount but Airbus won’t be playing games with them. Take it or leave it if you will!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭tomhammer..


    Ya so O'Leary not that smart considering there's only 2 players



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,060 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    re the windows, its a good point, ive been on aircraft whereby the cabin windows that look like they've been cocaine chopping boards years old, so they dont get replaced ?

    The bit on the inside is plastic and purely cosmetic, not actually part of the window.

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭AnRothar


    There are 4.

    Comac the Chinese manufacturer and Tupolev who are russian.

    O'Leary previously tried to use them as a stalking horse when negotiating but they were not serious contenders.



  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    I wonder why Airbus don't play along. It might cause Boeing to lower their prices which means less cash for an Airbus competitor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    The Ryanair business model relies on maximising efficiencies in every possible way - all of their fleet has a common type rating, for example. A move to all-Airbus or a mixed fleet would be a major undertaking and the numbers would really need to add up for this to happen, I'd say.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The only planes that Comac and UAC (The Russian conglomerate that has all their brands) have produced in any quantities recently are regional jets.

    The ARJ21 is a DC9 knockoff and the SSJ is astoundingly unreliable.

    The total production volume of both combined is less than Ryanairs fleet size, and the SSJ is currently not producible in its Western certified form due to sanctions - the domestic product version is not the same



  • Registered Users Posts: 541 ✭✭✭AnRothar


    I accept that the Russian offering may be lacking.

    In the middle term the Chinese offering may be useful.

    A poster claimed there are "only" 2.

    At heart both A320 & B737 are regional jets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 869 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Embraer are realistically the most serious player outside the big 2, at least until the Chinese really get going.



  • Registered Users Posts: 755 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    That would be a reason for Ryanair not to deal with Airbus but not a reason for Airbus to not deal with Ryanair.

    Maybe Boeing would be smart enough to know that any talks between Ryanair and Airbus were for show and not budge on price., In this case there would be no incentive for either Ryanair or Airbus to put on a show.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    There's a cost in making quotations, meetings,spec changes priced etc ,also possible leaking of prices where another airline will demand similar,Airbus probably got burnt/ disappointed a few times and said list price,we have other things to be doing , fair enough and not that uncommon in other businesses either, you can only "cry wolf" so many times.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Airbus's previous head of sales stated that he knew Ryanair were only using them for leverage and as a result would only offer them list price.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,520 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    In another setback to Boeing and it's QA, 50 and that is an "at least" number, not a definitive total, 50 MAX-9 airframes have been identified as having "mis-driilled" holes.

    Those drill locations should be located either CAD directed, or via a tooled jig. The Airframes identified are 50 due for delivery. No real indication of how many may already have been delivered that needs assessment & rework.


    That this level of mistake escaped the notice of Boeing & Spirits QA is honestly shocking. Not discovered until a complete drill down of QA was undertaken.

    It points to shortcuts in both production, where operators pressed for time introduce a shortcut to save on process time. That should have been picked up by both team/line leads & by process engineering.

    That it wasn't? Points towards tacit approval of the shortcut by management to keep throughput high.

    Despite any such tacit approval? It should certainly have been caught by QA and addressed. That it wasn't? Points to a blind eye being turned to process changes that were deemed to be acceptable, but not written up or added to process flow.

    Further indication of a belief widely held, that Boeing are now overtaken by McDD's penny pinching management style rather than Boeings engineering and safety tradition.

    Post edited by banie01 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭trellheim


    It has been 27 years since McDonnell Douglas merged with Boeing. I'd say its all Boeing.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,733 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    While the fault is certainly "all Boeing", the corporate culture that fostered this mindset orginated with that McD takeover 27 years ago.

    Remember the rollout of the B787 prototype? We later found out that it was a shell held together with cable ties. That was in 2007. 4 years after the launch.

    So this mgmt malaise is at least 20 years old.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭ricimaki


    Prelim report for Alaska Airlines is out: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Pages/DCA24MA063.aspx

    Summary is that 4 bolts were not installed at the time of the accident



Advertisement