Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1343134323434343634373690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,251 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Neither side has made any major progress? We keep hearing this, and have been hearing it for months (frequently accompanied by the phrase "failed/stalled counteroffensive") ... and yet that point refers only to the movement of the line of conflict on the ground.

    Anyone who's wandered through the north of France will surely have seen the panels marking the position of the front line in WW1 and noticed how little it moved over the course of several years - but the war wasn't being fought and won there.

    In 2023, Ukraine drove the Black Sea fleet out of Crimea, and have make the Black Sea sufficiently treacherous that the same Black Sea Fleet generally stays out of it. Similarly, they have made the skies over Donbas, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Crimea sufficiently dangerous that helicopters rarely visit the front line regions any more, and their jets are increasingly wary of taking to the air.

    Those two achievements alone are "major progress" for Ukraine, and there is nothing comparable for the Russians to brag about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,152 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    FFS just give Ukraine what they need to finish these rats off altogether.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But they are press ganging people into service theres plenty of videos showing Ukrainian men being grabbed on the streets and taking away to be conscripted,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭glen123


    ...and this somehow makes me less Ukrainian and less knowledgeable than you, for example, about what goes on in the country where, as I mentioned, all my family and friends and their kids still live? Unlike you, I don't watch and read Russian propaganda to know what exactly they are promoting there these days. Maybe you should switch to Ukrainian news instead too for a change?

    Or are you ashamed to come across this? After all it's the creation of our "hero" and his besties.

    Kvartal 95 making disgusting jokes about people of Skadovsk (Kherson), currently under occupation, during their New Years performance. One of the participants visited Crimea at least 3 times since its occupation (big no-no but ...what's another y....visit). Some MPs are now calling for them to volunteer to the frontlines after their wonderful performance (won't happen, of course). Poor sods even had to cancel their gig at Bukovel (our top ski resort)...and one would think what...ski resort..gigs...during the war??

    Poor mayor of Skadovsk was so disgusted, he ended up quoting Petlura's "We are not so afraid of Moscow lice, we are afraid of Ukrainian nits."

    Let's see how Zelenky's strong hand is going to pack them all up, drive them to Avdiivka and leave them all there as volunteers :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    Way to not read the article about press ganging foreigners in Russia and also go off on a tangent and to then make claims without any evidence



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Tangent your grasp of thing seems very much limited



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    More reality with sources on foreigners in Russia




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Fast track citizenship..

    Nothing new there the law was proposed pre Ukraine invasion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    And now signed by your leader for life, here is your chance to get that coveted Russian citizenship and show off your military expertise



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This isn't a great sign,Ive seen other reports from Ukrainian unit's saying that they ran out of mortars and 40mm grenades for their MGLs




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The U.S. may not but the E.U. certainly do. Not to the point where Russia collapses chaotically or uses weapons of mass destruction, but the majority of E.U. Member States want to see the Russian army routed from all Ukrainian territory.

    You keep mentioning the artillery deliveries as though it is the only weapon that is being used or the only help that the E.U. can provide, when it is not. You speak about it as though it was a broken promise - the EU promised 1m shells within a year from March, 2023, they have delivered almost 500k and they still have some time before March to make it up. But in any event it is not because they are dragging their feet or unwilling to provide shells, the problem is that you can't just magic up a millions shells out of nowhere, nor can you give away your entire stocks that will be needed to train your own troops and to be used in the event that Russia attacks an E.U. Member State.

    Your dismissive attitude towards 2,500 armored vehicles is striking. Likewise with the jets.

    Are the U.S. and E.U. being cautious and conservative about assisting Ukraine? Absolutely yes. They don't want it to escalate into a full scale NATO v Russia war and they don't want to deplete their own stocks or run the risk that Russia will destroy or capture their most sophisticated equipment. But the E.U. countries at least would like to see nothing more than a Ukrainian victory as soon as possible. It's just that it isn't possible to win a war overnight.

    As to what is the plan, well in many ways there is no plan. The US and EU didn't start this war. Their actions have been entirely reactive throughout. A more relevant question is what are the next steps for the US and EU, and the answer to that will hopefully be revealed in the next couple of weeks.

    The U.S. is not going to cut all aid to Ukraine, but they are probably not going to give the 60bn that Biden would like them to give. The U.S. has a massive national debt and the Republicans are gaining ground in arguing that they shouldn't be giving out so much money in foreign aid (even though it is in their long term strategic interests that Russia not take over Ukraine and that the money is often reinvested in the US industry). The figure they eventually give will, IMO, be somewhere in the region of 20-40bn. I would hope that it will be towards the upper end of that range.

    As for the E.U. Member States, well that's a more straightforward issue. They can't use the E.U. or N.A.T.O. to coordinate aid to Ukraine, so they are going to have to find a way to do so without involving Hungary. This will take longer as it requires the national parliaments to get there, but they will. So I wouldn't be pessimistic on that front.

    As to how 2024 will play out, it is very hard to say. I suspect that the period between now and March will be very intense but if the Russians keep attacking as they are they will suffer huge casualties and deplete their weapons. After the election, it is unclear if Russia will engage in mass mobilisation or not. It is also not clear whether they can realistically mass mobilise and achieve any real effects, but you can be pretty sure that if they do so the EU and US won't be far behind in increasing support for them.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The logic of Ukraine not striking inside Russia in 2022 was that they didn't want to escalate and they didn't have the capacity given that they weren't allowed to use aided weapons to strike Russia proper. 2023 showed us that Ukraine can hit military targets in Russia, but it is a risky strategy if they target civilians as this could play badly amongst the countries providing aid to them.

    The idea that Russia retaliates 100 fold isn't really accurate I'm afraid. Russia are intent on striking civilian targets across Ukraine regardless of what the Ukrainians do. They didn't decide on a whim to fire over 200 missiles in the last week - that was planned in advance. The fact that Ukrain struck Belogord is an excuse for them to claim that it is retaliation, but in reality it is not.

    If Russia really had additional, non-nuclear and politically acceptable capacity to damage Ukraine, they would have done so by now. And the last year has shown that they can strike inside Russia without causing the Russians to take drastic measures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,742 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    It turned out in end that it was Russian anti air that “struck Belgorod” and another example of a bomb being dropped on this town by … Russians themselves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @johnnyskeleton You speak about it as though it was a broken promise - the EU promised 1m shells within a year from March, 2023, they have delivered almost 500k and they still have some time before March to make it up.

    They already said that they failed and wouldn't be able to deliver on the promised as I said they would,they haven't delivered 500,000 either in September/October they were looking at 300,000 shells delivered in 8 months,we also know that even if they promised 20bn ,90% of that stays in America going to America jobs supporting American programmes not Ukrainian,for instance there was discussion of another patriot system and I believe 100+ missles for it ,but that and they won't be delivered before 2027 ,the EU wants Russia out of Ukraine but they more than likely want Russia sitting at the table Russia can provide big opportunities to the EU and they don't want a broken up and highly unstable groups on European borders ,

    While artillery isn't the only weapon system in Ukraine,it's the the main tool for keeping large numbers of men and vehicles at bay ,if they are suffering shortages as coming from Ukrainian accounts that suggests that they are going to end in a precarious position in the next few months,



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton



    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-countries-order-only-60000-shells-ukraine-via-new-scheme-sources-2023-12-06/

    Together, those schemes have yielded some 480,000 munitions, according to the EU - less than half of the target, with about four months to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    It’s interesting how some (ahem) are demanding detailed war plans and exact commitments

    While ignoring that the Russian side they cheer for still hasn’t produced war plans or coherent justifications several Years into the Three Day war they started

    And continue to make wild claims on thread without offering a shred of evidence to backup said claims



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,622 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Does the Ukraine have the capacity to make their own shells? Would they even bother if it would constantly be targeted



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,958 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Odd. I've been in S3/G3 positions long enough to know how much of the planning is done by enlisted vs officers, and I can't say I agree with your assessment which is supported by....?

    I would also be curious to hear why you think that the Soviets, Chinese and Albanians were wrong when they decided to revert back to a rank structure which included officers and enlisted. Surely after having actually tried going the other way, they would be best placed to make the determination from practical experience as to just how needed the positions are for effective operations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    You haven't been able to explain anything so far including how a respected military officer and historian is wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They recently set up new production lines for western artillery shells ,but capacity and protection is the biggest issue,they are blowing through a serious amount of artillery per week,much more than they or the EU can realistically produce in short periods



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    Meanwhile in the land of endless manpower and equipment




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭rogber


    Dictators have survived a lot longer than Putin in countries much poorer as well. We'd all love to see him fall but he's been there nigh on 20 years already and I wouldn't be surprised to see him cling on for quite a few years more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭rogber


    I wasn't even responding to that, you're twisting things around



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭zv2


    ???

    image.png


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Some deliveries from Berlin


    1x Skynex air defense system

    - 10x Marder 1A3 IFV

    - 2x Hensoldt TRML-4D air surveillance radar units

    - Undisclosed number of IRIS-T SLM Missiles

    - Undisclosed number of Leopard 2 ammunition

    9000 artillery shells.

    More trucks

    305 Haenel MK 556 rifles aka H&K 416...

    The skynex is probably the most interesting delivery it's an anti aircraft gun geared towards which can be ground or truck based depending what they delivered pretty new system I previously posted about on here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,742 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Not really a surprise. I wonder are they any better than their shells?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,144 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I've been in similar situations, and the level of planning tends to be very broad strokes. Anything pertaining to actual operations being handled on the lower level. Fires, logistical support, air coordination, all regulary the remit of enlisted or contractors. There's no special sauce involved that necessities an officer corps, it doesn't take OCS to send emails or populate trackers.

    A system based on meritocracy, competence and experience would be far preferable to one that pushes individuals into positions of authority based on nothing more than a college degree. It's telling that the most capable sof units are NCO driven and largely free from officers.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement