Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1330733083310331233133690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,086 ✭✭✭TokTik




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭thereitisgone


    Lets see in 1 year the importance of artillery, no doubht it will still be important, but drones are coming ahead in leaps and bounds rapidly

    Much cheaper and more accurate to send one drone instead of 4 shells

    This war is constantly changing, not just this war but probably also wars in the future



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes Putin's reign began in blood, continues in blood, and will end in blood. Seems to be the standard for Russian's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Yeah and no ,

    Drone is effective where and when you don't have to deal with electronic warfare systems,but when you have dedicated modem systems drones loose effectiveness,the fpv drones being used in Ukraine are operating on 2.5-5 GHz Radio, Jam those properly your drones become a paperweight, where 4 155mm do serious damage and you Can't jam them ,and while drones look like the future more and more counter drones are coming online , small drones have very limited operating times something like 25 minutes at most and that drops dramatically in cold weather



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    Air alerts and bavovnas in Sevastopol again. Good



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,742 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭zv2


    It is interesting that he says "we" got him in...we as in FSB.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's well documented putin was put into power, it's been discussed time and time again on here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,473 ✭✭✭zv2


    True and when you extend the argument the question becomes 'Is this really Putin's war or is he just a useful fanatic, fronting a sinister FSB war?' People say Putin went a bit crazy during lockdown and started a war. I think it is more complex than that.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The point now though is who controls who..??? Once Putin got his hands on the levers of power, did he lay down his authority on everyone, including the feared FSB? He certainly brought his FSB /KGB colleagues with him to the Kremlin anyway. So as he is still in power, it appears that he presently has their support. Time will tell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,161 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    There is no point negotiating with Russia. Russia doesn't abide by its own agreements. Putin may not be immortal but there is no great appetite for a functional democratic society in Russia. Who comes after Putin will be just as bad or worse.

    The only way Ukraine survives is for Russia to be completely broken or Russia to withdraw to its own borders while agreeing to hand over it's citizens involved in the multitude of war crimes committed by Russia; along with Russian assets being used to cover the reconstruction of the sovereign country it decided to invade. There is no happy ending here and no amount of Hellen Lovejoy esque wringing of hands will make it ok.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Since you are the preeminent poster on this thread championing negotations, what do you think a peace agreement will look like?

    Just in broad terms? Will Ukraine give up territory? Will Russia have some other influence over their affairs? Who will pay for all the damage and destruction? Will people who commit war crimes be held accountable? Will Ukraine be guaranteed that its seabourne freight will not be interfered with?

    Ive asked everyone who champions a negotatied peace but never get an actual answer - what do you see this peace actually looking like?



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    And Ive been saying for weeks that the big problem isnt that NATO countries cant produce enough shells, its that it isnt worthwhile scaling up to producing 5m dumb shells a year (which they could easily do if NATO countires really wanted to) its that no one wants to invest in the capacity to produce so many shells when, once the Russian war is over, demand will drop off a cliff for dumb munitions.

    Arms manufacturers will produce enough shells so that in a worst case scenario they will keep producing them at the same rate for years to come, or they will produce them in accordance with existing capacity, or they will increase production if governments take the risk and invest or commit to long term large orders.

    In reality, the difficulties in producing dumb shells can be compared to the supply constriction in the Vinyl records industry. Its not that they cant produce enough, its that they dont want to put significant investment into an old technology because of a sudden increase in demand for outdated tech.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,079 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Someone just as bad as Putin or worse.... This is what people say, but if I think about it, if that person exists, it begs the question why they haven't taken power already or are agitating for it in an effective way. They wouldn't be politely waiting in line. If they are, it strongly suggests they're under the yoke of Putin's political machine as much as anyone else is in Russia which isn't a great indicator of their ability to consolidate power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    As you know he's his one loyal army within the military,two main objective squash decent and keep him in power,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,481 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Has been rumours for weeks now (could be just fanciful or wishful thinking) that Ukraine would launch a large scale offensive by sea directly into Crimea itself.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,376 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    There's a few names very important here. Putin is the mouthpiece. But these are the fanatics who drive what orders come from the Kremlin.

    These are : Nikolai Patrushev

    Sergei Naryshkin

    Alexander Bortnikov

    Sergei Shoigu

     Bortnikov and Patrushev’s sons have become powerful Russian officials. Dmitry Patrushev is Russia’s minister for agriculture and Denis Bortnikov is the deputy president and chairman of the state-run VTB Bank’s management board.

    Mafias.

    Edit: if you wanted change in Russia. Target those names above and maybe leave the husk of Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But on that there's literally only a handful of companies who actually produce shells one particular company in Norway didn't receive any orders from the Norwegian military for something like 10 years,I don't know how many times we've had people on here telling us the whole of western military industry has massively ramped up production because we were on a war footing,and yet we have shortages across the board,

    Wishful thinking or too much time on social media



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    McCarthy has been booted from his role as speaker of the house in the US ,

    This could be trouble



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I wonder though, how many of them have private army's?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,376 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Is there even a public army now?

    It's been the FSB's/Putin's operandi to have these private armies around the world to influence power on the ground and power on the Internet.

    How these cancers will be eliminated is another thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,376 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    There's 27 active Private Military Companies operating from Russia.

    Even the Russian Orthodox Church finances it's own PMC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Could be massive especially if the next speaker is more a Trump supporter. It just shows how much power they are wielding there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,248 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Considering the time it took to elect McCarthy in the first place, will some in the GOP in Congress be happy for no speaker to be elected at all?

    Will they change their minds when some Republicans support a Democratic speaker nomination?

    Or are they just looking to fashion a permanent vacancy in the post (if that is possible)?


    Edit:maybe I was getting off topic as the question should be how this could affect the war in Ukraine..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well, if the head of the is cut off, then there's a good chance that there will be a war of succession, and many of the PMO owners will die, or otherwise be put out of action. Case of survival of the fittest. I'm not sure which of them (Girkin?) said that reason Kadyrov and Prigozhin were both pulling their army's out of Ukraine to preserve them for the internal war that was coming. And they were not the only ones with an eye on the future either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,131 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    Total war as during WW2, such as carried out by Britain & the USA as well as the Soviet Union, means everyone has a part to play in defending the nation, including women, from working in military factories to the front line. There's always engineering & support duties, planing & logistics, transport, repair & maintenance to support large numbers of front line soldiers in combat.

    Hitler didn't believe in mobilising women for war as the Allies did, they didn't even work in factories in large numbers, women were supposed to raise their families. Instead the Nazi's used mostly inefficient, underfed, largely unqualified prisoners to supplement their war factories.

    Is Putin going to start full scale mobilisation & conscription for the army, forcing civilians into arms manufacturing factories as Stalin did? That's his only option to win, but does Russia even have the resources & capability to increase military equipment manufacturing to a total war scale?

    Will the more affluent population in Russia's western regions & cities even follow Putins demands if they were implemented?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    Try reading the link I provided.

    "As of late 2022, following Ukraine's Kharkiv and Kherson counteroffensives, the Bakhmut–Soledar front became an important focus of the war, being one of the few front lines where Russia remained on the offensive.[37] Attacks on the city intensified in November 2022, as assaulting Russian forces were reinforced by units redeployed from the Kherson front, together with newly mobilized recruits.[38][39]"

    If you don't like Wikipedia try The ISW.

    "Wagner mercenaries nevertheless intensified their offensives on Bakhmut and fully committed to the Battle for Bakhmut in Fall 2022 likely to achieve informational and political rather than operational objectives."

    The facts are clear, there was no "winter pause" in the battle for Bakhmut. If it makes you feel better to keep claiming there was, go ahead by all means, but I for one won't be wasting my time replying to any such nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Field east


    The ONLY, ONLY , ONLY way for UKr to survive is to join NATO. It is the only entity that Russia/ Putin understands - and his successors. And that is not even stone cast guaranteed bur it’s by far the best available option.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Field east


    When you think about it - and given how Russian operates , it’s attitude towards agreements , eliminating opposition, interfering in soverign states, concentration of power amongst gov supported elites/oligarchs, jailing on trumped up charges, take on democracy, etc, etc, etc - it makes for a perfect strategy to have private armies like Wagner especially operating overseas as they can become self financing , increase the level of ‘friendliness’ and ‘cooperation’ And because their owners are in Putins pocket he can direct them at his will



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement