You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the Left - read OP

You're not comparing like with like.

Today, the threat from the far-left is not violence. Yes, there are a fringe number of violent cases (BLM riots etc.), but that does not constitute the overall threat. Nobody has argued that the far-left are equally as violent as the far-right today. That's nonsense. It's a strawman.

From my perspective, the threat from the far-left is not -- I repeat not, largely associated with violence -- but rather on the social and cultural damage and division the ideology wreaks into society. Whether it's arguments in favour of uncontrolled population growth; misogynistic attempts to destroy women's sport and spaces; or identity politics that seeks to pit group identity against group identity; the stifling of free speech and expression; or the attempt to introduce this divisive ideology into schools; there is an awful lot of damage that this ideology can and is causing. That's not even the least of it.

And I'm not referring to "the left" in totality, only the fringe on the radical extreme. Most on the traditional left agree with me on many of these core points. Not all, but many. Nor does it mean I'm arguing that far-right threats do not exist. They do exist, and these threats are readily and rightly discussed on the thread title that bears its name. But far-left threats in their own form also exist, and I'm highlighting some of those threats here. They deserve to be discussed, not arrogantly dismissed.

You can continue to attack the strawman that far-right violence is on one side and pronouns are on the other, but this is nothing more than a disingenuous attempt to downplay the real and legitimate threats that can and do emerge from far-left ideology.

Then you agree with me that the far-left can and does go too far.

The examples you cite are among the same kind of criticisms I tend to make. There's nothing "hateful" about identifying these mistakes, it's incumbent upon society to identify them and weed them out.

Because this thread is only about one side. Another thread already and rightly discusses the threats from the far-right.

Precisely because it is whataboutery. Look at the thread title.

This isn't a competition, where we must decide whether threats only come from one side. And when threats from the far-left are identified, we don't need to qualify that identification by reference to the far-right. It doesn't mean we're saying no threat exists from the far-right.

In other words, they are mutually exclusive threats.

That's just a silly non-sequitur, straw man, and red herring.