Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

18078088108128131853

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    It used to be that you'd only see this level of gutter posting during the world cup. And by multi reg accounts.

    Sad to see that it's all the time. And by the same people who always do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,576 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,076 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Gutter posting?

    What did your post add to any conversation??

    Look in a mirror next time

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,076 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Munster fans care. Players who would rather to have Kleyn on our team instead of playing us care. But other people's opinions don't count I guess

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,076 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Btw, if Kleyn had stank up the place and was clearly not up to standard, would he still be off topic on this thread?

    Ban billionaires



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    As such I don’t think it would be unreasonable to expect us to be talking about players who are in or around the current squad or eligible to play for us.

    It’s also not unreasonable to talk about players who were available to Farrell prior to the game today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,076 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    You're mistaken aloof. This thread is only for guessing who Farrell might pick in future, and then immediately congratulating him for making the correct calls once the decisions are announced

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,702 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    then talk about it in the appropriate Munster thread. No one else gives a toss



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Good point and something which was done for the last few weeks. He’s not available anymore. So by that token we can move on and discuss the players at our disposal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,855 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    If you and other posters are putting this much effort into posting about it, ye clearly care enough to engage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You’re under no obligation to engage in the discussion. It seems like a perfectly reasonable topic for discussion to me tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭Hank the DJ


    So it's wrong to comment on a player for a team we'll be facing in the RWC?

    Very narrow minded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Has anyone watched Ireland over the last couple of years, winning triple crowns, series in NZ, grand slams and thought "what this team really needs is a Jean Kleyn"?

    Like, maybe he's a better option than Treadwell or McCarthy, I'm happy to concede that. But is he really so good to warrant the amount of outrage his omission has gotten? Ireland have been really f*cking good over the last two years, winning lots of games and playing a good brand of rugby. People seem to have forgotten this.

    And if Kleyn ends up playing against us in the RWC, I'll be delighted, because it will mean that at least one of Etzebeth, De Jager, Mostert and Snyman is injured.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    If the worst thing we can say about Farrell's judgement is that he picked the wrong guy as the fifth or sixth best lock, then I think we're doing alright.

    I'd also argue that Kieran Treadwell or Ross Molony would have looked pretty good against the Aussies today too. They were a long, long way short of proper test quality.

    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    On the subject of second row selection, I can understand those questioning why Joe McCarthy was selected ahead of Kleyn for the Ireland squad. He isn't as good a player right now and has been injured quite a bit this season. But when you go down the depth chart, we're looking for 'finishers' (I hate that term) rather than starters. Our main pairing is Ryan and Beirne. Two world class locks as good as any around. If either is injured then Henderson comes straight in.

    McCarthy is a physical freak and I've seen him mow through Kleyn on multiple occasions in inter pros. He has that explosive athleticism the former lacks. I also think he's an all round player who is surprisingly excellent at breakdown turnovers for a man of his bulk and possesses great handling ability. He can be ill disciplined and give away silly penalties, but he's only 22. He'll improve on that with more experience.

    I think we're betting on McCarthy's ability to make a greater impact as a 20 minute sub rather than a starter. A lot of the above also applies to Treadwell. That's where Kleyn misses out, I think. He's not at the same level as Ryan or Beirne and he's not seen as a finisher.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,576 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,702 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    McCarthy is class, I think he'll show his quality if he gets a chance. Leinster really messed up not picking him instead of Jenkins for the final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,576 ✭✭✭✭phog


    A few weeks ago we had posters here claiming Kleyn wouldn't play international rugby for SA now we've posters saying well it was only Australia

    Well I suppose with attitudes like that they'll never be wrong, in their one mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I can understand where Lancaster and Cullen where coming from though. McCarthy was only back from a three month injury and had barely played. Jenkins is a more experienced player and had returned to full fitness six weeks earlier. The latter was pretty poor in the final, but it was the correct decision at the time.

    I do think that Nienaber will look at McCarthy and want him in the starting 15 though. He's an athletic freak similar to Baird.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    He’s got huge potential. His athleticism is so impressive for a big man with his body shape (different to Baird or Ahern for example). I think he was unfortunate that he missed so much rugby over the season. Unfortunate for Ireland too as he is someone to make a difference from the bench but at the same time I’d be concerned with his penalty record which he needs to iron out with game time. Was his last game for Ireland when he came off the bench in the Australia win in the 2022 AI?



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’d say the fact that he is 29 and our lock depth is weak enough that guys like mccarthy or treadwell are even in the squad at all, makes it an obvious tactical error long term.

    We could easily have another coach after Farrell who would like to have an international level tight head lock at his disposal.

    South Africa, probably the most loaded country in the world talent wise dipping back into ireland for a lock at all in any squad is a decent enough indicator that it was probably an evaluation mistake in its own right.

    It will take a lot more than one grand slam and a tour win against NZ to convince me that we are as deep as south africa and we can afford to let guys like that go. South Africa with the right coaching and time together could put out three or four fully competitive international teams, especially if they could get back all their guys who play for other countries. The idea of them coming back for a guy we don’t pick is insane. It shouldn’t happen.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think Nienebar will want to bounce the current NIQs and bring in two/three south africans and maybe a knox style move in the academy. Probably not next year but for 2024. Size and power helps any game plan and he has the connections.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    We could easily have another coach after Farrell who would like to have an international level tight head lock at his disposal.

    Ok but it isn't Andy Farrell's job to worry about what the next Ireland coach might want. His job is to deliver results, and I think it's fair to say he's been doing a good job of that.

    It will take a lot more than one grand slam and a tour win against NZ to convince me that we are as deep as south africa and we can afford to let guys like that go

    Two things here. First of all, nobody ever claimed we have better depth than SA. And secondly, Kleyn wasn't "let go", he just wasn't selected, same as many other players who didn't make the 42 man squad. Jack Carty, Jordan Larmour, James Hume etc. He then chose to switch allegiances back to the country of his birth.

    The idea of them coming back for a guy we don’t pick is insane. It shouldn’t happen.

    See, this reeks of inferiority complex to me. Why exactly shouldn't it happen? Why does South Africa capping a player in a largely 2nd string team automatically mean he should have been in the Ireland squad? I'll once again remind people that Ireland are actually really f*cking good at the moment and are ranked above South Africa.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Let’s see how this all works out at a world cup. I’ve heard the we are the best team in the world thing before.

    Of course we let him go. We know how to read a calendar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Yeah lets. If Ireland lose a game that we would clearly have won if we had Jean Kleyn, I'll admit it was a blunder to not select him.

    And I never said we're the best team in the world, I said we're really good.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    He should have been selected because he’s a better player than mccarthy now and has been a better player than treadwell forever.

    He should also have been selected because losing really good locks to south africa of all teams is just so weird to be almost certainly a mistake. There are almost as many south africans playing outside south africa as there are irish pros.

    This all seems like hubris to me. But we’ll see in the world cup. Could be wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Its like if we don’t select a brazilian and suddenly he’s back in their soccer team

    It's nothing like that at all, because the Irish soccer team are sh*te.

    But we’ll see in the world cup. Could be wrong.

    If Ireland underachieve at the world cup, it will not be because we didn't select Jean Kleyn.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If Ryan and Henderson get injured, then yea that could matter. There is no one else that could approximate their impact.

    I thought the idea that Kleyn is just a ‘decent’ player who doesn’t impact winning would die with a selection to even a supposed south african b team. It’s nonsense. Rassie and Nienebar aren’t idiots talking on a forum. They sit on top of the deepest selection of talent worldwide and decided to pick him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    If Ireland underachieve at the world cup, it will not be because we didn't select Jean Kleyn.

    Of course it won't, but that's exactly how it will be painted if things don't go well

    It's already being described as hubris and the RWC is still months away.



Advertisement
Advertisement