Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

N4 - Mullingar to Rooskey [route options published]

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    So, what about that N4, eh? I hear they’re planning on doing some work to it, possibly between Mullingar and Rooskey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No funding for 2022 for any progression. So quite some wait before we hear anything.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    This road was flagged by TII in 2017 as being particularly prone to head on collisions. It (and sections of the N2, N20 and N22) were added to the NDP partially for that reason in 2018.

    Very sad that it’s not considered a priority for this reason alone, besides access to the NW/regional development etc.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    2 ministers and 2 TDs hounding poor eamon seams to have worked



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    That's great news, can we expect a preferred route soon or has that been delayed?

    I'm looking forward to seeing how they plan to link the new route to the N5. From looking at the map, there doesn't seem to be any obvious good solution.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 FreedomOfSpeechAndChoice


    They'll probably go for a compromise solution, like have the N5 beginning at the new N4's junction with the R194, and then direct traffic along what is now the western end of the current N4 Longford bypass, and onto the N5 where it currently begins now at the roundabout.



  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    I got on to TII about this project and the preferred route corridor is due to be selected by the end of this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Some obvious survey work going on along the route on Friday. Could have been for fibre rather than the road, but there was no branding on the vehicles like there usually is for NBI/Eir!



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Latest:

    The project has reached the route options selection phase. Initially, TII was unable to provide an allocation for this project in 2022, given the level of funding available for major road projects. However, funds became available early in the year and it was possible to provide a reallocation in order to progress the options selection phase. As a result of this, the options selection process was reactivated. Studies were subsequently undertaken in relation to various environmental disciplines and additional appraisal was carried out to take account of the national investment framework for transport in Ireland, NIFTI, which was published in December 2021. It is expected that an emerging preferred route corridor will be published in quarter 1, 2023, and that this route options selection process will be completed in quarter 2, 2023.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    On the other side of the coin, with the news yesterday of the new Knock-Heathrow route the youth of the north west won't have to use this road anymore when they move to New South Wales. Swings and roundabouts.

    On a more serious note, the NDP in 2018-2027 out of the NPF had a specific list of projects designed to improve accessibility to the North West. Surely of all projects this should be right out there for serving a particular need to connect poorly accessible areas. (It was also flagged for one of the highest rates of head on collisions but safe inter urban roads aren't a priority at the minute).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I think you are misrepresenting the current transport policy there. Safety is pretty much the only ground on which interurban upgrades are prioritised.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I don't agree with that, journey times and accessibility are a major factor (or certainly were in the development of Ireland's inter urban routes).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I always thought for the sake of national unity, that there should have been an M4 from Kinnegad-Longford and possibly a bit beyond, mostly for the optics.

    It looks really bad that apart from the M1 and M3, there isn't a single motorway in the Republic north of the M6.

    So I still think this scheme should be built as a full motorway, but that will require the removal of Eamon Ryan. We need to wait for him to leave but then this scheme probably wasn't going to construction before then anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    If the road were safer, more people might use it, and emissions might increase, so making it safer is now probably illegal. Similarly, if a region is more accessible, that might lead to more emissions, so opening up the northwest to more homes (emissions!), jobs (emissions!!) and investment (emissions!!!) would also now probably be illegal under our self-imposed anti-development straitjacket.

    The roads will be left as they are, and if the good people of the northwest have a problem getting around, that’s not the state’s problem. Or, at least that seems to be the current stance. Why we tolerate these restrictions is another question entirely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    You mean apart from the M1, M2, M3 and M4, there isn't a single motorway in the Republic north of the M6!? That's a nonsense argument.

    Eamon Ryan won't make a blind bit of different whether Mullingar - Longford is motorway or not. There are criteria which determine road type and approve the project to proceed to the next phase against certain benchmarks. There is very little chance of the cost of a motorway being approved in this case, regardless of who the minister is. Motorway would also create unnecessary planning difficulties and delays.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Like I said, national unity.

    The traffic levels on M6 Athlone-Galway (13k at Loughrea) and M9 Kilkenny-Waterford (12k south of KK) aren't enough to justify motorway but they were built anyway.

    N4 at Edgeworthstown showing 13k.

    Figures from here, for 2022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    The M17 would disagree with you there - it is (just) north of the M4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Here’s why there are no motorways to the north-west of the country

    That’s the population density of Ireland, from the 2022 census data. I’m strongly in favour of upgrading the national road network, but if I saw a government spending billions just to put blue lines on a map between places where hardly anyone lives, I would want them out of office as soon as possible.

    M20 will be the last major stretch of motorway built in Ireland. For the rest of the primary network, 2+2 will be more than adequate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,805 ✭✭✭✭joujoujou
    Unregistered Users


    ^^ I can easily imagine someone else making up exactly opposite argument. I mean: it is not "there's no motorway over there because there's low population density", but rather "there's low population density over there due to lack of motorways (and other transport infrastructure)".

    I'm aware of some flaws in that logic, but still... ;-)



  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    Just had a look at the funding history for this project. Just 200k has been allocated for 2023, compared to:

    2018: 400k

    2019: 800k

    2020: 1m

    2021: 2.4m

    2022: 1m (nil initially)

    The size of this year's allocation doesn't seem like enough to progress the project significantly. I hope I'm wrong and we see a preferred route soon.

    Edit: bit of an update here-


    Post edited by DumbBrunette on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    It looks like this job as mentioned above is about to stop again according to the local TD in the dail yesterday. Also Leo V said the Carrick on Shannon Bypass will take priority on this route yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    A shame, but if there isn’t enough funding to do both of these N4 jobs, then Rooskey-Carrick-on-Shannon is the more important one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    It would be a real shame to see it canned after 6m euro was spent on design, on top of what was spent before the project was cancelled the previous time. It really is a very substandard road for the traffic levels and has a poor safety record. Unfortunately TII made it clear in the 2023 allocations that long stretches of new road still in the design phase are at the bottom of the priority list for funding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    This is a hideously frustrating road to drive on; and surely has to be more dangerous than the Carrick-on-Shannon bypass section (outside of COS itself, mostly consisting of 1990s grade wide single with very few access roads); but it's the one that ticks the "town bypass" box of being acceptable for the Greens; and will have much more of an impact on average drive times



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The amount of Time and Money the state wastes like this. Then you also lose the design team as they will probably have moved on by the time this project gets going again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    They should rename it the Ballinalack - Rathowen- Lomgford Bypass



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    This project, and many others, crawling along was inevitable given the ridiculous policy now of designing many massive projects and spending next to nothing on actual construction. There are billions of Euro worth of projects which will all be looking for a share of the few hundred million budget each year for the second half of this decade. It is obvious that only some will go to construction while others are long-fingered until more funding is available.

    This project is a dead cert for the long finger given traffic volumes, the cost of the project and the two main towns it bypasses are already bypassed. Smaller projects are the only way to advance things on a road like this. The existing road isn't terrible, 10km new road from east of Bunbrosna to west of Rathowen would solve most of the problems on the eastern side of Longford town. A bypass of Newtownforbes is needed on the western side but I think that should be looked at in combination with a N5 Termonbarry bypass.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It’s not a ridiculous policy. It’s the way everyone else does it: design the best solution, and build it when you can afford to. The opposite, of letting budget dictate the design is what had us rebuild all the junctions on M50..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    It is ridiculous to be designing projects which you don't even have the money to design, which is exactly what is happening here. They absolutely don't do that anywhere else. The solution is properly profiled and realistic spending plans and only progressing that which can realistically be delivered in the foreseeable future.

    To get around the problem of limited funding but lots of projects needing funding, we are drip feeding funding to to keep projects on lists to keep people satisfied. They will crawl along the planning process for the rest of the decade with nothing meaningful happening.

    Next year, we will likely spend more on designing road projects than actual construction. That would absolutely be ridiculous. It just creates a bigger backlog of projects looking for increased but still limited funding later. It is likely that some of these designed projects will sit on the shelf waiting for hundreds of millions of funding to be made available for so long that they will become out of date, permissions expire and have to be designed again. It has happened before. The other risk is that the mega project doesn't pass PSC gateways and the really necessary part of the project gets dragged down by the nice to have parts.

    The way to avoid that would be to phase the project, basically just build a part of it for which absolutely needs to be done and is small enough to fit within funding envelopes. If it ends up like that, it would have been better to have pursued that part of the project earlier as a standalone.

    Your comparison to having to upgrade the junctions on the M50 is in no way relevant. There is no way that 40km of new N4 is going to be built in one go anyway. The design now will likely be split at points where it touches the existing N4, no reason those sections couldn't be looked at separately while still allowing for further construction later. The initial part of the M18 finished at a junction with an extra bit of motorway built so the future section was just a continuation of that. Budget has to be one of the main considerations, this project is already falling victim to budget limitations and it is only looking for relatively small amounts of funding now!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Designing schemes piecemeal is a really bad idea. And I never said that construction would be all in one go: actually, my point was the opposite - design the whole thing first, then divide it into buildable projects, so we're not disagreeing there. That way you don't end up building redundant sections of road that you very soon bypass (like spending millions on a brand-new N9 alignment at Moone and Timolin, then as soon as it was open, designing a motorway that would bypass that bypass).

    You can't phase construction of a project if you haven't designed all of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The Moone Bypass got 9 years (and 9 days - both openings are recent enough to have online articles about them) as being the N9 at least.

    The N4 Enfield Relief Road had under 3 years! Kinnegad's N6-only relief road got 7.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The motorway network was designed and built piecemeal and it turned out alright. You just decide where to begin and end a particular section, then end it in a suitable way to later extend while having an appropriate junction with the existing road.

    In the case of the N4 Mullingar to Rooskey, after the main route selection, they should select part of it for planning and delivery now. Bringing the whole lot through design is pointless as a) the funding isn't available to even design all of it and b) the funding won't be available to build it for a long time, probably into the next decade.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    It's abundantly clear that large scale road projects will be in a holding pattern nationwide until after the departure of Eamon Ryan in 2025.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Ryans departure will make no difference, the annual budget under the next minister still wont be sufficient to deliver a project like this plus all the others. There this already several billion € worth of projects for construction from 26 on but the annual budget will only be several hundred thousand. Those "in a holding pattern" aren't getting built any time soon regardless of the minister of the day.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Budgets change quickly along with political priorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Not to the extent which would be required. Between 2020 and 2026, we will have commenced 4 €100m+ projects, there are about 10 such projects (not including N4 Mullingar-Rooskey) planned to commence between 26 and 30. Some of them are several hundred million € projects and the M20 would be €1bn on its own. And there are also lots of smaller but significant projects to consider as well (e.g. Slane bypass, Ardee bypass, etc.).

    Basically, even with a big bidget increase, the next minister will struggle to get all the current pipeline started, nevermind adding more projects. For context, the roads budget for next year is to be €145m, at least €500m will be needed each year just to get through what is intended to be built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster


    Any movement on this project?

    All I found was this article:

    People in the midlands are frustrated by the Department of Transport's €100m underspend when just two per cent of that figure, would be enough to progress the the N4 Mullingar to Roosky project.

    That's what Longford Westmeath TD Robert Troy is saying after It was confirmed by both the Taoiseach and Tainaste that any underspend could be redirected to progress the N4 road upgrade.

    The Fianna Fáil rep also discussed the discontent over a lack of support for transport for people with a disability.

    Deputy Troy says the cost of the road is a fraction of the underspend:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No, and it won't ever be a priority with the current Minister.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That €100 M underspend also includes a pile of public transport and active transport projects that aren’t moving. There seems to be a reluctance to spend money from the current Minister, regardless of purpose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,475 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Sadly not any time soon. There’s no drive or will to build new roads- this is all would up in the various excuses and knots. In the 2000s there was a determined priority from the top to develop good roads. It’s pretty much the opposite now, any excuse not to build them



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster



    Funding of in the region of €2 million to take the long awaited N4 upgrade to the next stage will be included in this year’s TII roads announcement.



  • Registered Users Posts: 53 ✭✭cartoncowboy


    Seems this years road allocations are being leaked by all the TDs, with Frank Feighan making similar noises about the N17. The TDs love claiming credit, wonder if there is an election coming :-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster



    Calls have been made at every level with local Councillors, Senators and TDs pushing for movement on the scheme.

    1.4 million euro has been allocated to the long sought upgrade of the N4 Mullingar to Longford Bypass project.

    Work on the project was paused over 17 months ago, with fears the design process and works would not materialise.

    Calls have been made at every level with local Councillors, Senators and TDs pushing for movement on the scheme.


    As part of the TII Road Project allocations for 2024, the funding has been allocated to Westmeath County Council to refine the route selection process.

    Reacting to the news today, Longford Westmeath Fianna Fail TD Joe Flaherty says the TII support will see major progress towards a final route selection.

    Speaking to Let's Talk today, Deputy Flaherty says the 1.4 million euro will keep the project rolling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster


    I thought the route was already selected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    On the current generation of plans, the corridor was, final route not

    Whatever there exists from the late 00s plans is irrelevant now due to different regulations



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Standard Toaster


    https://www.westmeathexaminer.ie/2024/05/08/route-selection-for-n4-upgrade-can-go-ahead/

    The selection of the route for the N4 Mullingar to
    Longford upgrade can now go ahead, following an allocation of €1.4m. At a
    meeting last week, members of Westmeath County Council welcomed the
    allocation.

    They were told that the draft documentation
    on the route selection is being finalised to allow the consultation
    process to commence. If more funds are available, the detailed design
    process can begin.

    The allocation is included in the €12.3m
    allocated for national roads and greenways in the county. It includes
    €4.7m for improvements, €5.5m for greenways, and €543,634 for
    maintenance.

    National Transport Authority grants of €4.5m
    have also been announced for various projects in the county; the biggest
    is Saunders Bridge in Mullingar, which is getting over €1.2m, and next
    are Athlone footpath and cycleway improvements for six strategic routes
    on €730,000.

    The allocation for regional and local roads
    is reduced, at €13.5m, but presenting the figures to the council, Jimmy
    Dalton, head of finance, said that if non-recurring specific improvement
    grants are taken out, they are generally in line.

    Mr Dalton pointed out that the allocations
    will be supplemented as the year progresses and further allocations will
    be received under the TII national road pavement improvement and
    maintenance programmes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Jp177


    Post from Seamus Butler Longford county councillor on FB:

    "Breaking news!
    I have been advised that Tuesday 2nd July 2024 is proposed as the date for presenting the N4 Emerging Preferred Route Corridor to the Councillors."

    Anyone else hear this or have more details? I wonder will this be 100% the final proposed route i.e. it won't change? And local people can be free of the uncertainty (I realise it may never happen, but it may and that, in and of itself, is uncertain).



  • Advertisement
Advertisement