Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1150415051507150915102215

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Looks like a successful night for the Israeli F35s ....

    Bet nobody saw that coming 🤣🤣🤣🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,885 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The only one who thinks the rand corporation is important is the rand corporation.

    But, while here, what are the peace terms you think Ukraine should agree to? Try and prove you're not shilling for russia.

    The US is defanging russia at a bargain basement price, support is there until russia abandon Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Israel Has Extended The Range Of Its F-35s: Report

    Reports in the Israeli media suggest that IAF F-35s have been enhanced to hit Iranian targets unrefueled and carry at least one new weapon.

    Jun 9, 2022

    The development has been announced together with the integration of a new, locally developed smart bomb for internal carriage in the F-35. These apparent upgrades to the Israeli Air Force’s long-range strike capabilities come as the Israeli leadership announces a harder line against Tehran’s nuclear program, while the air force conducts exercises widely thought to be dress rehearsals for potential raids against Iran.

    Well that's the main idea of the F-35. ;-)

    The whole fighter thing is so weird. Every single time they make a fighter, a huge effort is put into extending their range. The F-16 was alovely looking jet, now it's a fugly abomination.


    All fighters are just basically small bombers these days and as soon as they come off a production line, someones trying to turn them into an F-111 or B-2

    They should go back to the YF-23 design, add range and make it into a stealth F-111 which is what most really want in the first place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭Bitcoin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    It was Israel. Netenyahu made an announcement about striking terrorists last night. It was supposedly aimed at internal unrest, but pull the other one.

    ⚡️Заявление Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu:

     "Tonight we have decided to attack the terrorist organisations. Our response will be strong, swift and precise. Whoever wants to hurt us, we will hurt them."

    UPD❗️: This was said yesterday at a Cabinet meeting about terrorists and instigators of unrest inside Israel.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Pretty much. The A-10 copied a fair bit of the doctrine of the precision ground attack, anti tank, anti shipping, anti personnel JU87 Stuka and both were equally idolised by their own troops and hated by the enemy. In the development stages they even engaged with German ex Stuka pilots to get their input, as much because they'd actually faced mass waves of Russian infantry and tanks, which was what was expected if WW3 kicked off. Both the A-10 and contrary to WW2 propaganda the Stuka are/were extremely valuable military platforms and tactical assets in the ground attack role. Flying artillery in essence(and that's how the Germans regarded the JU87). They even strapped a pair of maahoossive guns to some Stuka's later in the war for anti tank, emplacement and shipping roles.


    However both suffer from one major issue; they both need friendly uncontested control of the skies and/or fighter escorts to operate. The A-10 had this in Iraq and Afghanistan, but this would not be the case in Ukraine with AA missile systems and MIG31's at high altitudes and speeds outside of Ukrainian air defences throwing long range AA missiles around.

    I suspect if we saw the A-10's in Ukraine it would be similar to Stuka's in the Battle of Britain. Great hope and a propaganda win, initial successes, but increasing losses would force them to pull back or withdraw.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @Wibbs However both suffer from one major issue; they both need friendly uncontested control of the skies and/or fighter escorts to operate. The A-10 had this in Iraq and Afghanistan, but this would not be the case in Ukraine with AA missile systems and MIG31's at high altitudes and speeds outside of Ukrainian air defences throwing long range AA missiles around.,

    Since when would mig 31s be inside Ukraine trying to intercept low flying A10s if they had them,it's not like ukraine don't have mig29s and su30 fighter jets to preform escort duties, so far the only action the mig31 has seen is launching cruise missiles in the Russians side of the blacksea,and the mig 31 isn't immune from anti aircraft missles,it can operate at just over mach 2 for literally short periods before it risks it's engines failing something that's not uncommon for previous hi speed high altitude Russian aircraft.

    And we've seen the A10 in very contested air space over Iraq twice hundreds of millions and only 6 aircraft Lost and other's suffering heavy - light damage but most were repaired and returned to service.

    Doing exactly what it was designed to do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,916 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Tonight's episode of Warship BBC2 9pm looks interesting & involves our Russian friends.

    On its way to the far Pacific, HMS Queen Elizabeth ventures into the eastern Mediterranean. Britain's biggest warship is exercising its rights of navigation in international waters, but almost immediately Russian warships are diverted from the Black Sea to intercept it, while. Russian fighter bombers are also scrambled from their base in Syria to buzz the British task force and a tense stand-off unfolds



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    It's fun to contemplate one of these warships going really slow and lofting a transparent balloon on a 2km wire coated in carborundum particles. Then take bets to see if the Orc fighter pilot doing the ultra low and unsafe fly-by can eject before his one winged plane spins into the sea.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,123 ✭✭✭✭Danzy



    Good articles on the race in the Ukraine and in Russia where Defense industries are ramping up.


    While Ukraine need speed to take advantage of Russia's current low point, The Russians are throwing mass numbers in to wear down Ukrainian forces and buy time to train and replace more and dig in deep.


    All a bit WW1, years of fighting for small movement, mass casualties and 2 broken States after it all. The worst outcome for all.


    It also talks about the need for Western arms industries to ramp up as western stocks are getting low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,150 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    What she reveals is shocking. Several of her friends i.e. children her own age, along with her grandfather, were killed in Mariupol in different incidents - this would suggest that civilian casualties in the city must have been very, very high.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,123 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    If they were even just badly organized they would have a lot more conquered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,916 ✭✭✭✭Discodog



    Another series had a Russian Intelligence gathering ship getting too close to Faslane. The tone of the English captain was like telling off a child - the Russian ship moved away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,150 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    We're not going to find out what the terrorist state did in Mariupol until the city is liberated. The suspicion must be though that many tens of thousands of civilians must have been killed when they were flattening the place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,916 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    This is the reaction when a British warship got close to Crimea in 2018. I love the commander's comment that there are 17 of them but we have 48 missiles :)




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,633 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    The Russian army is still present in Ukraine, is learning from it's mistakes, is adapting and retains personnel and equipment superiority over the Ukrainians. If that sounds like might is right, very often it is, whether we like it or not. War is incredibly wasteful of resources and peoples lives and while you might look on Russians tactics as stupid, brutal and excessively wasteful (they are, war tends to like that), it does seem the government retains significant support across the population of the Russian federation for the time being and will not withdraw.

    There is a lot of focus in this thread on the latest wonder weapon from NATO countries, being the solution, there is much less discussion about the current moral and damage to the Ukrainian army over the last 12 months. In the last 2 months, there have been an increased frequency of dead Ukrainian heros showing up in my feed, I'm using that as a proxy to indicate are taking significant casualties.

    I doubt the Ukrainian army has enough manpower or resources to drive the Russians back across the border, after this year they will reach a point where they need manpower from NATO countries to finish the job. Right now, no one is interested in playing for stalemate. Wars of this scale take about 5 years to come to an end. I expect boots on the ground in 2024 and an overall conclusion by 2027. That also means that the countries within the EU (not just NATO) after this current phoney war will be forced to align and it won't be so easy for "Irish neutrality" to circumvent this.

    What the conclusion to the war will be, I have no idea, I am working on the premise, that for the next 5 years we will be living with a war economy in Europe, as more resources are sent in that direction. Even though we don't do the direct fighting in Ireland, the key features of that economy are shortages and rationing and more of a move to command and control economy. You can see this is the shortages of energy and accommodation, and the political response will align if nothing else for expediency and needing a diversion.


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Looks like they are prepping, including backdoor shenanigans to keep people from leaving




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    In a televised address, Mariupol Mayor Vadym Boichenko said it's been difficult to calculate the exact number of casualties since the war began nearly 50 days ago, but his latest estimate was about 21,000 civilian deaths. 4/12/22 https://www.newsweek.com/mariupol-civilian-death-count-could-surpass-20000-mayer-says-1697435

    Note, thats just 50 days in. Apply the principle of not wanting to scare the children and I think there are good reasons no one want's a realistic number for civillian deaths. As they say, the numbers can't be established until an area is recaptured and then there's the problem of the filtration camps and the 2 million that made it out of those and were kidnapped to Orcistan.

    I think it will be found that filtration camps were death camps and a lot never left on two legs, or that there were two streams shipped to Russia, with one ending in graves or crematoria there where the attrocity could be effectively covered up. I wonder if US intelligence has been monitoring the heat output from known crematoria for any significant increase?

    It's not a nice topic to think on. I said days into this conflict that a Ukrainian Orc expert at a university in Paris said that they had a comprehensive data set (names, addresses, phone numbers, social media ac's) of at least 2 million people in Ukraine who comprised the core of civil society, that they would be looking for and eliminating. And she was right. We had stories of Orcs knocking on doors in captured areas clutching lists and looking for specific people. It's what the filtration camps are partially for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    ..




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    You might want to do a little more research into the Rand corporation if this is your opinion. I'll leave that task up to you though, I'm not your nanny.

    Regarding the Ukraine war, I don't think Russia is doing any favours to itself, but as you say, the idea was to "defang" Russia to use your term. And it might well do so, but at enormous cost to the US. When I cast a glance around the world I see a realignment taking place that is not in the US's favour. When this war is over I feel that the US will find itself more isolated than before, and China more powerful - as the ones who kept out of the fight and made no new enemies in the process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    An SUV with a z-swastika burned down on Altufiyevo Highway in Moscow. Ukrainian DRGs work while Muscovites sleep.

    Nice.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    “it does seem the government retains significant support across the population of the Russian federation for the time being and will not withdraw.”

    Depends on what exactly you assume. If, in a terrorist, mafia, dictator run state you’ll find very few people openly critical of Putin’s regime, you are correct. Pretty meaningless though.

    As for ‘working’ on this… thanks for confirmation.


    As for “mighty” Russia versus the waking giant of the west proxy fighting against the economic minnow that is Russia, then piss off with your dire warnings. Russia reached peak economic disturbance… give a look at fuel costs.

    Russia has already lost… just takes Russophiles time to realise. Bit like Hitler in HIS bunker commanding devastated divisions thinking he could win the war. Hitler 2.0, same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭mikewest


    it might well do so, but at enormous cost to the US

    You mean at a fraction of the cost of Afghanistan don't you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @Pa ElGrande There is a lot of focus in this thread on the latest wonder weapon from NATO countries, being the solution, there is much less discussion about the current moral and damage to the Ukrainian army over the last 12 months. In the last 2 months, .

    That's utter tosh ,

    Ukrainian morale is pretty much high across the board,and they have increased in size both in power and equipment, vehicles and armor along with heavy artillery and aircraft,

    I think your showing nothing but a pure bias towards the Kremlin and it's propaganda



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    WW1 was the catalyst for the US to become a dominant world power.

    Somehow I don’t think the US will come out too bad from this. No need to worry about them.

    As for Russian ordinance, unless turret tossing becomes a competitive sport or stationary Russian military aircraft come into vogue as decorative pieces it’s not looking too promising for them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Lol

    Rand Corp: how to destroy Russia

    Rand analysts estimate that Russia’s greatest vulnerability is that of its economy, due to its heavy dependency on oil and gas exports. The income from these exports can be reduced by strengthening sanctions and increasing the energy exports of the United States. The goal is to oblige Europe to diminish its importation of Russian natural gas, and replace it by liquefied natural gas transported by sea from other countries.

    Another way of destabilising the Russian economy in the long run is to encourage the emigration of qualified personnel, particularly young Russians with a high level of education. In the ideological and information sectors, it would be necessary to encourage internal contestation and at the same time, to undermine Russia’s image on the exterior, by excluding it from international forums and boycotting the international sporting events that it organises.

    In the geopolitical sector, arming Ukraine would enable the USA to exploit the central point of Russia’s exterior vulnerability, but this would have to be carefully calculated in order to hold Russia under pressure without slipping into a major conflict, which it would win.

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2019/05/23/rand-corp-how-destroy-russia/

    That's from 2019. All good except the last part, they understimated Ukraine.

    It's as if Putin read that report and decided to take actions designed to ensure every suggestion was implemented: '...that's the gas exports taken care of, now let's see, if we announce a mobilisation to feed people into a meat grinder, the smart ones will all leave the country...I like it, we shall do that.'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I don't mean from the conflict itself, but due to the fallout after the conflict, in the medium to long term owing to the realignment of the world.

    All those countries that no longer feel they have to toe the US line because internationally the US has become relatively weaker in relation to up-and-coming countries like the BRICS with China at the head of the list. I believe that this war will speed up the process of 3rd countries moving away from the US sphere of influence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Yes, that was back in 2019 ... but now the Rand Corp has changed its opinion, and wants the US to push for a settlement. I posted the link upthread.

    Take the matter up with them, I'm just the messanger here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Let's imagine a wonderful world of china, iran , Belarus, India as some kind of utopia that's going to rule the world,

    It's not going to happen



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    China is totally reliant on the West for its economy. Do they loathe the west, sure. Are they stupid enough to do a Russia, after they see Russia humiliated, resorting to spitting out their dummy, threatening to fire nuclear weapons… impotent rage? I don’t think so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    No, you might want to do a bit more research...

    These Think Tanks like Rand, are a means to try and pressure politicians and sell the policy viewpoints of filthy rich people who want government to do their bidding, thus circumventing democratic principles and processes. Most filthy rich people in the US would tend to be right leaning, and that's certainly the case with Charles Koch. What you are touting as some sort of 'independent' and intelligent view is actually just a very wealthy Republican businessman trying to influence a Democrat president, and any Republican Congressmen/Senators who don't agree with him and support Ukraine and the current US direction.

    You have been suckered, basically.

    If you look at the bottom of the article you originally linked to, you will see that the article was sponsored:

    This effort was sponsored by Peter Richards. Initial funding for the Center for Analysis of U.S. Grand Strategy was provided by a seed grant from the Stand Together Trust.

    Dig a little further and you will find.

    The New American Engagement Initiative started in 2020 at the Atlantic Council, with $4.5 million of support from the Charles Koch Institute. The funding organization bore the name of the right-wing billionaire known for his libertarian policy inclinations and has since been rebranded as Stand Together, which has also donated to other research institutions, like the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and the RAND Corporation.

    Which means you are batting for the Orcs, because Koch certainly is and your precious 'independent' Rand corp piece is nothing less than pro Putin shilling.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,885 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You said the RAND corporation was important, it will be up to you to show it as such in the context of the Ukraine/russian conflict.

    What is your peace plan?

    russia is working to defang themselves, no one was interested in doing so up till February last year, the fact that their fangs were already blunt pre-operation is a humongous miscalculation by putin (their impotent war effort has made NATO even more powerful to the extent that third party countries are now receiving modern equipment to use against russia, this was unthinkable in January last year). That you are still shilling for russia is also no surprise.

    As repeated often, the cost to the US is a pittance vs. what they were spending on military preparedness already, that you keep going on about the cost to the US shows how inept your position is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,916 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    The Iranian defence ministry says it has foiled a drone attack on a military facility in the city of Isfahan.

    The ministry said three drones were involved but there were no casualties.

    One drone was destroyed by air defence systems and two were caught by "defence traps", causing minor damage to a building, the ministry added.

    The extent of damage to the site has not been confirmed by the BBC, and there has been no immediate claim of responsibility.


    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-64445306



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The big explosions across multiple bases and facilities including one that measured 5.4 on the ritcher scale says other wise



  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭charlie_says


    Had a good chuckle at some recent posts.

    Ukrainian morale is high! 99% of Moscow would crush Putin!

    RAND Corporation is pro Russian when it's funded by the Atlantic Council!

    Amazing stuff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 90 ✭✭Jackiebt




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not only that,i think everyone overestimated Russia as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,633 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    Germany lost the war in 1942. They did not wave a white flag and go home and they fought and had support right to the bitter end. It took many years of re-education to convince them not to start another war. You can now imagine the ructions today when they are being asked to support a war, they left quite a lot of dead last time around in Ukraine, they are not inclined to repeat this. Even though though the Germans had lost, they continued to do damage for another 2 years afterwards.

    It took the entry of the United States in Europe to insist on taking the shortest route to Germany to bring the war to to an end sooner, the Brits on their own could not take the fight to the continent, they could only fight in the North African desert with the aid of troops from the colonies.

    Likewise, even if forced back to the pre-2014 borders, that's not the end. Russians may spend a few years squabbling among themselves, or other powers may make a bid for territory. Finland may see its chance to grab Karelia, China will see it's change to grab Manchuria and all the resources east of the Urals. That won't suit Europe or the United States so they will make a play for the area west of the Urals spearheaded by Poland and Turkey would like to secure the south to Kazakhstan. You think they would not do that? or would they let the place dissolve into multiple 'stans? with nukes lying around until they were no longer viable.

    Another scenario is Russia takes much of the territory east of the Dniper and Ukrainian army fronts collapse and retreat to Kiev. European countries wreaked by combination of material shortages and high unemployment, no longer have the willingness to fight and a stalemate is reached. by the river being the diving line. Neither side Russia or EU will survive such an outcome and will face the economic crisis of debt collapse. Historically all sides that get involved in European land war end up broke. The only winner from this would be China, simply by not having to expect resources in the war.

    At the moment the objective for Moscow is hold what they have and advance to the river and subjugate Kiev. Kiev wants to drive Russia back to the 2014 borders and have Russia pay compensation. How are they going to get there?

    ‘That’s called World War III’: Biden defends decision not to send jets to Ukraine

    “The idea that we’re going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains going in with American pilots and American crews — just understand, don’t kid yourself, no matter what y’all say, that’s called World War III,” Biden told a gathering of House Democrats in Philadelphia.

    Well now . . .

    Ukraine expects 24 fighter jets from allies as part of first package – media

    Ukraine intends to receive 24 fighter jets from international allies as part of the first batch, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesman for the Air Force Command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, told the Spanish newspaper El País. "The Air Force's priority is to get American F-16s, although Kyiv is considering the option of French Rafale and Swedish Gripen," the newspaper writes.


    Wars never pan out the way their planners intended.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @Pa ElGrande Wars never pan out the way their planners intended.


    Just ask the Russians about their 3 days to conquer Ukraine.....



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Well now indeed. Biden was specifically referencing "American pilots and American crews" That's the WW3 bit, not the offensive equipment, which the US and many others have been supplying since the start of this.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,633 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Indeed. Just ask the American neocons (Dugin equivalent) bringing "freedom and democracy" to the Iraqis, who would welcome them with open arms. In practice they unleashed a civil war, increased Iranian influence and jump started Islamic state. I remember being in the United States in 2002, there was wall to wall media coverage with every American general and spokesman telling Americans they had the invasion as good as wrapped up. By 2006 the Americans were looking for the exits, they withdrew under Obamas reign. Putin and co did not learn any lessons from that.


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Pure whataboutry ....

    They invaded Iraq twice and beat the Iraqi twice and then came back to fight isis .

    Remind us what did Russia do in all the time occupied a small part of Georgia and part of Ukraine,

    And lost over 100,000 men , thousands of tanks,Apcs , aircraft in a little over 9 months this year

    Compare the losses from Iraq and enjoy the laugher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,483 ✭✭✭macraignil


    More success for Ukraine in disrupting supply lines of the russian invasion force:




  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement