Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DC cinematic universe general stuff

17810121318

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,723 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    As an aside, is The Rock the A-list star with the fewest genuinely good films to his name? Virtually all major stars have some big auteur collabs, critical favourites or just small indie passion projects to their name, or even just a few genuinely great, timeless blockbusters. The Rock, despite being a big star and financial success, barely has any films that feel like they’d stand the rest of time. Moana as a voice actor sure, and Southland Tales as a cult, midnight favourite. You could argue Pain & Gain as an auteur collab of sorts 😅 But pretty thin on the ground beyond - mostly just big old generic blockbusters ranging from grand (Fast Five) to real bad (too many to list). For someone with an obviously popular and well-liked screen presence, it’s fascinating how it seems to be through reputation alone rather than the actual quality of the films.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    After your first sentence I was thinking “I’m a pimp. And pimps don’t commit suicide”.


    I know southland tales tanked but I really enjoyed it. Great to see so many actors in unusual non typecast roles aswell. Also enjoy the moby soundtrack.

    And it has an advert with a car having sex, what’s not to love?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Checked his wiki filmography page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwayne_Johnson_filmography

    Had a lot more film and tv involvement than I was expecting.

    As I went down the list the points of note I took after read your post were:

    • probably the fast and furious films will be something seen / rewatched for a good while so he'll have those
    • disney are likely to keep their films going for as long as they think they can make any money from them so Jungle Cruise will have that. Haven't seen it though so can't guess how long that would be
    • Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle was the film that jumped out where I thought I remembered it as fun more than anything else so that's the one I'd say has a good chance. Not sure as to the lastability of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    I just watched Black Adam... it-s not as bad as people make out... SOme genuinely funny moments from the rock with the "use your line " bit...

    still not good enough from DC, they have 90 years of stories.... some utter clowns making decisions here... with cavill and The ROck, they have a slam dunk...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    If you look at the way the rock has talked about his work over the last few years, he has been on the lookout to move from a starring feature role into production and having his own "media empire" situation. This is particularly obvious with the jumanji, jungle cruise, red notice, type stuff - the media campaigns were a lot about what "his team were bringing" rather than just his role. I think he was trying to pivot Black Adam into getting the role that James Gunn now has, and that hasn't worked.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I've slowly cooled on The Rock the longer his career has gone on, and he has betrayed that almost aggressive desire to play safe, vanilla sort of characters. People like to trash the MCU and whatnot as emblematic of the kind of creative bankruptcy within Hollywood - but is The Rock the true totem here? The guy's CV is just one long line of the cinematic equivalent of a shoulder shrug.

    He seems to be a very charismatic presence, but I've even started to question how much of that is authentic; there are shades of Tom Cruise with his public persona. I've seen hints of a range that suggest he could branch out, but seems chronically allergic to anything resembling a left-of-field move. I'd go to bat for things like Jumanji as far better than they ever had any right to be (and arguably came closest to the actor playing against type), but around that have been a constant succession of bland-at-best blockbusters whose dearth of anything resembling imagination showed them as kinda cynical blockbusters precision engineered to appeal to foreign markets, or toy-boxes for The Rock to pose within.

    You look at the physically equivalent actors of yesteryear and say what you will about Arnie for instance - and I frequently have - but the guy was willing to take risks and appear in various types and genres of film. Heck his career went into orbit in the first place, playing the bad guy. Same with Stallone, Willis and all the rest; they had a comfort zone but they also tried their hand at writing & directing (Stallone), or all sorts of roles (Willis). Whither that for The Rock



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    A big part of the trouble is how Rock goes way too far with the promotion of his movies (and all his products like his energy drink, tequila, sportswear etc) that it's impossible to take any of it seriously now. As I said, he's more hype-man than actor.

    Half of his promotion of Black Adam was centered around what his plans were for after Black Adam; how there'll be more of the Justice Society, how there'll be a showdown between Black Adam and Superman (even though Superman's return should have been a surprise), and how he and his producers had big plans for the future of the DCEU, and wanted to have a hand in helping to find their version of Kevin Feige.

    You're not really selling a great movie if you're more concerned about trying to promise fans that good things are coming after the movie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭ketchupmessi63


    I think he is at that stage of his career where accepting a 007 role is the most logical step forward... This video games tie ins are a double-edged sword, as shown by the Netflix show (I'm aware that Warhammer 40,000 is a much broader topic than video games, no worries :) )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The Rock gone now.

    Gunn laid the Smackdown on his Candy Ass.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,190 ✭✭✭ThePott


    The Rock found out really quick that the hierarchy of power in the DC universe had changed.

    Post edited by ThePott on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,723 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Sacked Adam.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    "What a helluva month - now we all need some Teremana! 😂🥃"

    Is it a bird? Is it Black Adam? No... it's Hype-Man!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭Cotts72




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Did the announcement on Aquaman come yet?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Very little in the way of actual announcements have been made, even with regards to Ezra Miller, Gal Gadot, Zachary Levi and Jason Momoa. I think it's early next year when Gunn and Safran are going to announce their starting plans for what the new DCEU will be. Until then, with the exception of some like Cavill & The Rock, we know very little for sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Yeah some reports that he is done as Aquaman however Gunn wants him to stay in with DC and play Lobo.




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I presume that with regards The Flash, the hope is that there's enough time for Ezra Miller to complete their patented Hollywood Road to Damascus, and the press junkets don't focus on what would then be Ancient History. It'll get released, hopefully makes WB some money off Keaton Nostalgia then quickly gets shunted into HBO Max and down the Memory Hole.

    IIRC, wasn't Aquaman 2 already shot, or very far along production?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,194 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    James Gunn seems to have a very messy leadership and communication style. Its ridiculous that they didn't announce the futures of Gal Gadot and Momoa when they announced Cavill was leaving. Outside of Batman I have no interest in any DC properties now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Gunn seems to be another one who seems to want to placate the Snyder fans on social media by constantly posting on social media where I think he would be btter just being quiet and getting on with the job behind the scenes until after Aquaman 2 Shazam 2 & The Flash are released and done.

    He seems a bit delicate when he replies to every Tom Dick and Harry on Twitter that say anything he perceives as slighty negative towards him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I think he had to address the Cavill in the room given he only announced he was coming back to the role 2 months ago. He would have been fielding questions about it until he'd said something.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,723 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I mean there's a good argument that no filmmaker should be on social media - Gunn himself knows the perils all too well as the subject of an unfair political smear campaign. But for someone who clearly values transparency and engagement with fans, he's been pretty sensible and diplomatic over the last few days. He's obviously trying to be as open as he can during a process that is both ongoing and likely tied up in various corporate machinations. He's debunking reports where possible, giving teases of his plans, and being cordial and respectful towards the likes of Cavill and Johnson.

    For someone who is clearly 'very online', he's handling this about as well as anyone could tbh given the various factions coming at him (not just angry fans - https://deadline.com/2022/12/james-gunn-ray-fisher-justice-league-star-slammed-dc-head-1235203040/). He'd be under fire as well if he wasn't saying anything while all this was unfolding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,194 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I just think what is the point going to see Aquaman 2 and the Flash now - as standalone films they will probably be pretty weak and they will not be part of a continuing films series so you could easily miss them and still understand subsequent movies in the DC universe. Marvel execs were geniuses in creating a film series where every movie was a jigsaw piece in an overall film series story.

    Did James Gunn tell Cavill he was coming back, then change his mind or was someone else involved in that decision?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Cavill was brought back before WB hired Gunn and Safran to run the DCEU. Cavill filmed his Black Adam cameo about 2 months before release, and publicly announced he was returning as Superman a week after the film came out (as that was the plan). But then a few weeks later WB brought in Gunn and Safran, and after about a month of discussing and planning what to do with the DCEU, they realised Cavill just didn't fit into their plans (as they want to go younger with Superman, and especially given the history of Cavill's Superman I'm guessing they want to just start again from the beginning).

    So the blame doesn't lie with Gunn. Cavill shouldn't have been brought back until WB knew what they wanted to do with the films. You could also argue that The Rock shouldn't have pushed so hard to get Cavill to cameo in Black Adam which was more to boost The Rock's film and standing more than anything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    There was nothing stopping Gunn from releasing a bland "excited to be here" statement, and leaving all this stuff with Cavaill and the rock behind closed doors until some time had passed. Nobody was expecting rebooted superman or next black Adam for years anyway. If this had come out halfway through next year as a single "here's where we are today" release, nobody would have thought twice.


    Instead, he's forcing two reasonably popular faces to admit he's dumped them immediately after some previous suits in the same organisation make a huge public palaver over how important the two of them were. It doesn't reflect badly on the two actors, it reflects badly on Gunn and the wider organisation he's supposed to be "leading".


    They've got nothing but an enormous set of messes in front of them, not least of which is "our next tent pole movie stars a child kidnapper dude who beats people up". You would think he'd be spending his time hurriedly separating himself from that guy, instead of two actors whose worst behaviour is to have slightly underperformed box office....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,194 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They are really betting the house on getting perfect replacements for superman, wonderwoman , aquaman, and the flash. That is a tall order. Pattinson was a good replacement to Affleck but i think gadot, cavill and momoa will be hard acts to follow and the new actors already will have to win over an audience who may think the previous actors were treated badly.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Depends on the film. The Batman suited Pattinson but if they go the style Gunn normally has? Not a hope. I mean I'm no superfan of his but thinking of Super, Slither, GotG, and The Suicide Squad he does have a certain tone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I think they've said Pattinson's Batman will remain outside whatever Gunn & Safran are doing, as will Joker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,284 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    I think the decision for the Cavill announcement and maybe the others is to be sure it's known they're free from their contracts. Would Cavill have gotten the Warhammer role if they or he thought he was still contracted to DC?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    If I'm Cavill I'm grateful to Gunn for not stringing me along for too long. Cavill announced he was returning as Supes before Gunn was hired, while I'm sure it's very disappointing he won't be returning, especially after leaving The Witcher, I'm sure there's a part of him that is happy to have closure and be free to fully commit to other projects.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    Cavaill is producing it, and acquired the rights to bring to amazon. He's not a hired actor on this (probably deliberate after the witcher nonsense).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,194 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    After Halo and the terrible Warcraft movie i have very little hope that Warhammer will be any good though im sure Cavill will make bank if he is producer. Pity he couldnt make Witcher work. If warhammer fails that will be a fair few bad tv/ movies he will have been in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Seeing reports on Twitter that some WB execs want to keep Ezra Miller on as Flash going forward considering he's kept out of trouble since his treatment for mental health issues.

    I wouldn't be surprised if Gunn & Safran nix that idea, but if they do keep Miller on after getting rid of Cavill.... that would be insane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Gunn is being coy on Miller but the closer we get, the worse the questions are going to become on Twitter for him. That's why I said a few weeks ago that he should take a step back from social media, as he's setting himself up for enormous pressure being so responsive.

    What happens when the (not saying undeserved) inevitable hit pieces ramp up on Miller in the run up to release, is he going to respond to all of them? And the people rage tweeting at him over said responses? You can see how it becomes quickly unmanageable trying to be so transparent undeŕ obvious restrictions.

    I imagine the Ezra news is just part of a larger PR effort to salvage The Flash at the BO. I'd be fairly certain he'll be gone after its release unless a miracle happens, both in Ezra's personal life and at the box office.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I don't see the logic ... unless it's simply a way to ensure the upcoming Flash film doesn't become an instant busted flush - which it would if news came out Miller was already yesterday's Barry Allen. They might as well continue the pretence this unreleased film has relevance for the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I thought the same, but then there have been a lot of rumours of Jason Momoa becoming Lobo going forward even though Aquaman 2 is coming out.

    The only reasons I can think of are a) they're using Flash to breach the multiverse and therefore cause the reboot of the DCU so want to keep the same actor to maintain some sort of continuity between the previous films and new films, or b) if Miller has gotten his act together, WB may be worried they'll be accused of only getting him to address his mental health issues to help promote the Flash movie so it can do well, and then getting rid of him which could then risk his mental health and therefore will make WB look really bad and insensitive.

    To be completely honest, based on his appearances so far he's not that great that anyone would really be clamouring for him to be kept on, not like Cavill. Maybe his performance and character is so great in his own film and that's why they're considering keeping him on, but even putting his personal issues to the side (which we really can't), he's been serviceable at best as The Flash so far and I doubt anyone would miss him if the role was recast.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    Nobody is irreplaceable, so recasting Miller isn't a problem. They don't even need to keep him around for continuity, they can use a different multiverse flash to do that once the movie comes out. But I would agree that its odd the lobo rumours are being spread around which potentially undermines aquaman, whereas "possibly kidnapped and assaulted a child" guy is getting a big "ohhh who knows" from the studio. Maybe armie hammer is on the slate to replace Cavaill?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭Cotts72


    Knowing James gunn he'll probably recast his wife as wonder woman



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    there is only so much post production can do lol


    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Holy God intentional or not that woman's demeanour towards it all is comical.

    Just goes to show that whatever Zaslav might be, the dummies in charge before him, and before them even, would have done irreversible damage to a number of IPs.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Every superhero film looks goofy as fúck in the raw production footage. I'd be slow to judge anything from Batgirl unless we ever saw a trailer or any kind of rough placeholder footage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yeah I have to agree. Taking one second of that footage at the right angle in slow-motion could just be a quick infill shot in the middle of a longer more complex sequence.

    I'd take that over Ezra Miller's style of running anyway.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah. We don't know how that shot was to be blocked at all. As you said, it could be as simple as some slow-motion footage for a Hero Moment, some infill or general coverage to be used as part of something larger. We can't know just by the raw footage alone.

    The stupid running alone makes me think the context is important - no chance it's as simple as it looks.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I couldn't find the one I wanted to find, but I did immediately think of on-set footage of the CW shows. Like I said, these things look goofy as fúck without post-production, editing & shot composition making them look at least vaguely respectable lol.

    Though with the CW shows, it was touch & go how the final product often looked, I will admit.




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    The Flash and Supergirl required significant special effects though, I don't know how much more they could add to Batgirl just.....running. Maybe some close up shakey cam to make it look gritty and frantic?

    But that's just me who hasn't a clue about how the making of such things work.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,723 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    There's every chance Batgirl would've been a bad film (like there's every chance it would've been good). We just don't know, and rest assured two seconds of contextless behind-the-scenes mobile phone footage isn't going to tell us one way or the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,225 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Agreed. And that's the thing, we don't even see the camera that was filming her or what angle it's supposed to cover (eg. it might be that they were only trying to film her arriving at the corner and not actually covering the angle of her running), is she in the background or foreground, is it an actual take or just setting up blocking...

    The tweet is pretty funny, but it's just in no way an actual representation of what the film would have been like.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The bit at the corner does make it look like it might have been some interstitial or somesuch: where Batgirl stopped, reacted, then ran onwards; thus she only needed to arrive there looking like she was running. I see at the corner there's a marker painted on the wall, so that's probably where Batgirl was expected to land at at the corner.

    Again, impossible to know but by all accounts it's not as straightforward as "hoho, look how stupid that looks, the movie must have been rubbish". It may well have been, but it won't be because the filmmakers were so hamfisted they couldn't get the lead actor to run normally, lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,284 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    I remember the comments about Titans when the behind the scenes pictures leaked and the criticism around Kory and Beast Boy at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,284 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    And so the line up for the new DC U film and tv slate has been revelaed

    So after saying how they don't want confusion by having multiple versions of the same character, it looks like we're going to have 2 versions of Batman. Though likely get Pattinson's sequel out of the way before bringing in the new one.

    The only release dates mentioned yet are the new Superman and the next Pattinson Batman, both in 2025.

    Then along with Viola Davis staying on as Waller, others may keep their roles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    Regarding the certifiable lunatic Miller: “There is nothing that prohibits that from happening,” said Gunn



    Errrr... Nothing? Really?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement