Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin - Metrolink (Swords to Charlemont only)

15556586061123

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Which will be more than offset when it's in operational phase, so what is your point? And before you say electric bus's the construction of said bus's and the batteries that come with them and also fleet renewal would generate more emissions over a 40 year period easily



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,637 ✭✭✭prunudo


    My point is, I don't think we should be using decarbonising as a reason to build it. It has many more merits than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Avoiding carbon fines at national level is a neat political trick to help"sell" metrolink to rural taxpayers. It's hardly a reason many of us want it built but it is a valid reason and can be used to soften the blow of spending so much if Dublin's own tax revenues on itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    They could tell them the EU want a metro in every EU capital



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,460 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Who are "Jaspers" and in what way are they independent?

    Reads to me like a report commissioned to give some political cover for mothballing another infrastructure project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,460 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    same gobshoites head to London and New York and wax lyrical about underground transport systems...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,552 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,460 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Interesting. So a sort of advisory quango. Not your usual external consultants.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,530 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Another anti-Metrolink article given prominent coverage in the Sunday Independent yesterday. It's pretty clear that officials in the Department of Public Expenditure are briefing heavily against the project. Coupled with the fact that Minister McGrath has spoken against the project in public and reportedly spoke against it at Cabinet, it's pretty clear he's doing his best to hobble the entire project.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 97 ✭✭Paul2019


    If they're going to scrap it, I hope they do so sooner rather than later so we can get back to doing what we do best - designing metros from scratch after spending hundreds of millions on previous schemes that get given the chop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    To achieve maximum wastage of public funds scrapage has to happen after the RO is granted. Which will be the end of 2023.



  • Registered Users Posts: 97 ✭✭Paul2019


    Spot on. I may have jumped the gun there a bit. It's just that we've had the same Metrolink plan for years and everyone must be so bored with it by now.

    But surely it must be past time for a brand new FULL study of Greater Dublin's transport needs.

    We could have lots and lots of UK consultants producing another really expensive glossy report with loads of graphs, tables and sexy pictures of foreign metros. Only the highest production values to be used.

    That should buy the government another 5 to 10 years of inertia and you can't put a price on that.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,867 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: Can we keep on topic please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    This is looking like a dead duck now, last month it was 10 billion odd and this month its 23 billion. Someone is working hard to scuttle the project, I dont even think it would have gotten accepted at 10 billion anyway. But 23bn is just off the charts, cities have hosted the Olympics AND built the infrastructure like metro lines to go with it for less than that.

    Its insane stuff and you wouldnt know what to believe at this stage. All I know is pre pandemic it was at 3bn with perhaps 4bn being realistic due to the construction inflation that happened in the Childrens Hospital. But this latest figure of 23 billion being thrown about is barmy, its gotten to the point that you'd now be getting better value out of building a nuclear power plant than this 19 kilometre metro which I never thought Id say.

    It doesnt help either than this firm Jaspers already do work for the European Investment Bank in advising on the spending of EU structural funds. This now gives politicians opposed to the project a perfect hook to hang their hat on.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,285 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is looking like a dead duck now, last month it was 10 billion odd and this month its 23 billion.  Someone is working hard to scuttle the project, I dont even think it would have gotten accepted at 10 billion anyway.

    It has been accepted.

    Also "unknown unknowns might push it to 23B" is a frankly both a phenomenally stupid and phenomenally pointless comment.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,530 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Yeah I do think it is important to point out that the Cabinet have approved the project as is, it is advancing despite the best efforts of Minister McGrath and his officials. Advocates will have to keep the publicity and arguments going though all the same, it's clear there are those who will not let up in their efforts to undermine the entire project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,460 ✭✭✭✭lawred2




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,530 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    It's not in Cork. Feels transport investment is too focused on Dublin, Cork still hasn't got it's own Luas yet and so on and so forth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Sure “unknown unknowns” could push it to €100bn.

    Why not go with that?

    Maybe even €100bn and 900,000 deaths during construction.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    "Both reports also expressed concern that the metro system will duplicate existing bus and Luas services along parts of the route, particularly the city centre and Ballymun, which could undermine the viability of other public transport services."

    Wow. The upside-down logic here is astounding. Developed countries don't behave like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Sure the Luas will be going out to Finglas... hard to think they'd conveniently forget...oh well, I'll vote for those who pursue MetroLink for what it is, not much else I can do I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Absolutely bizarre statement. Completely normal for metros to replace bus and tram routes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭VeryOwl


    Ah, so that's where Varadkar got his crazy figure from. Not content with overseeing the cancelling Metro once, he's gearing up to do his piece to cancel it again. €24 billion for a basic metro line is not credible. It's a remarkably stupid figure.

    A bananas sentiment, at odds with how properly-run cities conceptualise their transport networks, but entirely consistent with why our public transport is such a shambles. These people are determined to ensure we don't get enjoy basic amnesties and have liveable cities we can be proud of. Someone earlier in the thread got it exactly right - gawking lovingly at metro systems in other countries - and then tutting we're getting ahead of ourselves when anyone suggest we build something for ourselves.

    The best antidote to that brand of cynicism and small-mindedness is getting something done. If public transport in Ireland wasn't a landfill of glossy PDFs and broken promises, these vultures would have nothing to peck at. The critics have shut up about Luas and DART, so perhaps if we can scrape this over the line they'll move onto decrying something else we're apparently undeserving of having.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,637 ✭✭✭prunudo


    If this gets scrapped again, something has to change, there is something very rotten at the core of how we cannot deliver large infrastructure projects. Waste multi millions on consultants and plans but never a shovel in the ground.


    I know officially its still going ahead but its wrong that senior politicians and civil servants are allowed sow the seeds of doubt off the record and hide behind reporters 'sources'. I hope I'm wrong but we've been here before and the soundings aren't good. I've always said that part of the planning team, there should be a much stronger pro metro pr campaign to put the negativity too bed quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    MMcG always seemed like a misery guts. Will there be a full reshuffle when the Taoiseach changes?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,867 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I would expect so. However, the given ministries will likely remain in the gift of the same parties. Small moves may happen though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    MMcG swapping with Pascal could be good, I'm sure a north Dublin TD would be beneficial to Metrolink.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,867 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    As long the North Dublin TD is not a member of Na Fianna GAA club.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Now that I think of it, things aren't looking good in December when Varadkar becomes the Taoiseach. I hope the c**t doesn't start talking down Metrolink.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Get planning for it. Once the recession hits, prices can drop and they can proceed. IF the tenders received shortly are madness...

    They have zero clue on the cost and 23,000,000,000 is as credible as 100,000,000,000. Even in this banana republic... Many of us here have and continue to pay large amounts of tax. In other countries, this gets you proper health, transport and child care services. They have large military expenditures. I think it's fair to ask, where is the money going in this kip ? Where is fifty percent over the pittance of 36000 euro going?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    More lies there. Imagine how much extra development and redevelopment Metro would facilitate. Including using the existing appalling options on offer...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    There is a huge difference, one option is highly dependable and segregated and very frequent. The other is a bus for ten km on single lane roads for the most part, with traffic light obsessed planners having lights every 50m. Ended up getting a taxi for E30, happy days !

    The dublincoach service from dundrum to airport via redcow was brilliant.typical it's gone too. Anything else is far too much messing about, before you even get to the airport...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    In anything I have seen, Varadkar has been very supportive of Metrolink (far more than anyone in FF who are more rural/Cork based), there is no reason to think that will change when me becomes Taoiseach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    He's also a TD in an area that would directly benefit hugely from metrolink. I used to live in his constituency and exchanged some emails about public transport with him and found him on top of things. I think he "gets it" more than many to be honest.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Not really, his constituents have sunk costs in land rovers. He took steps against dart west because his looper mates operate illegal horse stables in Ashtown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I'm not sure too many people in D15 drive Land Rovers to be honest. Only a small part of his constituency is what one would consider affluent. There aren't enough votes there to keep him in the Dáil.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Its really hilarious! Look after a handful of voters or what they think is in their best interest. The problem with this approach is, after decades of inaction, the non nimbies eventually become so disillusioned, they stop voting or vote for other parties out of frustration. Ffg wonder why they keep losing support. You cant keep spoofing the same people for decades, deliver nothing and then be surprised when even your original core voters start leaving you...

    Talking of varadkar, he has gone so far to the left. He will cancel metrolink and spend the money on welfare increases... its what rte and joe duffy would want...



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Except for the very large mistake he made when he told the press that the project could cost 23 billion. In a country like this, that is enough to scupper a project. It is the figure the media are reporting now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The ones that would vote FG would. These people are elected with a few thousand votes and scrape into power on the 11th count. The majority of their constituents won't feature on their radar



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,867 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Is there any way the Gov can put the skids under ABP to get the railway order through in double quick time?

    They need it through and qualification to tender out asap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭MyLove4Satan


    Considering he is pure evil and loved locking us down as long as he could get away with it you can be sure that snake will cancel it and be smirking while he is doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I really hope if it is built they won't try to continue this 'metrolink' brand at operational phase, please just leave it at 'metro'



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I wonder what colour they will assign it on maps. In early public transport plans it was always blue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,552 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Blue is the obvious next line colour, considering it will be in a system with Luas. Yellow for Lucan Luas if that goes ahead before the world burns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It should definitely be on a map with DART and luas, maybe have thinner lines for the luas to indicate it's tram routes. It still hasn't been made public what DART 'lines' will operate in 2030. Will we have say a three line system:

    - Hazelhatch to GCD

    - Greystones to Drogheda with Howth spur

    - Spencer Dock to Maynooth/M3

    Or some other combination. Operating a three line system would mean an interchange has to be built at Glasnevin regardless of what happens with Metrolink.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,516 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Think the sun will have turned into a red giant before that gets built

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,552 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There are indicative service plans somewhere in the docs for DART+ West. A proportion of the Maynooth/M3 trains are shown as going to Bray; Hazelhatch to Spencer Dock as far as I remember. I'd expect Drogheda-Greystones with some Drogheda-GCD to make up the numbers then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,756 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    We'll find out I suppose but getting it right on a map is essential. A proper Dublin rail map has yet to be produced which doesn't inspire confidence. Visitors need to see how they're going to get around at a glance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,108 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    this is the latest attempt, it's not terrible TBF - at least it isn't trying to cram all the info into a shape designed to go above the Dart doors:




  • Advertisement
Advertisement