Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

19394969899135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd agree with that except the last part. As Ricciardo is performing now, f1 wouldn't be much poorer without him. It would be better to roll tte dice on a rookie than hold on to a driver who was once very good.

    I don't get attached to drivers in that way. For some it's like an old shirt in the wardrobe which you know you'll never wear again but can't bring yourself to get rid of. The likes of Kimi in the last 3 or 4 years were just taking up space and people thought they'd miss them. But nobody really misses kimi now.

    Same with Ricciardo. I hope he can refind form. But if he doesn't and loses his seat, that's fair enough because F1 should be for the best current drivers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    Well George is the same age as Max and Charles and 2 years older than Lando. How do their careers so far stack up against each other?

    George really should have been moved up earlier, he himself said 3 years at Williams was too much. If he was a free agent rather than tied to Merc I dont see why he wouldn't have been snapped up by RB given their driver issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭thefa


    Not the point made by the poster though that I disagreed with, ie. hasnt worked out for Russell. Piastri has a lower prize alright with Alpine or McClaren so will have to work his way up.

    He’s been in the sport less time than those two though, particularly Verstappen. Verstappen is probably the best driver at the moment and has had to be patient and have a team built around him to get to the point where he’s won one and looks like he’ll be amongst the favorites for a few years to come.

    There’s so much luck, timing, development that need to go right for even the very top drivers to mount serious title challenges. Given the competition, I don’t think it’s realistic for even some of the top talents to expect to be in contention in the very early years. There’s some exceptions like Hamilton but those are once every blue moon.

    And again, even if he had gone to RB it doesn’t necessarily improve his chances at a championship with Max there. Not a hope he hops into last years car and outperforms Max. Probably wins a couple of races and RB win the constructors but what good is that if he’s going to be Verstappen’s shadow for the next few years. I don’t see the point in winning a few more races early on if it hinders his chance at a championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Russell's 'loyalty' was completely self serving. He got his seat at Mercedes and Hamilton will likely only be around for a couple of seasons.

    Even with all Mercedes problems, it's still a better car than Alpine. And given their track records as constructors, Mercedes is likely to get back to the front where Alpine is likely to languish around the midfield. Russell's 'loyalty' is just smart business in exactly the same way Piastri's lack of 'loyalty'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭thefa


    So having loyalty but expecting future benefits from it make it completely self serving?

    Thanks for clarifying robot George 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah. There's no such thing as loyalty in F1. There suit themselves and if it coincides with loyalty, it looks like loyalty. The George Russell example looks like loyalty because ehe had the prospect of being world champion in one move so he stuck it out at Williams.

    There's absolutely no point in Piastri d1cking around at Williams for a few years so he can get a drive in Alpine to start his career and hopefully move to a top team. He's absolutely right to move to a midfield team and begin his career now instead of mucking about and wasting 2 years at Williams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    This will age well if all of a sudden Williams makes some serious in roads moving up the grid. 😋

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,140 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    To quote Murray Walker: 'If is F1 spelled backwards'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    McLaren are now, indirectly putting a lot of pressure on Ricciardo.

    Even if legally he has all the cards, and that is the rumours, he faces a choice of accepting a payout to leave or staying with a team where no one wants him around for another year.

    I imagine he is exploring options but the only openings seem to be back to Alpine or a move to Williams and it is not clear he is wanted in either team.

    If he does decide to stay at McLaren then, imagining the atmosphere that might exist there, his performance would be almost guaranteed to deteriorate.

    Either way a sad end to his F1 career.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Actually that is incorrect. 'if' is an I and on F.

    F1 is an F and a 1 so Murrey Walker was wrong.

    There is nothing similar about them at all except for the F.

    Now if you said 1F. Nope that does not work either thats just a 1 and an F.

    So ye that never made sense that sentence from Murrey Walker

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Either way a sad end to his F1 career.

    It's not over yet.


    He could go back to Renault/Alpine be rejuvenated there and rediscover his mojo.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    hes a bloody good driver, and a funny fcuker, it would be a shame to lose him from the grid



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Yep, under some real serious pressure there.

    Also if anyone wants to over read the fact that there's oranges in his hat then go for it.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,667 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    The green floaties in the background are clearly a hint that Daniel is moving to Aston Martin









    /joke



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,500 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Suppose for Ricciardo there's an element of chicken involved. He can stay and drive with McLaren next year. Nobody is likely to be happy with that. He can stay until McLaren pay him off, and then go somewhere else. Risk here is that McLaren delay to the point where there's no open seats left. Or he can give up next year's seat and negotiate a drive for next year, which will be substantially less money that he's currently guaranteed from McLaren...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    He's got to be keen to get a drive at Alpine. He isn't performing at Mclaren and I really doubt that's going to change next year. But he did well (better at the very least) at Renault.

    Even though the car is probably not as good as the mclaren, he can't drive the mclaren. But he might be able to drive the Alpine and rescue his career. He's finished if he doesn't drive well next year, whichever team he drives for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Ricciardo wants to go to alpine. McLaren want him to go to alpine. Alpine want him to go to alpine.

    The only issue is money. McLaren hope he will walk so save themselves a packet.

    Ricciardo wants to be pushed to get a payoff.

    McLaren know ricciardo cannot drag his heals as he may lose available seats so McLaren will give ricciardo all the time in the world to make 'his decision' even though the world knows he is out.

    Ricciardo is bluffing that he really wants to stay to see out his contract in an attempt to get McLaren to give him payoff.

    It's a game of chicken but ricciardo is blessed that all this went on as he really was finished in F1 if he did another year at McLaren.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Some red bull filth, pure barge board filth


    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Already chat on SM about Ferrari grid penalties in Spa



  • Posts: 1,824 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ricciardo is motivated by money more so than having a good drive. His career moves show this.

    He's got a fat salary at McLaren and I don't see him voluntarily leaving unless his salary is matched. Since nobody else is likely to pay him $15m (or whatever he's on) for his services, there might be some deal where McLaren cover the difference just to be rid of him. Otherwise I just see him staying there, not necessarily in the car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    You might be right about his motivation. I often wondered about his move away from red bull after partnering Max for a year. Its possible he realised he's just not as good as Max and he decided to cash in.

    Coulthard said he was offered Irvine's Ferrari seat to be Schumacher's no.2. But he refused because he believed he was best and would beat Schumacher. He acknowledged that he was very much mistaken in his typical humble style.

    I wonder how a driver can partner an obviously faster driver and not be honest with themselves about the fact that they're not as fast. Maybe Ricciardo just realised the fact that he wasn't fastest in the team, let alone the grid. But he knew he could still make a great career and plenty of money in a few years and live comfortably for the rest of his life.

    If I had to bet, I'd say he's lost his mojo and won't be back to his best. I hope he can find form again but I wouldn't bet on it happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭thefa


    Fact is you can’t confirm that no loyalty exists. While the top level of the sport is most definitely cutthroat, there’s appears some posters are trying to convince themselves that no human element exists here. Some even suggesting that Alpine would take Piastri right now without bother after he’s publicly humiliated them after being with them multiple years! The denial of any notion of loyalty is just an oversimplification of how ruthless it is at the top.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I don't see much loyalty. Can you think of many examples of great loyalty in F1?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement