Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

194959799100137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    To a point you are correct. But it's a dangerous stance to take - publicly snubbing a large works team before you have sat your ass in an F1 car.

    I'm not saying he shouldn't have gone to McLaren but it was short sighted to publicly humiliate the Renault company like that.

    You might say there is no loyalty but at the same time, nobody knows who will have the best car in 5 years time so to potentially narrow your options in any way is silly stuff for a young lad to be doing.

    Alonso and flavio will be on a beach somewhere retired in 5 years time and won't give a f*CK about Piastri.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I thought his statement was just being legally clear where he stood. Alpine were trying to pressure him into driving for them. They probably wanted to collapse any talks he might have been holding with other teams. I did t see it as deliberately humiliation. Rather I saw it as being explicit about thr fact that he jad not signed for them and as things stood, would not be driving for them.

    Contracts mean naff all in F1 so he probably had to make clear to Mclaren that he wasn't going to leave them in a sticky situation by turning around and signing for Alpine.

    Nobody seems to be recognising that Alpine tried to sabotage any negotiations he might be having and bully him into meekly accepting their drive. Bad behaviour from Alpine.

    Nobody looks good in all this, bit I don't see any one bad guy either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Because, as I sit here at 7:15pm Saturday evening. McLaren have not actually done anything. All we have are journalists quoting "sources". No statements from anyone bar Ricciardo posting on social media before Hungary stating he's staying. Zak did say he'd look for exit plauses but that was months ago. The current official line at McLaren is that Lando Norris and Daniel Ricciardo will have their contracts honoured next year. If that changes, then we can talk about how they are looking.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah McLaren have kept it all very civilised. When Ricciardo wanted to stay they gave him public backing. They've always publicly backed him throughput his struggles during the 2 seasons.

    Now there's a seat Ricciardo might be very interested in, I'd say they're delighted. But they haven't aired any dirty laundry in public. Textbook performance by McLaren.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭thefa


    I get your point and agree to an extent but George Russell is such a bad example to use.

    Like what’s the alternate reality where it works out better for him? Goes to RB instead of Perez for 2021 and be in Max’s team or go to the mess of Ferrari instead of Sainz that year? Maybe he wins a race a bit earlier but he’s got an opportunity to become the number one driver for Merc when Hamilton is gone (not happening at RB) at arguably the best organized team (which Ferrari are nowhere near).

    After only half a season at Merc he has as many career podiums as Norris, another guy with clear talent but who started off and is still in an upper midfield car that is a distance outside the top 3 teams.

    Russell’s loyalty to and patience with Mercedes is paying off.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Russell's loyalty paid off because the carrot was Mercedes and the stick was Williams.

    For Piastri, the stick is Williams but the carrot is only Alpine. Why bother with Williams when he could just jump straight into the mclaren instead. The end result is similar but without doing 2 years at Williams



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,791 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Alpine are the only one losing out. Mclaren and Ricciardo did a good bit of business.


    They will not lose out if Ricciardo performs well for them assuming of course that he gets the Seat. Now if he joins Alpine and is still performing as he is at Mclaren then that's bad for both Alpine and Ricciardo more for Ricciardo than Alpine as his F1 career could be over. Let's hope it does not come to that. F1 would be a sadder place without Ricciardo in it.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd agree with that except the last part. As Ricciardo is performing now, f1 wouldn't be much poorer without him. It would be better to roll tte dice on a rookie than hold on to a driver who was once very good.

    I don't get attached to drivers in that way. For some it's like an old shirt in the wardrobe which you know you'll never wear again but can't bring yourself to get rid of. The likes of Kimi in the last 3 or 4 years were just taking up space and people thought they'd miss them. But nobody really misses kimi now.

    Same with Ricciardo. I hope he can refind form. But if he doesn't and loses his seat, that's fair enough because F1 should be for the best current drivers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    Well George is the same age as Max and Charles and 2 years older than Lando. How do their careers so far stack up against each other?

    George really should have been moved up earlier, he himself said 3 years at Williams was too much. If he was a free agent rather than tied to Merc I dont see why he wouldn't have been snapped up by RB given their driver issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭thefa


    Not the point made by the poster though that I disagreed with, ie. hasnt worked out for Russell. Piastri has a lower prize alright with Alpine or McClaren so will have to work his way up.

    He’s been in the sport less time than those two though, particularly Verstappen. Verstappen is probably the best driver at the moment and has had to be patient and have a team built around him to get to the point where he’s won one and looks like he’ll be amongst the favorites for a few years to come.

    There’s so much luck, timing, development that need to go right for even the very top drivers to mount serious title challenges. Given the competition, I don’t think it’s realistic for even some of the top talents to expect to be in contention in the very early years. There’s some exceptions like Hamilton but those are once every blue moon.

    And again, even if he had gone to RB it doesn’t necessarily improve his chances at a championship with Max there. Not a hope he hops into last years car and outperforms Max. Probably wins a couple of races and RB win the constructors but what good is that if he’s going to be Verstappen’s shadow for the next few years. I don’t see the point in winning a few more races early on if it hinders his chance at a championship.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Russell's 'loyalty' was completely self serving. He got his seat at Mercedes and Hamilton will likely only be around for a couple of seasons.

    Even with all Mercedes problems, it's still a better car than Alpine. And given their track records as constructors, Mercedes is likely to get back to the front where Alpine is likely to languish around the midfield. Russell's 'loyalty' is just smart business in exactly the same way Piastri's lack of 'loyalty'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭thefa


    So having loyalty but expecting future benefits from it make it completely self serving?

    Thanks for clarifying robot George 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah. There's no such thing as loyalty in F1. There suit themselves and if it coincides with loyalty, it looks like loyalty. The George Russell example looks like loyalty because ehe had the prospect of being world champion in one move so he stuck it out at Williams.

    There's absolutely no point in Piastri d1cking around at Williams for a few years so he can get a drive in Alpine to start his career and hopefully move to a top team. He's absolutely right to move to a midfield team and begin his career now instead of mucking about and wasting 2 years at Williams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    This will age well if all of a sudden Williams makes some serious in roads moving up the grid. 😋

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,118 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    To quote Murray Walker: 'If is F1 spelled backwards'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭rock22


    McLaren are now, indirectly putting a lot of pressure on Ricciardo.

    Even if legally he has all the cards, and that is the rumours, he faces a choice of accepting a payout to leave or staying with a team where no one wants him around for another year.

    I imagine he is exploring options but the only openings seem to be back to Alpine or a move to Williams and it is not clear he is wanted in either team.

    If he does decide to stay at McLaren then, imagining the atmosphere that might exist there, his performance would be almost guaranteed to deteriorate.

    Either way a sad end to his F1 career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,791 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Actually that is incorrect. 'if' is an I and on F.

    F1 is an F and a 1 so Murrey Walker was wrong.

    There is nothing similar about them at all except for the F.

    Now if you said 1F. Nope that does not work either thats just a 1 and an F.

    So ye that never made sense that sentence from Murrey Walker

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,119 ✭✭✭This is it




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,049 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,791 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Either way a sad end to his F1 career.

    It's not over yet.


    He could go back to Renault/Alpine be rejuvenated there and rediscover his mojo.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,049 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,791 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,791 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,049 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    hes a bloody good driver, and a funny fcuker, it would be a shame to lose him from the grid



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Yep, under some real serious pressure there.

    Also if anyone wants to over read the fact that there's oranges in his hat then go for it.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,049 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,528 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    The green floaties in the background are clearly a hint that Daniel is moving to Aston Martin









    /joke



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,416 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Suppose for Ricciardo there's an element of chicken involved. He can stay and drive with McLaren next year. Nobody is likely to be happy with that. He can stay until McLaren pay him off, and then go somewhere else. Risk here is that McLaren delay to the point where there's no open seats left. Or he can give up next year's seat and negotiate a drive for next year, which will be substantially less money that he's currently guaranteed from McLaren...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    He's got to be keen to get a drive at Alpine. He isn't performing at Mclaren and I really doubt that's going to change next year. But he did well (better at the very least) at Renault.

    Even though the car is probably not as good as the mclaren, he can't drive the mclaren. But he might be able to drive the Alpine and rescue his career. He's finished if he doesn't drive well next year, whichever team he drives for.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement