Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

19192949697135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,459 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Do Alpine retain any links to Guanyu Zhou? He's acquitted himself quite well this year, and brings cash and sponsorship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Alonso is ruthless. He lies straight to the teams face on Sunday and told them he was going to sign with them. Then Monday morning they found out in the AM pess release that he had already signed with AM.

    I heard a great conspiracy theory which i think was from The-Race. They implied that Alonso strung Alpine along until after Sunday at the request of his bezzy-mate Mark Webber (Piastri's agent). Reason being that Piastri's contract says he became free to find his own seat if Alpine hadn't sorted one for him by midnight on Sunday 31 July.

    So suggestion is alonso waited until after that deadline to announce his AM drive, which helped Webber and Piastri in their negotiations. Piastri wins because he is free. If he's obliged to race for Alpine then he can't negotiate much for wages or conditions such as an equal share of upgrades. But he can negotiate more of that stuff if he's free. Plus he could go to mclaren which would be a massive bonus.

    Not saying I believe it, but it's certainly interesting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    With Flavio on board, you know there's going to be shenanigans



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Webber was under Flavio's management too, I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    What I find interesting is that Briatore was banned from representing drivers after race fixing scandal.

    How come he is back in the F1 family again?

    And how come teams are willing to deal with him?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    Because he appealed that straight away and it was overturned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    Just check and it was not exactly overturned. There was an out of court settlement in 2010 and the FIA dropped their appeal in French courts. Briatore was found guilty but the ban was only to 2013.

    From Pablo Elizalde on Autosport

    Quote

    "The agreement means neither Briatore or Symonds will be allowed to work in Formula 1 until the start of 2013 and in any other competitions registered on the FIA calendars until the end of the 2011 season.

    In a statement released on Monday, the FIA said both Briatore and Symonds had expressed regret and apologised for their actions."

    I am still a little surprised that teams are happy to deal with him though. Initially Renault seems to have back him and Symonds but a few days later sacked them. Assuming their own internal investigation showed that they had fixed the race.

    Post edited by rock22 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Today's installment of this story

    I've no idea how reliable the source is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    In the interest of journalistic fairness, would you mind crediting the source of the bit in bold.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    Sorry, have edited my post above. It was from Autosport 2010



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    Maybe you should check yourself. This is literally the second paragraph in the article you linked to:

    "Their ban, however, had been overturned by a French court because of irregularities in the process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    And if you read on, "In a statement released on Monday, the FIA said both Briatore and Symonds had expressed regret and apologised for their actions."

    "In return, they have asked the FIA to abandon the ongoing appeal procedure, but without the FIA recognising the validity of the criticisms levelled against the WMSC's decision of 21 September 2009, as well as to waive the right to bring any new proceedings against them on the subject of this affair," the FIA said."

    So, as I said , not exactly overturned. The FIA agreed to abandon their appeal after "Briatore and Symonds had expressed regret and apologised for their actions.".

    I deliberately used the words . not exactly overturned, to indicate that the matter did not end there but rather there was an out of court settlement in which Briatore was banned from F1. But this time the ban was until 2013, rather than indefinitely.

    I thought the clarification was useful information to people reading this topic,. You obviously do not agree .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,499 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    So looks like McLaren will get Piastri. Alpine look amateurish, Aston Martin look like pros. McLaren, hard to tell. Could work out well, could be a disaster. And not looking super nice either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    His driving is ragged at times though, as it was in 2018 with McLaren. If he had a Red Bull or Ferrari under him he could get away with a few mistakes but not in an Alpine or Aston Martin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It's true that he looks ragged at times. But I think there's always a nostalgic sense where we remember drivers in their prime as being flawless, but that doesn't reflect the reality.

    Alonso wasnovertaken by Max the first time last weekend because alonso oversteered and went wide. Amd max went on to win but max had a big spin in that race too.

    Nobody is perfect, being a little ragged isn't ideal but alonso is still doing a really good job. I predicted he'd be past it on his return last year and I'm delighted to have been wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Well unless they pay off the remaining year of Danny Ric's contract, I don't see that as too smart from McLaren



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    I can see why McLaren would want to dump Ricciardo for Piastri, but I still don't understand why Oscar would choose McLaren over Alpine. Alpine are ahead of McLaren in the championship and are a full works constructor. Neither of them look like challenging the top 3 any time soon but there's nothing to suggest McLaren is a better opportunity, particularly when he's been embedded with Alpine as a junior driver and they're so invested in making him take the next step, while he'll arguably be a number 2 to Norris at McLaren. Then again I also didn't understand why Alonso would jump ship to a much slower Aston Martin, so maybe Alpine are just a complete mess behind the scenes with no optimism looking forward.

    I also don't see why everyone is assuming this means Daniel will go to Alpine - I just can't see them or any other F1 team wanting him. He's performing poorly and trending down over time. Surely they'd rather look to another free agent like Mick Schumacher who's performing reasonably well and trending up over time. I still reckon Daniel's future will be a negotiated move to one of the other McLaren teams in Indy or Formula E that honours the payment terms of his contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    But is it not the case that Ricciardos poor performances have cost McLaren constructors points?

    I know points and tables tell a different story but the feeling I get is that McLaren have a bit more about them as an outfit over Alpine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Not to defend his poor form, however Ricardo has some points. Piastri has never raced an F1 car, sure he's tested one, but hot lapping isn't racing properly, he could wither under the pressure and not score any



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Yeah that's a fair statement, with a better performance from their second car they might be ahead. Alpine have lost a bunch of points to reliability though which is something you'd expect them to get on top of. Remember Alonso put the Alpine on the front row of the grid in Canada before going backwards in the race due to a power loss, and he was on a lap fast enough to be at the front of the grid in Australia too until a hydraulic failure.

    I'd still rather a works team than a customer team, at least Alpine have a chance if they ever turn around a really good car but McLaren will never beat their supplier. At best it's a sideways move and in no way would I say it's worth tearing up your contract with the team that supported you all the way through the junior series and to start your F1 career in such an acrimonious manner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,868 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Interesting video on the whole Piastri fiasco (not sure how to embed):

    More Piastri/Alpine F1 shocks by Peter Windsor - YouTube

    Apparently Alpine's deal with Piastri was that if he wasn't going to drive for them next year he'd have a seat at Williams for a year with Alpine financially backing him, so he knew he'd be driving in F1 next season. Guess he didn't want to go to Williams when there was a chance to join McLaren, and also appears to explain why Alpine were only offering Alonso a 1 year deal, if of course it's true at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Norris is nearly 20 points ahead of either Alpine driver. If McLaren had 2 decently performing drivers, they would be well ahead of Alpine. Even hamstrung by Ricciardo's performance, they're only 4 points behind Alpine.

    I'd say it's fair to assume the mclaren is the better car and team. Alpine show no signs of improving the engine which is the worst on the grid. Mclaren has the Mercedes engine. I think it's a better seat for a few reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I for one would love to see Daniel at Alpine and back to racing good again next year as he neven should have went to Mclaren in the first place. It was a mistake but then he never should have left Red Bill either.

    I wish Daniel and Alonso all the best for next year and I wish Piastri and his management a horrible time next year as punishment for him running away from the team that gave him the opportunity to get into F1.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,321 ✭✭✭✭klose


    I mean Alonso has duped Alpine, Piastri has by all accounts done nothing wrong contractually. Sure, Alpine gave him his shot being their junior is all but can't begrudge the lad a shot in a competitive car over sitting on the sidelines again for another season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    He would not have being sitting on the sidelines again for another season. He would have been in the Alpine who had him as there junior like you say and spent lots of effort and time on him. Alpine are also ahead of Mclaren at the moment in the constructors standings. He should have being happy when they said he was racing for them instead of going to Mclaren.

    Then if it did not work out at Alpine for him next year he could have went to Mclaren then.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Why would he drive for Alpine if he could get a deal he preferred at another team? Accordingly to reports, the contract between Piastri and Alpine had expired the day before , so he was entitled to arrange another seat if he could. And he did so. He didn't break any contracts.

    Alonso screwed Alpine. Lied straight to their face which (intentionally or not) allowed Piastri's contract to expire whixh gave him the freedom to arrange a Mclaren drive. What do you think about that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    You can see Flavio Briatore pulling strings in the background here He is Alonso's manager and was Mark Webber's during his driving career- the same Webber who is now Piastri's manager and who also happens to be a close personal friend of Fernando.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Why would he drive for Alpine if he could get a deal he preferred at another team?

    Because they trained him up and put lots of effort and time into him.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    But as far as he knew when looking around for other seats, alpine were not going to be able to offer him a seat for 23 due to Alonso signing for another year.

    If it was as simple as that, I wouldn't blame Piastri BUT it all looks like the management behind Alonso and Piastri knew exactly what they were doing and intentionally pulled the rug from under alpine and made them look bad along with it.

    Piastri should have quietly gone to alpine even after they announced him as driving for 23 and made them aware and issued a joint statement to reverse it and let everyone save face and maybe keep so sort of relationship.

    Renault have been around F1 for along time and much of that time with the winning engine. Not a smart move to publicly humiliate such a company who had supported him heavily.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement