Right to a house?

you can clearly see we re currently experiencing a rapid rise in social dysfunctions, in the form of addiction, mental health issues, and all sorts of dysfunctional behaviors, in extreme cases, for example america, this can be seen even clearer, such outcomes occur when humans are unable to fulfil their most critical of needs, i.e. property, health care etc etc, this can also be seen here in ireland to.... and the only solutions our state and major institutions have is to further accelerate these problems, which also leads to rapidly rising wealth inequality, i.e. we re in serious crisis, i.e. we re in state of social crisis, potential social collapse, and the institutions we have created to resolve these type of issues, are unable to react, and in fact keep defaulting to effectively the wrong answers, i.e. further accelerating the issues to hand....

yes, it truly does depend where you are in life, you will find, most, but not all, older generations truly are doing better, as polices have been more so in their favor, polices such as the maintaining the value of their assets such as property, but this is coming at a cost, a cost to younger generations, i.e. their own kids, grandkids, nieces and nephews etc etc

again, woman entering the work force, or remaining longer in the workforce, has not caused the hyper inflation of our property markets, the age of financialisation truly has caused this....

..again, you re simply unable to see that something catastrophic is failing, and its looking like most of our political representatives also dont see this.....

its clearly obvious, if we maintain this approach, there will more than likely be serious social and economic breakdown eventually, for example, elder care effectively collapsed during covid, this care is generally provided by younger generations, but if we continue as we are, and these younger generations are simply unable to provide themselves with their most critical of needs, they simply also wont be able to provide you with your elder care, as you age!

You really talk a lot and say nothing. Society hasn't collapsed or about to. We had most of these problems before and did very little about them now we acknowledge them. I take it you are below 30 and not used to the real world where revolution doesn't actually happen. The quality of life is greatly improved for all in this country since I was a child. I don't see people in rags on the street with no shoes which was possible in the 80s.

You just sound completely clueless and inarticulate. When I was a child nobody's mother had a job now the majority do and households are dual income this changed things dramatically and permanently. It took time and demographic were drastically different then and are vast young generation got older.

You are incoherently rambling. I asked you how the the government policies to get investment in to develop property is failing. You haven't answered that yet. You have tried and failed to bring in so much else but still haven't answered. I am guessing you can get by with out having cohesive thoughts but seem to think you have some insight into economics and social progress. Can I ask what formal education you have had on the subjects? I only have leaving cert honours economics and 10 years implementing government social policies

Free space between your ears if you think that is possible.

Im reminded of that famous debate before the last election when Pearse Doherty was asked where he was going to get the €40billion necessary to carry through on their campaign pledges, without raising income tax, suffice to say he couldn’t explain how they would pay for all they promised. I say let them in there, very quickly the public will see it is more of the same, you can’t “magic up” mass housing, free healthcare/education/sanitation without someone having to pay for it.

What is with you not answering questions put to you? That appears to be your problem. You aren't listening and are just regurgitating information you read. The study of economic was/is not just taught one way. Criticism of economic views is key to the education so you are not only taught neoclassical economics you are taught economic principle and their effects along with the need to understand statistics.

You don't get simple logic. Noticed you failed to explain how you are educated and informed on the subject. We can rule out you studied/understand economics. I implemented decisions made by others and had no say in the policy. Not sure what you do for a living but do you get to decide how everything is done?

If you are well into your 40s how do you not see the improvements in living standards?

academic economics is primarily neoclassically based, and id completely agree with economist steve keen on this one, 'it perfectly describes a world that actually doesnt exist', i.e. its largely nonsense!

..the fact that under such school of thought, humans are considered 'rational beings', hence the term 'rational expectations', when the fact is, humans are in fact highly complex emotional beings, whos decisions are based on such...

...and one of the most disturbing facts under this school of though, it still has a refusal in accepting the true functions of money, banks and debt in our reality, no wonder it completely missed 08 coming, when many critics of so, seen it a mile off, this can be clearly seen in the actual data....

yes, of course i do indeed see the rapid rise in living standards, but there has also been a rapid decline at the same time, neoclassically based ideologies have a severe inability of seeing both are in fact true, at the same time! neoclassical projections tend towards dichotomous outcomes!

...and again, one of the main failures of neoclassical, i.e. logic! humans are not logical beings, period!

what question would you like answered?

lets keep this simply so, which one first?

fair enough, im not going back over the tread, i simply dont have the time, so tis up to you.....

lovely stuff, round and round we go, fairly typical neoclassical thinking alright!

...so what is the questions, i.e. im giving the opportunity to engage, in an attempt to simplify, but not to neoclassical levels of over simplification?

...or maybe, just badly informed....

What is your education or working experience to say you are knowledgible on the subjects of economic and society development? Clear enough for you?