Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1230231233235236333

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I think the question is, what was Vettel doing on Question Time in the first place? He some kind of armchair current affairs wonk?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Yeah, I'm just surprised to hear that Seb was chosen to appear on a UK current affairs discussion. Not to belittle him but I wouldn't be surprised to see Ant & Dec on it soon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    He held his own, something Braverman didn’t. The audience (who appeared to be well up politics) had no time for her( or Boris for that matter) and seemed to know about The Proticol and what it meant. Braverman meanwhile was like a broken record. Vetttel is a German who says it as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭ath262


    There's some sort of campaign underway by a number of head brexiters - Mogg (or Ress-Mogg or whatever) was on radio or TV this morning moaning about the UK being treated unfairly by the EU, both Truss and Johnson have been making a lot of noise over the last couple of days about overriding the NIP - along the lines of their amazing oven ready deal "not working it has to go", and Frost and I think another a minister were speaking the the US on the subject - looks like Frost had a audience of about 10 or 12... dont know why it was even reported on - is this dead cat stuff to distract from the 50 fines for Downing Street parties, or to keep the UnDUP happy ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,764 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Nobody is hiding behind it, everyone is aware that the UK CAN do whatever it wants.

    But a signed agreement gives rights and avenues to deal with breaking the rules. Not to mention the massive reputational damage.

    Now, the UK, and currently is, arguing that it has no choice, it is trying to make a moral case since legally they are snookered.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,580 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    More unsubstantiated claptrap.

    If you can point to where in the NATO treaty, the organisation can't go beyond Germany please do so.

    No treaty with the UK was broken. Feel free to provide a source.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,363 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    “Originally intended” so there nothing that says NATO couldn’t move east then ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,560 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Two by-elections they'll probably lose; claims of 5-10 "red wall" Tories in talks to cross the floor - there's a chance he'll need to keep the DUP on side as that "thumping 80 seat majority" is beginning to evaporate



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,518 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    A man who's career involves repeatedly going round in circles, with the odd car crash thrown in - he's well positioned to speak on brexit!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,301 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Yes Treaties are broken all the time by countries who depending on the gravity of the situation are then shunned by the rest of the international community. You break a treaty with a small African nation and unfortunately the rest of the world might just look on disapprovingly. You break atreaty with the largest trading bloc in the world and theres gonna be some serious consequences like nobody will trust you again meaning all future treaties will be far harder to get a good deal on and likely have pretty draconian clauses in the case of you breaking them.

    Also as many have pointed out theres no treaty to limit NATO expansion all assurances were made orally. Also not sure if Russia is really the country you want to use as a comparison for the UK.

    Finally Ireland broke no Treaty, we were granted legislative independence under the Statue of Westminster in 1931 allowing us to amend out constituation and move from the Irish Free State to Eire and then in 1949 the british Government passed the Ireland act recognising we were no longer part of "his majestys dominions".



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is it possible that the UK could come up with a proposal that eliminates checks to goods destined for Northern Ireland, yet still protect the integrity of the single market? Maybe some type of trusted trader scheme or stiff penalties for anyone supplying goods that are eventually found in the EU?

    If the UK do unilaterally change the protocol, does that mean that Northern Ireland is taken outside of the Customs Union by default? Since there is no longer a bilateral legal framework in place? What a disaster for the North if that were to happen.. custom posts around the land border and losing access to the SM. Look at how many times milk crosses the border for example. Who's to say that Republicans won't rise up with violence if they are removed from the SM...

    Interesting week ahead!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,086 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    In what way was he less positioned than Farage when he started appearing.

    QT has been stooping to clickbait guests for a while now.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The mythical Smart Border.

    It doesn't exist anywhere else, catching bits that eventually make it in is wide open to abuse, how are non trusted traders processed, the UK are incapable of conducting their own border controls nevermind others virtual ones.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    But why is Johnson persistesting with this path? They don't want a trade war with the EU or broken US relations. He doesn't give a toss about the DUP or the North in general. Why go to such extremes when it can only mean bad things for the UK. Why is Northern Ireland suddenly so important to the Tories?

    Baffling and worrying times.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,334 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    It never was and it never will be; what's important to Boris is the fact he can given an external enemy (EU) to his party and keep that in the headlines. This ensures the voters will remember what a strong alpha male he is standing up to evil EU "got Brexit done" and "UK are now being bullied because EU refuse to change".



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Because, bluntly, Johnson is a liar and charlatan whose tactic is to just endlessly operate in campaign mode and antagonise rather than, you know, actually govern and implement the "oven ready" deal he ushered in in the first place. Brexit is a busted flush but they'll avoid properly implementing it as long as possible. Maybe the plan is to have a Taiwan situation where everybody just agrees not to look too hard at the details. Don't ask, don't tell.

    So while the papers talk of Protocols and EU intransigence, they're not talking about the internal controversies, cost of living shames, and other issues things the Tories should be hung out for. I do think it's as simple as that. If the EU threaten sanctions then I'm sure Johnson will pivot again, or use the tabloid mouthpieces to stir up more factionalism. The guy is a spoofer and the DUP idiots for going along with it all. Again. All because of fear of a North leaning towards Dundalk instead of Durham.

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    And because, NI is doing quite well out of the protocol, and is at the moment the best performing part of the UK, exposing Johnson brexit in GB as a failure!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Exactly. A prosperous North shows Brexit as folly. If leaks have shown Tories to be openly scoffing at Partygate and lockdowns, imagine what they must say about the DUP in private. Good little loyalists willing to shoot themselves in the face for the Union. Ashamed to be even called Irish, and would self-destruct their own economy rather than given an inch towards all island harmony.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,580 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I think the bigger plan is that every time Johnson threatens the protocol, it severely discourages investment in NI. He doesn't even have to do anything to try and hold NI back.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    If that's what he's doing, they are ven more devious shower of c you next Tuesdays than I had thought them to be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭ath262


    The 'Charm offensive' by Frost, Burns et al in the US has not gone well - Frost suggested that Biden and the US administration did not grasp the situation in Northern Ireland and details of the Protocol... think he might have that idea backwards!!

    Following up on the recent letter to Ms. Truss there's a congressional Delegation on it way this week from the US to UK, including the Chairman of the Ways and Means commitee

    David Frost does Britain no favours in its US charm offensive on Brexit (Irish Times €)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭timetogo1


    And the DUP go along with it. For the definition of useful idiot they could use their logo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭timetogo1


    Brexit Republic is back on the podcasts. Informative as usual.

    He made a good point. When the EU compromises the UK banks the compromise and then moves onto another issue and moans as if the EU will do nothing. So much for taking back control.

    I got that impression too. No matter what the EU seems to do the UK moans and blames the EU. It must be a nightmare negotiating with that. When ever you make any progress they just move the end goal further away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,764 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Tbf, what other option do they have? Like the Tories, they cannot stand on their record so need an enemy to focus attention on.

    Without this what do they offer to a new NI? Not much, so they need to have a 'war'.

    The strange thing is many people simply accept that its the EU they are fighting against, for the sake of the Union. When in reality it is the UK government and voters they are fighting against as they are in favour of Brexit and agreed to this deal.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Johnson meeting NI leaders about reforming the Protocol, rather than scrapping it. Who knows what that means, or how long that position will last.




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,334 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    He's hitting the trifecta of "Cross community support, no hard border on the island of Ireland and no border in the sea" as his goal yet as always give zero answers to how to birth this unicorn...



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The comment that the leaders will receive "tough" talking must enrage Long or O'Neill, especially given the former really gave the DUP both barrels this week, for taking a wage while scuttling the Executive. As you say, this is empty rhetoric from Johnson; what possible amendments could be done?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    The country can break a Treaty alright ............ but they can't expect just to break bits of the Treaty that they don't like while still having the other bits remain

    If the UK had an agreement with India so that it could send them X amount of trade tariff free per year in return for 10,000 visas, you couldn't expect the Indians to continue letting them send that trade in tariff free if, the day after signing, the UK decided "actually we don't want to give out the visas so let's scrap that part but keep the bit we like. All good India - yeah?"


    Ireland broke an agreement to pay land annuities to the UK government which resulted in a a good chunk of a decade or so of economic war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,301 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    So Charles speech contained nothing about the protocol and Boris is backing down from the recent threats as literally everyone else but you knew he would.




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,870 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    'Ireland broke an agreement to pay land annuities to the UK government which resulted in a a good chunk of a decade or so of economic war.'

    That cost Ireland dear due to the 'economic war' that caused GB to stop buying Irish beef among other things. As a consequence, our economy suffered desperately and beef production for export was basically stopped.

    However, when war started in 1939, GB looked for the beef again, but there wasn't any. So an economic war bit them hard when suddenly they needed the very thing they chose to embargo.

    I suspect that if there was a United Ireland, many aspects of the divorce deal would contain similar poison pills that will bite one side or the other, depending on the thoroughness of the negotiations, and the financial arrangements that are agreed, and the relative strengths of each side. By which I mean the eagerness of the GB side to rid themselves of their financial burden that is NI, and the delight the Irish side would have of taking on the Unionists as fellow countrymen and all that would entail.

    I think the Windrush generation would have a lot to say about answering the call from Britain to help provide much needed manpower after the war to help rebuild the shattered economy.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    We both know the user will be back in a few months, making another claim that the Protocol is about to die. It's bad form to play the man not the ball, but this is Kermit's modus operandi: parachute into the thread, make bold.claims the Protocol is to be dropped and Ireland kicked out of the SM. When neither come to pass, away they go for another month or two. Rinse and repeat. Their obvious leering lust for an Irish-exit from the EU clouding anything resembling judgement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,162 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I think while London will push through and the EU will fold. It will Likely mean Britain with unfettered access to the EU single market than us being divided out.


    Most of Europe isn't plussed either way and Johnson will have taken encouragement from recent statements.


    America may decide things though.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,580 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    No, it won't. It means London is playing the tired old dismantle the protocol card before doing another climbdown. As usual, the narrative of the EU screwing Ireland over any day now for six years proves false.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    But, you've lied on other threads. Why should we believe you now? Remember your quote about Ta-Nehisi Coates that you made up? There's prior art with you.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,580 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Hang on. Are the defenders of Brexit really so desperate that they're invoking a treaty from a century ago?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Would you be even surprised if they had? At this rate I await somebody, straight faced, arguing for a return to the Gold Standard.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,580 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    In hindsight, no. I suppose it's something different from the standard EU betrayal dead horse they've been flogging for over half a decade.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,086 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    And an agreement where the victim were paying reparations to the colonial oppressor at that. Not really the same as the willingly signed Brexit agreement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,928 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Here's Simon Coveney mentioning "uncertainty on the island of Ireland in terms of single market membership". The very thing I have been saying and some completely dismissing.

    That threat is real and the fact it's actually being mentioned should be waking people up.

    In the absence of a tough EU response the reality is that Britain will decide whether we are in the single market or not depending on what it chooses to do.

    Again we have words from the EU but nothing on consequences which should be spelled out to the British public which can only help create it's own pressure on the Tories.

    The British media is now asking about the consequences and so far it's just blank stares.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    You completely misinterpreted Coveneys comments for your own interpretation. He is not "floating" some plan B in plain sight to self-destruct a pillar of the EU to placate the UK, he's referring to the whole island operating as a single market - which the Protocol is intended to do.

    He clearly states " the island of Ireland" in relation to the "single market". When are YOU going to wake up and admit your eagerness to see the EU burn is overriding reality?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,928 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    You keep going around in circles moving goal posts.

    Ireland will not be in the single market if there is going to be a hole on our borders.

    If you want to believe in a fairytale where such a world exists then more power to you.

    And just for clarity, I don't want to see the EU "burn", I want it reformed.

    AND I equally don't want our future decided by decisions in London either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭moon2


    Ireland will not be in the single market if there is going to be a hole on our borders.

    Great! You've already identified a solution to your problem which doesn't require the Republic of Ireland exiting the euro zone! All we need to do is shore up that hole in the border!

    As this event would only occur as a result of the UK closing its borders to the Republic, it would probably be a relatively easy job in comparison to Ireland unilaterally deciding to close the border with NI.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    What goal posts? My position hasn't moved. You, not me, assert that the EU will remove Ireland from the EU Single Market without our consent. Coveney was not referring to that single market, but the potentiality of a hard border between north and South. Simple as. Ergo, the current "single market" between the two countries as defined thanks to the Protocol. The Republic will continue with existence within the EU SM, with the obvious calamity of renewed borders in Ulster. You are the one taking the passing comment and running.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,928 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    No, you're wrong, I have never said the EU will throw Ireland out of the SM.

    That is not how it would happen.

    It will happen by default. It won't be some grand announcement in Brussels.

    It will be increased checks between the continent and Ireland over time until suddenly people will realise that we are less and less part of the SM.

    I repeat what I have always said, the Tories will only be forced to stop this behaviour when the consequences are laid out for them.

    Next you'll reply the EU is playing 4d chess instead of what I strongly suspect is the reality (particularly in the context of Ukraine) that they have no intention of sanctioning Britain.

    If the EU came out this week and laid out the steps they are going to take I'd be happy with that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,764 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Kermit.de.frog, what do you think the EU should be doing to stop the UK from its current path?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,928 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    In my view they need to describe what exactly the retaliatory action is going to be so the British public know. This should increase opposition to these tactics in London and help put pressure on the Tory party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,719 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Nah. Sure what tory voters are gonna read EU retaliatory measures. Sure the Tories don't even bother themselves telling the public what benefit they will get out of removing the protocol. They can't as NI is faring better than GB since Brexit. The only thing they could say is they are "levelling down" NI



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You're like a child desperately seeking attention at this stage. SC did not say what you're asserting and just because you want to be right on it does not make you right. SC's position has been clear all through the Brezit car crash. So please stop with the paranoid nonsense!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The EU has said all along that they will decide on any action after the event. That way, they are the side who are not making threats - threats which will simply be used as fodder for the anti-EU press.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement