Too many people would have to keep it a secret...

But we should believe you when you claim to have done work for companies and committed active fraud?

Why would we believe anything you say when you believe very silly stuff and have been caught out in lies before?

But your example contradicts your position.

We are now finding out about all of the financial irregularities at RTE.

They weren't able to keep their secret.

Yet you content that literally millions of people all over the world are able to maintain the conspiracy to fake all space flight and to convince people that the world is round.

Any yet Markus is claiming that as something that proves the conceit of the thread and to declare us bizarre for not agreeing with it.

The amount of waffle posted on these forums touted as "fact". Must be dozens of discredited conspiracy theories.

And you're still clinging on to one falsehood, the lab leak. The theory was that it was man made, on purpose, in a lab.

And no, I don't think Dee was the only one who knew. But there were clearly too many people to keep it a secret. Which is why it came out.

So again, you are claiming that this somehow proves your insistence that all conspiracy theories can be true, but then point out that it was too big to be kept secret.

And again, you are proposing this in the context of your own claimed belief that all space travel is faked.

The people at RTE were too greedy trying to pocket a few million. And this was what exposed them.

Meanwhile millions of people are involved in the fake space industry, spending trillions over decades for literally no reason. And this to you is something that can be obviously kept secret.

Again, you are exposing how your own argument fails.

RTE has a grand total of 1800.

The number of people who would need to be involved in your conspiracy theory about space travel would be in the millions, spaning many countries, agencies and companies.

You are contending that RTE was exposed because "they were too big".

This clearly does not make sense, hence why you aren't addressing it.

Deceptions can exist within organisations. But the rest of your post is illogical. How does that disprove "too many people would have to keep it secret"?

Your post is completely lacking in logic and evidence.

It was missed by earlier auditors because of how it was reported, and the amounts.

You're implying, completely without any evidence or justification, that the earlier auditors spotted it and knew what was going on and kept quiet.

What do you have to justify that? I'm guessing nothing?

Whereas what seems to have happened is that it come up on audit radar as it was over €100,000 when two payments were bundled together.

Tubridy received two payments of €75,000 each in 2022, totalling €150,000 (being a payment for 2021 and a payment for 2022). It was these payments that prompted the review by Grant Thornton in late March of this year. 

https://www.thejournal.ie/external-investigation-potential-financial-issue-rte-6100006-Jun2023/#:~:text=In%20a%20statement%20released%20by,was%20understated%20publicly%20since%202017.