Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Parking and traffic in Phoenix Park

1636466686986

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    What speed is "inappropriately fast"?

    @bubblypop didn't say what speed the 3 or 4 laps was at.


    Since they finally decided to separate pedestrians and cyclists someone thought it was significant.

    Do we know why the cycle path was moved onto the road? It could have been to eliminate parking in the shoulder and not because of pedestrian/cyclist conflict.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,500 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    When someone is cycling "inappropriately fast", what exactly is the danger in your view?

    Approximately, at what speed does riding a bike become "inappropriately fast"?

    When you describe the park as being like "the Tour de France", do you mean people wearing appropriate clothing for riding a bike or going fast or that they travel about 200kms around the park? To be honest, its a fairly stupid comparison so I'd be interested in understanding your logic there!

    Do we know why the cycle path was moved onto the road? It could have been to eliminate parking in the shoulder and not because of pedestrian/cyclist conflict.

    My understanding was that it was moved for a number of reasons including the existing cycle path was effectively a footpath which hindered any meaningful progress for someone travelling by bike. Many people commuting by bike didn't want to use the cycle path as it required having to yield to cars at each crossing - quicker to cycle straight down CA. Also, the increase in people walking in the park during lockdowns required additional path space.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'm surprised people don't know the rules and laws around cycling.

    "...Cyclist driving a pedal cycle without reasonable consideration..."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It was a knee jerk reaction to give pedestrians more space when the park was busy (which it never is according to this thread) during the lockdown and they made some comment about safety.

    Since the park was mostly closed to cars and/or parking at the time parking was irrelevant. The decision to remove parking permanently came after.

    Though they've closed various parts of the Ave to cars before.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,500 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What evidence is there, apart from what I perceive to be your bias, that cyclists are not using reasonable consideration? How many people have been injured by people cycling in the park in the last 12 months? Where in the park did these incidents take place?

    For comparison, how many people were affected by drivers who weren't exercising reaasonable consideration? How many people were injured somehow by drivers in the park in the last 12 months? Where in the park did these incidents take place?

    FWIW, I have cycled many times in the park in the last 12 months. I travel at speeds around 30km/h depending on wind, etc. Is this inappropriate speed? Was I cycling without reasonable consideration?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,741 ✭✭✭Effects


    I think there's a decent sized one in the park alright.

    Screenshot 2022-03-01 at 09.40.54.png




  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Cyclist cycling round the park is unreasonable? Is it speed you’re concerned about? Does cycling clothing offend you somehow?

    I get that you don’t agree with Chesterfield parking making way for cycles, but you seem to be genuinely concerned about cyclist behaviour, especially those using the park for recreation or exercise.

    Could you elaborate a little?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Actually I already stated as a cyclist I was only too happy to see new cycle lanes. All I said was the car parks can be full now and it could be better managed.

    Now you've created a load of strawman arguments rather than have reasoned discussion. Clothing is your own sensitivity nothing to do with me.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Feel free to quote my posts around my objections to people fashion choices you imagine to be there.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    some deflection you've got going on there, Flinty! You know full well that that was in jest

    I'll repeat my question, posted earlier "I get that you don’t agree with Chesterfield parking making way for cycles, but you seem to be genuinely concerned about cyclist behaviour, especially those using the park for recreation or exercise. Could you elaborate a little?"

    Is it just speed that you are concerned about? Or other cyclist behaviours in the park? I am not trying to wind you up. I am genuinely interested



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,741 ✭✭✭Effects


    I think most people can agree that the Grand Prix that's been happening in the Phoenix park for the past few decades needed to be scaled back, and that's what's happening now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Strawman arguments suggest its vexatious. I didn't mention any concern about "cyclists" or "especially recreational or exercise" So I can't elaborate on a point I never made.

    I'm saying "some" cyclists" cycle like idiots, excessively fast and I would add aggressively to that. That my experience of "some" other cyclists on the cycle path and other parts of the park. That my experience as "cyclist". If you want to defend "all" cyclists thats your own crusade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    That's a catch 22, which I suspect you know (not without your own bias perhaps :) ). We don't keep proper accident statistic on cycling accidents, or injuries. They are both massively under reported but also mis-reported by merging hospital data with other stats. So an accident off road will be presented as on road cycling in some stats. Which will then be misreported in the media. That's why there a giant thread of cycling reporting in the media. Whereas there a lot of more reporting of accidents with cars. So its not similar comparison.



    I didn't say all cyclists. I said "some" cyclists. Someone asked about speed. I just quoted the text of the fixed penalty fine, as thats how its phrased. Regardless itts not about speed, its about appropriate speed. Someone mentioned some people treat it like a race track I only agreed, that being my experience.

    A speed limit is not a target. It is simply the maximum speed you are legally entitled to drive at on a stretch of road. You must drive at a speed appropriate to road and weather conditions, volumes of traffic present and likelihood of hazards. These are all vital ingredients which drivers must factor in every time they drive. When drivers ignore these factors, even travelling below a particular speed limit, they could very easily find themselves in a potential crash scenario. A small reduction in your speed could have a massive effect on the outcome for you or others.

    How on earth is anyone meant to answer for you. Only you can do that. I certainly don't feel the need to defend bad drivers or cyclists, and I don't associate myself with either group. If you want to identify with or defend "all drivers or cyclists" thats nothing to do with my comments.

    if you have links to good quality data on accidents stats in the Park, please share. There are self reported stats, which are not that useful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Well thats literally the driveway to the car park. Maybe your suggesting we drop granny and the walker off in the middle of the road, or park in the entrance and have a picnic right there in the entrance?

    If we cycle it its 4 mins. So say 8min if granny or the toddlers break into a run. Or just bring bicycles for everyone. Maybe congestion is a factor. if we do it at 4am it could be quicker again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    How about a obstacle course to get into the park. if you can't get over it, you can't use the park.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,500 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So you've no data to back up your assertion. You referred to cyclists travelling at an inappropriate speed. I'm trying to understand how you have decided that they were travelling at an inappropriate speed. Roughly, how fast were they going? Did they hit someone?

    The cycle path along the road sees cyclists of differing speeds pretty much all of whom are travelling much slower than the adjacent traffic. But I don't see you referring to the drivers as travelling at an inappropriate speed so you'll understand my confusion. What makes a cyclists travelling at n inappropriate speed despite being slower than traffic right beside them?

    What makes it inappropriate?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    1. I didn't pick that spot, I typed "ashtown castle" into Google, if I'd known you were going to be so anally retentive about the whole thing I'd have used exact measurements
    2. Exact measurements: it is 90 metres from the nearest parking spot, hardly unrepresentative of the actual journey times
    3. When you manage to get a space near the "driveway to the car park", how do you manage to make it to the actual amenities? Do you teleport there, or do you....ummmmmm....I dunno....maybe walk there?
    4. Bottom line: You called it a 40 minute walk, round trip. It's not even a 15 minute walk each way.
    5. I count 125 parking spots there. How many should be provided, in your opinion?
    6. We were primarily talking about kids and toddlers when the issue of Ashtown Castle came up....it was you who brought up Granny and her walker. She'll be doing well to make it round the hedge maze, but I'd say she's great craic on the slides
    7. There is a finite amount of parking available everywhere. If you can't get parking, instead of taking responsibility that you didn't get there earlier enough, sucking it up and going somewhere else, your solution is to make the car park bigger....correct? a) how much bigger, b) what happens when the bigger car park gets full.....go bigger again? c) where does this end?
    8. Yes, dropping those with limited mobility off while you go park the car is a thing that has been done for decades. I've no idea what your issue is with doing just that.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Translation "waaaaahhhhh wahhhhhhhh, I didn't get to park right outside my destination like some sort of moviestar.....woe is me, won't someone think of the fictional horde of grannies in wheelchairs who can't move a total of *checks notes* 92 metres....waaaaaahhhhhhhh!"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    More like you've no data for your bias. Least I proved a link to a study, you provided diddly.

    Faster then me on the bike, around 15kmph, faster than cars on the road doing around 30kmph. I think that excessive on a cycle/footpath passing other cyclists (and pedestrians) with no margin for error. Faster then me in the car.

    I didn't refer to drivers inappropriate speed because we were talking about cyclists. I'm not defending drivers. That's a false equivalence.

    The argument here is that the park is for people walking around, family, children. These even closed roads to facilitate this. Somewhat contradictory we have no problem with high speed cycling through the same pedestrians, families and children, or tourists on leisurely cycle. No bias there at all.


    Obviously struck a nerve with this one. We'll see a 5% jump in Strava times this evening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Context...

    its been said it never busy except if there's an event on, or at the hottest day of the summer. I just pointed out its been full more than once in the middle of winter very much off peak. I was just pointing out there's all types of people using the park facilities, often with limited mobility. Often needing supervision, dropping off isn't always possible.

    If you are going to guesstimate journey times to the best case scenario (not even into the car park in this case) you can hardly complain if some takes a more realistic measurement, even a worst case scenario.

    If you only want to suit yourself no compromises fine. OPW has been here many times before and had to roll back due to public and political pressure. They've done this already with the roll back of cul de sac on North road back to one way. Closed gates only to have to reopen them.


    As for the visitor centre parking. They could validate parking, so only those using the facilities can park there. No ones likely to pay for parking if they didn't were going there specifically for the facilities there. If they are going for a walk or unloading a bike they will go elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭Wikidy


    But no matter what they do inside the park, I am not keen on cycling the short distance from the Halfway house to the Ashtown Gate, especially with kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Again. Small children walk more slowly. Especially on the return leg.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    LOL.

    I suggest you a new thread on needy entitled wheelchair users. Bound to be popular.



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    its been said it never busy except if there's an event on, or at the hottest day of the summer. I just pointed out its been full more than once in the middle of winter very much off peak. 

    It has been said that the entire park, not just Ashtown Castle car park, is only ever really busy when events are taking place. You pointed out that one particular corner of the park, one car park, was full on a couple of occasions when that might be the most attractive corner of the park due to the amenities available at that time. There's a huge difference between those sentences and what you're claiming. It's not like you can sit and have a picnic when the grass is wet, better stick to the enclosed areas with hot drinks, toilets etc.

    Your failure to answer the other questions asked of you speaks volumes.



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jaysus, this granny has gone from a walker to a wheelchair in a matter of hours. I'd suggest you have bigger issues than getting parking near the playground.



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Fair enough. Get up earlier, so, or go somewhere else.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Question: Were all the wheelchair spots taken up on those times the car park was full?



Advertisement