Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish language gets full EU status today

1679111219

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Some very interesting stuff here on the background to the appearance of Ulster Scots as a 'thing' and just how recent it is.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Ulster Scots has the same linguistic authenticity as the language used by young lads that go around in little gangs calling everyone "fam"



    Ulster Scots the language equivalent of people thinking they are smart for quoting "flying spaghetti monsterism" as an obstructive mechanism against anyone who want's to try to do something positive related to some actual religion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Sure let’s pretend it doesn’t exist and that the largest party in no has said that while it is in its current form the it is impossible to implement the NDNA in full and therefore it would have to be cherry picked to bring in ILA. So direct link. But I am not going down that rabbit hole with you. The troops are mustering to get me banned 🙂.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Seems like I was right. If you go back to early in this thread you were leading everyone to believe that the Irish language was sorted by consensus. It took 7 pages before we discover that what you mean is you don’t have the first clue what impact this fudge would have on Irish signage, whenever, if ever, it is implemented.

    so we are agreed that the is no consensus on whether Irish language signage will be going up. phew!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    As asked and so far avoided...can you show the clause in NDNA which states it is all or nothing deal? Can you point to anything it has to say on the Protocol?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Firstly Donald, I am not a big fan of funding be pumped into Ulster Scots language. Our communities are not symmetrical. I would suggest other aspects of Ulster Scots culture are much more important to our community like marching bands, bagpipes, drumming, Scottish dancing (and indeed to a smaller degree Irish dancing), our friendships with Scottish people, etc.

    just on a side note, you will be hearing much more reference to ulster-British culture.

    I would suggest that Ulster-Scots language is in use everyday by almost every person living here. Our English spake here is peppered with it, much more than I am aware of Irish words being used (except in the likes of place names).

    the support I would like to see for ulster/Scots culture to compare with Irish language would be very practical ie support for music lessons, band uniforms and instruments and running costs, Hogmanay events and Burns nights, and indeed subsidy for ferry travel between ni and Scotland to ease travel costs. They are just some of the top of my head. Do that and I am sure most of my community would welcome similar support for Irish. As Francie says, no one should fear equality - and in this case equality will cost serious bucks for the Ulster Scots community to catch up on funding levels, not to mention the ulster British aspect developing. Maybe Europe would help 😳



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The only place there will not be dual language signage will be where there is a pocket of dissent. Nobody is going to insist it be there, it will however be erected where there is majority agreement.

    Dual signage has long ago started to be rolled out and is a continuing process, the latest being Belfast City Council

    Belfast City Council gives green light to bilingual street signs - BBC News


    I thought this quote from a DUP councillor hilariously lacking in awareness:

    "Many people regard the addition of an Irish street sign as cultural branding of their area," 


    The fact is, an area without dual language signage is an area that will brand itself culturally. If the two languages are represented then you cannot tell what an area is culturally...which is normal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Is there anyone in the political sphere that has an issue with support for Ulster Scots downcow?

    Can you quote them or point to them blocking legislation on it?



  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Jaylen Attractive Bellboy


    The fact of the matter is Northern Ireland is a part of the island who’s proper language is Irish. We were forced to speak English by the British. It is our national language and as far as I’m concerned bi-lingual signage should be island wide, including the north.

    if that’s a problem for anyone my advice would be to relocate to mainland UK. Leave the island if the language offends you so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,506 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Afair Irish is supposed to be first and of at least equal size + the same visibility as English. I think Irish language signage is required for public bodies (not English, so either Irish or bilingual or else separate Irish and English signage). These were changes in the "Official Languges Act" (checked and that is from 2003, how time flies https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/6bdcf-official-languages-act-2003/).

    I do remember there was some small amount of controversy about aspects of that, because Irish was already present on street signs/other signage erected by public bodies etc. here and always had been (?) and extra requirements were criticised as bureaucratic & officious, making work and increasing costs.

    Like most such minor aspects of government bureaucracy that don't affect people very much at the end of the day, I don't think anyone worries about it now (other than those who deal with it for their job or something) and it is just a fact of life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I never said there was such a clause written in to it.

    do you think if we had an agreement that I would paint your house and you would fix my car, that it would be reasonable if I said after you fixed my car that there was no clause that it should all be done so we’ll forget about the bit about painting?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Ha...Unionist arrogance and supremacy again.

    It isn't 'quid pro quo' downcow. You need to accept the days of blocking rights and equality are over.

    When will Unionism learn and stop driving into cul de sac's



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭lurleen lumpkin


    'Get me banned?' So the consequences of your posts are all everyone else's fault. Unionists gonna unionist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    No I would love to respond to you about the spelling of Irish but I would be risking giving people cause to report me and have me banned. There is no point in me reporting your scoff at ulster Scots as it will be seen as fine. Was there anything in NDNA about treating the two cultures the same on forms?

    Having said that, I have some sympathy with your statement. I would hear similar said within my community and might have said the same myself until recently, but some people have a real interest in developing it.

    I might surprise you, but I got challenged for saying I only know one person reared in the unionist community who has a big interest in developing Irish language, well that is one more than I know has a big interest in developing ulster-Scots language

    I do though love the words peppered through our lingo and would hate to see them go. I am curious do you guys use many Ulster Scots words down south?

    like would you know what I meant if I said that one particular poster has been doing a lot of blethering today?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Wrong again francie. You’ll be surprised there is no consensus on this. Some areas don’t have the option, some areas require 50%+1, some require only 15%. So it’s not always majorities who decide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Would you include the Gaeltacht areas for your dual language diktat? They might not be to happy with you, but sure you could relocate them to the islands



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Is there anyone else agrees with francie. ie that when agreements are made, that either party can decide that they will just do the bits they like. It’s actually hilarious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Francie you are looking at ulster-Scots through Irish eyes. To suggest that our cultural identity has just arrived is nonsense. The difference is it has been self sustaining and the community follow their interests instead of being directed by funding down narrow routes like language.

    I would suggest the best bits of Irish cultural identity have also been self sustaining and I personally wouldn’t include language in that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I didn't say it had 'just arrived'...I very specifically said 'the appearance of Ulster Scots as a 'thing' is a recent phenomena.

    Specifically it became a 'thing' around the time when Unionists were first being forced to agree to Irish language rights. 1998.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,666 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This is gas stubbornness downcow.

    Some areas have different requirements because the 'requirements' have been agreed by majority.

    Where there are pockets of dissent are where Unionism has used it's majority to not allow dual signage.

    This ain't rocket science.

    Are you in denial that there is more and more dual signage going up?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    here Donald this will take a couple on mins and give you a laugh.

    I would be curious how you guys do

    I have just done it and cruised 100% so my Ulster Scots is dead on.

    you’ll even get a certificate for your wall if you do ok 🏅

    https://discoverulsterscots.com//language-games/wheen-o-wurds-1/index.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    i guess most of you guys must be amazed by our decision making.

    A majority on a council vote through a decision that only 15% are required to win a vote ie 1000 voters. 750 vote against and 150 vote for - the vote is carried.

    Francie is not wrong about that. That’s what he means by a majority decision - over 15%.

    only in nationalist controlled councils mind you. Gerrymandering 🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭boardise


    Sinn Féin and their apologists ,as usual,blow two ways on issues like this. On the one hand they constantly dredge up happenings from centuries past which they cherry pick when trying to buttress their general approach;on the other hand they try to slide away from events related to the 30 odd years of a pointless murderous conflict (which they condoned and justified and participated in through propaganda) by urging us all to 'move on',



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Go off with yourself - it's that sort of inflammatory rhetoric that does nobody any good. Very few, if any Irish people were ever forced to speak English. They learnt English for same reasons that people still make an effort to learn it worldwide - for their own economic advantage. People aren't generally stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Here’s the Irish quiz. I impressed myself at it and got 22/60. Not to bad. I must have been listening to my dad.

    https://learningonline.typeform.com/to/MSKGMrs3?typeform-source=testyourlanguage.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Gaelscoileanna are popular alright, for various reasons and not all wholesome. But one motivator for parents is future career paths, to get their little Seán or Sineads into the bums of civil service jobs and pensions, churning out Irish language materials required in turn by legislation. What a waste of a working life.



  • Posts: 667 ✭✭✭ Braxton Cuddly Scalpel


    As I commented way back at the start downcow, why not get yourself a copy of Buntus Cainte 1 and try larnin yersel, nowt to be afeard ah.

    You'll be surprised how much of our NI word structure is taken from Irish.



  • Posts: 667 ✭✭✭ Braxton Cuddly Scalpel


    Is this whole thread not about respect of a language thats not your own ? You might not like it and you might think its not real, but should you not respect it anyway ?



  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Jaylen Attractive Bellboy


    How are they relevant? Last time I checked they use both languages with a preference towards Irish, obviously, that includes road signs, which is the topic of this discussion in the first place.

    ill wait eagerly for you to show me the link between them and bilingual road signs in the north.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Jaylen Attractive Bellboy


    Mad to think you’re old enough to have been witness to that, all I have is basic history at my disposal how jealous I am.

    since you’re an expert, I’m sure you can correct this then?

    The first British Law enacted in Ireland which specifically banned the use of the Irish language was Article III of The Statute of Kilkenny from 1367 which made it illegal for English colonists in Ireland to speak the Irish language **and for the native Irish to speak their language when interacting with them**

    so yeah, they definitely forced Irish people to speak English mate.



Advertisement