Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

16768707273164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows sent an email about Jan. 6 — apparently on his personal account — saying National Guard would “protect pro Trump people”, per his contempt report: 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Read about this. It seems very strange to me that Meadows would think he could get 10,000 National Guard Personnel activated to protect Trump supporters at the 06 Jan rally called to support Trump's cause while the election result was being read into the record on the hill. Looking back at the day and the chaos in the upper echelon of Washington political and security circles in the days before the 6th about the non-availability of reinforcements for the DC police [who was the authorised person to sign the paper need for the activation and call-up of the Guard] back then. The Mayor etc all voicing off after the fact on what they could not get done to help the Capitol and DC police when it was needed. Edit: If what is reported to be in an email sent by Meadows referring to the NG being active and present on the day for the supposed reason mentioned is absolutely true, it flies in the face of the reported chaos in DOD and military circles about who could call up the NG to support the DC authorities. It could tend to add substance to the whatever about political hacks abusing national authority to supress the reading of the vote result into the record on the 06 Jan 2021.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Tonight's revelation by Liz Cheney at the committee hearing on Mark Meadows that Don Trump Jnr texted Meadows asking him to tell Trump Snr that he needed to talk to the US and tell the people attacking the Capitol to get out, that in Don Jnr's words "things had gotten out of hand, that tweeting to the Capitol Police was not enough" seems to show that Trump was advised to tell his supporters to stop what they were doing at the Capitol. It doesn't actually show Don Jnr had told his dad this but there would be no reason for anyone to say he couldn't do so. There seems to be contact made between Fox News and Meadows asking him to get Trump to get things involving his supporters at the Capitol under control or his legacy would be destroyed. It's apparent Trump Snr's foot-dragging did him in in the long run and Don Jnr realised what was happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,153 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Not happy just attempting an insurrection, they considered a coup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The pressure that the committee is putting on Meadows by releasing the contents of the texts on his phone to flip and turn up at the hearings to tell all of what he heard, saw and conversations he was involved in on the 06 Jan about the insurrection attempt, and any he took part in on the previous days is terrific. I'd imagine his family also must be feeling the heat. It's obvious now why the committee is going after the phones belonging to certain Republican party members of the senate and house who were on the hill on the 06th Jan. the committee wants to prove the members were complicit in an attempt to subvert and destroy the existing US republic and its constitution.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,262 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    The mark meadows text messages are big news but they just put meat on what most people already believed to a high degree.

    Donald Trump’s head must be spinning for the all the “winning” bigly he’s been doing lately. I’m joking of course, because a trump appointed judge this week denied his appeal to block his tax returns going to congress, and there was the rejection of his executive privilege claim. And an accountant that dealt with his taxes at the accountancy company he used has been granted IMMUNITY to testify before a New York grand jury. As I said so much win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,953 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I see he is going to hold a media conference on January 6th. As if anyone wants to listen to that clown now.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 richierichwithouttherich


    42.6% of Americans still have a favourable opinion of Donald Trump so plenty of people still want to listen to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,019 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Citation? 42.6 is hard to believe even from somewhere like Rasmussen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 richierichwithouttherich


    Screenshot_2021-12-22-19-38-59-715_com.android.chrome.jpg

    Considering he was impeached twice and caused an insurrection his popularity has risen which should be concerning for Democrats that no matter what they try and do they can't shake off Donald Trump.

    Imagine if it was a an actual politician they were up against.. Dems better hope Donald runs again as ron de Santis would walk in to the whitehouse at the moment.

    Democrats are all over the place at the moment you have manchin causing mayhem then AOC and Bernie complaining about everything while Kamala and Joe are like the principal and vice principal who can't get the class to quieten down.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Would you consider it to be a fact that the Republicans also cant shake off Donald Trump?

    Would you have any thoughts on what Trump and former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly revealed about them both taking booster shots having a possible negative effect on GOP supporters [given how the chosen audience booed him for the revelation of apparent support for the Biden & Fauci approach, as distinct from the small and strange reaction from some elected GOP personalities] where it comes to Media graphs displaying possible approval ratings on Trump as a possible candidate or useful ally to the GOP in the 2024 presidential election and Senate/Congress/State elections the GOP think very important to its political future in the US?

    Post edited by aloyisious on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Any actual politician would not be a cult leader which means they are not immune to scandal so I am not sure an actual politician would help their case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It was interesting to watch and listen to Trump's Surgeon General tonight on CNN discussing Trumps support of the Covid-19 booster shot saying that if Biden had asked him earlier to support his Admin's push to get more people take the shot, Trump would have done so and come out about having taken the booster shot himself. The former surgeon general called Trump President during his statement. Bill O'Reilly seems to have come onside with Trump in promoting the US public to take the booster shot against the Covid-19 pandemic in the US. It might be a way of Trump taking control again of his electoral chances for the next few years or supporting some-one favourable to him.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    "The former surgeon general called Trump President during his statement"

    Isn't that standard protocol though? That ex-presidents retain "president" as their official title for life?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,725 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    It is yeah, it’s an odd thing and generally harmless enough use of a title and respect. Although Trumps use of it now on his press releases is distasteful but generally in keeping with his lack of dignity.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,432 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The US President retains the title during his life.

    The reason they are always referred to as Mr. President is because when Hoover was President, a radio reporter or presenter could not get President Herbert Hoover out and kept muffing it. So it was then accepted to just refer to them as Mr. President and avoid the possibility of such unfortunate mistakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    • That's true enough as things go. It's that it seemed to me when watching the interview that the former surgeon general used it to make a political point: that Biden didn't contact President Trump and ask him to support him in the ongoing fight against the Covid pandemic. He didn't [if I'm getting things right] say: President Biden did not call President Trump and ask him for his support. Following on from your post, I went looking for Mr Adams interview words and the CNN interview and it's enabled me to see my initial reading of it [in reference to Mr Adams] was wrong. He may not have been slamming Biden for inaction. This is the interview wording:
    • Trump endorsed coronavirus vaccines this week, saying it's protecting people and not killing anyone.
    • Jerome Adams, his surgeon general, suggested he waited to say this until Biden praised him.
    • "You can't deny that that is when he changed his tune and came out and supported vaccinations," he said.

    Former President Donald Trump's surgeon general implied that Trump waited to express public support for coronavirus vaccines until President Joe Biden praised his involvement in them.

    Jerome Adams, who served as US surgeon general under Trump, told CNN's "AC360" on Thursday that he was surprised Biden had not praised Trump over the vaccines earlier, and suggested Trump had been waiting to back the vaccines until he got the mention.

    —Anderson Cooper 360° (@AC360) December 24, 2021

    "We know the president's love language is words of affirmation. We know Joe Biden is known for his cooperation," Adams said.

    "So, to me, what was most shocking, what was most telling, wasn't that Donald Trump came out and supported vaccines — it was that it took Joe Biden 11 months to finally do what he has been known to do for 79 years, and that's to reach out across the aisle. "Once he gave President Trump those words of affirmation, you heard President Trump come out and say: 'Thank you, I appreciate that.' And he applauded it. And I hope we see more of that."

    The CNN host John Berman seemed surprised by Adams' comments on the Thursday show.

    He said: "Come on, Dr. Adams. I mean — are you are telling me that Donald Trump didn't praise vaccines or boosters until Joe Biden decided to thank him for the vaccines? That's what he was waiting for?"

    Adams responded by saying that he had studied psychiatry and psychology, and said: "People have different words of affirmation, different love languages. That's the truth.

    "That is when you saw Donald Trump change his tune. I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm saying you can't deny that that is when he changed his tune and came out and supported vaccinations.

    "And regardless, that's a good thing."

    Biden had said on Tuesday: "Thanks to the prior administration and our scientific community, America was one of the first countries to get the vaccine."

    Trump endorsed the vaccines to the conservative commentator Candace Owens in an interview published Wednesday.

    "The vaccine worked. But some people aren't taking it. The ones that get very sick and go to the hospital are the ones that don't take the vaccine," he said.

    "But its still their choice, and if you take the vaccine, you're protected. Look the results of the vaccine are very good, and if you do get it, it's a very minor form. People aren't dying when they take the vaccine."

    Trump has sent mixed messages over his support for the coronavirus vaccine. He sought praise for the vaccines being developed while he was president, and got vaccinated himself.

    But much of his base is against the vaccine, and he notably did not get vaccinated in public, despite many other politicians doing so.

    He was booed by a crowd of his own supporters on Sunday when he announced that he supported vaccines and had received a booster shot.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-s-surgeon-general-suggests-the-former-president-only-decided-to-publicly-back-vaccines-because-biden-praised-him-first/ar-AAS727i?ocid=uxbndlbing

    The gap remains between the former and the present presidents', as volunteering still seems to be something former president Trump does not go for if it does not enable gain for himself over the national interest of killing off the Covid-19 pandemic first. Trump had been vaccinated but wanted Biden to praise him for getting vaccinated before electing to urge their fellow citizens to take the Covid-19 vaccinations themselves.

    Post edited by aloyisious on


  • Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ^^^^^ If some find the a bit TLDR then

    ..just read the last paragraph!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,021 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    It's also completely incorrect. Look at this line "Trump had been vaccinated but wanted Biden to praise him for getting vaccinated before electing to urge their fellow citizens to take the Covid-19 vaccinations themselves."

    He's been recommending people get the vaccine for pretty much since the time it came out. He went to the conservative conference in Feb and told that bunch to get the shot.

    He did it again in March.

    And April, and July, and August, and September...

    Like many Republicans, he is averse to vaccine mandates, and his position on masks may be questionable, but it is certainly not correct to say that he has not been a promoter of people choosing to get the vaccine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 953 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    A rare concession to sense. I wonder how many voters that has cost him.

    Of course they will simply add it to the rest of the cognitive dissonance.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The word "electing" was mine, and not in Mr Adams line, just my understanding of what Mr Adams meant when he said what he said. I noted Mr Adams line on the psychology of Trump in reference to getting Trump to do and/or say something he probably wouldn't have felt inclined to do, in this case in the present political atmosphere where he doesn't seem inclined to make any statements which could be read as reaching-out or validating Biden's presence in the White House. Choosing could have been an alternative word for me to use instead of electing. The reach-out being made by Biden to Trump made all the difference, as far as Mr Adams professional opinion is concerned. Maybe Mr Adams wasn't aware of the other moments where Trump advised the general US populace to take the vaccine to protect itself from the effects of Covid-19. Thank's for your input, I missed you from the ongoing debate as a US resident giving us an update from home soil, alongside the other US residents in this debate.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,021 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Sorry you miss me, but Trump is no longer President, so I don't see much merit to hanging out in this thread very much. You'll see me on the other current events threads...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,274 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Yeah most Republicans in power are pro vaccine most notably Trump. I think because he thankfully is off social media people don't follow what he says these days which is understandable but nonetheless he has been pro vaccine since day 1 and is likely to use the vaccine rollout as one his main achievements when he runs in 2024.


    De Santis, Abbot etc all pretty pro vaccine also, the only GOP types who aren't the headbangers in the house MTG and Boebert etc,,,and while they make a lot of noise online they don't matter that much to the GOP overall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,153 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Not directly related to Trump but certainly is an interesting story about one of his supporters.

    Remember all the claims about Biden being compromised because of Hunter connections in Russia?

    This is a sitting Republican representative who went to Russia, supposedly met someone and fell in love and got married within 8 months.

    (Could well be another example of the conservative hypocrisy around accusing others of that which you are guilty)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Just noticed that Cawthorn got divorced after just 8 months of marriage. It's always amusing when the very people who bang on about "the sanctity of marriage" and "family values" ditch all that in their own lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Reference the viability of Trump's chance to have an effect on the next election, the outcome of his planned media event at Mar-Al-Lago on the 6th [the 1st anniversary of the insurrection bid by his supporters on various fronts] should be telling when what he says is given a rigorous post-mortem for truth and fact, if in fact it does go ahead and not cancelled on or before the date.

    Until he renounces the lies of his claims to still be president and throws in the towel publicly on his and others efforts to promote his viability for another term, I'll decline to accept that we must take it for granted he will not run for it again. IMO, it's simply not safe to do so given the public claims from persons still high in US national affairs that they see him, and not Biden, as their legitimate president.

    If he does throw in the towel, it must not be accepted as a quid-pro-quo for his not being prosecuted on charges of instigating the 2021 insurrection bid by his deluded followers and leave them to be the sole bearers of responsibility of his efforts to overthrown the established US Republic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,099 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Trump has cancelled the Mar-A-Lago media event he had planned for the Capitol insurrection bid 1st anniversary, blaming the news media and the House Committee investigation for the cancellation. Two new lawsuits have been started against him by former Capitol Police officers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,982 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Not sure id even see it as a concession to sense, in that it’s still self serving after all - he sees himself as the chief reason there are vaccinations, thanks to his project Warp Speed (which was a good program in fairness), and has always wanted to soak up as much credit for that as possible.

    The problem on the avid Trump supporters side is that it’s a bit too much doublethink to process… there’s no covid, it’s just a cold, it’s a trick, masks are an affront to freedom, Trumps vaccines to lower the virus risk are great. In fairness, it’s a particularly hard circle to square.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    I watched a Jan 6th INsurrection! documentary on RTE last night. On 4 seperate occasions claims were made that the event was analogous to 911...

    And people wonder why some say the democrats will have a miserable mid term this year...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,805 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    I'm not sure many American voters care all that much about a documentary on RTE, they're more concerned with domestic terrorists having another go at it.



Advertisement