Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

17967977998018021111

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,800 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    That's not patronising, that's just somebody being a complete dick.

    Plus if one of my friends or work colleagues (to use the examples in the ads) had the virus the rest of us wouldn't even be going out as we would most likely all be deemed close contacts... What an idiotic advert



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭watchingfromafar


    He absolutely is being punished.

    If the government mandates that you can't leave your house without a vaccine would you call that a choice too?

    Because it certainly isn't businesses idea to have brought these passes in. It is government restrictions on society which dictates who can and cannot socialise.

    Choice is being able to reject or take something without any consequences.

    Do you think everyone who doesn't get the flu jab should be banned from indoor venues? Because thats a choice too right?


    I take it you are in favour of adding all vaccines for all contagious diseases in future? Sure why not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,036 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    Ironic that with more people there's less restrictions, as clearly more people in that scenario means an increased risk of someone actually transmitting Covid.

    I'd understand it with U18's more so if it was going to have a massive difference on the level of transmission (I understand vaccines do reduce transmission somewhat).

    But you're talking about a population who are very unlikely to become seriously ill themselves from it, so there really should be more of a choice in that age category, no real need to coerce them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭watchingfromafar


    Even old Bill Gates is saying they are only slightly doing something to transmission.


    Given that the difference is slight it is incredible that people think passes do much for transmission.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,274 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Its right up there with the ridiculous notion that €9 chicken wings worked last year, the world is bonkers atm.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    lol, a little off topic. just wondering why you said middle aged white men? Seems odd to mention their ethnicity, age and sex as if it was important.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,229 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Slim chance the government are going to go against NPHETs advice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,939 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Its frightening that people think like this. As you type those words can you not see how frightening that is for society?

    Your words completely rely on the inherent assumption that the options and the "choice" is agreed by all to be fair and good.

    "You have a "choice". If you want to be normal, you just have to do this thing that you don't agree with."

    Thats not a choice, thats a threat.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,274 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Or maybe Leo the Leak is saying it so that if they do go against nphet it'll look like his idea :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Captain Barnacles


    Bill says we need to re do the vaccines, how about they focus on treatment this time ?

    Why is this also a no no in discussion ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,288 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    You want to close schools early where kids play with friends and believe if a kid doesn't take a vaccine they don't need then tough look about social activities.

    You certainly have no kids or care about kids in general and I would be banned it I said what I would like to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Good piece here. When we get over the obsession with cases and turn off the news, that's when the pandemic is over. It already could be if enough people wanted it.

    Some historians have observed that pandemics do not conclude when disease transmission ends “but rather when, in the attention of the general public and in the judgment of certain media and political elites who shape that attention, the disease ceases to be newsworthy.”8 Pandemic dashboards provide endless fuel, ensuring the constant newsworthiness of the covid-19 pandemic, even when the threat is low. In doing so, they might prolong the pandemic by curtailing a sense of closure or a return to pre-pandemic life.

    Deactivating or disconnecting ourselves from the dashboards may be the single most powerful action towards ending the pandemic. This is not burying one’s head in the sand. Rather, it is recognising that no single or joint set of dashboard metrics can tell us when the pandemic is over.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I actually just heard that ridiculous RSVP ad on the radio there again and caught the website this time - https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/84a4f-risk-symptoms-venue-people/

    The undertone of fearmongering under this supposedly sensible official advice is frankly disgusting. Basically trying to make people afraid of doing perfectly normal activities with friends and family.

    There has been a definite ramp-up on these ads in the last week or so - probably explains why the media are pushing the agenda so heavily again (as we saw in the reports on the profits made from these ads by TV/radio stations).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Or more than likely Leo trying to play the good guy ,as in nothing to do with me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I really want to understand what you think is the risk here.

    The vast majority of adults - especially the relatively small cohort ACTUALLY vulnerable - have been double/triple vaccinated.

    Who are you protecting with this approach? You said earlier about hospitals being overrun - from what? Mild case of the sniffles?

    I think your issue is more with HSE capacity but as I said before, that's a long-standing problem and nothing to do with/long before Covid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    Covid has been so polarising. The “we’re all in this together” didn’t last long. I always considered myself a centrist. Wear a mask, wash your hands and get the jab, a sensible plan out of all this I thought.

    as flippant as it sounds, I can’t got for a spontaneous pint after work anymore, as there is no after work.. I have to book a table a couple of days in advance. A thousand other example I could make. This may not fit a dictionary definition of lockdown but I feel very restricted, I feel pretty oppressed.

    in USA terms I don’t fit neatly into a blue state or a red state. But middle ground seems to be disappearing here just as it has there, it’s either the perpetual lockdown brigade pretending we’re not in lockdown or the virus doesn’t exist brigade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭noraos


    Not OP, but the vast majority of decision makers / advisors etc. in relation to COVID restrictions, being forced on the young today, are middle aged white men.. not sure how diverse our government is, but the only faces I see on a daily basis are the faces of boring middle aged white men.. who clearly are not interested in the damage they are doing to our younger generations..

    "To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all."-Oscar Wilde



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭watchingfromafar


    I think you'll find the actual "covid doesn't exist" people are a fraction of a percent of what the restriction, authoritarian "choices have consequences" lovers call anyone who questions whats happening.

    Reality is, covid exists. But we are in the mist of great mass hysteria.

    Its basically like we are hive mind that has body dysmorphia and we are overly focused on this and some people can't let go.

    The vulnerable are vaccinated. Everyone who wants it is vaccinated.

    Time to move on.

    It is pure hysteria. We have lost all sense of balance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I think we can leave the nonsense Twitter-baiting gender/race stuff out of it and just refer to them as overpaid, out-of-touch/insulated bureaucrats in fairness

    There's plenty of poor quality (younger) female TDs in Government too. Gender doesn't indicate competence.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    seems oddly descriptive and I'm still not sure why their age, gender or sex would be surprising or remarkable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Middle aged is a stretch to call some of them too. Some of them are elderly.

    It does have an impact though. Someone who owns their own house, stable employment that hasn't been affected is less hurt by their restrictions as they have been as much as a college student who works in a bar part time as an example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale


    What's the booking a table days in advance for a pint thing? I'm not finding i have to do that at all. That's in cities and smaller towns I've been.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭noraos


    I agree, perhaps the description was unnecessary, I did add my own work 'boring' to the OPs wording, also unnecessary .. oops

    but I think possibly, what was implied is there is only one particular sector of this society who are making these restrictions and they are blissfully unaware of the restriction are effecting the people and the future generations- those people are middle aged, have bought houses- probably multiple, have had college education- and all the experiences that can goes with that, have partners living with them, have financial stability and security, and lets be real.. they have a very comfortable life to live ahead of them in their golden years...and so do their children.

    For the rest of us, ALOT of us, and our children, our lives are being effected by these restriction, more than they will ever ever realize.. only yesterday I heard of a 38year old man who hanged himself at home in his mothers house... (he was living at home to save for a mortgage and had an appointment with HSE - which had been pushed out).

    I think when people are angry at the government and NPHET and restrictions, perhaps the image that is conjured in someone's mind is that of ''The Fat Cat''

    "To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all."-Oscar Wilde



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    When childrens shoes were considered a luxury non essential item we all knew who was calling the shots. And it wasn't women or children.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,916 ✭✭✭User1998


    How can you mock someone for predicting there will be more restrictions at some point in the future? We have been at this for almost 2 years now and have had restrictions eased/worsened several times despite our high vaccination and at times low rates of covid



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    That's a pretty reasonable position in fairness. But, has it really been polarising out in the real world rather than somewhere like Boards ? (genuinely asking). I'd guess that in my extended circle of friends/relatives/work colleagues its a fairly wide spread of people, and from what I've seen, like most, they're obeying most of the restrictions most of the time. Nobody is 100% following all the guidelines by any means, but by and large people are being sensible. I think.

    You'll always get the headers at the extremes and the wind up merchants online. We've seen all the name calling, lockdown merchants, nervous nellies, curtain twitchers, hide under your bed, and the let it rip brigade, covid deniers, bla, bla, bla, rinse and repeat. Sensible debate has largely been overtaken.

    But hey, it is what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,413 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It's to stop the unvaccinated taking up hospital beds by not having them in places where transmission is high.

    Vaccines are effectively keeping the R number down along with other restrictions, they're not perfect, but good as a range of measures (and transmission post vaccination drops significantly which is great as a lot of Irish have had the booster now).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,413 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    What % believe it's an EU plot to control our lives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,916 ✭✭✭User1998


    The problem is that there’s still a massive stigma about not getting tested, theres people out there who’d considered you a granny killer for leaving the house with cold symptoms



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's also the public message to get tested, whatever you have. Today is the last day you can guarantee not being in isolation on Christmas Day!



Advertisement