What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

There is no way that Trump didn't plan to take control if he lost.

He laid the groundwork for claiming it would be stolen months in advance because he knew there was a distinct chance he could lose. On that basis, he definitely planned on how he could steal it if he lost.

The idea that he did it for any other reason but to hold onto power in defiance of the will of the people is absolutely and utterly absurd.

He is no different that a wannabe dictator and I'd challenge anyone to think otherwise.

What tactics in particular do you have an issue with? Are they acting illegally or outside of their powers?

You know by now that Noto’s opinion is proof enough

You might laugh at these clowns but with the amount of right wing militias only waiting for the sign to mobilise the US could be in a dangerous place in two years time.

Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and the former White House advisor Steve Bannon floated an idea that an "army of patriots" and "shock troops" should be prepared to take over the government if former President Donald Trump were to run and win in 2024.

During Thursday's episode of Bannon's "War Room" podcast, he and Gaetz outlined their plan if Trump should win.

Trump has not yet publicly announced he is running in 2024.

"People didn't like that Donald Trump raised his voice, but sometimes you gotta raise your voice to raise a ruckus and to raise an army of patriots who love this country and will fight for her," Gaetz said.

"We're going to operationalize the performance to go right after the people who are imposing the vaccine mandates, who are enriching themselves, and who are selling out the country," Gaetz added.

Bannon then went on to suggest to a nodding Gaetz that there should be a "theory of governing" before elaborating on what his plan would be if Trump were to be president again.

"It's fresh and it's new. This is Trumpism in power. That's when we went to the 4,000 shock troops we have to have that's going to man the government. Get them ready now. Right?" Bannon said. "We're going to hit the beach with the landing teams and the beachhead teams and all that nomenclature they use when President Trump wins in 2024 — or before."

trumps father paid a doctor to lie about trumps "bone spurs".

is there a bone spur graft that trump supporters can get to be like their hero?

All hearsay and not validated, right? So without proof it's only your opinion and not fact, correct? Hey, just going off the rules that are applied to me, here.

Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

She is not accused of a crime. She’s only exercised her Right to free speech and petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The House Select Committee is not allowed to seize her records because of it.

Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

She is not accused of a crime and there has been no probable cause argument made. The House Select Committee is not allowed to seize her records because of it.

Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

She is not accused of a crime. Where is the indictment of a Grand Jury? The House Select Committee is not allowed to seize her records in order to venture into a fishing expedition to try and maker her held responsible for the supposed crime they are looking into.

Amendment VI. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

She is not accused of a crime and not been informed of the nature of the reason for this unconstitutional search and seizure. Where is the indictment of a Grand Jury and the evidence against her to warrant the seizure of personal records? The House Select Committee is not allowed to seize her records in order to merely venture into a fishing expedition to try and maker her held responsible for the supposed crime they are looking into.

What we are seeing the Democrat House Select Committee is the old Soviet mentality of doing things... Show me the person and I will show you the crime.

What proof do you have that he had bone spurs? Have you examined his feet?

It's a claim made by a known liar. Why would you believe it? He has no particular history with the military, never showed the slightest interest in it prior to seeing them as a good pool for votes.

So yet again you have got it wrong. Nobody here has to prove he doesn't have them, it was up to him, and now you since you are standing squarely behind him on it, to prove it. Should be easy enough.

Apart from the doctors letter, which we all know can be easily obtained, what other impact did it have on him?