What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

Only one place left to appeal to and that is the Supreme Court. they might not even take the case.

PowerPoint is great, you can even plan your coup attempts on it.

Notobtuse "Nope, Trump would not have accepted a continuation of his presidency without support from Congress."

So I think we can all be pretty satisfied that Everlast is wrong. Clearly Trump, and indeed the insurrectionists, were simply out to have their voices heard by their local representatives. While it may LOOK like he was planning on ignoring the election results, what he really was doing was something, context, something Biden is senile, HC!

To illustrate the depths of Trump's abnormal psychology, here's Penn Gillette talking about what Trump is really like. Something he learned when he appeared on a season of Celebrity Apprentice. The whole clip is interesting, but specifically at 2:35 he talks about Trump going into a rant about a random blog he'd read on the Internet which claimed he hadn't sold some property for enough money. Even a random blog on the Internet criticising Trump was something Trump could not let go of, and had to vociferously point out that he'd made a profit on the sale. Trump must win every argument and dispute, no matter how small. No matter how insignificant to the course of his life. And if he can't win the argument, it's like you say - he must proclaim that something is crooked, that something is going against him, that there is a conspiracy of some sort. He has never been able to admit simple defeat or that he was simply wrong. Not ever. The only way I imagine him doing so, would maybe be to save himself from a significant stretch in prison, but even then, he'd contradict whatever he said after getting off.

It's hilarious how his sycophants portray him as some sort of alpha male when the reality is he's so weak, he can't admit being wrong about anything ever. Imagine idolising someone that pathetic.

There is zero point in debunking the nonsense you post on here.

Whenever anyone confronts you with facts, you retreat for a few days only to re-emerge with more of the same. It is almost as if you go back into your echo chambers and replenish your supply of right wing talking points.

Trump and his cronies attempted to overturn the will of the people on multiple fronts. The fact that you don't think this happened, or that there should be consequences speaks volumes.

I swear, if Trump had of introduced prima nocta, I have no doubts his zealots would happily hand over their significant others.

It is my contention, as should be everyone's, that when those in control use their powers to do things against people's rights guaranteed under our Constitution, they are engaging in illegal activities.

And as I had mentioned, the committee is violating a person, who has not been accused of a crime, of her First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. Her name is Caroline Wren.

What if it's just a conversation between two adults?

clearly you have no idea of the powers of a congressional committee.

No, it's not, but in the same vein it's shouldn't be dismissed merely because the opinion and information came from me, either.

You've never had bone spurs on the bottom of your feet, have you? I do on my right heel, like Trump. I can tell you this... No military person would want me on their squad because I would only be slowing and dragging them down because of what happens from long walks, or running, or carrying heave loads for periods at a time. The pain is such you can no longer put pressure on it. That IS why it's a reason to be exempt from military service.

"You've never had bone spurs on the bottom of your feet, have you? I do on my right heel, like Trump."

This man's devotion knows no bounds!

I'm not dismissing anything. You made a statement about the congressional panel. I asked for reasons why you held that position. You have provided nothing. Simply an opinion.

Posters have pointed out that an opinion doesn't mean anything unless it is backed up. Not because it is your opinion, although your track record on simply making up stuff based on no actual evidence does mean that the burden of proof weighs heavily on you, but that is the normal course of debate.

Otherwise anyone could simply say anything and others must treat it as a fact. As you continually do on this thread, everyone could simply post whatever rubbish they like and expect everyone else to respect it.

So I ask again, what tactics in particular do you have an issue with? Are they acting illegally or outside of their powers?

Bit like Padre Pio and his "stigmata"😂

Suddenly proof is needed