Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fine Gael Demographic

Options
168101112

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,114 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Would not necessarily be impossible for SF to form a government without FF or FG involvement on those numbers. Obviously would depend on the makeup of the independents. I've said it before but if a non-FF/FG government was even remotely possible, there would be massive pressure on all sections of the Left top make it happen.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,509 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Only if they end up with some absurd coalition. You are talking SF/SD/LB/GP/PBPSOL and then 5 INDs.

    Absolutely no way that government gets anything done. You are also relying on the PBPSOL crowd who can barely agree what day of the week it is and have no interest at all in being part of the decision making process.

    They need FF.

    Of course, election is far away still, SF could see further gains, but they need to start eating larger chunks of FF's dinner rather than taking from the plates of the other left parties.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think SF are positioning themselves for a coalition government deal with FF or FG at their Ard Fheis atm. Dropping their rejection of the SCC with caveats is a big move.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,876 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It is yeah, they should be dropping it without caveats, but they want to keep their nefarious friends somewhat onside.

    Usual SF nonsense, cherry picking law and order and the constitution since 1971.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,509 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    While I said FF would be crazy to go for this, the chances of FG entertaining a coalition with SF is absolutely zero.

    FG would lick their lips at going into opposition against SF/FF. Outside of actually winning the election and getting top spot again, that outcome is probably the next best from a FG party political viewpoint.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'd have said that of old FG and FF. But look what happened. FG displayed a hunger to stay in power last time. I wouldn't be so sure of what they would do. Neither FF nor FG can afford to become irrelevant and one of them will as politics re-adjust away from the power swap of the last 100 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,876 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They will merge, sooner or later. No other long term solution makes sense. It'll probably begin with electoral pacts and so forth, and will take a decade or two to complete, but it will happen.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,509 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    How would a SF/FG coalition even work? What do they even agree on? Coalition usually means compromises on policy but it generally requires some sort of commonality to at least begin with.

    I can't imagine SF would consider a FG coalition to be honest. They would need to be really desperate for power.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,797 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    FG being the primary opposition to SF/FF would obviously be the exact opposite of becoming irrelevant.

    Anyway, this is silly. There is zero chance of FG going into coalition with SF. Absolutely stone cold zero.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,876 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Correct.

    In fact, SF are coalition repugnant to everyone bar the far loony left and combined with their seat bonus aversion, the limit of their ambitions may be quite a bit lower than they expect.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Put a glass and your ear to the door of any FF meeting up and down the country, and catch a fair whack of the parliamentary party in their honest moments. A plurality would rather a coalition with SF than FG. That's reality.

    They're going to make life very difficult for Vardakar once he's back in the driver's seat, and you can't say the man hasn't earned it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Ideologically, is there any difference between FF and FG worth talking about? So if a coalition with FF is possible, one with FG is too.

    Politics in Ireland is changing in a way I never thought it would. Anything is possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Grand theory if you think the FG demographic isn't changing. But it is and very quickly too.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,797 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Can you please enlighten me as to how and where it is so rapidly changing that something that they ruled out within fractions of a second after the last election somehow would become plausible further down the line? They have been by far the most antagonistic to each other in the current Dail. There is not the remotest sign of their enmity disappearing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I wouldn't rule it out, is all I am saying.

    A couple of years ago I would have adamantly ruled out FF and FG coalescing.

    Look at the vote FG can now muster if you have problems understanding how the demographics are changing. It isnt that long ago ceilings of the high teens were being talked about for SF.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,797 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes, SF have done remarkably well. But while the FG vote is heading downwards, the demographic very much remains those who would rather see the party dissolve than go into govt with SF.

    It is possible in the pointless sense of "anything is possible", but there is really zero reason to think it is ever going to happen. Particularly not when FF exist and are the much, much, much likelier to do so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 45,303 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    The party to gain the most will be the one in opposition when and if SF are in power imo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    My personal opinion is that either FF or FG will take a hammering next time out. That will leave only 2 parties capable of forming a 2 party coalition. The size of the SF mandate will create its own dynamic. If it is a large vote then I rwally dont think they can be shut out on moral grounds.

    And I don't think either FF or FG have a track record of maintaining a moral stance and are well able to swallow hard. And i think a coalition is possible for that reason.

    We'll see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 45,303 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    Not balancing the books is ok. LOL.

    Probably something the SF spoofer finance rep would say. The country is riddled with debt ffs. Let's not pile more welfare handouts on to an already inflated welfare state. FF and FG have done enough damage there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85



    what are you talking about, might consider it? did you forget the last election , SF would have won most seats if they ran more candidates. Some of their candidates, nobody knew who they were, but people so sick of the FFG crap, the voted for them regardless... I can only imagine another several years of this current farce, things are going to get worse for the coalition of failure. If talking meant anything, ireland would be worldclass in every regard...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    please, enlighten me with what they got right.. i am all ears... The motorway network isnt bad, Ill give you one there... They are appalling on the environment, and frankly every other matter in my opinion. Cant defend ourselves, law and order is a farce. Infrastructure a farce. health, housing ...

    I will tell you what though, we do have a world class welfare state aswel though, creating a sort of poverty trap. You probably see that as a good thing, I dont...

    Keep Margaret cash and co from emigrating, god forbit. Keep them here at all costs! Let the young and educated, facing rip off everything here, emigrate... Its just a really brilliant idea... Wolf of wall street rate of marginal tax on a peasant income. Thats the irony though isnt it, outrageous taxes for the little peasant, while the wolf of wall street pays in a relative pittance. Wanderer78 correctly raises many of the issues facing society. Far too many of you , have been listening to the FFG BS of "well they contribute a pittance in corporation tax" but they have a factory or two etc in ireland... Trickle down economics bullshit. Designed to keep those who know a bit more than nothing, thinking we arent actually being screwed! These companies with more money than god, contribute a pittance of what they morally should be...


    But go on, defend someone here earning over 35,000 losing half their income... (half their income over 35k or whatever pittance it is. I just know some genius will be along to tell me, that you dont lose half your income at 35k...)

    Post edited by Murph85 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,303 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    Mary Lou got it wrong, no two ways about it. Tactically messed up and cost SF at least 5 years. A weak leader, unlike SF leaders of the past.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,949 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    this is now well proven, go outside of politics for this one, theres now sufficient evidence to support, a deficit run economy is far more safer than a primarily credit run one, but not problem free of course, once again, graph supplied! we truly need to get over this one, oh and deficit money doesnt necessarily need to be only given to those on welfare, even though pup has proven, given citizens on welfare more money directly benefits the economy, as this money is spent into the economy, but providing the economy with more public money via deficit spending is far better, as private sector money, i.e. credit, generally just moves towards asset markets, inflating asset prices, in particular related to property and land markets.

    the whole planet is riddled with debt, its how our economic and monetary systems work, i.e. credit and debt! without it, there would be no economic activities, period, but again as the graph shows, private debt has now become the far more dangerous of the two, so pick your poison!




  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There would be some who would see this answer as maybe not the door being opened, but certainly being held ajar.




  • Registered Users Posts: 16,114 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But how does it come to be FG rather than FF that is doing the deal with SF. Can you sketch out the circumstances where that could happen? FF turn them down but FG are up for it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Thought I had written that post clearer.

    I think it will be only one or the other able to hold negotiations. FF or FG will take a hammering and not be able to form a 2 party coalition.

    With a FG Taoiseach heading into an election,(if the government runs it's term) it could well be FG taking that hammering.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,114 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I don't see why it has two be a two-party coalition. Plenty of left-wing parties up for a deal with SF. IMO FF+Lab+SD+whoever will always be a prefereable lineup of coalition partners than FG for SF.



  • Registered Users Posts: 67,284 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Correct. I was just talking about one possible scenario.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    in the long run, its probably worked out even better for them!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    FFG need to ditch their pathetic leaders, they are both toxic to the electorate...



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement