Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Will racism ever end?

123457

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Exactly. You cannot be convicted on someone else word, unless there is strong evidence to back their word up.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Absolutely, but with the available evidence (i.e none) it's fair to say that it wouldn't be possible.

    Barely disguised implication of racism there. Good man/woman yourself Bubblypop.

    Imagine, insinuating that someone who points out that it would be deeply unfair and impossible to advocate convicting people of hate crime without serious evidence, is racist or a racist enabler for doing so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Or any crime. I wouldn't like to be the Garda who sends a book of evidence to the DPP that amounts to "The Dunne said Fandymo robbed his sheep, therefore we would like to prosecute".



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    It should be replaced with "If a crime is committed and there are no other witnesses or any other evidence, is it prosecutable?"

    The answer is no.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oh this is one of those posts where you change what a poster said completely and turn it round.

    you don't know what evidence is available because you have not investigated.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Or the garda that sends a file to the DPP stating that girl A claims she was raped by boy B, a number of months ago.

    as pointed out, an investigation would take place, should a complaint be made. Why are you assuming there would not be more evidence?


    why are there posters here who are trying to say that we shouldn't prosecute people for hate crimes/racist incidents?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    We can only go from what the OP has told us. He didn't state that she got his license place, or that there were witnesses. I'm going on the information at hand, not imaginary evidence that may or may not exist. And a Garda won't send a file to the DPP on someone's word alone. There would be a complaint, then evidence collected, if there was no evidence, no file would be sent to the DPP.

    Who has said that we shouldn't prosecute people for hate crimes/racist incidents? Show me one poster, and the number of the post where they have said that.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have no issue with, and would absolutely support people being prosecuted for racism or for hatred as long as both terms are watertight and not open to vastly different interpretations and can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

    It's incredibly important that the definition of the crimes are clear and consistent and are not open to manipulation by bad faith actors.

    Yet somehow, the spindoctors on here manage to equate that with saying that racist/hate crimes shouldnt be prosecuted.

    You only have to look at this this thread where accusations/implications of posters being racist could mean that innocent people could be hauled through courts based on spurious allegations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Well clearly you’re not making any defence, what you ARE doing is proposing a scenario for which you have no evidence whatsoever, and expect that anyone should be compelled to take it seriously.

    That’s precisely the reason why I know for a fact you don’t have a point, and also why I know for a fact that you’re accusing me of having accused you of defending the behaviour of the person in the opening post by way of attempting to turn the argument back on me when I haven’t accused you of anything.

    The account given by the victim wouldn’t simply be discarded in any case, regardless of whether or not the investigating officers even managed to make contact with the person who you’re claiming could lie to them about having shouted racist abuse at a random stranger (and they could find themselves in a whole world of even bigger trouble if investigating officers turn up evidence which flat out contradicts their version of events!), but in ANY case, the proposed legislation is useful and on the face of it would apply in circumstances as described by the OP.

    It’s precisely for circumstances like that which the legislation was proposed in the first place, not just as a means to address antisocial behaviour motivated by racism, but for a number of other motives too which drive antisocial behaviour such as that described by the OP.

    It’s clear you’re not defending the behaviour, obviously, but it’s also clear that you’re attempting to undermine the purpose of the legislation by claiming it’s of no use in cases like the OP described, when you also believe the OP’s wife was the victim of a racially motivated attack, based upon no evidence whatsoever according to yourself, knowing that it’s not up to the victim to make that determination in any case…

    I hope I’m giving a faithful summation of your position because you’re literally all over the shop, but your point comes down to “the legislation would be of no use in those circumstances”, even though it’s quite clear it would be useful, and then you’re off again with asking for definitions of this, that and the other, when these terms are quite clearly defined already in existing legislation.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm going on what would happen in an actual investigation as opposed to an imaginary non investigation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    There is no investigation, except in your imagination.

    Now, any chance of answering the second part, since you a) made the claim and b) have said "Oh this is one of those posts where you change what a poster said completely and turn it round." I'm sure you wouldn't want to be seen as a massive hypocrite talking out of both sides of your mouth.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What second part



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Who has said that we shouldn't prosecute people for hate crimes/racist incidents? Show me one poster, and the number of the post where they have said that.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Plenty of posters putting down the possibilities of prosecutions.

    Sure they'll never be any evidence etc etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Ahh will you stop being so dramatic. There’s no requirement for any legislation to be so watertight, and anyone who would be facing charges would be entitled to legal representation in any case, an actual legal defence, not just makey-uppy nonsense that would undoubtedly only add to their clients existing credibility issues on foot of them being terrible bloody actors! 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    That's not what you said though. Is it? Or was it just "one of those posts where you change what a poster said completely and turn it round."

    You said "why are there posters here who are trying to say that we shouldn't prosecute people for hate crimes/racist incidents?"

    Not one poster has said or 'tried' to say that we shouldn't prosecute people for hate crimes or racism. You have lied, misrepresented people and twisted words consistently. I'm delighted to have such a clear cut example to point out your barefaced hypocrisy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    It seems to be fine for you to talk about going on evidence and all the rest of it, but when bubblypop is giving an opinion based upon what WOULD actually happen in any investigation (procedures ‘n’ all), you’re making the point that there’s no investigation and accusing bubblypop of hypocrisy?

    You actually HAVE changed what bubblypop said, but don’t appear to have any issue whatsoever with your own talking out of both ends.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,903 ✭✭✭✭Rothko




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    We are talking about the OP. I am going on what we know, as said by the OP. There is no evidence. He hasn’t even reported it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We have gone heavily off topic.

    I think most agree that racism will always exist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Indeed there will always be racists lurking in the shadows. And it would seem apologists for them when they step into the light.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Robbie, can you please stop with the thinly disguised insults and accusations?

    It's tiresome at this stage and drags the thread off topic. There have been no racist apologists on this thread and if you feel there has been, then come out and point out exactly who they are and what they said.

    You will find that racism has been universally condemned on this thread and despite attempts to put words into others mouths or to misrepresent opinions, nobody has defended racism or racists.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's like asking I suppose will the caste system ever end? It's not just a 'white' issue is what I'm saying!



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,903 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    He has to resort to that because he's unable to form a rational argument. Let's see what sly dig or twisting of words he'll use next.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Dunne can you stop with the personalalising every comment.

    I have posted a comment on a discussion board.

    In that comment I never mentioned you I never mentioned boards. So I'm unclear why you are taking this so personally.

    Are you trying to imply there are no racists and racist apologists in society in general?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    No one in this thread has said it is!

    Regardless of the nationality or the level of Melanin in the skin of the person who commits racism it is wrong.

    I'm not sure why you needed to the tell the OP that though. Does it not being a white only issue lessen the impact of the racism his wife suffered?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's as clear as day what you are doing Robbie.

    And to underline my point, you again pull a Cathy Newman and put words in my mouth despite my comment EXPLICITLY saying that there will always be racists.

    It's ridiculous at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Can you stop trying to drag the thread off topic with these attempts at insulting me.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Seems to be a clear trend of posting for some evidenced in this and other such threads. Deflect, avoid direct questions for the most part, misrepresent, imply negatives in posters, then run to either insult, or more usually claims being insulted. All in an attempt to get a gotcha moment and/or censure of posters and opinions that don't agree with the narrative. I have found any narrative - and it matters not which narratives - that require tactical debating can't stand on the evidence or argument of their own two feet.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    It's certainly not a White only issue. Like I was saying earlier pretty much every society on the planet has and does have narraitives of belonging and not belonging and a heirarchy to those labels. The caste system of India a good example, honed over centuries to delineate that heirarchy. Skin colour even there plays a part. A study reported in the Times of India fleshed this out. The study "indicates that social structure defined by the caste system has a “profound influence on skin pigmentation"

    Though caste is most commonly associated with Indian culture it's also been present in others like Nepal and the Philippines. Social stratification is or has been in play in most world cultures. And that's internally. The Other is stratified again.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Another thread ruined by the usual suspects, and nothing done by Boards to stop it. No wonder it was hemorrhaging users pre-Vanilla and continues to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭seenitall


    I remember at the height of Destiny’s Child fame, I read an article about them and their brand, describing how, since Beyonce was the lead etc. she demanded to always look the “fairest” in all the promo photos of the three girls. Chuckle. Internalised racism, anyone? Anyhow, it wasn’t that controversial at the time, but I can only guess at the hoollaballoo that would follow such an article these days.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well sure in a world where it's acceptable to call Larry Elder the "black face of white supremacy", it's plain to see that racism and accusations of racism has become so weaponised by certain groups to smear people they disagree with on social and political matters.

    The fact that someone dressed as a gorilla threw eggs at a black political candidate went relatively under the radar because of what side of the political divide the people involved were aligned with.

    The coverage of such an incident would be vastly different if the political sides were swapped.

    Racism is a scourge but the people who use racism as a handy tool to falsely accuse others of racism or who go out of their way to invent racism, be it for virtue signalling or to add heft to their opinions, are also abhorrent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    There has for a long time been considerable pressure on black and darker skin toned celebrities to lighten their skin. Either using skin products or in retouching the photos of them published.

    I believe the pressure to lighten her skin for Beyonce is rumoured to have come from her father and the bands manager.

    It is wrong for the media or anyone to push the idea that darker skin is not attractive. The retouching of darker celebrities to lighten their skin tone does increase pressure on young darker skin toned people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭seenitall


    I find it hilariously funny that for such a seemingly empowered, proudly black woman, etc. this was in fact what was going on behind the scenes. Moreso as I really dislike her arrogant style of communication with her fans (at least in her “Bow down, bitches” phase, dunno if she still goes on like that). Her whole attitude screams distasteful entitlement. So the story is just pure lols.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    I don't really follow Beyonce's career but there might be considerable difference between the stage managed persona presented and the real person. Never the less, the societal pressure to lighten skin tones has been well reported at this stage.

    Here is an article from this year about images of Beyonce being retouched to make her appear paler not from the person herself but from the publisher of a magazine she was featured on. And I hope we can agree that is wrong and presents the wrong image to young impressionable fans.




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    That whole "diva" stuff is part of Black American culture and it's a complex enough thing. African American women were largely absent from mainstream culture save for "big mamma" servant stereotypes in Hollywood and Tom & Jerry cartoons and their beauty was never mainstream. Even their natural hair has been tweaked with treatments and rarely seen in the natural state, save for a short period in the late 60's and early 70's. Black women's hair is a debate in of itself. African American men have and continue to be feared, but they're also also fetishised and are far more mainstream in US culture(and beyond). Hell, if you go looking for interracial porn, what are you expecting to see? It's far less likely to be Black woman with White or Asian man. Intermarraige also follows a similar pattern. We even see this in advertising. Where an interracial couple is present you'd not lose much money betting it'll be a White woman with a Black man. So an African American woman like Beyonce is very much aware of this bias and lack of visibility in the mainstream.

    As for lightening of skin tones: As Robbie notes this has long been in play. In US culture it goes back to slavery days where there were "House Negros" and "Field Negros", the former selected for their paler skin(often a result of rape by slavers in previous generations), so they were seen as "better" and "worse" depending on the viewer. This in turn is yet another example of the richer in many cultures and not just White favouring pale skin as a sign of wealth and status. That Coco Chanel in the 1920's after a holiday in the Cote D'Azur was able to turn that on its head and make tanning fashionable among the great and the good was actually one of the biggest shifts in beauty perception in human history.

    Interestingly when uncontacted tribes have first seen White people they tended to freak them right out. To many such cultures the dead are thought of as White, so to them they were looking at zombies.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,934 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    For the most part I look at racist comments as just stupidity and ignorance.

    There are those who use it for their agendas. They need to be shut down. Similarly you have those with agendas who take every opportunity to label people racist, they need to be shut down too.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Yup. It's long been known in that trade that a cover with a Black model will consistently sell fewer copies than one with a White model. Asian models would be somewhere in the middle. What's sadder is that magazines aimed at Black women will also show a bias towards lighter skinned cover models.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    You cannot reduce racism to just stupidity and ignorance certainly not in the modern world. It is definitely used by some who wish it to be deliberately divisive and to create divisions within society. It is much easier to control the poor when they are fighting each other and the differences there are at skin colour level than looking at who really creates many of the problems in the world.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭seenitall


    Sure, but if there was anyone who’d no place complaining about the lack of visibility (at that stage of her career, of course), it’s surely Beyoncé, any more than would her friend Gwyneth or any other Hollywood/entertainment luvvies have any, either. So what does she go and do with all this visibility, fame and strong black woman power shtick? Oh yes, despite talking the good talk, she just sticks to the stereotype of “the whiter, the better” for her photos, no intention of upsetting the apple cart whatsoever. That’s the hypocrisy of it, although of course, reading about the context you describe, I suppose it makes financial sense alright! And that’s the bottom line.

    ETA: I suppose contrast that with the almighty stink that Kate Winslet raised after being photoshopped to look thinner for a magazine cover recently.

    Post edited by seenitall on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,935 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    If two white people are standing at a bus stop and make a racist joke containing the N word and there is a black person in earshot who feels like the word was used as an insult to them, would you believe that would constitute hate speech and should be punishable?

    Intentionally or otherwise, I think this question is somewhat misleading. just to clarify There is no law that is prosecuted simply on the basis of one persons desire that it should be done. If there was, there'd be a hell of a lot more cases before the courts for rape/sexual assault.

    Say the scenario happened, someone would have to report it, it would have to be investigated and a decision made whether to pursue a prosecution or not. There's a lot of different factors that would come in to play with potential for what actually happened to be either end of the scale such as the two white people talking quietly amongst themselves, not even aware there was a black person there and one of them tells the joke to the other. I wouldn't suggest a prosecution should be pursued in this instance. But, if the two white people were standing there, saying nothing, and the black person walked up and one of the white people looked deliberately at them and got their attention and then loudly to their friend so that the black person, and anyone else in the vicinity could hear, what was being said, told the joke and laughed towards the black person, then possibly, yes, a prosecution should be pursued but again as an outcome of it being investigated appropriately. And there's many other ways this scenario could play out trending towards one end of the extreme or the other.

    Those arguing against legislation to help limit such events imply that it is likely that in all instances, just because one person claims the comments were deliberately aimed at them, that a conviction will be the outcome when there is no evidence that this will be the case, either with respect to this topic, or any other legislation on the books. In fact, the burden of responsibility at play in the judicial system favours heavily towards the accused rather than the accuser.

    Now, given the scenario as outlined above, do you think the behaviour of the two white people should be punishable if it were to happen in the second scenario as I outlined?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Good point why is it ALWAYS a white woman and black man in adds ?

    I just want to see a black woman and white man for you know , eh ... DIVERSITY ???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,795 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    This, there will always be racism.

    there will always be too other deplorable things in our society like...

    murder, assault, rape, drink driving, corruption, bullying, fraud, extortion.. it’s not human nature but just the nature of some shît humans... you can educate, deter.... but hey you can’t program people...or tune them to a frequency that they don’t want to be tuned to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    But you can also just like rape, murder, drink driving etc make racism a criminal offence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,795 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Racism waa a crime i thought.

    Proving it would be difficult in most cases... racism is discrimination that comes in multiple forms...

    Rape , murder, drink driving are black and white...

    I could discriminate against a person because i dislike their personality... nothing illegal there.. however if they are of a differing ethnicity and accuse me of whatever dislike or snub being racially motivated. . . Id have a case to answer..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Race is one of the 9 grounds upon which you cannot discriminate already under the equal status act.

    But racism itself is not a crime. And the Dept of Justice has proposed introducing legislation to deal with this but has not yet produced a bill.



  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭hcf500


    Sadly, trump was a major asset to bigots and racists. He did so much damage in just 4 years. Its a relief that there are adults back in the white house again but I feel it will take decades to repair the divisiveness he has caused. Remember, this was a man that said neo nazis and white supremacists were fine people!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He also said a heartfelt and complimentary eulogy at the funeral of Sen. Robert Byrd, a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan, saying he was “one of my mentors” and that “the Senate is a lesser place for his going.”

    Oh wait... no he didn't.

    I think it's wrong to to blame trump for increasing divisiveness in America. America was always a racial powderkeg, under every president.

    What is divisive though is dishonestly quoting someone in an attempt to show them as racist, like you just did.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    I'm pretty sure Donald Trump never specifically targets these two groups and said they were fine people.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement