Would you be happy for your children to receive covid-19 vaccine

I want to see these ten year studies demonstating the long-term safety of covid before I trust it over a vaccine.

So you accept that the trials of the existing vaccines have been completed successfully which allowed them to go to approval, great, at least we can agree on that. The fact that you linked to a study that was nothing to do with this is still hilarious, and I see you've tried to completely ignore your faux pas instead of accepting you made a hilarious mistake and move on (and again I wonder how long you were spewing lies based on this study).

You'll be glad to hear (and this is the case with all medicines) that monitoring of medicines is always ongoing and being studied so you don't need to worry about those missing "long term studies" they happen for all approved medicines as part of the approval and rollout system. Given the huge numbers who have gotten these vaccines, they have been shown to have an excellent safety and effectiveness profile.

But look, how many billion doses of the vaccine need to be administered before you think it's safe, that is the pertinent question, 2, 3, 4?

You talk about long term effects, and that you don't like to be called 'antivax'.

There is absolutely no data, zero, that could explain how the alleged 'long term effects' are supposed to work on a chemical or biological level. Or even what they are. Keeping it unspecific and ominous enough to create fear.

At the same time, if you look at the origin of the 'long term effects' narrative and FUD, you will find literally countless conspiracy videos that point out that the purpose of Covid vaccination is culling the human race, and that people will start dying from vaccinations in 3-6 months after getting the shot.

You will also find countless videos that claim that the vaccine injections carry secret components, like 'magnetic crystals' or microchips, that could be used as an explanation for the supposed long term effects, among other nefarious purposes.

So you want them to do a study separate to the ongoing monitoring that all approved medicines go through after rollout? To what end, what would it uncover differently? Why would you set up a study into something that is happening already?

At least admit you were wrong about the study you linked, that might show some intellectual growth on your side :)

Anyway, you'll be delighted to know that the ongoing safety monitoring has already been going on for longer than a year, so your condition has been met. Now, they won't stop the safety monitoring just to meet some arbitrary date, it will keep on going.

Now the question is, what new condition will you put in place now that it's clear that your previous condition has already been met (and clearly you didn't know this either, not having a good day from the looking up studies perspective).

The "substance" is gone from an individuals system after a few days, after that, there is (verifiably) nothing to detect other than antibodies and t-cells.

But look it was one year, now it's 3-5 years, I'm sure in 2-4 years time the goalposts will shift again but at least you'll stop lying to people about phase 3 trials and linking to wrong studies in the mean time (at least on boards.ie).

This Robert Malone character did not pioneer anything. He is preying on vulnerable people like you for his own self promotion.

Your "renowned pathologist" is also a fraud

I'll bet you knew both these things but posted them anyway. 

Umm, that Yahoo News article is reporting on a discussion on the Tucker Carlson show on Fox News.

I posted earlier about the correlation in the US between vaccine ignorance and Trump voters.

Then you throw Tucker Carlson and Fox News at me as your source of authority. Just beautiful, I literally couldn't have asked for more proof of your world view.

I love that you think it's everyone else who is being manipulated. Fox News, that's pure gold.