Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vaccine Megathread - See OP for threadbans

14849515354331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭Kumejima


    Hmmzis wrote: »
    What you are displaying is confirmation bias. You're looking at one particular case without much detail on it and are extrapolating things that cannot be extrapolated from it. I'd let the medical people examine the exact cause of death.

    That said, it's common for people of a certain age to die due to their age, bedridden or not.




    Ah jayzis.


    Ok, let me rephrase that. I think it it is safe to assume that getting the vaccine and the subsequent side effects almost certainly killed this man, while leaving a small window open for just coincidental bad timing and he was due to die that week anyway.



    A view any objective human being would take given the timeline of events.




    Do you really beg to differ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    I can't be the only one skeptical of a parish priest in Ireland (96!) being vaccinated as late as April? How many active priests are over 90 and how in gods name would they not have been identified in their community as the vulnerable age groups for vaccination?

    If he was in his 70s I wouldn't be as skeptical. 96 is pushing the credibility barrier.

    Sources would be nice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    This is hilarious:

    Bhutan sat on coronavirus vaccines for months, awaiting auspicious rollout date
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/04/14/bhutan-vaccines/
    For months, Bhutan sat on hundreds of thousands of doses of AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine, waiting for the stars to align.

    Despite receiving a supply of vaccines in January, the small Himalayan kingdom didn’t begin immunizing its population until March 27, a date that was selected through astrological consultations with Buddhist monks.

    But once that auspicious date arrived, Bhutan made up for lost time. In less than two weeks, the country administered first doses to more than 93 percent of eligible adults, according to its Ministry of Health.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    I really dislike the British media, but they did pile pressure on to get every jab delivered into an arm ASAP, forcing the government there to open up 24 hour jab centres.

    We’re now entering a phase where large scale deliveries are about to happen, we need to start putting pressure on now.

    Let’s not sit on stockpiles of vaccine as we get setup for its roll out, keep pressure on the government to move heaven and earth so that as soon as a vaccine arrives into Ireland it’s in someone’s arm 24 hours later.

    No matter what it costs, it’ll be cheaper than not doing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭Kumejima


    Turtwig wrote: »
    I can't be the only one skeptical of a parish priest in Ireland (96!) being vaccinated as late as April? How many active priests are over 90 and how in gods name would they not have been identified in their community as the vulnerable age groups for vaccination?

    If he was in his 70s I wouldn't be as skeptical. 96 is pushing the credibility barrier.

    Sources would be nice.




    Nuacht TG4 have his funeral cortege. Last weeks Kerryman has the photo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 583 ✭✭✭noplacehere


    Kumejima wrote: »
    Ah jayzis.


    Ok, let me rephrase that. I think it it is safe to assume that getting the vaccine and the subsequent side effects almost certainly killed this man, while leaving a small window open for just coincidental bad timing and he was due to die that week anyway.



    A view any objective human being would take given the timeline of events.




    Do you really beg to differ?


    No they wouldn't.

    Over Easter my grandmother age 97 was out walking on the Friday. Had two of her sons visiting her (there are lovely pictures). Had a small fall on Saturday morning. Died early Sunday morning. She went downhill very fast and just didn't bounce back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Kumejima wrote: »
    Nuacht TG4 have his funeral cortege. Last weeks Kerryman has the photo

    Yep. Sorry don't believe it. I hope you can understand why.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭Kumejima


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Yep. Sorry don't believe it. I hope you can understand why.


    Sure I do, because, as with the conspiracy theorists you so happily mock, you won't even entertain the idea of opening yourself to facts that contradict your worldview.



    I'm slipping into mockery myself here so let me be serious.


    We all want the same thing - we all want to keep our population happy and healthy and alive. Its just people on your side of the aisle seem to have this implicit trust in the vaccines that people on my side of the aisle cannot share.


    Its real simple. There are no long term studies showing these are safe. Full stop.



    So to me this entire vaccination program is collective insanity. At best you vaccinate people over 70 who are robust enough to withstand the side effects but you don't give it to the old and the frail, nor the young who are at no fatal risk of covid.


    I am genuinely aghast at the enthusiasm for what is essentially an experimental drug.


  • Posts: 1,159 [Deleted User]


    Kumejima wrote: »
    Nuacht TG4 have his funeral cortege. Last weeks Kerryman has the photo

    You should be able to provide a link so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Kumejima wrote: »
    Sure I do, because, as with the conspiracy theorists you so happily mock, you won't even entertain the idea of opening yourself to facts that contradict your worldview.



    I'm slipping into mockery myself here so let me be serious.


    We all want the same thing - we all want to keep our population happy and healthy and alive. Its just people on your side of the aisle seem to have this implicit trust in the vaccines that people on my side of the aisle cannot share.


    Its real simple. There are no long term studies showing these are safe. Full stop.



    So to me this entire vaccination program is collective insanity. At best you vaccinate people over 70 who are robust enough to withstand the side effects but you don't give it to the old and the frail, nor the young who are at no fatal risk of covid.


    I am genuinely aghast at the enthusiasm for what is essentially an experimental drug.

    What you have just said doesn't add up to your previous point. You came into this thread aparantly driven by concern about a priest who died shortly after a vaccine and now your concern is long term effects.

    It sounds like you have an idealogical pre disposition against vaccines. You are incoherently throwing every bit of negativity against the wall hoping something will stick with someone. People who are much smarter than you, who have spent their whole lives studying this, are recommending population wide vaccination.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Why though? Lets be realistic - by the end of this month, all the vulnerable age groups will be vaccinated. Yes we need to be cautious - I am not suggesting we re-open night clubs and let 500 unvaccinated 18-25 years olds in - but continuing a lock down once all the vulnerable age groups and people will underlying health conditions have got it, is just ridiculous.

    While I appreciate there are people with vulnerable kids, etc - there were always these. We can at very least open everything up to outdoor activities, and NPHET have already said there is no issue with fully vaccinated people meeting up indoors.

    We simply can't keep our society locked down forever - the financial hit has to be considered here too given the pressure for funding in the health service, etc. The money has to come from some where.

    By the end of June, there will be more people killed weekly in road accidents than Covid - we don't just block the roads.
    Brilliant post and I agree completely with everything you've said. However, in replying to that poster, I think you have touched upon a nascent issue - that there is a section of society who have been conditioned into thinking Covid is the be all and end all. That it is, and should remain, our singular focus in society. That no Covid death is acceptable.
    I am not in any way trying to belittle the threat of Covid but, once most of the population have been vaccinated, that threat becomes almost negligible. Unfortunately, however, we know that there will still be deaths from the disease, and people will have to accept that. In that sense, there will need to be a recalibration of the moral compasses of some I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    I’ll give you a hint. Something that helps your car stop ( spelt differently but sounds the same) and something McD’s have as an alternative to sitting down and eating. Then put the 2 words together :D:pac:
    I think I deciphered your riddle! :D That word is already quite prominent, and expected. I guess it's just another word for the media to cling onto as we approach the end of this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,963 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    I really dislike the British media, but they did pile pressure on to get every jab delivered into an arm ASAP, forcing the government there to open up 24 hour jab centres.

    We’re now entering a phase where large scale deliveries are about to happen, we need to start putting pressure on now.

    There really is far too much acceptance of poor performance these days, and we constantly see the KPI's creeping back with very little outcry. In January people were talking about the rollout ramping up in March and April, now it is May and June, soon it will be July and August and then we will be told that we can look forward to maybe getting our lives back in September or October.

    There is such a disassociation with the effects of these lockdowns, we just get told that it will be another few months as if that is no big deal, but to hundreds of thousands of people it is a big deal, its a ****ing massive deal.

    Are far as I am concerned the vaccine rollout should be the single most important thing happening in this country, the government ain't got **** to do but be on it. So why do we keep hearing people patting themselves on the back for such underwhelming numbers? Over 40's can get a vaccine tomorrow up North and we are cheering because 69 year olds are finally allowed to book an appointment? 96 year priests only getting jabbed last week? As Roy Keane would say, do me a favour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭Champagne Sally


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    I’ll give you a hint. Something that helps your car stop ( spelt differently but sounds the same) and something McD’s have as an alternative to sitting down and eating. Then put the 2 words together :D:pac:

    I give up. Is it Breakthrough? Do I win a prize?:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    With the portal open for 65-69 I think the comms on the next steps are actually quite poor. I would expect them to start scheduling appointments almost instantly with a purpose built IT system. The injections are starting early next week apparently so not sure why they havnt advised when the appointments will be scheduled.

    I know they wanted to give everyone a few days but even scheduling the 69 year olds would be a start.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    I think I deciphered your riddle! :D That word is already quite prominent, and expected. I guess it's just another word for the media to cling onto as we approach the end of this


    Micky posted a twitter thread about it a few days ago. Personally to people I know, I'm warning them that there'll be a huge increase in stories of "vaccine breakthrough infections" but not to worry.

    The thread he posted was very good. Micky, do you have it handy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭ceegee


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    This is hilarious:

    Bhutan sat on coronavirus vaccines for months, awaiting auspicious rollout date
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/04/14/bhutan-vaccines/

    Interestingly, the king pledging to wait until everyone else got a vaccine before him, was seen as helping the high uptake as people viewed getting the vaccine as helping to protect the king.
    Don't think that approach would work for Micheal and Leo, people would delay getting the vaccine out of spite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    Micky posted a twitter thread about it a few days ago. Personally to people I know, I'm warning them that there'll be a huge increase in stories of "vaccine breakthrough infections" but not to worry.

    The thread he posted was very good. Micky, do you have it handy?
    I really don't see the surprise here. Was this not inevitible? For example Pfizer is 95% efficacious, so there is always the remaining 5%...for breakthroughs to occur. No big deal, risk is tiny, life moves on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,440 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    With the portal open for 65-69 I think the comms on the next steps are actually quite poor. I would expect them to start scheduling appointments almost instantly with a purpose built IT system. The injections are starting early next week apparently so not sure why they havnt advised when the appointments will be scheduled.

    I know they wanted to give everyone a few days but even scheduling the 69 year olds would be a start.

    From what I heard though, most people who register on the portal will be given an appointment fairly quickly. It looks like the actual appointment comes at short notice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,002 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    crossman47 wrote: »
    Slow perhaps. Incredibly slow - no.

    8.6% of the population fully vaccinated isn't incredibly slow? Just slow. Ok.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭Champagne Sally


    Just wondering if anyone else got a call from their GP and told their vaccine appointment would be the following week and they would get a text with the details. How long did it take between the call and the text? Call received here yesterday but still no sign of the text, which could be completely normal but I just don't know. I thought other posters might know. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 JMR46


    mfceiling wrote: »
    6.7% of the population fully vaccinated isn't incredibly slow? Just slow. Ok.

    If you want to talk about fully vaccinated Northern Ireland are at 16%, not a million miles ahead.

    They've taken a different approach as I'm sure you're aware to go with more first doses initially so you can't fully compare the 2. Anyway we've had this debate a million times on this thread.

    So yes slow but not incredibly slow IMO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,440 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Just wondering if anyone else got a call from their GP and told their vaccine appointment would be the following week and they would get a text with the details. How long did it take between the call and the text? Call received here yesterday but still no sign of the text, which could be completely normal but I just don't know. I thought other posters might know. :confused:

    I've heard of quite a few people getting a text at short notice (e.g. the day beforehand), so I wouldn't be worrying just yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    50k registrations between yesterday and lunch time today on the portal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,790 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Yes, isn't there talk now that they were sent dodgy batches and not the actual stuff that was peer reviewed in the studies?


    That was the Slovaks across the river.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/08/world/europe/slovakia-coronavirus-russia-vaccine-sputnik.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭Tyrone212


    65 to 69 vaccinations will start around mid week and will take 3 weeks to complete according to RTE News earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,078 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    Strazdas wrote: »
    From what I heard though, most people who register on the portal will be given an appointment fairly quickly. It looks like the actual appointment comes at short notice.

    I registered yesterday and I think it stated I would get 3 - 7 days notice of my appointments.......I'd happily take less!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,267 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    mfceiling wrote: »
    8.6% of the population fully vaccinated isn't incredibly slow? Just slow. Ok.

    I’m over 70 and vulnerable (by their own website). My neighbours are all vaccinated . My wife ( who will register shortly (67) is the one of the few at work not vaccinated at her place of work. Depends on who your doctor is. Some are well organized, some aren’t. That’s the way it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,759 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Merkel got first dose of AZ today. Not really news but shur.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Le Bruise


    Merkel got first dose of AZ today. Not really news but shur.

    Ah it is to be fair. Good to see her leading by example with the AZ reputation struggling!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement