Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine and testing procedures Megathread Part 3 - Read OP

1251252254256257328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Do you actually believe that?

    Maybe not tomorrow but could be sooner than you think. The green travel pass is getting the go ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,076 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Micheál Martin has told the Dáil that a national portal for people to register for a vaccine is set to be up and running by the third week in April.

    It would want to be up and running by then. Paul Reid said last weekend that 65-69 year olds without risk issues would be starting first doses in April!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Heres what i am confused about though, how are they identifiying the "at risk" groups in the under 65s?

    If priority is now going to be based on age, will my age (51) be looked at and my vaccination appointment given based on that, or will they also check for any underlying conditions?

    I don't think they will, as I was last seen by the Diabetes Clinic in the hospital in Nov 2017 (I checked with them this morning) and my GP is clueless.

    Sorry for being a moan, but its all very frustrating, and I'm not the only one in this position.
    At risk conditions first is how it's working up to groups 7&8. My guess, based on other people's stories is that you are likely to hear from the clinic not the GP. I'd say neither has a clue at present anyway and are waiting for the HSE to notify them. To do that the HSE will need to have guaranteed supplies and we're just not in a good place yet. Even so it shouldn't be too long but all you can do at present is wait.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    vienne86 wrote: »
    It would want to be up and running by then. Paul Reid said last weekend that 65-69 year olds without risk issues would be starting first doses in April!
    Yeah but they're likely to be GP so what we have at present should be good enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,265 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    I believe you are either at very high risk (Diabetes and HbA1C ≥58mmol/mol) or done by age.

    The change is after group 7 . All diabetics Type 1 and Type 2 who are not very high risk ( ie HBA1C <58 ) are in Group 7
    They will be done regardless of age


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,076 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Yeah but they're likely to be GP so what we have at present should be good enough.

    Really? I'm in that group and believe I will be registering online and getting my vaccine in a mass vaccination centre.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    vienne86 wrote: »
    Really? I'm in that group and believe I will be registering online and getting my vaccine in a mass vaccination centre.
    OK. If that's the case then that probably sets the timeframe for the group. I just assumed it was the same as the older cohort and that the portal would kick in for all the really big groups.


  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I believe you are either at very high risk (Diabetes and HbA1C ≥58mmol/mol) or done by age.

    Thanks, my HbA1C is over that (not by much, but still over). This was confirmed by blood test last week, but as it was requested by GP surgery, not hospital clinic, I don't know where this will be picked up by the HSE, or if it will be picked up.

    I don't know, I guess I'll just have to wait and see and keep doing what I have been doing, and see how it pans out.

    Thanks again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭noserider


    Russman wrote: »
    Yeah, she's usually very good and always seems to be well on top of her brief.

    I didn’t understand what she was saying about the Travelling Community and Roma groups.
    Was it that they would still be prioritised as they are living in crowded settings?
    Open to correction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    noserider wrote: »
    I didn’t understand what she was saying about the Travelling Community and Roma groups.
    Was it that they would still be prioritised as they are living in crowded settings?
    Open to correction.
    They were two groups that the CMO used to report on way back and they are high risk, as you say, on account of their living arrangements.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,990 ✭✭✭plodder


    The one thing that I don't like about Karina Butler is when she says "we'd love to vaccinate everyone at the same time, but ...". I think most people get that everyone can't be vaccinated at the same time. It's a bit patronising.

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    noserider wrote: »
    I didn’t understand what she was saying about the Travelling Community and Roma groups.
    Was it that they would still be prioritised as they are living in crowded settings?
    Open to correction.


    Higher incidence of and vulnerability to certain conditions I'd say.


    For example, travellers in particular are more likely to die from respiratory illness than others.


    https://assets.gov.ie/18859/d5237d611916463189ecc1f9ea83279d.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,469 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Indicative timelines due within the next week apparently

    https://twitter.com/oconnellhugh/status/1377248538845978624?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    plodder wrote: »
    The one thing that I don't like about Karina Butler is when she says "we'd love to vaccinate everyone at the same time, but ...". I think most people get that everyone can't be vaccinated at the same time. It's a bit patronising.
    It's just the limits of trying to be positive!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,732 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    The big AZ delivery is due today. When we likely to hear if it's correct or short as per usual.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    Higher incidence of and vulnerability to certain conditions I'd say.


    For example, travellers in particular are more likely to die from respiratory illness than others.


    https://assets.gov.ie/18859/d5237d611916463189ecc1f9ea83279d.pdf

    The first few pages of that make for good reading. The amount of organisations for travellers is pretty damn high. I'm sure they don't all get government funding either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    noserider wrote: »
    I didn’t understand what she was saying about the Travelling Community and Roma groups.
    Was it that they would still be prioritised as they are living in crowded settings?
    Open to correction.
    Basically, yes.

    They probably also don't want to say it, but they know that these groups are extremely unlikely to seek out vaccination for themselves or be willing to register on any government portal.

    So instead they send a team out to them to arrange for the whole group to get vaccinated.

    Travellers, Roma and the homeless are at higher risk of severe covid, so this fits with the whole concept of vaccinating those by order of vulnerability.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭Klonker


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Mary Lou on the bandwagon now. This is going to get messy and they'll rile up the unions.

    .

    As bad as the government have been through all this, the opposition have actually been worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭celt262


    seamus wrote: »
    Basically, yes.

    They probably also don't want to say it, but they know that these groups are extremely unlikely to seek out vaccination for themselves or be willing to register on any government portal.

    So instead they send a team out to them to arrange for the whole group to get vaccinated.

    Travellers, Roma and the homeless are at higher risk of severe covid, so this fits with the whole concept of vaccinating those by order of vulnerability.

    Yep probably more likely to turn up and demand a vaccine without an appointment but that's another days work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    irishgeo wrote: »
    The big AZ delivery is due today. When we likely to hear if it's correct or short as per usual.
    Not sure it's still a fixed date it could be plus X days! Rest assured Donnelly will broadcast it on Twitter when/if it arrives!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Scuid Mhór


    Looks like it’s all kicking off now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    Looks like it’s all kicking off now.


    How do you mean?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 553 ✭✭✭ddarcy


    Thanks, my HbA1C is over that (not by much, but still over). This was confirmed by blood test last week, but as it was requested by GP surgery, not hospital clinic, I don't know where this will be picked up by the HSE, or if it will be picked up.

    I don't know, I guess I'll just have to wait and see and keep doing what I have been doing, and see how it pans out.

    Thanks again.

    If you’re diabetic and attend hospital you were moved to group 4. They just did a select all copy and paste to the HSE. HSE also dropped the HBA1C requirement. I personally know 3 hospitals that did this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Russman


    seamus wrote: »
    Basically, yes.

    They probably also don't want to say it, but they know that these groups are extremely unlikely to seek out vaccination for themselves or be willing to register on any government portal.

    So instead they send a team out to them to arrange for the whole group to get vaccinated.

    Travellers, Roma and the homeless are at higher risk of severe covid, so this fits with the whole concept of vaccinating those by order of vulnerability.

    Makes sense alright. Just reading an article in The Journal (I Know, I know !) referencing a HIQA report suggesting that the single does vaccine may be preferable for these groups. How much of our J&J allocation would that take up if they did that ? I've no idea how many travellers, Roma & homeless we have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,935 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    I was just speaking to the receptionist at my GP today, I was enquiring about vaccination as my sister received her first jab last Saturday in Bandon, Cork, I'm Salthill based in Galway, same condition as my sister and the receptionist asked me my age, I'm 56, she then told me the GP is only vaccinating the over 70s at the practise, so apparently I have to get in touch with the vaccination centre at Ballybrit. Haven't received any letters or emails from medical staff yet anyways, I presume I'll be notified at some point by post or is the onus on me to contact the vaccination centre. There seems to be a mess of information out there and it can be confusing.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,265 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    ddarcy wrote: »
    If you’re diabetic and attend hospital you were moved to group 4. They just did a select all copy and paste to the HSE. HSE also dropped the HBA1C requirement. I personally know 3 hospitals that did this.

    Are you sure ? Family members Type 1 with very controlled levels ?
    Attending Tallaght hospital


  • Posts: 939 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Russman wrote: »
    Makes sense alright. Just reading an article in The Journal (I Know, I know !) referencing a HIQA report suggesting that the single does vaccine may be preferable for these groups. How much of our J&J allocation would that take up if they did that ? I've no idea how many travellers, Roma & homeless we have.

    Travellers only about 30,000 as per last census, probably an underestimate. Homeless around 8,000. Roma estimate is 5,000.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Russman wrote: »
    Makes sense alright. Just reading an article in The Journal (I Know, I know !) referencing a HIQA report suggesting that the single does vaccine may be preferable for these groups. How much of our J&J allocation would that take up if they did that ? I've no idea how many travellers, Roma & homeless we have.
    All told probably about 40,000 (32k travellers in 2016, 2.5K Roma). Makes sense to use J&J with no need to chase people for 2nd shots.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement