Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How long before Irish reunification? (Part 2) Threadbans in OP

1136137139141142146

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    downcow wrote: »
    ...and would that include disposing the likes of bobby sands?
    You see that’s one of the points that the unionist community were shocked, and still are, that ordinary nationalists can revere people who were involved in the murder of innocent members of our community?

    Bobby Sands wasn't a murderer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    Yes, terrorists. Back in the day there wouldn't have been any sympathy if someone in the UDA got killed around where I was living, these guys were only a few streets away and frequently came over to shoot people who had no involvement at all. But most people did not agree with the IRA campaign.

    What I was questioning originally Downcow, do most (not all, but most) Protestants accept that the Plantation of Ulster was terribly wrong, that the treatment of Catholics post partition was also terribly wrong as was Bloody Sunday? No doubt the vast majority of Catholics think that things like the Enniskillen bombing and La Mon were atrocities.

    Yes. But themuns started it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    downcow wrote: »
    I appreciate the honesty in your post.
    As for the issues you raise. I see the plantation as something long back in history. Who are you going to blame? Those living in Dublin now whose ancestors benifited? Do you blame my people? - some of whom arrived during the plantation and most who did not arrive during the plantation. Presbyterians were treated worse than Catholics by the Anglican rulers at times - we have let it go. We don’t blame our Anglican neighbours. I honestly think it’s nuts to refer to the plantation as a factor today. It was a long time before land was taken off native Americans, auusies, etc, etc. I think it’s this old victim mentality. If it’s not the plantation then it’s the famine. Many of your people benefited from both.

    Bloody Sunday is over-egged. It was very unfortunate but it certainly wasn’t any worse (and I would suggest not as bad as) la mon etc. These were protesters and there was a riot taking place. The people in la mon were having dinner and were burned to death simply because they were Protestant .

    Many Catholics were treated badly after partition and it was blatant sectarianism and to be condemned. But you are missing the context. They were seen by those running the country as out to wreck the country (no excuse) but a reality.
    I do get fed up with nonsense like Catholics didn’t have the vote etc - just lies.

    These issues were all complex but I am accepting us brits got it very wrong a lot of the time I am sorry for that. But I have to stomach the constant innocence being portrayed by many on this forum of the Irish. You Irish have discriminated against us brits in a major way also but seem in denial. No acceptance by many of the vicious sectarian campaigns of the ira. No responsibility taken for 70% of the Protestant population having to get out of ROI, nor the mass movement of people in ni eg 90%+ of the Protestant population of derry have to set up new communities on the waterside and those that are left living in a fortress. No acceptance of the sectarianism of the ira cleansing entire towns of Protestants eg my home town
    Etc etc

    Bloody Sunday "over-egged" ?
    Innocent people standing up against sectarianism, gerrymandering, discrimination... executed in the street by the state ...
    Widgery's lies portraying the innocent as terrorists...

    But for the sectarianism by the Unionist govt in Stormont...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Nqp15hhu wrote: »
    Not in modern times. I would like you though to provide evidence of a how a Protestant in NI would be treated more favourably in 2021? Could you provide that evidence please, thanks.


    https://amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/business/agri/protestant-farmers-more-likely-to-have-large-farms-northern-ireland-statistics-show-37474528.html

    This ties in with my earlier post.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Not asking for justification...I'm asking what it is that is different. downcow struggled with this too, funnily enough.

    Downcow gave you an endless list. It was Irish posters on here who really struggled to give examples of how they were distinct from british culture. I think it was narrowed down to leprechauns, Irish dancing (which we discovered was copied from the british army) and garlic sports


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Nqp15hhu wrote: »
    So you think that a United Ireland will solve the division in my country? How? It'll just flip things over.

    Partition was a wrong that needs correction.
    The difference is uniting Ireland won't lead to inequality for anyone. Nobody will be burnt out while authorities turn a blind eye. There will be little support for terrorism from any side.
    People give less and less of a **** about religion, thank Jebus.
    I think any no campaigners north and south are really only concerned about no longer being top dog and looking after their own. No government or party should be putting one group above another.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    downcow wrote: »
    Downcow have you an endless list. It was Irish posters on here who really struggled to give examples of how they were distinct from british culture. I think it was narrowed down to leprechauns, Irish dancing (which we discovered was copied from the british army) and garlic sports

    downcow...the British see us as a distinct culture and sadly(for you) you are included in that. Davis Trimble, Ian Paisley knew it and so does everyone else. We are all seen as 'Irish' distinctly, by Britain and the rest of the world.
    The Orange is as much part of my culture as it is yours. It just happens to be a part of my culture I wish it wasn't...like the RC church might be to you. But the RC church is part of you too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Rodin wrote: »
    Bobby Sands wasn't a murderer.

    You know this?
    I couldn’t confirm that but i know he belonged to an organisation who’s raison detre was murder.
    I understand he was a thief.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Rodin wrote: »
    Bloody Sunday "over-egged" ?
    Innocent people standing up against sectarianism, gerrymandering, discrimination... executed in the street by the state ...
    Widgery's lies portraying the innocent as terrorists...

    But for the sectarianism by the Unionist govt in Stormont...

    It was terrible. But thousands of people were murdered in ni and many were just trying to keep their heads down and live.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    downcow wrote: »
    Downcow have you an endless list. It was Irish posters on here who really struggled to give examples of how they were distinct from british culture. I think it was narrowed down to leprechauns, Irish dancing (which we discovered was copied from the british army) and garlic sports

    Do you really want to go over this nonsense again, Downcow?

    Language, music, sport, literature, food, myth/legends, I could go on. Irish culture is well defined and known across the world.

    Even many similarities between the less....sophisticated British and Irish cultures are easily differentiated, for example compare the typical British style estate pub and it's atmosphere to the typical traditional Irish pub.

    Why so insecure all the time? The existence of an internationally known and widely loved Irish culture doesn't diminish yours. Perhaps the bigger issue is Ulster Unionism's constant striving to define itself as, 'not Irish' rather than focusing on what it actually is forms part of the problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    downcow...the British see us as a distinct culture and sadly(for you) you are included in that. Davis Trimble, Ian Paisley knew it and so does everyone else. We are all seen as 'Irish' distinctly, by Britain and the rest of the world.
    The Orange is as much part of my culture as it is yours. It just happens to be a part of my culture I wish it wasn't...like the RC church might be to you. But the RC church is part of you too.

    I can’t understand why you are so infatuated by what ‘Britain’ thinks?
    What Britain or anyone else thinks about me doesn't change who I am. Just because the world thought Irish people were thick, alcoholics who liked fighting, doesn’t mean that they are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    downcow wrote: »
    I can’t understand why you are so infatuated by what ‘Britain’ thinks?
    What Britain or anyone else thinks about me doesn't change who I am. Just because the world thought Irish people were thick, alcoholics who liked fighting, doesn’t mean that they are.

    *
    We are all seen as 'Irish' distinctly, by Britain and the rest of the world.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    Do you really want to go over this nonsense again, Downcow?

    Language, music, sport, literature, food, myth/legends, I could go on. Irish culture is well defined and known across the world.

    Even many similarities between the less....sophisticated British and Irish cultures are easily differentiated, for example compare the typical British style estate pub and it's atmosphere to the typical traditional Irish pub.

    Why so insecure all the time? The existence of an internationally known and widely loved Irish culture doesn't diminish yours. Perhaps the bigger issue is Ulster Unionism's constant striving to define itself as, 'not Irish' rather than focusing on what it actually is forms part of the problem.

    Kettle and pot come to mind. You are barely indistinguishable from the English and yet you try to distance yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    downcow wrote: »
    It was terrible. But thousands of people were murdered in ni and many were just trying to keep their heads down and live.

    Nobody has said those murders were ok.
    You've said Bloody Sunday was "over-egged"

    But Unionist sectarian discrimination is the Sine Qua Non of the modern troubles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    downcow wrote: »
    Kettle and pot come to mind. You are barely indistinguishable from the English and yet you try to distance yourself.

    The English can distinguish us in a heartbeat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Rodin wrote: »
    Nobody has said those murders were ok.
    You've said Bloody Sunday was "over-egged"

    But Unionist sectarian discrimination is the Sine Qua Non of the modern troubles.

    We've come a long way. When Bloody Sunday happened Unionism was happy it did, as was Britain.
    Now only belligerent Unionism thinks it was was 'over egged''
    Belligerent Unionism is meeting in the upstairs rooms of pubs these days and inventing Loyalist threats to try to stop a Protocol that today the EU and THE UK said is going nowhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    downcow wrote: »
    Kettle and pot come to mind. You are barely indistinguishable from the English and yet you try to distance yourself.

    You're projecting your own insecurities again, Downcow.

    I've no problem with acknowledging significant crossover between British and Irish culture (I can think of around 800 reasons for that), but the absolute fact of the matter is Irish culture is recognised (and celebrated) across the world, and easily distinguished from British culture.

    Irish culture is easily defined, no amount of shouting, 'NEVER, NEVER, NEVER' will change that.

    Instead of the snide comments with no basis in actual fact, perhaps actually address the odd point. I'll remind you that when this discussion last came up, I was happy to provide examples as to how Ulster Unionist culture and traditions are different from Irish culture. As I said already, perhaps better to focus on the positives of your culture instead of trying to define yourself as, 'whatever those ones down the road aren't' to the extent you try claiming to know nothing of what happens twenty or thirty mile down the road from you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    We've come a long way. When Bloody Sunday happened Unionism was happy it did, as was Britain.
    Now only belligerent Unionism thinks it was was 'over egged''
    Belligerent Unionism is meeting in the upstairs rooms of pubs these days and inventing Loyalist threats to try to stop a Protocol that today the EU and THE UK said is going nowhere.

    The absurdity of today's news that the Orange Order were removing themselves from cross-border projects....because of an agreement with the EU that their British government agreed to. It's genuinely perplexing the level of mental gymnastics required to avoid acknowledging the responsibility the UK (and specifically the DUP who make up a significant number of their membership) hold for.....you know, signing up to an international agreement which they then claimed was fantastic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    You're projecting your own insecurities again, Downcow.

    I've no problem with acknowledging significant crossover between British and Irish culture (I can think of around 800 reasons for that), but the absolute fact of the matter is Irish culture is recognised (and celebrated) across the world, and easily distinguished from British culture.

    Irish culture is easily defined, no amount of shouting, 'NEVER, NEVER, NEVER' will change that.

    Instead of the snide comments with no basis in actual fact, perhaps actually address the odd point. I'll remind you that when this discussion last came up, I was happy to provide examples as to how Ulster Unionist culture and traditions are different from Irish culture. As I said already, perhaps better to focus on the positives of your culture instead of trying to define yourself as, 'whatever those ones down the road aren't' to the extent you try claiming to know nothing of what happens twenty or thirty mile down the road from you.

    It’s actually a pathetic go to discussion for Irish nationalists. I actually don’t care where we overlap and where we don’t. I don’t know why you need to get ni british folk to fit into your wee Irish box. It’s clearly an insecurity


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Rodin wrote: »
    Nobody has said those murders were ok.
    You've said Bloody Sunday was "over-egged"

    But Unionist sectarian discrimination is the Sine Qua Non of the modern troubles.

    What I mean about over-egged is that it get more attention than any other atrocity in ni. That’s all

    If you asked me to list atrocities in ni I would have a very long list before I even thought of Bloody Sunday - and that would include many attacks on the nationalist community like loughinisland. The people murdered in loughinisland were like the people in la mon. They weren’t protesting or in a riot situation They were having a drink and the were murdered simply because they were catholic


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    downcow wrote: »
    It’s actually a pathetic go to discussion for Irish nationalists. I actually don’t care where we overlap and where we don’t. I don’t know why you need to get ni british folk to fit into your wee Irish box. It’s clearly an insecurity

    You don't care.....yet you're off on one about how they're the same.


    Also, as for needing to get NI British folk to fit into an Irish box....I'd suggest reading my post again. Specifically where I said "I'll remind you that when this discussion last came up, I was happy to provide examples as to how Ulster Unionist culture and traditions are different from Irish culture.".....

    Are you even reading the posts you're trying to argue with?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    You don't care.....yet you're off on one about how they're the same.


    Also, as for needing to get NI British folk to fit into an Irish box....I'd suggest reading my post again. Specifically where I said "I'll remind you that when this discussion last came up, I was happy to provide examples as to how Ulster Unionist culture and traditions are different from Irish culture.".....

    Are you even reading the posts you're trying to argue with?

    So we can agree and move on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    The absurdity of today's news that the Orange Order were removing themselves from cross-border projects....because of an agreement with the EU that their British government agreed to. It's genuinely perplexing the level of mental gymnastics required to avoid acknowledging the responsibility the UK (and specifically the DUP who make up a significant number of their membership) hold for.....you know, signing up to an international agreement which they then claimed was fantastic.

    There is no nuance in 'Unionism' until they actually remove the DUP. It is a homogenous entity until those who pretend they are not DUPers remove the DUP.

    Far too many Unionists stand idly by.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    There is no nuance in 'Unionism' until they actually remove the DUP. It is a homogenous entity until those who pretend they are not DUPers remove the DUP.

    Far too many Unionists stand idly by.

    There is the arrogance and naivety of republicanism summed up all in one post.
    Such a short post and yet there is so much I could react to in it - but I guess it doesn’t need exaination to anyone, it is so glaring.
    ......and all the time we have a nationalist community in our country whom the majority vote for Sinn Fein, lol, you couldn’t make it up. But that’s their choice and I’m sure they have their reasons, which is up to them and non of my business


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    So if we use this thread a litmus test, I don't see much uniting of minds between Orange & Green, indeed quite the opposite!

    Poles apart, so how do you unite the two parts of the island if such different opinions & aspirations exist between the two main tribes?

    Answer; You don't unite, you just make sure to outbreed the Unionists, win a border poll and you get a "United" Ireland ..... not by uniting with the enemy (unionism) but by outbreeding them.

    Is that good?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    So if we use this thread a litmus test, I don't see much uniting of minds between Orange & Green, indeed quite the opposite!

    Poles apart, so how do you unite the two parts of the island if such different opinions & aspirations exist between the two main tribes?

    Answer; You don't unite, you just make sure to outbreed the Unionists, win a border poll and you get a "United" Ireland ..... not by uniting with the enemy (unionism) but by outbreeding them.

    Is that good?

    Yeah that seems to be the plan.
    The problem is it’s like chasing the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, as more and more Catholics enjoy and buy into the benefits of the U.K.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    So if we use this thread a litmus test, I don't see much uniting of minds between Orange & Green, indeed quite the opposite!

    Poles apart, so how do you unite the two parts of the island if such different opinions & aspirations exist between the two main tribes?

    Answer; You don't unite, you just make sure to outbreed the Unionists, win a border poll and you get a "United" Ireland ..... not by uniting with the enemy (unionism) but by outbreeding them.

    Is that good?

    Conveniently ignoring the rapidly growing middle ground in NI, primarily voting Alliance/GP who are open to being convinced on the benefits of Unification (or continued membership of the Union).

    Despite your rhetoric, the decision will be carried by this middle ground, not who, 'outbreeds' the other.

    As I've said already, threads like this aren't actually a very useful litmus test; they carry a massive inherent selection bias as they tend to attract the more entrenched views of those who care enough to actually post about it (along with a small handful of WUMs who think their trolling is clever and subtle). I include myself, but then I don't think my view is necessarily reflective of what the average person twenty or thirty years younger than me who grew up in a different environment altogether holds.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,872 ✭✭✭View


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    Conveniently ignoring the rapidly growing middle ground in NI, primarily voting Alliance/GP who are open to being convinced on the benefits of Unification (or continued membership of the Union).

    Despite your rhetoric, the decision will be carried by this middle ground, not who, 'outbreeds' the other.

    As I've said already, threads like this aren't actually a very useful litmus test; they carry a massive inherent selection bias as they tend to attract the more entrenched views of those who care enough to actually post about it (along with a small handful of WUMs who think their trolling is clever and subtle). I include myself, but then I don't think my view is necessarily reflective of what the average person twenty or thirty years younger than me who grew up in a different environment altogether holds.

    The evidence from the last GE is that your “the rapidly growing middle ground in NI, primarily voting Alliance/GP” was largely confined to “traditional” unionist areas. In most such areas, the Alliance came in second to the DUP (ie under FPTP, they are the main “challenger” party to the incumbents). In “traditional” nationalist areas, by way of contrast, the Alliance were coming in fifth or sixth (ie with not even the remotest chance of victory).

    As such, it’s a major assumption to think that, in an either/or referendum, those rapidly growing middle ground Alliance voters are going to vote to unite with Ireland - unless that is, serious effort to persuade them has been put in. That though would require much more effort and political flexibility that the usual “shut up, we’re going to outvote you” crowd are interested in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    So if we use this thread a litmus test, I don't see much uniting of minds between Orange & Green, indeed quite the opposite!

    Poles apart, so how do you unite the two parts of the island if such different opinions & aspirations exist between the two main tribes?

    Answer; You don't unite, you just make sure to outbreed the Unionists, win a border poll and you get a "United" Ireland ..... not by uniting with the enemy (unionism) but by outbreeding them.

    Is that good?

    There is and never was a need to unite with belligerents, they will, like before, be left behind.

    The Jamie Bryson's and the Gregory Campbell's are the ever diminishing rump of those left behind by the GFA.
    They are meeting in the upstairs rooms of pubs these days...literally.

    Look at the protocol...a bit of foot stamping and we have the EU and the UK copperfastening it just yesterday.

    Left behind again. And that will continue to happen as long as Unionism allows the DUP to represent them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I do find the DUP success very strange. Surely the majority, the vast majority, of Protestants can’t be anti gay marriage these days, but somehow they did nit turn on the DUP. Why not? Why wasn’t there an exodus to more liberal unionist over that? Plus Gregory Campbell complaining about too many black people on a TV show and that other buffoon about gay dancers. Very strange that the DUP have held so well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    View wrote: »
    The evidence from the last GE is that your “the rapidly growing middle ground in NI, primarily voting Alliance/GP” was largely confined to “traditional” unionist areas. In most such areas, the Alliance came in second to the DUP (ie under FPTP, they are the main “challenger” party to the incumbents). In “traditional” nationalist areas, by way of contrast, the Alliance were coming in fifth or sixth (ie with not even the remotest chance of victory).

    As such, it’s a major assumption to think that, in an either/or referendum, those rapidly growing middle ground Alliance voters are going to vote to unite with Ireland - unless that is, serious effort to persuade them has been put in. That though would require much more effort and political flexibility that the usual “shut up, we’re going to outvote you” crowd are interested in.

    .... That would be why I didn't make the assumption that the rapidly growing middle ground were going to vote for a United Ireland, and specifically said that they were open to being convinced of the benefits of either Unification or remaining part of the Union. That Unification lies in the hands of the middle ground who aren't dogmatically bound to either Unionism or Nationalism has been my point all along; one that I've raised with a great degree of regularity.

    The allegedly, 'usual' crowd of shut up we're going to outvote you? Even the most ardent of Shinners talks of dialogue and engagement with Unionists. Apart from a handful of fringe lunatics, this, 'usual crowd' is just a strawman. I suppose it is easier to argue against an opinion that pretty much no one actually holds though.

    Regarding APNI's general performance, I'd warrant that FPTP voting is a massive factor there; just taking myself as an example, in a STV system, they would be my first preference every time....when I lived in the Fermanagh South Tyrone constituency with FPTP voting, I voted for SF despite them not reflecting my views; the alternative was someone who reflected my views even less and a wasted vote.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    Conveniently ignoring the rapidly growing middle ground in NI, primarily voting Alliance/GP who are open to being convinced on the benefits of Unification (or continued membership of the Union).

    Despite your rhetoric, the decision will be carried by this middle ground, not who, 'outbreeds' the other.


    Rhetoric? Not sure about that, just stating the obvious deep division between the two main tribes on this island, one Unionist/ Loyalist, one Nationalist/Republican ....

    Uniting together as one unified Ireland.
    No way baby, no sign of that anytime soon.

    The middle ground is good news indeed, once inhabited by the SDLP and the UUP and now (as you say) inhabitited by the Alliance and the Greens.

    All I'm saying is that there seems to be no uniting of hearts & minds between Unionism & Nationalism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Rhetoric? Not sure about that, just stating the obvious deep division between the two main tribes on this island, one Unionist/ Loyalist, one Nationalist/Republican ....

    Uniting together as one unified Ireland.
    No way baby, no sign of that anytime soon.

    The middle ground is good news indeed, once inhabited by the SDLP and the UUP and now (as you say) inhabitited by the Alliance and the Greens.

    All I'm saying is that there seems to be no uniting of hearts & minds between Unionism & Nationalism.

    And you say it repeatedly every 3 to 4 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Rhetoric? Not sure about that, just stating the obvious deep division between the two main tribes on this island, one Unionist/ Loyalist, one Nationalist/Republican ....

    Uniting together as one unified Ireland.
    No way baby, no sign of that anytime soon.

    The middle ground is good news indeed, once inhabited by the SDLP and the UUP and now (as you say) inhabitited by the Alliance and the Greens.

    All I'm saying is that there seems to be no uniting of hearts & minds between Unionism & Nationalism.

    The UUP were never the middle ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Bambi wrote: »
    The UUP were never the middle ground.

    You probably mean as Unionists they were never Nationalist leaning in their thinking.

    The UUP had the main middle of the road Unionist vote, until the extreme DUP took over, while the SDLP had the main middle of the road Nationalist vote until the extreme Sinn Fein took over.

    Back when the UUP and the SDLP held the middle ground the DUP and the Shinners were referred to as being at the two extremes of Loyalism & Republicanism.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    downcow wrote: »
    What I mean about over-egged is that it get more attention than any other atrocity in ni. That’s all

    If you asked me to list atrocities in ni I would have a very long list before I even thought of Bloody Sunday - and that would include many attacks on the nationalist community like loughinisland. The people murdered in loughinisland were like the people in la mon. They weren’t protesting or in a riot situation They were having a drink and the were murdered simply because they were catholic

    There's a clear distinction between illegal paramilitary activity and state street executions. You fail to see that.

    And it gets more attention because the people of Derry kept the pressure on. If they hadn't then Saville would not have exonerated their loved ones. They've no apologies to make for making the incident front and centre...

    Unjustified and unjustifiable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    There doesn't need to be a uniting of Nationalism and Unionism. They're twins with twin to twin transfusion. As one grows, the other withers.
    The Red Sea will part with a vote on reunification and when a United Ireland happens, the sea will close again, swallowing the enslavers once more. Unionism will be consigned to the rubbish bin of history.. another failed empire.

    Tá an lá ag teacht....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    You probably mean as Unionists they were never Nationalist leaning in their thinking.

    The UUP had the main middle of the road Unionist vote, until the extreme DUP took over, while the SDLP had the main middle of the road Nationalist vote until the extreme Sinn Fein took over.

    Back when the UUP and the SDLP held the middle ground the DUP and the Shinners were referred to as being at the two extremes of Loyalism & Republicanism.

    Nope, the idea that UUP were the Unionist equivalent of the SDLP or Alliance is just not true. It was the UUPs endorsement of the GFA that killed them off with their voters and turned the DUP into the main Unionist party, that's how middle ground the UUP were.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    downcow wrote: »
    You know this?
    I couldn’t confirm that but i know he belonged to an organisation who’s raison detre was murder.
    I understand he was a thief.

    So every BA soldier is a murderer too by default.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    downcow wrote: »
    I can’t understand why you are so infatuated by what ‘Britain’ thinks?
    What Britain or anyone else thinks about me doesn't change who I am. Just because the world thought Irish people were thick, alcoholics who liked fighting, doesn’t mean that they we are.

    Fixed that for you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I do find the DUP success very strange. Surely the majority, the vast majority, of Protestants can’t be anti gay marriage these days, but somehow they did nit turn on the DUP. Why not? Why wasn’t there an exodus to more liberal unionist over that? Plus Gregory Campbell complaining about too many black people on a TV show and that other buffoon about gay dancers. Very strange that the DUP have held so well.

    I agree I wish a greater number would go with liberal unionism.
    Maybe is reflective of coming out of conflict. The nationalist community surprise me and I assume the don’t support sectarian murder yet they vote in very large numbers for a party that contains sectarian murderers at all levels and their entire party refuses to condemn the sectarian murder of the past. Very hard to understand


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Rodin wrote: »
    There's a clear distinction between illegal paramilitary activity and state street executions. You fail to see that.

    And it gets more attention because the people of Derry kept the pressure on. If they hadn't then Saville would not have exonerated their loved ones. They've no apologies to make for making the incident front and centre...

    Unjustified and unjustifiable.

    I have no problem with them raisin it continually. After all they are victims. I remain of the opinion la mon and loughinisland were worse in that the victims were not on a protest march that broke down into a riot with ira men knocking about with guns intending to murder those policing the situation.
    In ni terms Bloody Sunday was not more, and I would contend was less, vicious than hundreds of other atrocities.

    I think we are going to disagree on this so maybe we should leave it at that


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    So every BA soldier is a murderer too by default.

    This makes no sense.
    Firstly I didn’t say m mcg was a murderer so no idea what you mean.
    Also, the army’s raisondetre is not murder The main aim of their organisation is not sneaking around attempting to shoot unarmed people in the back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    downcow wrote: »
    This makes no sense.
    Firstly I didn’t say m mcg was a murderer so no idea what you mean.
    Also, the army’s raisondetre is not murder The main aim of their organisation is not sneaking around attempting to shoot unarmed people in the back.

    Their main aim is hardly throwing parties and baking cakes, Downcow.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Fionn1952 wrote: »
    Their main aim is hardly throwing parties and baking cakes, Downcow.

    I never suggested it was, but now you raise it, that is fairly close to the main aim of the Army Catering Corps.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    downcow wrote: »
    I remain of the opinion la mon and loughinisland were worse

    Let me explain this to you again and I'd appeal to you to think before you write on this issue in the future. Nobody blames the victims of La Mon and Loughinisland for their own killings.

    The Bloody Sunday victims took 40 years and to have their loved ones found innocent of being lawfully shot to death by British Army murderers.

    Do you understand the difference?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭External Association


    I think the Troubles postponed it b0y 50-80 years. I won't see it in my life time, though I'd like to. I don't have a partitionist mentality. The fake state was setup through political chicanery in 1920.

    You could remove a segment from most nations like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    downcow wrote: »
    I have no problem with them raisin it continually. After all they are victims. I remain of the opinion la mon and loughinisland were worse in that the victims were not on a protest march that broke down into a riot with ira men knocking about with guns intending to murder those policing the situation.
    In ni terms Bloody Sunday was not more, and I would contend was less, vicious than hundreds of other atrocities.

    I think we are going to disagree on this so maybe we should leave it at that

    How dare people be out protesting and fighting for their rights...
    Should have been in a pub putting the world to rights over a pint...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Rodin wrote: »
    How dare people be out protesting and fighting for their rights...
    Should have been in a pub putting the world to rights over a pint...

    Hard put any massacre over another. What makes Bloody Sunday almost unique is the lying afterwards by the authorities that the State demanded the public respect. The British State has never recovered its standing in Ireland since that time. Hard believe it, but in West Belfast in the 70s there were quite a few men who had been in the British army. No young fellas in Ireland could join it since without putting themselves at some degree of risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    in West Belfast in the 70s there were quite a few men who had been in the British army.

    There were quite a few from the Bogside in the British Army too, it was one of the few routes out of desperate poverty.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement