Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Average speed cameras on M7

«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,884 ✭✭✭Tzardine


    I welcome them.

    Wont be an issue for most people. I set the cruise control when on the motorway and I assume most do. Hopefully it slows down some of the numptys on the motorways.

    You cant miss the cameras too, so if you do like to travel a bit faster, and get caught out its your own fault.


  • Posts: 596 [Deleted User]


    And by Limerick, you of course mean Tipperary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    I assume they'll be plenty of warning signs when you are about to approach it so if you are over the limit you can slow down, I don't see the problem with having them on a motorway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 171 ✭✭Renault 5


    Common in the UK I think and Australia.

    Surprised it took so long to introduce them here

    6034073


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,106 ✭✭✭The Continental Op


    The one place they are really common and work well in the UK is on motorway roadworks. Before no one took any notice of the speed limits for road works but the average speed cameras have changed that.

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,725 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    No issues with them at all. Set cc at 120 km/h and sit back and relax...

    The only time they’ll be an issue is that time your driving at 120, and a car passes you, and then slows down to 110-115, so you overtake them again, and a few minutes later they do the exact same thing, rinse & repeat......... sometimes you need a quick blast at 130-140 to lose them once and for all..... (or at least for 10-15 minutes until they catch you again and slow down again’.

    You see them on almost every long motorway drive......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭eusap


    That section of motorway is well known for accidents, so no surprise they picked it


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,059 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Someone needs to invent an average lane camera to teach people how to keep left :D for the other end of the M7


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,293 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    PsychoPete wrote: »
    I assume they'll be plenty of warning signs when you are about to approach it so if you are over the limit you can slow down, I don't see the problem with having them on a motorway

    You mean one of these?

    1602502558504.jpg--m7_cork__dublin__limerick_motorway.jpg?1602502558000

    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,883 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    press release reads more like they're putting in variable speed limits than average speed cameras since they mention adverse conditions so many times and say 41% of people are speeding, must be pretty safe to speed if 41% of people are speeding and there are only accidents when it has freak hail storms? :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 944 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    PsychoPete wrote: »
    I assume they'll be plenty of warning signs when you are about to approach it so if you are over the limit you can slow down, I don't see the problem with having them on a motorway

    Average speed cams - there will be another at 1km/5km/next junction. They time you over that distance to determine average speed. Obvs requires number plate recognition to work.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Kalyke


    No issues with them at all. Set cc at 120 km/h and sit back and relax...

    The only time they’ll be an issue is that time your driving at 120, and a car passes you, and then slows down to 110-115, so you overtake them again, and a few minutes later they do the exact same thing, rinse & repeat......... sometimes you need a quick blast at 130-140 to lose them once and for all..... (or at least for 10-15 minutes until they catch you again and slow down again’.

    You see them on almost every long motorway drive......
    My God I thought I was the only one inflicted with the CCC (Curse of Cruise Control) Why do they do it? Weird, "I wont be overtaken" attitude!


  • Registered Users Posts: 944 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    The one place they are really common and work well in the UK is on motorway roadworks. Before no one took any notice of the speed limits for road works but the average speed cameras have changed that.

    Have had them on a lot of the UK dual-carriageways for at least 15 years. One place they made a difference is the road to Stranraer, as lots of drivers were overcooking it to make their ferry in time. Makes it a much more pleasant drive now that you don't have people up your ar*e trying to pass when you're sticking to the speed limit. And roadworks, as you say.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,059 ✭✭✭kirving


    Badly needed in some areas, particularly around busy junctions where it can be difficult to pull out from the left lane, to let people join due to people way above the limit in the right lane.

    (And yes, I know it's up to the cars joining to match speed, but it's good practice to do as much as possible to allow them to join by moving over or adjusting your own speed.)

    I'm just astounded that 10% of people are still speeding in the port tunnel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Vittu


    No issues with them at all. Set cc at 120 km/h and sit back and relax...

    The only time they’ll be an issue is that time your driving at 120, and a car passes you, and then slows down to 110-115, so you overtake them again, and a few minutes later they do the exact same thing, rinse & repeat......... sometimes you need a quick blast at 130-140 to lose them once and for all..... (or at least for 10-15 minutes until they catch you again and slow down again’.

    You see them on almost every long motorway drive......

    What is that about, it really annoys the hell out of me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 124 ✭✭1percent


    liamog wrote: »
    Someone needs to invent an average lane camera to teach people how to keep left :D for the other end of the M7

    I fully support this idea!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭vectra


    No issues with them at all. Set cc at 120 km/h and sit back and relax...

    The only time they’ll be an issue is that time your driving at 120, and a car passes you, and then slows down to 110-115, so you overtake them again, and a few minutes later they do the exact same thing, rinse & repeat......... sometimes you need a quick blast at 130-140 to lose them once and for all..... (or at least for 10-15 minutes until they catch you again and slow down again’.

    You see them on almost every long motorway drive......

    Thanks heavens for adaptive cruise :D

    Before I had adaptive I felt the same as you, It used to annoy the living hell out of me. I eventually came to the conclusion that the only way to get the aggrevated feeling was to slow to 110 for a few kms. instead of speeding up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,544 ✭✭✭Hogzy


    vectra wrote: »
    Thanks heavens for adaptive cruise :D

    Before I had adaptive I felt the same as you, It used to annoy the living hell out of me. I eventually came to the conclusion that the only way to get the aggrevated feeling was to slow to 110 for a few kms. instead of speeding up.

    But the adaptive cruise control would have you slow down with the car in front which keeps over taking and slowing down, which sort of defeats the purpose of cruise control in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    PsychoPete wrote: »
    I assume they'll be plenty of warning signs when you are about to approach it so if you are over the limit you can slow down, I don't see the problem with having them on a motorway

    If you miss them, then not even Specsavers couldn't assist you.

    They will be mounted on bright yellow poles with advance signage


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,436 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Fit them on the M1 and the fines would clear our national debt :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭eringobragh


    infuriating to see this wasted on a motorway..but alas

    having lived in Australia, they had speedcams eachside of every school district...seems the focus is way off dangerous roads here :confused:

    ...Leave them to it anyway the gosafe thing was a fiasco running a massive deficit...Irish drivers for the most part are some of the slowest drivers on the planet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭vectra


    Hogzy wrote: »
    But the adaptive cruise control would have you slow down with the car in front which keeps over taking and slowing down, which sort of defeats the purpose of cruise control in the first place.

    Cruise control yes.
    But not adaptive as you don't have to do anything, unlike normal cruise you either disengage it or put the foot down to overtake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime


    I used to drive many a bus on the motorways including the M7/8/9/1/11/50 etc and it was regular I'd get overtaken by a car, only for the c,unt to slow down in front of me leaving me to overtake it again. Rinse and repeat about 4 times until one of us exits. So that's nothing new with average speed cameras.

    I took a quick glance on the Twitter feed, and of course there's a dose of clowns saying it's just another money racket and a waste etc.
    I'm not getting into it with them but very simple if you don't speed then what's the issue ?


  • Posts: 596 [Deleted User]


    press release reads more like they're putting in variable speed limits than average speed cameras since they mention adverse conditions so many times and say 41% of people are speeding, must be pretty safe to speed if 41% of people are speeding and there are only accidents when it has freak hail storms? :D

    The accidents due to hail storms are more towards Roscrea / Borris in Ossory. I’m not aware of many accidents on this Nenagh - Birdhill stretch despite what was posted earlier by eusap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,411 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    If they put one in the M50 they would end up sending out parking fines


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,293 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    There has been a good few accidents over the years in that spot alright, there was at least one fatality and freak weather at the time was one factor. Some people I've spoken to, who use it regularly recon the design of the road and the way water drains off it may be another factor too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,725 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    vectra wrote: »
    Cruise control yes.
    But not adaptive as you don't have to do anything, unlike normal cruise you either disengage it or put the foot down to overtake.

    yeah but you still have to overtake them to return to the speed you've set....

    If I set cruise control at 120 km/h, I don't want cars overtaking me and slowing me down to 110, I want to drive at the 120....

    if I wanted to drive behind a 'pace car', I'd do so and let adaptive cruise control keep me at a safe distance.
    I dont want to drive behind pace cars because they'll go 105 up a hill, and 120 going down the hill etc.....


    If I want to drive at 120, I want to drive at a constant 120

    Adaptive is fine when there's no opportunity to overtake, but it's irrelevant when on a dual carriageway and overtaking can be done


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    Will be a great success.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,725 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    My favourite is when you're driving along a relatively quiet stretch of motorway, and see a truck in the distance, and as you get closer to it, there's a lone car sitting in behind it, no more than 2 car lengths away from it, wipers on full blast (because of the wash from the truck, despite the fact it stopped raining 20 minutes ago), completely happy to sit there, and oblivious of the fact an overtake would make their life much easier. then long after you pass them, you take a look behind, and they're still tucked in behind the truck!!!

    I'd say that some of them are drafting, and doing it for fuel efficiency, but i think I'd be giving them too much credit, and the reality is they simply have no awareness of their surroundings..

    Must be a nightmare for truck drivers having someone tail you so closely for so long on a motorway!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    bazz26 wrote: »
    There has been a good few accidents over the years in that spot alright, there was at least one fatality and freak weather at the time was one factor.

    That happened between Birdhill and Limerick if its the incident I'm aware of, at the bog crossing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,402 ✭✭✭plodder


    PsychoPete wrote: »
    I assume they'll be plenty of warning signs when you are about to approach it so if you are over the limit you can slow down, I don't see the problem with having them on a motorway
    They have special average speed camera warning signs on the port tunnel. They are more likely to be accepted if there are specific warnings. Good to see it finally happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,314 ✭✭✭ratracer


    The miserable €80 fine is not a deterrent to speeding in this country. It should be ramped up to €250 or more, then that would make some think twice about their speed.

    BTW, I also think 120km/h is too low a limit on the motorway network, it could be raised to 140km/h safely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    ratracer wrote: »
    The miserable €80 fine is not a deterrent to speeding in this country. It should be ramped up to €250 or more, then that would make some think twice about their speed.

    A realistic chance of being caught might make people think twice...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,725 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    ratracer wrote: »
    The miserable €80 fine is not a deterrent to speeding in this country. It should be ramped up to €250 or more, then that would make some think twice about their speed.

    It's like the driving in the bus lane fine.... €80 and that's it, it's not a penalty points offence (I dont think it is anyway).

    When was the last time you saw a Garda enforcing the bus lane??
    How often do you see people driving in the bus lane (and thus slowing you down when they merge back in ahead of you)?

    For the time it would save someone every morning/evening, it would probably be worth the potential €80 fine every few weeks/months if it's saving you a few hours a week in commuting time..... (and I'm sure people have and go by this attitude)

    Much better enforcement is needed, but perhaps remote enforcement... like say a team of CCTV operators that can focus on completely random sections of bus lanes (hot spots) around the cities, and issue postal fines (along with photo's of the offence taking place) to the offenders. Can't ID the driver, no problem, the registered owner of the vehicle gets the fine.... don't pay the fine??, road tax increases by 10% for every unpaid fine for the following year, and insurance database updated to show you are a rule breaker and dont pay your fines...

    If there was a belief out there that maybe this bus lane is being watched today, I better not risk it...., would completely cut it out all togeher say for teh few that are happy to risk it and pay the fines...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    and i just bought myself a hot hatch :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,500 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    They should fix that section of motorway instead of putting a revenue generating device on it. It absolutely pools water and is extremely dangerous...but fixing it doesn't generate income.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,059 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    ratracer wrote: »
    The miserable €80 fine is not a deterrent to speeding in this country. It should be ramped up to €250 or more, then that would make some think twice about their speed.

    BTW, I also think 120km/h is too low a limit on the motorway network, it could be raised to 140km/h safely.

    If I was in charge, I'd make fines be €20 but only payable in person (by the driver) at a motor tax office. The fines should be low so that we can massively ramp up enforcement, but annoying so that you are irritated into compliance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,457 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00


    fryup wrote: »
    and i just bought myself a hot hatch :(

    It's the twisty country roads that you'll enjoy your hot hatch, not on the motorway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    liamog wrote: »
    If I was in charge, I'd make fines be €20 but only payable in person (by the driver) at a motor tax office. The fines should be low so that we can massively ramp up enforcement, but annoying so that you are irritated into compliance.
    And make it that the only office where you can pay, is the tax office in Longford :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭i57dwun4yb1pt8


    pity they didnt fix the road design instead, its very bad in harsh weather .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,587 ✭✭✭✭vectra


    yeah but you still have to overtake them to return to the speed you've set....

    If I set cruise control at 120 km/h, I don't want cars overtaking me and slowing me down to 110, I want to drive at the 120....

    if I wanted to drive behind a 'pace car', I'd do so and let adaptive cruise control keep me at a safe distance.
    I dont want to drive behind pace cars because they'll go 105 up a hill, and 120 going down the hill etc.....


    If I want to drive at 120, I want to drive at a constant 120

    Adaptive is fine when there's no opportunity to overtake, but it's irrelevant when on a dual carriageway and overtaking can be done

    OK
    so when they drop to 105 up the hill you can indicate and overtake, then they do 120 down the hill and you are already in front doing 120.

    If this continues for too long, one of my ways to sort them is when they indicate to pass me for the 3rd time I will accelerate to match their speed before the cross lanes.
    You will 99% of the time see them pull back in and stay there. The others will get annoyed and put the foot down :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,289 ✭✭✭DaveyDave


    Don't see the issue. We need more of these. The rampant speeding on the M50/N4/N3 is ridiculous. If they stood on an overpass with the new laser guns they'd clean up.

    My only concern if we do see more of these is people suddenly dropping the anchors, sick to death of people dropping to 60 in an 80 zone on the N4 because a Garda car is engaged with someone pulled over or when there's a speed van.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    It's the twisty country roads that you'll enjoy your hot hatch, not on the motorway

    but more chance of pranging it


  • Posts: 596 [Deleted User]


    yeah but you still have to overtake them to return to the speed you've set....

    If I set cruise control at 120 km/h, I don't want cars overtaking me and slowing me down to 110, I want to drive at the 120....

    if I wanted to drive behind a 'pace car', I'd do so and let adaptive cruise control keep me at a safe distance.
    I dont want to drive behind pace cars because they'll go 105 up a hill, and 120 going down the hill etc.....


    If I want to drive at 120, I want to drive at a constant 120

    Adaptive is fine when there's no opportunity to overtake, but it's irrelevant when on a dual carriageway and overtaking can be done

    You are aware that you don’t suddenly lose the ability to overtake with ACC on? Or indeed that your accelerator doesn’t stop working either?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,725 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    DaveyDave wrote: »
    My only concern if we do see more of these is people suddenly dropping the anchors

    People will see these, and think it's a 1 shot deal, drop the anchor for it, and then once passed, it'll be back up to speed....

    DaveyDave wrote: »
    sick to death of people dropping to 60 in an 80 zone on the N4 because a Garda car is engaged with someone pulled over or when there's a speed van.

    This.

    see's Garda car/camera van, immediately drops to about 20-25 below the posted speed limit.

    :confused::confused::confused::confused::mad::confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,883 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    There will be people doing 60-80 for a decent portion of the monitored zone 'to be sure' they are under the 120 on average


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,106 ✭✭✭The Continental Op


    There will be people doing 60-80 for a decent portion of the monitored zone 'to be sure' they are under the 120 on average

    Maybe drivers drive differently in the UK but I've found on long stretches of Average Speed Cameras the traffic tends to move at just below the limit when I measure using a satnav. So my guess is the average motorist is sticking bang on the speed going and going by their cars speedo.

    I use the satnav in the UK primaily to give me my speed in MPH.

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭stoneill


    vectra wrote: »
    OK
    so when they drop to 105 up the hill you can indicate and overtake, then they do 120 down the hill and you are already in front doing 120.

    If this continues for too long, one of my ways to sort them is when they indicate to pass me for the 3rd time I will accelerate to match their speed before the cross lanes.
    You will 99% of the time see them pull back in and stay there. The others will get annoyed and put the foot down :D

    Yep, this works, you have to match their speed for a while until they make a decision to pull in behind you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,725 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    vectra wrote: »
    If this continues for too long, one of my ways to sort them is when they indicate to pass me for the 3rd time I will accelerate to match their speed before the cross lanes.
    You will 99% of the time see them pull back in and stay there. The others will get annoyed and put the foot down :D

    I must try that..

    Though the issue with this method now is you'll be speeding and will beat the allowable time from 1 'gate' to another in an average speed check zone...


  • Advertisement
Advertisement