Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part VIII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

17273757778331

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Lundstram


    It’s ok folks, 2020 was just a bad dream. Never happened.

    Thanks for confirming that, Graham.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    Lundstram wrote: »
    I was been kind saying over 70 considering vast majority of deaths have been over 83.

    Keep clinging to the few middle aged folk with underlying conditions who died “from” Covid19.

    Young lad stabbed to death in Dublin the other night. Should we ban all knives? No because that’s silly. Like your way of thinking.

    I'm just thinking if all the ICU beds are full and all the staff are off sick. Who are you expecting to look after you when you fall off your polo horse. Answer that.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    If you have only been staying at home for a “few weeks” since last March you haven’t been following the guidelines

    If you've been locking yourself in the house since last March, you've been doing it wrong.

    It would explain some of the more OTT protestations though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Windmill100000


    ypres5 wrote: »
    What about the past year of restrictions? and the way the government are talking the year yet to come because of some boogeyman variant they've dreamt up

    Well, nothing is going to change in the short term with cases still high. We locked down before with far less numbers, so no easing is going to happen yet.
    Variant or no variant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    ypres5 wrote: »
    I think few weeks is a bit of an understatement at this point

    This lockdown started what 4 weeks ago. It not like we're out of Coffee.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbv5B71KmkA&ab_channel=NenaNenas


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,333 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    The government are already talking about 'new variants' emerging in the coming months and admitting defeat to them with restrictions been strongly suggested

    Yes, there's been dozens of variants already, most will be miniscule changes, but we have to accept that there may be ones that need extra attention.

    Would you rather when vaccinations happened we stuck our fingers in our ears and went "virus gone la la la"
    yesterday was a kick in the head for everyone and once reopening starts it will be chaos and rightly so

    "why won't they open the pubs so I can go ****ing mental"
    yeah, that's the attitude that will get us out of this......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Lundstram


    beauf wrote: »
    I'm just thinking if all the ICU beds are full and all the staff are off sick. Who are you expecting to look after you when you fall off your polo horse. Answer that.

    Can’t happen. My local polo club in Kildare has been shut for months now much like everything else.

    I miss polo horsing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭ypres5


    beauf wrote: »
    This lockdown started what 4 weeks ago. It not like we're out of Coffee.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbv5B71KmkA&ab_channel=NenaNenas

    my point is there's absolutely no prospect of an endgame from the way the government is speaking they've barely mentioned the vaccine anymore other than the 22 that went whoopsies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,567 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    down so quickly but we would have stayed on a more even keel instead of having cases plummet down to nothing and explode to almost 10k in the space of a few weeks.

    Cases didn't get near 10K.

    We got over 6000 positive swabs 3 days, because of reporting restrictions there was a lag.

    Again your claim is not backed by reality or other European countries who were late bringing in restrictions.

    And by any metric if things were more relaxed we would have entered Christmas week with a higher instance rate and the same reproductive number, with the added negative that UK variant would probably have become the dominant one at that stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,567 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    If you have only been staying at home for a “few weeks” since last March you haven’t been following the guidelines

    Fintan is on a self imposed Level 7.

    Good man Fintan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,663 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Graham wrote: »
    If you've been locking yourself in the house since last March, you've been doing it wrong.

    It would explain some of the more OTT protestations though.

    Nobody said they were locked in since last March.

    You incorrectly stated it was just a few weeks since then.

    Grossly inaccurate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    Some of you lot have completely lost the plot now and are getting hysterical. I would honestly suggest taking a break from the internet for a while.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,663 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Boggles wrote: »
    Fintan is on a self imposed Level 7.

    Good man Fintan.

    I’m incredibly responsible

    More than I can say for the pontificating finger saggers who expect many to do what they dont


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭acequion


    acequion wrote: »
    I have a question.

    Without getting into my feelings about the latest targetting of foreign travel, I would like to know if the very strict clampdown is only because of level 5. Level 5 is effectively a lockdown where no non essential travel beyond 5km is permitted. And that includes leaving the country. Ok I get that. And presumably that's how they have the right to fine people. However increasing the fines to €500 just for leaving the country, but not for a very long journey within the country, how legal is that? And MM said today in leader's questions re people going on foreign holidays, “That needs to stops, that very clearly needs to stop.” Again what kind of legal footing does he have to say that? People are advised not to do non essential travel but it's not illegal. So how can they be so punitive?

    Also, will this extreme punitiveness end with level 5, as in the fining of people travelling abroad? Without being in a lockdown situation how can they continue to do that? Will it just be whatever testing and quarantine requirements are currently in place?

    I would like factual answers to the above please, not somebody finger wagging about foreign travel. There is enough of that at the moment. I'm also surprised that these measures are not being in any way challenged or officially criticised. Or maybe they are and I've missed it? Any clarification would be great, thanks.

    Anyone care to answer or speculate please? I note someone posted about human rights and EU rights so I do think the above is relevant and important. Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Lundstram


    froog wrote: »
    Some of you lot have completely lost the plot now and are getting hysterical. I would honestly suggest taking a break from the internet for a while.

    I agree. Take a break, maybe look at some data. Look at today’s hospital numbers compared to this time last week. Look at our case numbers two weeks ago then look at yesterday’s.

    Pop back in soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭cnbyz


    i dont understand why people are so obsessed over foreign travel. Its already very few people traveling and the country is in lock down. Its not like they have anything better to do other than staying at home once they are back. Negative pcr test should be sufficient. Schools however are a big problem. Open them and we'll all face the consequences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,567 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I’m incredibly responsible

    More than I can say for the pontificating finger saggers who expect many to do what they dont

    I know you are Fintan, screw those finger saggers. :confused::)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,663 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    They've been bitten before by overpromising - most recently at Christmas when they very quickly had to row back.

    We're not going to stay locked down once the vulnerable are vaccinated
    .

    Where are you making this stuff up from?

    Those in power imposing restrictions have essentially said the very opposite to your wild ideas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,663 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Boggles wrote: »
    I know you are Fintan, screw those finger saggers. :confused::)

    Haha, that sucking autocorrect


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Nobody said they were locked in since last March.

    You incorrectly stated it was just a few weeks since then.

    Grossly inaccurate

    You will find there was no mention of "since" anything.

    If you have to make up things to argue against, it doesn't say much for the point you're trying to make.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,663 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Lundstram wrote: »
    I agree. Take a break, maybe look at some data. Look at today’s hospital numbers compared to this time last week. Look at our case numbers two weeks ago then look at yesterday’s.

    Pop back in soon.

    Yeah I think posters who suggest 50million would have died really need to follow their own advice sometimes.

    A nice cup of tea and some relaxation techniques will certainly help


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Windmill100000


    Nobody said they were locked in since last March.

    You incorrectly stated it was just a few weeks since then.

    Grossly inaccurate

    No foreign travel or trips to other countries to see friends, but I've certainly never felt locked in. I've gone for my daily walks when I can. I'm bored but I've never actually felt "locked in".


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Yeah I think posters who suggest 50million would have died really need to follow their own advice sometimes.

    :D

    apparently it's hyperbole season

    people meeting up is what the survival of the species depends on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Windmill100000


    Yeah I think posters who suggest 50million would have died really need to follow their own advice sometimes.

    A nice cup of tea and some relaxation techniques will certainly help

    When were those estimates made?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    No foreign travel or trips to other countries to see friends, but I've certainly never felt locked in. I've gone for my daily walks when I can. I'm bored but I've never actually felt "locked in".

    Damn.

    At least your honest


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭francogarbanzo


    acequion wrote: »
    Anyone care to answer or speculate please? I note someone posted about human rights and EU rights so I do think the above is relevant and important. Thanks.

    I don't think you'll get much of an answer here. People seem obsessed with arguing the effectiveness of restrictions, comparing data from sources all over the place, and making dishonest misrepresentations of each others' points. There is a complete lack of conversation around the moral/ethical/legal side to lockdown and other restrictions. I think we need a specific thread about it, to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Yeah I think posters who suggest 50million would have died really need to follow their own advice sometimes.

    A nice cup of tea and some relaxation techniques will certainly help

    :D:D:D:D:D:pac:

    That post should become a meme.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Lundstram


    Hearing on the news a class action lawsuit is underway against the minister of education for not allowing special needs children return to school.

    Good on them, I hope they are rewarded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭TobyHolmes


    Lundstram wrote: »
    Hearing on the news a class action is underway against the minister of education for not allowing special needs children return to school.

    Good on them, I hope they are rewarded.


    its very hard on the kids and the families.


    is it the MOE though or is it the union in which teachers refused to work (I dont know how the setup works TBH)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    They didn’t increase supply, cause we had none to begin with. They allowed a small amount of it for a short window of time and people made the most of it.

    None to some IS an increase.
    SusieBlue wrote: »
    ..Ironically the option you are arguing against is the one which would have meant less pressure on the health service and less misery for society. Bizarre.
    ...

    I'm not sure what option you think I'm arguing against. People who wanted the lockdown lifted, got their wish in Dec. It almost immediately caused a crisis in the health services in Jan. So you don't have to guess what might of happened, because it already happened. It also caused a return to a harsher lockdown in Jan maybe longer.

    SusieBlue wrote: »
    This just isn’t sustainable any more.
    The longer it goes on the more the cases will rise with each reopening.
    We had the longest and strictest lockdown in the EU and ended up either the same or worse off than every other EU country. That much can’t be denied.

    Most other countries didn't open up for everyone to go nuts over xmas. That was Ireland being "special".

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cbo1aTJito&ab_channel=FamilyGuyFunnyMoments

    We've had 10months of lockdown, no major crisis.
    We (against medical advice) lift it for 3~4 weeks at xmas. Immediate crisis.
    But is not the 3-4 weeks at fault, its the previous 10 months. Makes perfect sense.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement