The Vaccine

enno99 · 20-12-2020 09:18PM

Dohnjoe wrote: »

I doubt there's any solid conspiracy these posters believe in. Most will be too wiley to commit to something they know they can't support, any any of the rest just seem to buy into the whole "mark of the Beast" thing.

This seems almost purely about denial, anything to cast doubt on the facts in order to hint something is "going on" but without ever having to detail that.

if you havent grasped it by now I cant help you

enno99 · 20-12-2020 09:24PM

Quiner wrote: »

I think we are all on the same page in terms of what we think. I don't wish to speak for other posters, but I think we believe the following:

The pandemic was planned to bring about the Great Reset. If it wasn't planned, it is being exploited to bring about the reset. Where we may differ is on what the reset will look like. I believe it will be a technocratic hell in which human beings will be controlled and heavy restrictions will be placed on our lives. That's the conspiracy theory as I see it, so I hope it won't be claimed again that people still don't know what the conspiracy theory is.

Thats the thing about looking into these things every one has a different view and when ideas are shared maybe we will understand what is going on a little better

Quiner · 20-12-2020 09:27PM

enno99 wrote: »

Thats the thing about looking into these things every one has a different view and when ideas are shared maybe we will understand what is going on a little better

You're right. But I find it puzzling why people continue to insist that the conspiracy theory hasn't been outlined. I think the conspiracy theory is very clear. A technocratic hell with health passports, no freedom, mass surveillance etc.

runawaybishop · 20-12-2020 09:44PM

enno99 wrote: »

Deaths ?

link please

What do you think denotified cases means? Every time you are shown proof you just change the question. It's entirely obvious. Your entire theory is based on a ever shifting web of lies.

enno99 · 20-12-2020 10:02PM

runawaybishop wrote: »

What do you think denotified cases means? Every time you are shown proof you just change the question. It's entirely obvious. Your entire theory is based on a ever shifting web of lies.

LOL.

Sure but we were discussing deaths did you miss that bit.

Quiner · 20-12-2020 10:10PM

Why are there fake cases in the first place? The whole thing stinks. Bogus tests, inflated death numbers, people dying of all sorts being put down as 'died of covid'.

runawaybishop · 20-12-2020 10:32PM

enno99 wrote: »

LOL.

Sure but we were discussing deaths did you miss that bit.

Yeah, so was I.

US2 · 20-12-2020 10:33PM

CDC now reporting 2.79% vax recipients have had health impact events (unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required medical care) and this is only after 5 days of rollout.
Seems the vaccine is actually more harmful than the virus which kills old frail people a few months early.
https://t.co/nnNZhoNWL1

runawaybishop · 20-12-2020 10:34PM

Quiner wrote: »

Why are there fake cases in the first place? The whole thing stinks. Bogus tests, inflated death numbers, people dying of all sorts being put down as 'died of covid'.

There are no fake cases, no bogus deaths, no inflated death numbers. You'd rather believe some lunatic on bitchute who is trying to make money off you. And you call people sheep. Take off the blinkers.

runawaybishop · 20-12-2020 10:35PM

US2 wrote: »

CDC now reporting 2.79% vax recipients have had health impact events (unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required medical care) and this is only after 5 days of rollout.
Seems the vaccine is actually more harmful than the virus which kills old frail people a few months early.
https://t.co/nnNZhoNWL1

It seems you can't tell the difference between getting a fever and dying.

Also, a few months early? Take a look at yourself. It's not just old people, who actually ****ing matter, younger people with zero health issues are also dying. What the **** is wrong with you people.

Duke of Url · 20-12-2020 10:40PM

US2 wrote: »

CDC now reporting 2.79% vax recipients have had health impact events (unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required medical care) and this is only after 5 days of rollout.
Seems the vaccine is actually more harmful than the virus which kills old frail people a few months early.
https://t.co/nnNZhoNWL1

Bizarre post

Do you actually know how vaccines work and what your immune system is used for?

Car99 · 20-12-2020 10:45PM

US2 wrote: »

CDC now reporting 2.79% vax recipients have had health impact events (unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required medical care) and this is only after 5 days of rollout.
Seems the vaccine is actually more harmful than the virus which kills old frail people a few months early.
https://t.co/nnNZhoNWL1

You best ease up on the cocaine it sends you on a downward spiral the day after by the looks of it.

enno99 · 20-12-2020 11:02PM

runawaybishop wrote: »

They denotified deaths and cases constantly, they have been doing it for months. Heres one from the 3rd this month, there are many many others.

Validation of data at the Health Protection Surveillance Centre has resulted in 21 previously confirmed cases being denotified, which is reflected in the standing total of 73,228 cases.

73,228 deaths or cases.
We were talking about deaths

Quiner · 20-12-2020 11:54PM

runawaybishop wrote: »

There are no fake cases, no bogus deaths, no inflated death numbers. You'd rather believe some lunatic on bitchute who is trying to make money off you. And you call people sheep. Take off the blinkers.

In England people who died within 28 days of testing positive for covid were put down as "died of covid". Even if they got hit by a bus, or fell off a ladder. So the death count in England is clearly inflated.

What's this thing about 97% false positives I keep hearing about? Is it true? Didn't the Supreme Court in Portugal rule that the test they use was a joke? Didn't the man who invented the test say it should it not be used to test for viruses?

20-12-2020 11:54PM

Quiner wrote: »

I think we are all on the same page in terms of what we think. I don't wish to speak for other posters, but I think we believe the following:

The pandemic was planned to bring about the Great Reset. If it wasn't planned, it is being exploited to bring about the reset. Where we may differ is on what the reset will look like. I believe it will be a technocratic hell in which human beings will be controlled and heavy restrictions will be placed on our lives. That's the conspiracy theory as I see it, so I hope it won't be claimed again that people still don't know what the conspiracy theory is.

So how does the nanotech tracking devices factor in?
And the stuff in the vaccine that causes depopulation?

Also can we take this to mean that you also agree that the virus itself is constructed and released on purpose?

And where does the Satanic stuff come in? How do you think the Bible predicted all of this?

runawaybishop · 20-12-2020 11:54PM

enno99 wrote: »

73,228 deaths or cases.
We were talking about deaths

Funny how you believe some coked up bitchuter but you struggle to believe official reports. Deaths are also denotified. Deaths are also, unsurprisingly, called cases.

Do you even have the slightest bit of hard evidence of your claim, or is it all from cult leaders who's guff you swallow blindly?

runawaybishop · 20-12-2020 11:57PM

Quiner wrote: »

In England people who died within 28 days of testing positive for covid were put down as "died of covid". Even if they got hit by a bus, or fell off a ladder. So the death count in England is clearly inflated.

What's this thing about 97% false positives I keep hearing about? Is it true? Didn't the Supreme Court in Portugal rule that the test they use was a joke? Didn't the man who invented the test say it should it not be used to test for viruses?

Wrong and no, it's not true. But I am just a random guy on the net, and obviously you wouldn't get your info from some random guy off the net.

20-12-2020 11:57PM

enno99 wrote: »

73,228 deaths or cases.
We were talking about deaths

How many deaths do you believe there have been?
How do you reach this number?

How many deaths will the vaccine cause and how did you reach this number?

Mrtm17 · 21-12-2020 12:04AM

I'm not taking any vaccine, don't vaccines usually take up too 10 year to gather info and long term effects,these ones are trialled for a couple of months and there grand?
Who know what the side effects are even a year down the road are even the ones making it havnt a clue

runawaybishop · 21-12-2020 12:04AM

King Mob wrote: »

How many deaths do you believe there have been?
How do you reach this number?

How many deaths will the vaccine cause and how did you reach this number?

Your, and our, mistake is responding to these claims like there is a genuine belief behind them. Nothing posted here from the conspiracy folks is grounded in science, practicality or reality. They are merely regurgitating nonsense from shysters. Snake oil salesmen making money from vulnerable people. It's a scam as old as time, prey on the weakness of vulnerable people.

Claims as nonsensical as this shouldn't be given credence, they should be ridiculed for the scam that they are.

To quote Stephen Fry -' You are a fraud, and I am saying this directly to you, you are fraudulent.'

runawaybishop · 21-12-2020 12:06AM

Mrtm17 wrote: »

I'm not taking any vaccine, don't vaccines usually take up too 10 year to gather info and long term effects,these ones are trialled for a couple of months and there grand?
Who know what the side effects are even a year down the road are even the ones making it havnt a clue

Wrong. Vaccines do not take ten years to gather effects. 99.99% of effects occurs in the first 2 months. The majority occur in the first 2 days.

Mrtm17 · 21-12-2020 12:07AM

runawaybishop wrote: »

Wrong. Vaccines do not take ten years to gather effects. 99.99% of effects occurs in the first 2 months. The majority occur in the first 2 days.

So no vaccine ever has had side effects after 2 months of been taken?

runawaybishop · 21-12-2020 12:09AM

Mrtm17 wrote: »

So no vaccine ever has had side effects after 2 months of been taken?

Most effects are realised in the first two months. Issues from vaccines are vanishingly small. 0.00014% of people experience issues.

This is a fact. I suspect that you will ignore it as you have already bought into the scaremongering.

Mrtm17 · 21-12-2020 12:12AM

runawaybishop wrote: »

Most effects are realised in the first two months. Issues from vaccines are vanishingly small. 0.00014% of people experience issues.

This is a fact. I suspect that you will ignore it as you have already bought into the scaremongering.

Find it hard to believe that vaccines have never had any side effects ever after 2 months of been taken,but u seem to know ur stuff

runawaybishop · 21-12-2020 12:13AM

Mrtm17 wrote: »

Find it hard to believe that vaccines have never had any side effects ever after 2 months of been taken,but u seem to know ur stuff

Seriously, with respect, can you not read?

Mrtm17 · 21-12-2020 12:15AM

runawaybishop wrote: »

Wrong. Vaccines do not take ten years to gather effects. 99.99% of effects occurs in the first 2 months. The majority occur in the first 2 days.

Yea I can read

runawaybishop · 21-12-2020 12:16AM

Mrtm17 wrote: »

Yea I can read

It doesn't seem like it. Most reactions occur in the first 2 months. Most. Not all.

Not once did I insinuate that there are no side effects after 2 months. You are wilfully misinterpreting what I have said. Which is par for the course.

Mrtm17 · 21-12-2020 12:17AM

runawaybishop wrote: »

It doesn't seem like it. Most reactions occur in the first 2 months. Most. Not all.

Where did you get them stats?

runawaybishop · 21-12-2020 12:18AM

Mrtm17 wrote: »

Where did you get them stats?

From more reputable sources than you got your information. As in, actually scientists and medical practitioners. Not some junkie on parler.

Quiner · 21-12-2020 12:19AM

runawaybishop wrote: »

Your, and our, mistake is responding to these claims like there is a genuine belief behind them. Nothing posted here from the conspiracy folks is grounded in science, practicality or reality. They are merely regurgitating nonsense from shysters. Snake oil salesmen making money from vulnerable people. It's a scam as old as time, prey on the weakness of vulnerable people.

Claims as nonsensical as this shouldn't be given credence, they should be ridiculed for the scam that they are.

To quote Stephen Fry -' You are a fraud, and I am saying this directly to you, you are fraudulent.'

Hancock ordered an urgent review into how deaths were being counted in England. I wasn't told that by a shyster. Professor Carl Heneghan co-authored an article about the 28 day farce. I can provide links tomorrow.

We're not vulnerable. We've just come to terms with the fact that we've been had. We don't like it, but there's not a lot we can do about it. It's lazy to throw out the "YouTube video" argument. There are plenty of mainstream media articles about the PCR test not being fit for purpose (there was one in the New York Times a few months ago) and the case in Portugal. No Bitchute, no shysters. All mainstream articles.

The Vaccine

Comments