Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Leinster Championship is dead.

1121315171821

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Enquiring wrote: »
    There wasn't more. Dublin won the Leinster u21 championship in 1984. How did they manage that if they didn't enter it?

    The OP admitted that they made a mistake by stating that Dublin didn't enter teams for decades during the duration of the under 21 competition.

    Whats your agenda here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    ShyMets wrote: »

    I saw that one it did not specify the years just showed they were not bothered.
    I would say the non-Dubs find it incredulous.

    Plus the fact it is so hard to pin down the years Dublin competed shows how little Dubs cared about it.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Gael85


    Definitely a few more spells than that, plus the set up was farcical.

    Dublin didn't compete u21 from 1985-1990.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Enquiring wrote: »
    About the same time the money started coming in.

    No. It was the same time when Dublin started to take underage seriously


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,580 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    Someone needs to lay off the KoolAid or Buckfast😉


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ShyMets wrote: »
    The OP admitted that they made a mistake by stating that Dublin didn't enter teams for decades during the duration of the under 21 competition.

    The opposite of what you just said is true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    There wasn't more. Dublin won the Leinster u21 championship in 1984. How did they manage that if they didn't enter it?

    Maybe your facts are wrong? You already said it was only the 80's I have shown you proof from the indo that Dublin did not enter teams for another period.

    Maybe buy the 2017 AI u21 (Dublin v Galway) prog online? You can then flog it to me for twice the price if I can't find mine! ;)

    Fecking annoyed I can't find it I want to read it. I was definitely there!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Gael85


    Amazing how no Dublin players end up going to Australia?

    James Madden. Ciaran Kilkenny, Kevin Devine, David Stynes, Sean McGuinness and Declan O'Mahony would have played some stage in Oz. Lots of Irish soccer internationals and league of players would have prominent GAA at underage in Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    ArielAtom wrote: »
    Someone needs to lay off the KoolAid or Buckfast😉

    I believe the phrase is 'bucky and some curry chips' (I am fluent in cluchie!) :D

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ShyMets wrote: »
    No. It was the same time when Dublin started to take underage seriously

    They started taking u21 football and hurling, minor football and hurling, club football and hurling, women's senior football and men's senior football and hurling serious all at the same time then. Just so happened that it coincided with millions of euros going their way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Maybe your facts are wrong? You already said it was only the 80's I have shown you proof from the indo that Dublin did not enter teams for another period.

    Maybe buy the 2017 AI u21 (Dublin v Galway) prog online? You can then flog it to me for twice the price if I can't find mine! ;)

    Fecking annoyed I can't find it I want to read it. I was definitely there!

    You provided an article which stated that Dublin didn't compete in the u21 championship for years which included a year that they won the Leinster u21 title. :pac:

    Your decades claim has been shown to be nonsense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Enquiring wrote: »
    They started taking u21 football and hurling, minor football and hurling, club football and hurling, women's senior football and men's senior football and hurling serious all at the same time then. Just so happened that it coincided with millions of euros going their way.

    My spidey senses are tingling. Is that you Ewan


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ArielAtom wrote: »
    Someone needs to lay off the KoolAid or Buckfast😉

    Obviously, you have no answer to your primary school myth being blown out of the water. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ShyMets wrote: »
    My spidey senses are tingling. Is that you Ewan

    You can see when the Dubs have lost the argument, they have nothing left so they resort to this kind of stuff. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Gael85


    Enquiring wrote: »
    I see another myth has been posted in the last few pages. The games development funding was all for the kids in primary school. Rubbish.

    Along with paying for professional coaches, Dublin also had well paid strategic officers in place. Their strategic program manager, Kevin O'Shaughnessy, had this to say: "The coaches work very much in tune with what the particular club wants", the coaches all had to have a high level qualification: "It is a high standard that allows them to train the trainers in each club to a high quality." Dublin also have a coaching and games officer. A few years ago, the then coaching and games officer Ger O'Connor had this to say: "The coaches don't just concentrate on hurling or football. They organise everything within a club and camogie and ladies football get the benefit too." Once again illustrating why it's not just Dublin senior footballers that the money has benefitted.

    Also, it wasn't 2005 when this began, it was prior to that and we also have first hand testimony from an actual development officer with huge experience in Dublin GAA. This quote is from long serving Dublin GAA GPO/GDA Pauric McDonald on the differences he observed in development squads from when he set out 2 decades ago to the current time: "I went back the following year to an U15 development squad. And if you were to compare the quality of player coming through then to the U13s now, the difference is night and day. Kids were coming into us without the basic skills. They were kick-passing a five-yard pass instead of hand-passing it but their instinct was to kick it along the ground. So they obviously hadn’t been exposed to any level of coaching. I look now at U14 football in Dublin and the standard of football in the county is phenomenal. The level of individual skill the players have, the level of coaching teams, it’s incomparable to the late ’90s, early ’00s. And a big reason why is obviously the GDO system going into Dublin."

    This all doesn't really sound like it's just a primary school operation to me. It's a multi layered system that has had huge benefits. The professional coaches had impacts on clubs right the way through, from the kids all the way up. Let's get a real example of this. Ballymun Kickams received the services of James Glancy. He was coaching the clubs minor team when he spotted 2 17 year olds called Dean Rock and James McCarthy. McCarthy in particular was very thin. Glancy assisted in getting gym equipment set up and watched over the transformation of McCarthy's physique. These were 2 talented players but were brought on again with the assistance of a development officer. Just one example again to show the help the money made. I don't believe Rock and McCarthy were still in primary school at 17 years of age.

    James Glancy role in Ballymun was to coach in primary schools. He not a S&C coach. Paddy Christie managed and coached Rock and McCarthy. He might of brought Glancy as a selector as when managed Dublin minor had Glancy with him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    There wasn't more. Dublin won the Leinster u21 championship in 1984. How did they manage that if they didn't enter it?
    ShyMets wrote: »
    Maybe your facts are wrong? You already said it was only the 80's I have shown you proof from the indo that Dublin did not enter teams for another period.

    Maybe buy the 2017 AI u21 (Dublin v Galway) prog online? You can then flog it to me for twice the price if I can't find mine! ;)

    Fecking annoyed I can't find it I want to read it. I was definitely there!

    Wiki is where Enquiring; is getting info. Let's for argument's say the indo had a typo and said 83 instead of 84.Even though wiki not a credible source.

    From 85 to 91 no dublin in the leinster u21 final for sure.
    Whereas previous it was said it was only 3 years in the 80's.

    I know well there were other intermittent spells out as well saw it before.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,538 ✭✭✭dobman88


    I believe the phrase is 'bucky and some curry chips' (I am fluent in cluchie!) :D

    I can say with absolute certainty I have never heard of or had that combination. Curry chips are grand no matter where you're from surely. Your culchie translator is on the blink.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Gael85 wrote: »
    James Glancy role in Ballymun was to coach in primary schools. He not a S&C coach. Paddy Christie managed and coached Rock and McCarthy. He might of brought Glancy as a selector as when managed Dublin minor had Glancy with him.

    Correction, part of Glancy's role was to coach in primary schools. As was pointed out by other officials within Dublin GAA, the professional coaches had many other roles within a club. Assisting the development of McCarthy and Rock was just one example of a development officer making a major difference well outside primary school aged players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    You provided an article which stated that Dublin didn't compete in the u21 championship for years which included a year that they won the Leinster u21 title. :pac:

    Your decades claim has been shown to be nonsense.

    See below discussing the above.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Wiki is where Enquiring; is getting info. Let's for argument's say the indo had a typo and said 83 instead of 84.Even though wiki not a credible source.

    From 85 to 91 no dublin in the leinster u21 final for sure.
    Whereas previous it was said it was only 3 years in the 80's.

    I know well there were other intermittent spells out as well saw it before.

    No, you don't, you were caught out. It was for a few years in the 80's. That's not wiki information or some dodgy article you produced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    They didn't compete at u21 level for 3 years from 1986.

    This has be proven to be incorrect. at least 85 -91 whether you like it or not.
    I suggest you contact the DCB for concrete confirmation and behave like your username!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    No, you don't, you were caught out. It was for a few years in the 80's. That's not wiki information or some dodgy article you produced.

    So the indo is dodgy now is it? I believe dublin also were absent in other spells.

    However, I believe your purpose is not to find the definitive answer, merely to discredit me?

    An account set up to do so?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    This has be proven to be incorrect. at least 85 -91 whether you like it or not.
    I suggest you contact the DCB for concrete confirmation and behave like your username!

    My advice is to disengage, if the poster who I believe I think it is. This just is just going to go around in circles


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    This has be proven to be incorrect. at least 85 -91 whether you like it or not.
    I suggest you contact the DCB for concrete confirmation and behave like your username!

    :pac: You've changed your years pretty sharpish there. It was 83-91 a very short time ago. It was decades you were saying before that. You need to take your own advice and do some research. I won't be wasting any more time on someone who has been caught out telling porkies numerous times. I just need to find the ignore button. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ShyMets wrote: »
    My advice is to disengage, if the poster who I believe I think it is just is just going to go around in circles

    Here are the Dubs waving the white flag, my work here is done. Goodnight all. :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Gael85


    Enquiring wrote: »
    Correction, part of Glancy's role was to coach in primary schools. As was pointed out by other officials within Dublin GAA, the professional coaches had many other roles within a club. Assisting the development of McCarthy and Rock was just one example of a development officer making a major difference well outside primary school aged players.

    Glancy only joined Ballymun in 07. WAS no GPO prior to him. The lads were coached all the way by Paddy Christie and would have been on Dublin development panels at the time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Cilldara_2000


    So the indo is dodgy now is it? I believe dublin also were absent in other spells.

    However, I believe your purpose is not to find the definitive answer, merely to discredit me?

    An account set up to do so?

    The Independent clearly is dodgy. The Leinster Council website has the roll of honour, I have match programmes in the house with the roll of honour. Who's dodgy - the committee in charge of running the competition or some badly informed journalist?

    Interesting how the claim started as "Dublin u21's footballers did not compete at that level for gaps of over decades" and is now being consistently watered down in the face of easily verifiable evidence to the contrary.

    People make mistakes but continued wild easily disprovable claims sort of water down the message of the person making these wild claims.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Enquiring wrote: »
    Here are the Dubs waving the white flag, my work here is done. Goodnight all. :D

    Or maybe you've just been rumpled. Night night


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Gael85




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    :pac: You've changed your years pretty sharpish there. It was 83-91 a very short time ago. It was decades you were saying before that. You need to take your own advice and do some research. I won't be wasting any more time on someone who has been caught out telling porkies numerous times. I just need to find the ignore button. :)

    Again discrediting tactic analysis the info based on facts - Indo stated 83-91

    Could be a typo.

    Wiki a known source which can be edited by anyone says dublin in 84 final.

    However, going by both Dublin do not appear in a Leinster final until at least 92.

    So you can gauge it from that it was not only a few years in the 80's as another poster claimed.

    And yes I believe Dublin did not compete at u21 in other spells - which I have already stated.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The Independent clearly is dodgy. The Leinster Council website has the roll of honour, I have match programmes in the house with the roll of honour. Who's dodgy - the committee in charge of running the competition or some badly informed journalist?

    Interesting how the claim started as "Dublin u21's footballers did not compete at that level for gaps of over decades" and is now being consistently watered down in the face of easily verifiable evidence to the contrary.

    People make mistakes but continued wild easily disprovable claims sort of water down the message of the person making these wild claims.

    They are not wild claims as you well know. It is generally a well known fact Dublin did not compete for a number of spells in various decades.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Enquiring wrote: »
    :pac: You've changed your years pretty sharpish there. It was 83-91 a very short time ago. It was decades you were saying before that. You need to take your own advice and do some research. I won't be wasting any more time on someone who has been caught out telling porkies numerous times. I just need to find the ignore button. :)

    As a 'new' guy with 200 posts boards.ie must be daunting. ;) I meant over number of decades as I said.

    Plus the fact there was a spell so recent speaks volumes.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Again discrediting tactic analysis the info based on facts - Indo stated 83-91

    Could be a typo.

    Wiki a known source which can be edited by anyone says dublin in 84 final.

    However, going by both Dublin do not appear in a Leinster final until at least 92.

    So you can gauge it from that it was not only a few years in the 80's as another poster claimed.

    And yes I believe Dublin did not compete at u21 in other spells - which I have already stated.

    Just in terms of 1984 u21 Championship. Dublin did win Leinster but did not make it to the All Ireland Final.

    https://www.dublingaa.ie/history/roll-of-honour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Just in terms of 1984 u21 Championship. Dublin did win Leinster but did not make it to the All Ireland Final.

    https://www.dublingaa.ie/history/roll-of-honour

    I sent a tweet to @dublingaa re u21's anyway as I am curious as to the exact years.

    I am a bit of GAA stato at heart!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Gael85


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Just in terms of 1984 u21 Championship. Dublin did win Leinster but did not make it to the All Ireland Final.
    https://www.dublingaa.ie/history/roll-of-honour

    Dublin lost in AI u21 semi final to Mayo in 84


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,580 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Or maybe you've just been rumpled. Night night

    You can only cut and paste so many pieces from the web until they loose their appeal, no structure just pieces from the net that don't even tie into each other, just C&P, rinse n repeat.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭gaffer91


    Leinster is dead because Dublin are so unfairly advantaged that competition with them is impossible. They have huge unfair advantages in funding (both from sponsors and the GAA) and population. They play nearly all consequential games at home, in particular All-Ireland semi- finals and finals. They have other advantages and there are other reasons for their success, but those three things (population, funding, home advantage) are big factors.

    If it's any consolation to the counties in Leinster, the All-Ireland competition has more or less gone the same way.

    Dublin need to be split into four. Other changes are of course needed in Gaelic Football but that is the single most important one. All funding from all sources should also be pooled and shared more equitably for all teams too.

    If Dublin aren't split, inter-county football will die. It's already almost dead tbh, it's probably too late for it to be saved. But splitting Dublin helps all counties by ensuring the meaningful survival of the competition.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    Leinster is dead because Dublin are so unfairly advantaged that competition with them is impossible. They have huge unfair advantages in funding (both from sponsors and the GAA) and population. They play nearly all consequential games at home, in particular All-Ireland semi- finals and finals. They have other advantages and there are other reasons for their success, but those three things (population, funding, home advantage) are big factors.

    If it's any consolation to the counties in Leinster, the All-Ireland competition has more or less gone the same way.

    Dublin need to be split into four. Other changes are of course needed in Gaelic Football but that is the single most important one. All funding from all sources should also be pooled and shared more equitably for all teams too.

    If Dublin aren't split, inter-county football will die. It's already almost dead tbh, it's probably too late for it to be saved. But splitting Dublin helps all counties by ensuring the meaningful survival of the competition.

    I think splitting Dublin should be the last option.

    What I do think needs to happen is a redistribution of funding. Pooled sponsorship. Limits to what county teams can spend and limits to the number of backroom teams.

    Perhaps move back to only 3 subs. This would somewhat reduce the advantage that teams with larger panels have.

    Have Dublin play games on an home & away basis. Dublin's home games played at Parnell Park with the exception of Leinster Finals and All Ireland Semi Final & All Ireland Finals


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    ShyMets wrote: »
    I think splitting Dublin should be the last option.

    What I do think needs to happen is a redistribution of funding. Pooled sponsorship. Limits to what county teams can spend and limits to the number of backroom teams.

    Perhaps move back to only 3 subs. This would somewhat reduce the advantage that teams with larger panels have.

    Have Dublin play games on an home & away basis. Dublin's home games played at Parnell Park with the exception of Leinster Finals and All Ireland Semi Final & All Ireland Finals

    I agree splitting Dublin is the Nuclear option remove all of Dublin's unfair financial advantages first level the playing field that way and level it by not allowing Dublin play every single game at home.

    All we are asking for is a level playing field here and if Dublin still dominate after that then so be it but we are simply asking for basic fairness from the governing body and we aren't getting it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I spoke about the benefits of training etc. that the Dublin football team enjoy and you go off waffling about politics and geography?

    Yeah and the fact that Kill GAA got money in 1999 like it's somehow relevant :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Lissoy wrote: »
    Up to minor level Dublin do not have the same level of dominance in Leinster that they enjoy at U20/21 and senior. Of the last 10 Leinster minor championships Kildare and Dublin have won 4 each with Meath and Longford on 1 each but when you get to U20/21 Dublin have won 7 of the last 10 with Kildare winning 2 and Wexford the other 1. And then 10 out of 10 at senior level.
    Why are Dublin better able to transfer talent through from underage levels to senior? I understand that not all underage players make good senior players but Kildare are obviously doing something right with their juvenile structures but it has not resulted in an improvement in their senior team. Is it a more professional approach to coaching at senior level or better strength and conditioning that is more of an advantage in adults than juveniles? Or that guys outside of Dublin are more likely to live away from home or travel for college or work that the same level of focus cannot be achieved on their football careers?

    Or maybe just maybe it's because the Kildare players aren't going into a multi million euro professional set up and the Dublin players are..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,733 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    Leinster is dead because Dublin are so unfairly advantaged that competition with them is impossible. They have huge unfair advantages in funding (both from sponsors and the GAA) and population. They play nearly all consequential games at home, in particular All-Ireland semi- finals and finals. They have other advantages and there are other reasons for their success, but those three things (population, funding, home advantage) are big factors.

    If it's any consolation to the counties in Leinster, the All-Ireland competition has more or less gone the same way.

    Dublin need to be split into four. Other changes are of course needed in Gaelic Football but that is the single most important one. All funding from all sources should also be pooled and shared more equitably for all teams too.

    If Dublin aren't split, inter-county football will die. It's already almost dead tbh, it's probably too late for it to be saved. But splitting Dublin helps all counties by ensuring the meaningful survival of the competition.


    The conversation dies if it just becomes about bashing the Dubs.

    What county are you from? Because if its anywhere other than Leitrim, then you have an 'unfair advantage'. Sort it out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,733 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Scoundrel wrote: »
    I agree splitting Dublin is the Nuclear option remove all of Dublin's unfair financial advantages first level the playing field that way and level it by not allowing Dublin play every single game at home.

    All we are asking for is a level playing field here and if Dublin still dominate after that then so be it but we are simply asking for basic fairness from the governing body and we aren't getting it.


    Kerry footballers get way more sponsorship money than Clare footballers.

    Meath has a way bigger population than Longford.

    What sort of a level playing field are you looking for?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    Kerry footballers get way more sponsorship money than Clare footballers.

    Meath has a way bigger population than Longford.

    What sort of a level playing field are you looking for?

    There's nothing you can do about population so that's a ridiculous comparison how about all counties get equal funding from the GAA not Dublin getting 20 times more than anyone else?? Surely you can agree to that??

    For what it's worth I believe all commercial sponsorship should be pooled and distributed equally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I have looked at how Westmeath fared in the NFL between 1999-2000 and how many Leinster Finals Westmeath have got to.

    Westmeath in NFL and Leinster

    2020 div 2

    2019 div 3 won

    2018 div3

    2017 div 4

    2016 div 3 relegated

    2015 div 2 relegated

    2014 div 1 relegated (no wins no draws)

    2013 div 2 promoted

    2012 div 2

    2011 div 3 promoted

    2010 div 2 relegated

    2009 div 1 relegated (no wins no draws)

    2008 div 2 promoted

    2007 div 1b relegated to the new div 2

    2006 div 2a promoted

    2005 div 1a relegated (one win one draw)

    2004 div 1a

    2003 div 2a (winners div 2)

    2002 div1a relegated (one win)

    2001 winners div 2

    2000 div 2a

    1999 div 2

    On the basis of this between 2013 and and 2016 it could be argued Westmeath were better than Meath (or at least on a par) as Meath had an absence from division 1 for 13 years until 2020. Even though Westmeath slid down the leagues subsequently, following 2014 They did defeat Meath in 2015 in the Leinster Championship and they proved it was no fluke by defeating Kildare in the following season in Leinster.
    'Focusing on the championship' was the phrased used about Westmeath in 2015/2016 I believe. To take it handy in the league and go old school.
    In my view approximately that period where Meath and Kildare fell off the cliff standards wise in Leinster and left a bit of a 'power vacuum' for even 2nd/3rd/4th best in Leinster.

    In the 136 years of the GAA. Westmeath have only won Leinster once in 2004 thanks to the ‘Paidi effect’.

    Westmeath only appeared in four Leinster finals in the 136 year history of the GAA

    Westmeath's Leinster Final appearances

    2016 (Hammered by Dublin by 15 points)

    2015 (Hammered by Dublin by 13 points)

    2004 (Paidi’s win)

    1949 (Meath hammered them by 11 points - 4 goals scored)

    1931 (Kildare beat them by 6 points)

    Yet John Connellen is only a ‘concerned Gael’ in 2020???

    Quite frankly I think John Connellen is completely deluded if he thinks money alone, is the answer to help Westmeath compete.

    Throughout their recent league history (20 years or so) Westmeath have been a div 2 team at best or a div 4 team at worst. Mostly div 2.
    When getting in div 1 they have been relegated .
    Most recently with no wins and no draws in 2014 div 1.
    The same as Kildare who had no win and no draws in div 1 in 2018 and were relegated.
    Similar to Meath this year who had no wins and one draw relegated from div 1.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    Leinster is dead because Dublin are so unfairly advantaged that competition with them is impossible. They have huge unfair advantages in funding (both from sponsors and the GAA) and population. They play nearly all consequential games at home, in particular All-Ireland semi- finals and finals. They have other advantages and there are other reasons for their success, but those three things (population, funding, home advantage) are big factors.

    If it's any consolation to the counties in Leinster, the All-Ireland competition has more or less gone the same way.

    Dublin need to be split into four. Other changes are of course needed in Gaelic Football but that is the single most important one. All funding from all sources should also be pooled and shared more equitably for all teams too.

    If Dublin aren't split, inter-county football will die. It's already almost dead tbh, it's probably too late for it to be saved. But splitting Dublin helps all counties by ensuring the meaningful survival of the competition.

    Welcome back:rolleyes:
    This is not " The Dominance of Dublin GAA Thread ";)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,580 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    dunnerc wrote: »
    Welcome back:rolleyes:
    This is not " The Dominance of Dublin GAA Thread ";)

    But it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,733 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Scoundrel wrote: »
    There's nothing you can do about population so that's a ridiculous comparison how about all counties get equal funding from the GAA not Dublin getting 20 times more than anyone else?? Surely you can agree to that??

    For what it's worth I believe all commercial sponsorship should be pooled and distributed equally.


    You need to clarify your statement.

    You say: all counties should get equal funding from GAA.

    So Dublin GAA - with 50000 active GAA members - should get the same amount of funding as Leitrim - with 1000 active GAA members?

    Is this fair?

    I'd broadly agree on the sponsorship issue - but here is the thing, the sponsors arent in it to make weaker counties better; they are in it to get exposure.

    Toyota will want a Dublin player driving their car. Not sure how you get around this.

    Maybe you'd prefer if nobody got any sponsorship (being honest, that mightnt be the worst thing in the world).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,014 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The mindset of many of the posters on this thread who believe that Dublin’s success was solely down to funding, reminds me a lot of those conspiracy theorists.

    You know? Those sort who believe that the earth is flat. The ‘flat earther’s’ as they are known.
    They always return to the same issue and would defend their argument to the hilt that the demise of Leinster is solely because of ‘Dublin’s money'

    Now as a reasonable person, I believe that the funding Dublin received has had some effect. But it is not the sole reason.

    To any reasonable person there are a number of other factors, which also contributed to the current scenario..

    1) Talent: How Dublin’s youngsters are a tremendous generation - not caused because of money - but because of their natural gifts and how Dublin at last took a proper focus on their underage structure. Dublin won the u21 AI for the first time in 2003. After years of treating it with distain and in some decades not even competing at all! Dublin also won the Junior AI in 2008 many of whom played an integral part in Dublin’s current era

    2) Dublin Management - Which relates to the above Pat Gilroy and Jim Gavin in particular built on the groundwork laid by Pillar Caffery. Jim was a particular link between u21 and senior winning the u21 in 2003. 2010 and 2012. Gilroy was key in blooding players prior to this and cutting out the less committed to the jersey. He also went back to basics with Dublin’s tactics initially making them harder to beat. But even prior to Dublin's AI in 2011 I would argue Kerry and Tyrone were just too good for Dublin a different level,

    It is no coincidence the both Gilroy and Gavin both work in professions where they have to show a high level of organisational skills. Plus be leaders of men

    3) Boylan, Paidi, Micko - Leinster rivals losing top managers - It is no coincidence that rapid fall in standards of Meath, Kildare and Laois have coincided with the loss of great GAA managers. Plus Westmeath’s only win was because of one great man.

    4) Poor subsequent management appointments and mismanagement - It has been about 15 years since Paidi managed West Meath how have Westmeath fared since in the league and even outside Leinster. It is also the similar amount of time that Boylan has left Meath and Micko has left Laois/Kildare

    Meath and Kildare have done decent at underage level in Leinster why has the talent not come through and shone in the league/qualifiers or super 8’s. Kildare have even won a u20 AI yet there is no real improvement.

    Personally I think it is right to question Kildare tactically because of this. Given the talent they are supposed to have how come we have not seen real signs of improvement. An u21 runners up in 2008 and an u20 win in 2018

    5) Antiquated Provincial Structures - The provincials are no longer fit for purpose in the 21st century. Particularly, when you analyse the standard of teams. In Leinster there is only one consistent div 1 team that would be considered top 7. It is not fair the levels in standard are not comparable. The provincials have long being an inequitable, and lopsided competitions. Only won by the same few teams with very occasional interruption.


    6) Population - larger population does not guarantee success as Meath and Kildare have shown against Carlow, Westmeath and Longford respectively - if the team is not managed correctly. Or if opponents have managers who use their tactics cleverly to negate population advantage.

    But, it is just a fact of life that Dublin is the Capital of Ireland and therefore has the larger population. It is likely this will always put them as a dominant team of a Leinster era even in periods of Dublin mismanagement. The 'culchie brain drain' also keeps GAA alive in Dublin. They settle down and settle in the GAA passing the love of the games on to their little Dubs. Plus many are heavily involved in Dublin clubs.

    This is despite the fact that vast areas of Dublin have no or very weak GAA , unlike most parts of the rest of the Island of Ireland (Except NI).
    Dublin have strong competitors in rugby and soccer. In many places in Ireland the GAA is the heartbeat of an area. It is not always the case in Dublin. You can go to some places and you would not even know ‘the match’ is on that weekend.





    It occurs to me that many of the posters who believe 'leinster being dead' is the fault of Dublin solely are of the mindset of 'don’t blame us it is not our fault'.


    Or to quote 'Dustin the Turkey'. Who sums up the mindset of much of this thread, and particularly the OP:



    “Don’t blame the culchies, they didn’t fail.

    It's not their fault, they were born outside the pale”

    I will dedicate this song to all of those of those of this mindset

    Especially, John Connellen, Scoundrel, Enquiring, Ewan McKenna et all this one is for youse! ;)

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭gaffer91


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    The conversation dies if it just becomes about bashing the Dubs.

    What county are you from? Because if its anywhere other than Leitrim, then you have an 'unfair advantage'. Sort it out.


    Dublin are the only county uniquely unfairly advantaged in terms of the scale, nature, duration and combination of their advantages. These unfair advantages include massive population, hugely disproportionate funding and playing all semi- finals and finals in their home stadium.

    This thread is about Leinster Championship. Dublin having these unfair advantages and utilising them well is the reason the province is dead.

    So we need to split Dublin and then we can look at other issues. That is the first and most important step to helping all counties in Leinster.
    dunnerc wrote: »
    Welcome back:rolleyes:
    This is not " The Dominance of Dublin GAA Thread ";)

    Thanks, hope you're well. I'm always happy to talk about how to help the Leinster Championship too. Unfortunately this also requires Dublin to be split.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement