Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXVIII- 71,942 ROI(2,050 deaths) 51,824 NI (983 deaths) (28/11) Read OP

1286287289291292328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    MOR316 wrote: »
    Pipe down, rub a dub

    Ah wisht im dyin for a pint and a bowl of chicken wings


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,190 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Or maybe the fact hospitals are rampant with covid didn't help matters and NPHET and the HSE need to get their own houses in order before wagging the finger at the public, restaurants and pubs.

    Beef

    What's beef got to do with it?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Seems there’s a strange idea on here that disagreeing with NPHETs decisions somehow makes you some sort of conspiracy theorist alcoholic.

    People are allowed to disagree.
    This is, believe it or not, a democracy.

    Well when you can't structure an argument you just stereotype and pigeonhole everyone who disagrees with you into a horrific caricature to make yourself look good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    froog wrote: »
    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/1126/1180723-santa-claus-christmas-covid-travel/

    He added: "It's important to say to all children in the country that we regard Santa Claus's travels as essential travel for essential purposes and therefore he is exempt from the need to self-quarantine for 14 days and should be able to come in and out of Irish airspace and indeed in and out of Irish homes without having to restrict his movement.



    ONE RULE FOR SANTA AND ONE FOR THE REST OF US!! BLOODY NPHET!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    All well and good until Tony Holohan plugholes every chimney in the country


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    shinzon wrote: »
    For a lockdown to work and I use lockdown in this instance in the loosest possible term people must adhere to it which this time they didnt, thats why the case numbers didnt go down to the exit target of 100 a day, tiredness complacency didnt bother there hole take your pick

    Unless theres buy in then lockdown doesnt work simple as

    Shin

    This was always known and yet it wasn't planned for.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    What's beef got to do with it?

    I was signing off my post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    Ah wisht im dyin for a pint and a bowl of chicken wings

    And a packet of crips


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Well when you can't structure an argument you just stereotype and pigeonhole everyone who disagrees with you into a horrific caricature to make yourself look good.
    Calling them doom-mongers, etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,086 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Seems there’s a strange idea on here that disagreeing with NPHETs decisions somehow makes you some sort of conspiracy theorist alcoholic.

    People are allowed to disagree.
    This is, believe it or not, a democracy.

    True. But is the rest of your post not getting upset about people disagreeing with your opinion?

    So which is it then?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    pjohnson wrote: »
    True. But is the rest of your post not getting upset about people disagreeing with your opinion?

    So which is it then?

    You can disagree with someone without branding the entire nation alcoholics as one poster did.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    pjohnson wrote: »
    True. But is the rest of your post not getting upset about people disagreeing with your opinion?

    So which is it then?
    You've fellas on here calling people alcoholics for suggesting NPHET are wrong.
    Jog along.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    pjohnson wrote: »
    True. But is the rest of your post not getting upset about people disagreeing with your opinion?

    So which is it then?

    Tbf, I've not seen strange accusations coming from Citizen.

    I've had some far out accusations come at me from some posters because I disagree with a lot of NPHET's recommendations and actions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    shinzon wrote: »
    For a lockdown to work and I use lockdown in this instance in the loosest possible term people must adhere to it which this time they didnt, thats why the case numbers didnt go down to the exit target of 100 a day, tiredness complacency didnt bother there hole take your pick

    Unless theres buy in then lockdown doesnt work simple as

    Shin

    Good luck to NPHET trying to sell a new lockdown in January/February if people didn't adhere this time

    For those that did the only thing that NPHET would change for all their effort is non essential retail to open but with enhanced measures


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,372 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    NPHET advising it's either open restaurants or allow household visits but not both? Grand, open the restaurants and leave the public decide if they want to follow Tony's advice on house visits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,086 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    You've fellas on here calling people alcoholics for suggesting NPHET are wrong.
    Jog along.

    Well you've fellas on here claiming cases are being purposefully held back to further the lockdown
    Jog along.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    MOR316 wrote: »
    Tbf, I've not seen strange accusations coming from Citizen.

    I've had some far out accusations come at me from some posters because I disagree with a lot of NPHET's recommendations and actions
    I'm not very liked by a few of the Tony 'level 3 didn't work' 'endzone' heads on here :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,178 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Good luck to NPHET trying to sell a new lockdown in January/February if people didn't adhere this time

    For those that did the only thing that NPHET would change for all their effort is non essential retail to open but with enhanced measures

    Varadkar has been the one floating restrictions in January so there's implicit admission that could be spike in cases after Christmas.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    I'm not very liked by a few of the Tony 'level 3 didn't work' 'endzone' heads on here :D

    You should get out the worry chart to show how unworried the public are. It's like something out of South Park.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭growleaves


    shinzon wrote: »
    For a lockdown to work and I use lockdown in this instance in the loosest possible term people must adhere to it which this time they didnt, thats why the case numbers didnt go down to the exit target of 100 a day, tiredness complacency didnt bother there hole take your pick

    Unless theres buy in then lockdown doesnt work simple as

    Shin

    In that case lockdowns should be off the table as an option.

    We've tried treating human nature and everything that is valuable in normal human relationships as a mere detail and now find that the mass of people won't co-operate.

    Who is surprised by that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    With the exception of healthcare workers and care homes, I would simply like to know how the f**k 100s of people are catching COVID-19 on a daily basis.

    Face-masks, hand sanitizer and social distancing. Are people really having difficulty with the basics?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Fair enough re. Hoolohan.


    Still some people are making up conspiracies about hidden case numbers. So thats still relevant.
    Yet blanket comments are made about the genuine posters who disagree with NPHETs advice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    NPHET advising it's either open restaurants or allow household visits but not both? Grand, open the restaurants and leave the public decide if they want to follow Tony's advice on house visits.

    Surely the right call is to keep restaurants closed and let people actually go and visit their family.

    For those of us that want to follow restrictions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,107 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Varadkar has been the one floating restrictions in January so there's implicit admission that could be spike in cases after Christmas.

    Or more likely he’s just bladdering on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Well you've fellas on here claiming cases are being purposefully held back to further the lockdown
    Jog along.

    In the case of holding back cases there is sufficient evidence to at least say, "It seems." Whereas, in the case of saying the entire nation are alcoholics...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    With the exception of healthcare workers and care homes, I would simply like to know how the f**k 100s of people are catching COVID-19 on a daily basis.

    Face-masks, hand sanitizer and social distancing. Are people really having difficulty with the basics?

    It's a highly contagious respiratory illness. Trying to stop it spreading is nearly impossible. Also the schools are open with nearly a million students coming and going every day. We were never going to reach summers low and it's been an absolute waste of time and money


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    26-11-2020-p1.jpg
    26-11-2020-p2.jpg
    26-11-2020-p3.jpg
    26-11-2020-p4.jpg
    26-11-2020-p5.jpg
    26-11-2020-p6.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Varadkar has been the one floating restrictions in January so there's implicit admission that could be spike in cases after Christmas.

    He runs with the hare and hunts with the hounds, and pops his head up when he thinks that there might be a round of applause.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    Surely the right call is to keep restaurants closed and let people actually go and visit their family.

    For those of us that want to follow restrictions.

    If the restaurants opened, what's stopping you from not going to them?

    I'm confused here, genuinely!
    Are you saying you're waiting for Government and NPHET to tell you what to do?

    They're guidelines! You have a choice! It's up to you!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    It's a highly contagious respiratory illness. Trying to stop it spreading is nearly impossible. Also the schools are open with nearly a million students coming and going every day. We were never going to reach summers low and it's been an absolute waste of time and money

    It’s highly contagious to people who don’t follow the basic protection measures.

    We are also told that schools are not the source of these outbreaks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Varadkar has been the one floating restrictions in January so there's implicit admission that could be spike in cases after Christmas.

    NPHET already threatened the need for another level 5 before this one started

    That does make sense if cases go up too much

    However NPHET did get one thing right in their original level 5 letter on October 4th

    Measures will only be effective if there is broad societal buy-in and adherence

    They can kiss that good bye next time around imo


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement