Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Milk and Dairy

Options
11516182021

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Jjameson


    onrail wrote: »
    Just stumbled on this thread. Full disclosure, I come from a farming background, but moved away years ago.

    Just my opinion - on balance, Irish dairy cows have a bloody brilliant life. They are out in fresh pasture in the good weather, protected from the elements in poor weather, fed and watered to their heart's content.

    It's not all positive obviously - the separation of calves from their mothers is a very obvious drawback, but all seems to be forgotten in a week or two. Having observed Dairy cows Vs Sucklers (who keep their calves to about nine months), do I think the sucklers and calves are more content? Not obviously.

    The 'imprisonment' argument is fairly weak imo. Far better than the rest of us who are chained to our laptops and desks for 40 years in the hope of a brief retirement when your body is wrecked!

    If the calf is taken instantly there’s no bond. The calf knows no different and the cow settles very quickly. Divide a 9 month weanling and there is stress.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    onrail wrote: »

    It's not all positive obviously - the separation of calves from their mothers is a very obvious drawback, but all seems to be forgotten in a week or two. Having observed Dairy cows Vs Sucklers (who keep their calves to about nine months), do I think the sucklers and calves are more content? Not obviously.

    The 'imprisonment' argument is fairly weak imo. Far better than the rest of us who are chained to our laptops and desks for 40 years in the hope of a brief retirement when your body is wrecked!

    All seems to be forgotten. There is no way of knowing that. And since she can't tell you to stop it just happens again and again until killed at a young age.

    It's your choice to be changed to your laptop.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    Jjameson wrote: »
    If the calf is taken instantly there’s no bond. The calf knows no different and the cow settles very quickly. Divide a 9 month weanling and there is stress.

    The bond and flow of chemicals conducive to it begin in pregnancy as in any mammal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭thecomedian


    auspicious wrote: »
    The bond and flow of chemicals conducive to it begin in pregnancy as in any mammal.

    No its not.
    Straight after birth can be tricky sometimes. Generally they are ok.
    They are not they same as humans.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,086 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    auspicious wrote: »
    Nope. It does not promote pet ownership. It promotes a solution to the problem of neglect and abandonment and crowded shelters which continual shopping causes by creating a demand which causes more and more to be bred.
    Rescue cats. Massive feral population in Ireland. Tend to their needs and neuter as many as possible to solve the problem. Many get sick and and they have a detrimental impact on native biodiversity. People need to care more.




    How would you feel about a hypothetical world where cats are not kept "imprisoned" for human pleasure and we also rid the world of feral cats?


    Suppose we could neuter them all. How would you feel about that? It would be possible with enough buy in from the public (Mao was able to get the Chinese to kill nearly all the swallows for example......didn't end up too well but how and ever that is a different matter). If there were no more cats then there would be no more cruelty to cats.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,086 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    auspicious wrote: »
    The bond and flow of chemicals conducive to it begin in pregnancy as in any mammal.




    The calf doesn't know. Anymore than a newborn child who is given to adoptive parents would somehow know it wasn't it's real parents.


    A calf is hungry. It drinks milk. It forms what you refer to as a "bond" with whatever or whoever gives it milk!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭thecomedian


    How would you feel about a hypothetical world where cats are not kept "imprisoned" for human pleasure and we also rid the world of feral cats?


    Suppose we could neuter them all. How would you feel about that? It would be possible with enough buy in from the public (Mao was able to get the Chinese to kill nearly all the swallows for example......didn't end up too well but how and ever that is a different matter). If there were no more cats then there would be no more cruelty to cats.

    Actually replace cats with people and all problems solved.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭onrail


    auspicious wrote: »
    All seems to be forgotten. There is no way of knowing that. And since she can't tell you to stop it just happens again and again until killed at a young age.

    It's your choice to be changed to your laptop.

    Any experienced farmer knows when a cow is stressed/in pain, or content. People with no experience of farms don't always realise this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    Cats are gorgeous but they are domesticated and therefore invasive in many parts. . Their needs and the population must be managed humanely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    onrail wrote: »
    Just stumbled on this thread. Full disclosure, I come from a farming background, but moved away years ago.

    Just my opinion - on balance, Irish dairy cows have a bloody brilliant life. They are out in fresh pasture in the good weather, protected from the elements in poor weather, fed and watered to their heart's content.

    It's not all positive obviously - the separation of calves from their mothers is a very obvious drawback, but all seems to be forgotten in a week or two. Having observed Dairy cows Vs Sucklers (who keep their calves to about nine months), do I think the sucklers and calves are more content? Not obviously.

    The 'imprisonment' argument is fairly weak imo. Far better than the rest of us who are chained to our laptops and desks for 40 years in the hope of a brief retirement when your body is wrecked!

    Welcome to the discussion ;)

    Some very interesting points

    I've seen it written that supposedly all these 'farmers' 'torture' their animals as well. I believe the other usual accusation is 'murder'

    Oddly enough I was at my neighbours place this morning to watch him lock up a couple cattle in a 10 foot square cell. They didn't meet their bail conditions obviously.

    He then took another and subjected it to some gratuitous water torture because you know that's the kind if thing that happens. He then went on a murder spree. All perfectly normal you know ....

    Edit: Before being attacked again and to clarify no I do not find any issue such as murder torture or imprisonment in any way 'funny'. I do however find the emotive use of such language to be deliberately disingenuous and a gross and deliberate misrepresentation of normal farming practice here.

    The thread title is a very good example of this


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,181 ✭✭✭Lady Haywire


    But don't these theoretical cats have animal rights as mentioned earlier on?
    Perhaps they don't want to be neutered.
    One miaow for the snip, two miaows for no snip?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    But don't these theoretical cats have animal rights as mentioned earlier on?
    Perhaps they don't want to be neutered.
    One miaow for the snip, two miaows for no snip?

    Apparently not. Some animal 'rights' extremists believe that pets are better off dead.

    In the US PETA were found to be involved in a campaign of stealing peoples pets and killing them - then dumping the bodies to get rid of the evidence

    Killing Animals: PETA's Open 'Secret

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/killing-animals-petas-open-secret_b_59e78243e4b0e60c4aa36711

    Please note. Do not open link if you think you will be upset. I know I was after reading it...

    Btw I only mention it because farmers are often accused of 'murdering animals. I think there is a lot of duplicity in such accusations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    But don't these theoretical cats have animal rights as mentioned earlier on?
    Perhaps they don't want to be neutered.
    One miaow for the snip, two miaows for no snip?

    It's for their own protection and to protect biodiversity. Many many feral cats live a wretched existence and that is all our fault
    Yes it's unfortunate but needs must.

    Theoretical? They are very real.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    auspicious wrote: »
    It's for their own protection and to protect biodiversity. Many many feral cats live a wretched existence and that is all our fault
    Yes it's unfortunate but needs must.

    Theoretical? They are very real.

    Genuine question - do these animals consent to such procedures?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    gozunda wrote: »
    Genuine question - do these animals consent to such procedures?

    What's your solution?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,181 ✭✭✭Lady Haywire


    auspicious wrote: »
    It's for their own protection and to protect biodiversity. Many many feral cats live a wretched existence and that is all our fault
    Yes it's unfortunate but needs must.

    Theoretical? They are very real.

    I say theoretical as I don't personally know of many feral cats around this area.

    So certain 'rules' can be broken because these animals are seen as pets? Yet if we do it with farm animals we're evil & abusing them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Jjameson


    auspicious wrote: »
    Cats are gorgeous but they are domesticated and therefore invasive in many parts. . Their needs and the population must be managed humanely.

    The Catholic Church thought that they needed to be banished in Europe during the Middle Ages. The ensuing surge in vermin was a massive contributor to the Black Plague.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    I say theoretical as I don't personally know of many feral cats around this area.

    So certain 'rules' can be broken because these animals are seen as pets? Yet if we do it with farm animals we're evil & abusing them.

    And so we come to the crux of the thread.
    Animals farmers do what they do for profit. Managing the feral cat population is done out of emphaty for them and the environment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    auspicious wrote: »
    What's your solution?

    I dunno. Was asking do you think the animals consent?

    I don't think they do.

    I've seen it often described that animals can't consent and that such procedures are supposedly 'cruel.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,086 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    auspicious wrote: »
    It's for their own protection and to protect biodiversity. Many many feral cats live a wretched existence and that is all our fault
    Yes it's unfortunate but needs must.

    Theoretical? They are very real.




    Feral cats are well able to look after themselves.You say domesticated...but they are far more independent than a modern cow breed!


    The issue with them is their effect on other wildlife!!!! Cats are too successful as predators and using human environments to their advantage.

    The kill so many other animals and decimate bird populations.



    I have a good friend who is hardcore vegan/environmentalist etc. She explained it to me. She supports movements that want to eliminate all cats from nature.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I have a good friend who is hardcore vegan/environmentalist etc.

    LOL


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Jjameson


    auspicious wrote: »
    And so we come to the crux of the thread.
    Animals farmers do what they do for profit. Managing the feral cat population is done out of emphaty for them and the environment.

    If a landowning farmer was motivated just by money he/she would let it or sell it.
    I love my animal and I also love to eat them.
    There is no profit in anything but the best animal welfare.
    The happier and more comfortable the animal the better the thrive.
    The more humane the slaughter process the better the efficiency,quality and yield of meat.
    Emotive terms such as “torture” “babies”
    may carry water among your peers but don’t change logical facts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30 sunnib


    Hi, what about organic dairy products? Organic cattle farmers claim to observe animal welfare.
    I very much enjoy eating buttter, sometimes use mayo instead, but I could not do without cheese. Vegan cheese is too expensive
    (I know - "you don't know what you can do until you have to.. " but if there was a win-win option ..)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Jjameson


    sunnib wrote: »
    Hi, what about organic dairy products? Organic cattle farmers claim to observe animal welfare.
    I very much enjoy eating buttter, sometimes use mayo instead, but I could not do without cheese. Vegan cheese is too expensive
    (I know - "you don't know what you can do until you have to.. " but if there was a win-win option ..)

    If you want to carry this question over farming and forestry there’s a few guys that are very learned on it.

    I think the answer is yes in general. They would be a bit lower stocked per hectare than an average conventional farmer. which may have merit. It’s definitely better for biodiversity and the wildlife.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,086 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    LOL




    What's the funny part to you?


    That I have a friend?


    Or that she is a vegan?




    Do you only have friends who are vegans? No non-vegan friends? Or is it the concept of having a friend that you don't really understand?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Politics Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,108 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dizzyblonde


    Mod note:

    As of now this thread needs to stay on topic. Personal attacks, trolling and bickering have all got to stop or there will be consequences. Consider this your warning.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 994 ✭✭✭NcdJd


    Mod note:

    As of now this thread needs to stay on topic. Personal attacks, trolling and bickering have all got to stop or there will be consequences. Consider this your warning.

    Thread title guarantees the conversation will be anything but civil in my opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    sunnib wrote: »
    Hi, what about organic dairy products? Organic cattle farmers claim to observe animal welfare.
    I very much enjoy eating buttter, sometimes use mayo instead, but I could not do without cheese. Vegan cheese is too expensive
    (I know - "you don't know what you can do until you have to.. " but if there was a win-win option ..)
    Animal welfare is not a black and white thing. Its poor animal welfare to put a healthy dog down but if that dog is suffering then it is good animal welfare.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    Jjameson wrote: »
    If a landowning farmer was motivated just by money he/she would let it or sell it.
    I love my animal and I also love to eat them.
    There is no profit in anything but the best animal welfare.
    The happier and more comfortable the animal the better the thrive.
    The more humane the slaughter process the better the efficiency,quality and yield of meat.
    Emotive terms such as “torture” “babies”
    may carry water among your peers but don’t change logical facts.

    "The happier and more comfortable the animal the better the thrive" . That goes without saying. ...

    Torture and babies I would see them as descriptors rather than emotive terms. Babies, I may have used but that's just go to common vernacular. Torture I would use in context as when I used it to describe the treatment of the pigs the the Irish factory farming video posted earlier in the thread.
    Though if I forcibly impregnated a female human against her will repeatedly for personal gain she would describe it as torture.
    But if it happens to a cow it's not?

    Other than those two examples I can't remember using those descriptors.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,181 ✭✭✭Lady Haywire


    Is it just A.I that you don't like?? A bull in the field is ok but the choosing of specific bulls for a cow is not?
    (there are many different reasons for choosing frozen semen bulls over using a bull in the field)

    And I've seen cows break through hedges/fences to get to a bull, heard them roaring the shed down to get a bull to hear them & a bull about a half KM away responding in kind once he heard the cow.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement