Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Who thinks Trump will win?

1150151153155156158

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭reg114


    Will Trump Win ? No.

    Nobody, not even Lincoln himself could survive 4 years of utter chaos, telling 20,000 documented lies, a merry-go-round of close associates who are now convicted cons and most importantly a criminally negligent handling of a pandemic that has contributed to the deaths of close to a quarter of a million Americans. The only thing purportedly going for Trump precovid was the economy , but recall he inherited a buoyant economy that had been resurrected post crash in 2008. The economy is still in ruins. Why would Americans rely on someone who was bankrupted multiple times to get them out of this mess?

    The other thing people have to remember is how unpopular Hillary was 4 years ago even amongst democrats. In 2016 you had a perfect storm of an unpopular Hillary on one side and on the other Trump, a 'billionaire businessman' whose name was very familiar to Americans. He said exactly what republican voters wanted to hear. He was seen as anti-establishment and novel. If anything the last 4 years has shown him to be the utter conman that he is. Big corporations like Deutsche Bank knew years ago he was a snake oil salesman but were intimidated by his name and the force of his personality.

    Trump has made a career out of talking BS and never accepting the word NO. His sheer arrogance and force of will, married to his sociopathy is why he has succeeded, till now. However, Americans are exhausted with his lies, tantrums and lack of common decency. In Biden they have relatively speaking a weak candidate, but I believe people so desperate to end the insanity they will choose Biden.

    You also have to look at the numbers. Even factoring in margin for error in the polls, Biden is looking like taking Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. These three states were won by Trump 4 years ago by less than 1 %. If Biden retains Blue voting states and only adds these 3 states, its game over for Trump. There is a possibility Biden might flip Florida too. Florida are counting mail in ballots as we speak and will deliver a result around 1 am Irish time, If Biden wins Florida, it will be a landslide.

    Biden will win.


  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭EasycomeEasygo


    Smee_Again wrote: »
    Trump has cancelled an election night party at Trump Hotel in DC.

    No word on why but they had sent emails soliciting donations to pay for it so it’s quite possible not enough was raised to pay for it and we know that Donald doesn’t have the money to pay for it himself.

    Not looking good for the Trump cult.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/30/eric-trump-election-night-party-433669


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    Wow just seen 3rd quarter GDP figures for the US economy, up 33.1% biggest ever rise in history apparently. Huge blow to the Biden campaign that.

    If something drops 30% and then rises 33% it is still down about 7% from it’s starting position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,000 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Smee_Again wrote: »
    If something drops 30% and then rises 33% it is still down about 7% from it’s starting position.

    Damn Math



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,256 ✭✭✭metaoblivia


    Wow just seen 3rd quarter GDP figures for the US economy, up 33.1% biggest ever rise in history apparently. Huge blow to the Biden campaign that.

    Not really. It sounds good of course, but the economy has shrunk so much this year that the overall GDP is still quite low. And economic recessions/depressions aren't marked by a consistently falling market, but a volatile one that still results in losses, even among some bright spots.

    I wouldn't expect those numbers to hold in Q4, especially as we started off October with Disney announcing major layoffs and a covid surge in much of the midwest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,650 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    reg114 wrote: »
    Will Trump Win ? No.

    Nobody, not even Lincoln himself could survive 4 years of utter chaos, . . . .

    All very well, except, Lincoln was dealing with chaos and yet got re-elected for a second term.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,650 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,511 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Pelezico wrote: »
    Trump is going to lose by a landslide. Pity this because at the end of the day he is great comedy.

    I'm hearing reports that Biden has 'a slight lead' in swing states in the latest polls this hour. Just what Hillary had exactly this time 4 years go. He's ahead of Hillary in the other states but, don't forget the Electoral Collage, so that won't make any difference if I understand the way it works.

    So, it's not looking good for Biden that the polls are narrowing as we get closer to election day, as I expected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,000 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    AllForIt wrote: »
    I'm hearing reports that Biden has 'a slight lead' in swing states in the latest polls this hour. Just what Hillary had exactly this time 4 years go. He's ahead of Hillary in the other states but, don't forget the Electoral Collage, so that won't make any difference if I understand the way it works.

    So, it's not looking good for Biden that the polls are narrowing as we get closer to election day, as I expected.

    The polling hasn't changed much, or has slightly widened in favour of Biden the past few days, please link to where you see different.


  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭hirondelle


    All very well, except, Lincoln was dealing with chaos and yet got re-elected for a second term.


    You realise that the Confederate states weren't part of the election?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    I knock Biden a lot but had I know he would do the following, I would have been on his side all along.


    https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1322218253247303681


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    astrofool wrote: »
    The polling hasn't changed much, or has slightly widened in favour of Biden the past few days, please link to where you see different.

    https://twitter.com/RobertCahaly/status/1322003986371719169
    https://twitter.com/RobertCahaly/status/1321952576884101120


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,395 ✭✭✭✭gmisk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Cahaly called the 2016 result. What's your problem with them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭vojiwox


    I knock Biden a lot but had I know he would do the following, I would have been on his side all along.


    https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1322218253247303681

    And we're back around full circle! LOL

    I wonder will Tucks lead with this tonight! :pac:

    All that damning evidence... Its like it never existed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,132 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    ...

    One of the two polls to correctly predict Trump's victory in 2016 is predicting victory for Biden:

    https://www.investors.com/politics/biden-vs-trump-ibd-tipp-presidential-election-tracking-poll-2020/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,000 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Ah right, just the Trafalgar group, looking at those numbers it looks like Biden is getting closer to Trump based on their previous polling :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    I knock Biden a lot but had I know he would do the following, I would have been on his side all along.


    https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1322218253247303681

    I shudder to think of what wars this guy will create to establish a legacy for himself.


    He looks like that type.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Cahaly called the 2016 result. What's your problem with them?

    They think that the polls you are looking at are biased but the one's they are looking at aren't....it's almost childlike.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,306 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I shudder to think of what wars this guy will create to establish a legacy for himself.


    He looks like that type.

    At least he won't be begging for attention or complaining that the media is talking about crops being destroyed in a state heavily dependent on agriculture instead of talking about him being nominated for an award (which he didn't win), or paying for illegal IP addresses to vote him as one of the worlds most influential businessmen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    At least he won't be begging for attention or complaining that the media is talking about crops being destroyed in a state heavily dependent on agriculture instead of talking about him being nominated for an award (which he didn't win), or paying for illegal IP addresses to vote him as one of the worlds most influential businessmen.

    How does this post relate in any way to what I said ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,650 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande




    Looks like the African American votes is staying home in Miami Dade, Florida. This county won by Clinton in 2016.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,511 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    astrofool wrote: »
    The polling hasn't changed much, or has slightly widened in favour of Biden the past few days, please link to where you see different.

    I said I 'heard' as in on the radio (LBC). If the report is correct and LBC is a reputable news source, 'a slight lead in swing states' is a rather different picture to what it was a month ago isn't it. I'd say the same pattern as 4 years ago.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How does this post relate in any way to what I said ?

    In fairness, I'm not sure if there's much to discuss in your post. Some vague claim that "he looks the type" when from a realistic perspective that he's a big improvement on Trump.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    In fairness, I'm not sure if there's much to discuss in your post. Some vague claim that "he looks the type" when from a realistic perspective that he's a big improvement on Trump.

    US presidents have form for starting wars.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




    Looks like the African American votes is staying home in Miami Dade, Florida. This county won by Clinton in 2016.

    In ballots so far, the Black vote is down just over 1% nationwide.

    At same for Florida as a State, with 2016. No great achievement in that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    With less than a week to go, I think it will be close, as always really. Take a look at the last 3 elections.

    Clinton votes in 2016: 65,853,514 Trump: 62,984,828
    Obama votes in 2012: 65,915,795 Romney: 60,933,504
    Obama votes in 2008: 69,498,516 McCain: 59,948,323

    I think the 'Clinton was unpopular' line is overplayed - she got the same as Obama second time around. I'm not sure Biden will get any more than Clinton did, or Obama in 2012.

    Trump energised a certain cohort to vote for him first time around, and obviously a chunk of them will again - I'd guess a large chunk.


    The question for me is where do extra votes come from, or where are they lost?
    I expect Biden to get very few extra votes, or lose any.

    With Trump, I also expect him to get very few extra votes, as I can't imagine he has done much to win over people who didn't vote for him 4 years ago. Maybe 9 months ago with the economy in good shape, but I don't think that counts for much now.

    Will he lose votes - there is going to be a certain kind of voter who gave him a chance 4 years ago, and won't do so again. But how big is that particular group of voters? Things have become so polarised I don't know how big that will be.


    And in a way, all that really matters is how the above applies to the voters in a small number of swing states, and it's only possible to be sure which states they were until after the fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,573 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    All very well, except, Lincoln was dealing with chaos and yet got re-elected for a second term.

    Trump has had more americans die of covid yesterday than died at the first battle of bull run. I dont recall lincoln saying that the civil war was a hoax.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭francois


    AllForIt wrote: »
    I'm hearing.. .
    I'm hearing Trump is going to lose bigly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,504 ✭✭✭francois


    Danzy wrote: »
    In ballots so far, the Black vote is down just over 1% nationwide.

    At same for Florida as a State, with 2016. No great achievement in that.

    "so far"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,306 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    How does this post relate in any way to what I said ?

    The implication in this is that Biden is concerned with notoriety for himself.
    I shudder to think of what wars this guy will create to establish a legacy for himself.


    He looks like that type.

    The examples I gave are that Trump is demonstrably more concerned with such a motivation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    vojiwox wrote: »
    All that damning evidence... Its like it never existed.

    Oh it still exists, just that mainstream liberal media are refusing to amplify the story the way they would if Donald had said he never spoke with Don Jnr about his overseas business dealings and then one of Don Jnr's ex business partners had come forward and, at risk of perjury, went on record with the FBI about how Donald was lying and he not only spoke with his son about his overseas business dealings, but went to hotel meetings about them in fact.

    Couple that with the emails from Don Jnr's laptop let's say, suggesting that Donald took a slice off the top and that there was business relationships with someone like Patrick Ho, and for sure the mainstream liberal media would have been all over this, with the usual leftist talking heads calling it a bombshell of historical proportions.

    This is election interference from big tech and mainstream media and no matter the election result, which side someone chooses now, with regards to these unethical actions, says everything about who people are what they are willing to allow happen just so their side can get/keep power.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So Pete, basically you're annoyed at publications enforcing editorial standards with stories that amount to conspiracy theories?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,306 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Oh it still exists, just that mainstream liberal media are refusing to amplify the story the way they would if Donald had said he never spoke with Don Jnr about his overseas business dealings and then one of Don Jnr's ex business partners had come forward and, at risk of perjury, went on record with the FBI about how Donald was lying and he not only spoke with his son about his overseas business dealings, but went to hotel meetings about them in fact.

    Couple that with the emails from Don Jnr's laptop let's say, suggesting that Donald took a slice off the top and that there was business relationships with someone like Patrick Ho, and for sure the mainstream liberal media would have been all over this, with the usual leftist talking heads calling it a bombshell of historical proportions.

    This is election interference from big tech and mainstream media and no matter the election result, which side someone chooses now, with regards to these unethical actions, says everything about who people are what they are willing to allow happen just so their side can get/keep power.

    The mainstream conservative media tried to drive this narrative and made a pigs ear of it leading to Carlson's embarrassing monologue the other night.

    Facebook was a conduit for micro-targeting ad campaigns in both the 2016 US Presidential elections and the Brexit Referendum, two contests which were won with extremely small margins of victory.

    Trump uses Twitter as his conduit to communicate with most of his fan-base.

    Crying foul because governance/society has shown that there is a desire to prevent the use of manipulated media and strategies on these platforms says everything about who people are and what they are willing to allow happen just so their side can get/keep power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,428 ✭✭✭✭briany


    osarusan wrote: »
    With less than a week to go, I think it will be close, as always really. Take a look at the last 3 elections.

    Clinton votes in 2016: 65,853,514 Trump: 62,984,828
    Obama votes in 2012: 65,915,795 Romney: 60,933,504
    Obama votes in 2008: 69,498,516 McCain: 59,948,323

    I think the 'Clinton was unpopular' line is overplayed - she got the same as Obama second time around. I'm not sure Biden will get any more than Clinton did, or Obama in 2012.

    Trump energised a certain cohort to vote for him first time around, and obviously a chunk of them will again - I'd guess a large chunk.


    The question for me is where do extra votes come from, or where are they lost?
    I expect Biden to get very few extra votes, or lose any.

    With Trump, I also expect him to get extra votes, as I can't imagine he has done much to win over people who didn't vote for him 4 years ago. Maybe 9 months ago with the economy in good shape, but I don't think that counts for much now.

    Will he lose votes - there is going to be a certain kind of voter who gave him a chance 4 years ago, and won't do so again. But how big is that particular group of voters? Things have become so polarised I don't know how big that will be.


    And in a way, all that really matters is how the above applies to the voters in a small number of swing states, and it's only possible to be sure which states they were until after the fact.

    Hard to see where Trump realistically picks up extra votes from. He seems to have pinned a lot of hope on getting votes from being the law & order president and promising the world when it comes to defeating the Covid pandemic.

    Regarding the first part of that, although a lot of middle class voters would be rightly dismayed by the damage caused by a minority of looters, that stuff probably isn't happening in their town, so it may not have the visceral impact on voting intentions that Trump wants. The Coronavirus, on the other hand, is all over the country. Are same middle class Americans particularly impressed by Trump's handling of this crisis? Consider this - Trump was winning a lot more polls in Pennsylvania back in March than he is now, so that would lead me to suspect the largest and most continuous issue since that time, i.e. Coronavirus, has impacted him and not in a positive sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    So Pete, basically you're annoyed at publications enforcing editorial standards with stories that amount to conspiracy theories?

    No idea how you could arrive at that conclusion. Maybe reread my post and watch the interview above. Again, if you've watched it already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,428 ✭✭✭✭briany


    So Pete, basically you're annoyed at publications enforcing editorial standards with stories that amount to conspiracy theories?

    "Don't listen to the fake news media!"

    "Alright, where should I be getting my news from?"

    "Facebook"

    "What are Facebook's journalistic credentials?"

    "They tell you what the fake news media doesn't want you to hear!"

    "No, I think you misheard me. I asked what are their journalistic credentials?"

    "They're not fake news!"

    "How do you know that?"

    "..."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,395 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    What a shock yet more scumbag comments from Trump this time about Doctors
    https://twitter.com/timjhogan/status/1322246965808291840?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,650 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    . . .This is election interference from big tech and mainstream media and no matter the election result, which side someone chooses now, with regards to these unethical actions, says everything about who people are what they are willing to allow happen just so their side can get/keep power.

    Matt Taibbi pointed out the suppression of the Biden story is an even bigger story than the scandal itself.

    Glenn Greenwald resigned in a very public manner gave his reasons, there is no way that the mainstream media in the USA can continue to suppress the story without severe reputational damage.

    The damage control they have run for Joe Biden just blew up in their face.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    osarusan wrote: »
    With Trump, I also expect him to get extra votes, as I can't imagine he has done much to win over people who didn't vote for him 4 years ago. Maybe 9 months ago with the economy in good shape, but I don't think that counts for much now.

    You'd be wrong on that one... very wrong.

    People will be voting on who they think is the best person to bring that economic prosperity back. That person is clearly Trump...

    It's certainly not Bumbling Biden, who is going to tax the fcuk out of everyone and tear down the highly lucrative energy industry piece by piece if he gets in.

    And the China plague was not Trump's fault... so people know that the economic situation was largely out of his hands. Just like everyone else that was hit with this virus. And the early growth numbers for the economy look really good, even with certain states not fully playing ball.

    So, with all of that and the huge amount of positive rhetoric that he is sending out to the people about the future... it's a no brainer. Trump2020!! :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    osarusan wrote: »
    With less than a week to go, I think it will be close, as always really. Take a look at the last 3 elections.

    Clinton votes in 2016: 65,853,514 Trump: 62,984,828
    Obama votes in 2012: 65,915,795 Romney: 60,933,504
    Obama votes in 2008: 69,498,516 McCain: 59,948,323

    I think the 'Clinton was unpopular' line is overplayed - she got the same as Obama second time around. I'm not sure Biden will get any more than Clinton did, or Obama in 2012.

    Trump energised a certain cohort to vote for him first time around, and obviously a chunk of them will again - I'd guess a large chunk.


    The question for me is where do extra votes come from, or where are they lost?
    I expect Biden to get very few extra votes, or lose any.

    With Trump, I also expect him to get extra votes, as I can't imagine he has done much to win over people who didn't vote for him 4 years ago. Maybe 9 months ago with the economy in good shape, but I don't think that counts for much now.

    Will he lose votes - there is going to be a certain kind of voter who gave him a chance 4 years ago, and won't do so again. But how big is that particular group of voters? Things have become so polarised I don't know how big that will be.


    And in a way, all that really matters is how the above applies to the voters in a small number of swing states, and it's only possible to be sure which states they were until after the fact.

    There could be an extra 10-25m votes this time. In terms of the popular vote it could be an annihilation for Trump, assuming extra votes break for Biden.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭vojiwox


    Oh it still exists, just that mainstream liberal media ...

    C'mon man! :P

    Ah Greenwald!
    The Intercept disputed Greenwald's accusations, writing that Greenwald "believes that anyone who disagrees with him is corrupt, and anyone who presumes to edit his words is a censor" and telling The Washington Post, "it is absolutely not true that Glenn Greenwald was asked to remove all sections critical of Joe Biden from his article. He was asked to support his claims and innuendo about corrupt actions by Joe Biden with evidence."

    "He was asked to support his claims and innuendo about corrupt actions by Joe Biden with evidence" - I like this bit. More of this please.

    Fair play to Greenwald anyway, he posted the text of his emails!! :pac:

    It doesn't help his case IMO

    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/emails-with-intercept-editors-showing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,000 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Matt Taibbi pointed out the suppression of the Biden story is an even bigger story than the scandal itself.

    Well of course they would. They said they had the evidence, yet they have released nothing, it's an embarrassment of an attempt at a story, and it's an embarrassment at the faux outrage of a "cover up". It's completely pathetic, and anyone still trying to big it up after tuckers on air meltdown is a completely pathetic loser.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Oh it still exists, just that mainstream liberal media are refusing to amplify the story the way they would if Donald had said he never spoke with Don Jnr about his overseas business dealings and then one of Don Jnr's ex business partners had come forward and, at risk of perjury, went on record with the FBI about how Donald was lying and he not only spoke with his son about his overseas business dealings, but went to hotel meetings about them in fact.

    Couple that with the emails from Don Jnr's laptop let's say, suggesting that Donald took a slice off the top and that there was business relationships with someone like Patrick Ho, and for sure the mainstream liberal media would have been all over this, with the usual leftist talking heads calling it a bombshell of historical proportions.

    This is election interference from big tech and mainstream media and no matter the election result, which side someone chooses now, with regards to these unethical actions, says everything about who people are what they are willing to allow happen just so their side can get/keep power.



    Truth bombs from Greenwald. Many who watch this will never understand it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭vojiwox


    Truth bombs from Greenwald. Many who watch this will never understand it!

    Think you might be underestimating people along with some projection!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Isn't Miami supposed to be a Democrat city?

    You'd wonder will the massive, unprecedented army of 2.5 million Trump volunteers that have been hard at work for months now, canvassing, knocking on over 12,000,000 doors in vital swing states, collecting data, registering first time voters (who don't get polled), analyzing the voting tendencies of attendees at rallies will pay off!!!

    I don't believe their figures but if they are half right about the amount of attendees that identify as Democrats attending the rallies this will be an interesting few days!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 262 ✭✭perrito caliente


    Wow. Always loved Greenwald. He is a bad ass and a good man to default to as a first point of refence on many topics. Did I hear Tucker apologise at the end?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,395 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Isn't Miami supposed to be a Democrat city?

    You'd wonder will the massive, unprecedented army of 2.5 million Trump volunteers that have been hard at work for months now, canvassing, knocking on over 12,000,000 doors in vital swing states, collecting data, registering first time voters (who don't get polled), analyzing the voting tendencies of attendees at rallies will pay off!!!

    I don't believe their figures but if they are half right about the amount of attendees that identify as Democrats attending the rallies this will be an interesting few days!!!!
    They obviously haven't been that hard at work...less than 5 doors knocked on each....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    gmisk wrote: »
    They obviously haven't been that hard at work...less than 5 doors knocked on each....

    Eh...that is 12,000,000 in swing states...they are on the ground all over the country targeting unregistered voters, who do not show up in polls by the way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,395 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Eh...that is 12,000,000 in swing states...they are on the ground all over the country targeting unregistered voters, who do not show up in polls by the way.
    Zero craic


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement