Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine/antidote and testing procedures Megathread [Mod Warning - Post #1]

14243454748325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    China backing Biden all the way.

    Like every sane person on the planet, then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    Any word on improved treatments for this?

    Surely they've learnt what works better since March and this is why we're seeing vastly reduced mortality numbers? (or a big part of it at least)

    Contrary to this though, I have seen Doctors online say they're giving the exact same drugs now for treatment as they were in March

    Reduced mortality is mostly down to younger age groups getting infected now. Not much in the drug arsenal has changed. There is some Remdesivir, but mostly it's down to steroids for late stage theraphy (Dexamethsone) and improved nursing protocols (i.e. not just shoving everyone on a vent at the first sign of oxygen trouble). Also, less load on hospitals means more attention can be given to each individual case, that alone can lead to substantially better outcomes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,149 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    What brought the Spanish flu pandemic to an end? I can’t imagine there were any vaccines then


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Ok Plasma Treatment seemingly, anyone know anything about that type of treatment?

    Trump to announce emergency authorization of plasma treatment for COVID-19

    https://nypost.com/2020/08/23/trump-to-announce-authorization-of-plasma-treatment-for-covid-19/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Gael23 wrote: »
    What brought the Spanish flu pandemic to an end? I can’t imagine there were any vaccines then

    Herd immunity, you either survived it and gained immunity or you dided.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    Gael23 wrote: »
    What brought the Spanish flu pandemic to an end? I can’t imagine there were any vaccines then

    it burnt itself out after killing 50 million people (3% of the global population at that time).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Hmmzis wrote: »
    Reduced mortality is mostly down to younger age groups getting infected now. Not much in the drug arsenal has changed. There is some Remdesivir, but mostly it's down to steroids for late stage theraphy (Dexamethsone) and improved nursing protocols (i.e. not just shoving everyone on a vent at the first sign of oxygen trouble). Also, less load on hospitals means more attention can be given to each individual case, that alone can lead to substantially better outcomes.

    Great answer, thanks

    I'm surprised and disappointed that not much has improved re: drugs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    froog wrote: »
    it burnt itself out after killing 50 million people (3% of the global population at that time).
    50 million - that's mad, I didn't realise it was so bad. Given that we are approx. 8 months into this pandemic with circa. 800k deaths worldwide, I wonder if it's the case that this virus is less deadly than that one, or on this occasion have we responded better with rapid spread of information, more advanced medicine, etc.?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    Gael23 wrote: »
    What brought the Spanish flu pandemic to an end? I can’t imagine there were any vaccines then

    It simply ran its course, the remnants of it are still kicking around though - H1N1 influenza.

    There are lots of ideas and theories about why the Spanish Flu version of H1N1 was so deadly. The thing though is, that since it's still an influenza strain, the contagiousness and therefore the natural reproductive rate isn"t all that high when it comes to infectious diseases. Here is one estimation based on schools, so would be on the higher side (it's the 2009 pandemic version, still H1N1 though):

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510564/

    Even with those numbers you can see that at the 30-40% penettation rate it simply can't sustain itself and gets reduced to background levels. When it comes to the general population at large, the penetration levels for H1N1 would be even lower for it to 'run out of steam' so to say.

    When it comes to SARS-cov-2, data coming out of India might be quite telling soon enough. New Delhi was up to 29% prevalence and Pune was over 50% already.

    Here is the report from Pune:
    http://cms.unipune.ac.in/~bspujari/Covid19/Pune2/Pune_Serosurvey_Technical_report-17_08_2020.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    50 million - that's mad, I didn't realise it was so bad. Given that we are approx. 8 months into this pandemic with circa. 800k deaths worldwide, I wonder if it's the case that this virus is less deadly than that one, or on this occasion have we responded better with rapid spread of information, more advanced medicine, etc.?

    it's an interesting but gruesome story, check out the wikipedia article on it to start with. basically an absolute **** show worldwide made much worse by world war I.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    froog wrote: »
    it burnt itself out after killing 50 million people (3% of the global population at that time).

    Some have said it could have been up to 100 million.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    eigrod wrote: »
    It’s been hard to take anything Trump has said seriously for the past 3+ years, but the next 3 months are going to be off the scale. Let’s see what Dr. Fauci says before giving this ‘breakthrough’ any credibility.

    Dr. Fauci was appealing for Plasma, it's possible Fauci had Trump's support they have been working on it together.
    https://www.cdc.gov/video/socialmedia/HHS/Dr-Fauci-Plasma-Donation-PSA.mp4


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    can someone explain this to me? according to the oxford vaccine team, they need people to get infected in the community to pass the phase 3 trial. i thought by the time you get to phase 3 you had proven it actually works and just needed to prove no serious side effects? and can they not just infect people in a controlled lab setting? seems like a mad way to test a vaccine. especially as according to them the vaccine could take a long time if infection rates starting dropping a lot.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-04-23-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-begins-human-trial-stage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,177 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Well they've been able to verify that exposure to the vaccine produces an antibody and T-cell response. Which means there's a high likelihood that the vaccine works. But you can't be 100% sure that the virus doesn't have tricks up its sleeve to evade those responses. You can only be sure when people have been exposed to the real deal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    froog wrote: »
    can someone explain this to me? according to the oxford vaccine team, they need people to get infected in the community to pass the phase 3 trial. i thought by the time you get to phase 3 you had proven it actually works and just needed to prove no serious side effects? and can they not just infect people in a controlled lab setting? seems like a mad way to test a vaccine. especially as according to them the vaccine could take a long time if infection rates starting dropping a lot.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-04-23-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-begins-human-trial-stage

    This is the problem your not allowed infect otherwise healthy people. Look up Nuremberg agreement, phase 3 trials will take years if not fast tracked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,709 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    froog wrote: »
    can someone explain this to me? according to the oxford vaccine team, they need people to get infected in the community to pass the phase 3 trial. i thought by the time you get to phase 3 you had proven it actually works and just needed to prove no serious side effects? and can they not just infect people in a controlled lab setting? seems like a mad way to test a vaccine. especially as according to them the vaccine could take a long time if infection rates starting dropping a lot.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-04-23-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-begins-human-trial-stage

    The Oxford vaccine is so far ahead because it's actually a SARS/MERS vaccine but it's rather to hard to test on a virus that's pretty low or non existent in the population.

    The sad thing is a few SARS vaccines were looking good but when the virus died out the funding died out too. We might been in s better place if we kept up the funding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    froog wrote: »
    can someone explain this to me? according to the oxford vaccine team, they need people to get infected in the community to pass the phase 3 trial. i thought by the time you get to phase 3 you had proven it actually works and just needed to prove no serious side effects? and can they not just infect people in a controlled lab setting? seems like a mad way to test a vaccine. especially as according to them the vaccine could take a long time if infection rates starting dropping a lot.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-04-23-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-begins-human-trial-stage

    Excellent point, but thankfully we're the "good guys" and our medical ethics, mean we'd only do this is some pretty extreme situations. There was some discussion about "challenge trials", give it a Google.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭timmy_mallet


    froog wrote: »
    can someone explain this to me? according to the oxford vaccine team, they need people to get infected in the community to pass the phase 3 trial. i thought by the time you get to phase 3 you had proven it actually works and just needed to prove no serious side effects? and can they not just infect people in a controlled lab setting? seems like a mad way to test a vaccine. especially as according to them the vaccine could take a long time if infection rates starting dropping a lot.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-04-23-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-begins-human-trial-stage

    Christ!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Go to 36.55 minutes. There claiming a 35% case mortality rate drop using the plasma. FDA approved. It's probably something we should be doing if it that useful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭darjeeling


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    Great answer, thanks

    I'm surprised and disappointed that not much has improved re: drugs

    Unfortunately I'm not so surprised that we haven't got a good early treatment.

    The only approved effective antiviral, remdesivir, has to be given intravenously - i.e. in hospital.
    But by the time patients are admitted, it's often too late for the drug to be useful.

    A macaque study showed that remdesivir worked well when given around peak viral load (link).
    In humans peak viral load occurs between symptom onset to +5 days (metanalysis study), so newly-admitted patients typically already have declining viral loads and have already entered the second, immunopathological phase.

    An effective orally or nasally administered antiviral could be very useful if given earlier after symptom onset, or even prophylactically in outbreak situations.
    There is one such possible drug, called NHC (beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine, also EIDD-2801) that works similarly to remdesivir but is orally administered.
    This drug was in the news around March/April and there are some ongoing trials that will report soon.

    Virologists who had warned of the likelihood of another new betacoronavirus crossing into humans, following SARS-1 and MERS, have lamented the failure to develop a broad spectrum antiviral against these viruses.

    The finding in 2018 that villagers in south west China had antibodies against bat betacoronaviruses (link) showed that spillover from bats to humans is ongoing, so a new zoonosis and subsequent pandemic was not unlikely.

    Incidentally, and further justifying concerns about viral crossover from bats to humans, a recent genetic sequence analysis concluded that the virus is unlikely to have passed through a pangolin or other intermediate host, but probably came direct from bats (link).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭darjeeling


    froog wrote: »
    can someone explain this to me? according to the oxford vaccine team, they need people to get infected in the community to pass the phase 3 trial. i thought by the time you get to phase 3 you had proven it actually works and just needed to prove no serious side effects? and can they not just infect people in a controlled lab setting? seems like a mad way to test a vaccine. especially as according to them the vaccine could take a long time if infection rates starting dropping a lot.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-04-23-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-begins-human-trial-stage

    I'm not sure there would be many volunteers in a challenge trial if there were going to be a placebo arm!

    Also, phase 1 and 2 trials in tens to low hundreds of volunteers will show up common side-effects, but some less frequent effects may only appear during phase 3 when the drug is given to thousands of people from all age ranges.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    darjeeling wrote: »
    I'm not sure there would be many volunteers in a challenge trial if there were going to be a placebo arm!

    Also, phase 1 and 2 trials in tens to low hundreds of volunteers will show up common side-effects, but some less frequent effects may only appear during phase 3 when the drug is given to thousands of people from all age ranges.
    There would be no problem with volunteers. However, if you tried doing what you suggest with the placebo, you'd end up in jail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    I’d nearly volunteer myself at this stage.
    Sick of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭stevek93


    My Covid test has turned into a a bit of a mess. I rang the National Virus Reference Laboratory now and just as well. They don’t give out results anymore but fair play to them they did mention my mobile number was one digit incorrect I would have been left waiting forever.

    I rang the HSE they said they can’t do anything about my incorrect number number and they can’t give me my test results either go phone your GP.

    Phoned GP and told them story, they said HSE are useless. Anyway waiting on a doctor to phone me now to sort all this out. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    stevek93 wrote: »
    My Covid test has turned into a a bit of a mess. I rang the National Virus Reference Laboratory now and just as well. They don’t give out results anymore but fair play to them they did mention my mobile number was one digit incorrect I would have been left waiting forever.

    I rang the HSE they said they can’t do anything about my incorrect number number and they can’t give me my test results either go phone your GP.

    Phoned GP and told them story, they said HSE are useless. Anyway waiting on a doctor to phone me now to sort all this out. :rolleyes:

    I thought they texted you the appointment details - how did they do that if the mobile was wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭stevek93


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    I thought they texted you the appointment details - how did they do that if the mobile was wrong?

    Maybe the person who carried out the test wrong it down wrong? He did ask me my mobile number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    stevek93 wrote: »
    Maybe the person who carried out the test wrong it down wrong? He did ask me my mobile number.

    Two separate systems, set up this year for data, sounds about par for hse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    Dr. Fauci was appealing for Plasma, it's possible Fauci had Trump's support they have been working on it together.
    https://www.cdc.gov/video/socialmedia/HHS/Dr-Fauci-Plasma-Donation-PSA.mp4

    "working together on it" :rolleyes: do you think Trump suggested it straight after the disenfectant and strong light inside the body, but the fake media didn't report it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    This is the problem your not allowed infect otherwise healthy people. Look up Nuremberg agreement, phase 3 trials will take years if not fast tracked.
    Isn't there a provision for 'emergency licencing' to bypass/skip the regular standard multi-stage testing or phases, and push straight to production, Gates mentioned it before.

    https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/What-you-need-to-know-about-the-COVID-19-vaccine

    Afterall the previous record of 5yrs is going to be hit out of this ballpark for this one with the 18mth target.

    Btw, no ones mentioned that: any vaccine will likely be a multi-delivery delivery as solutions develop, you could well need a second (or thrid) additional shot. Again something Gates has mentioned.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement