Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Madeleine McCann
Options
Comments
-
-
She wandered out herself, something happened (car accident/paedo)flasher0030 wrote: »Thanks man. You've clarified it. So there was no laughing and joking by the McCanns. So after all the talk about odd reactions, there was no odd reaction. So it was another fabricated lie by the other poster.
It's a rather transparent repeated attempt to suggest that they were all part of some seedy child sex ring cartel. Conspiracy theory 101.
A few problems with this particular attempted slur is that;
A) They had two meetings with this particular individual after their daughter's disappearance, whose alleged predilictions for underage girls was not known publicly at the time. This attempted slur on the McCanns is not concerned with showing they had any knowledge of this, either before or after the meetings, no, it is just put out there as more 'odd' (ugh) behaviour. The endless nudge, nudge, wink, wink, make up your own mind type thing that permeates these threads.
If they were part of this seedy sex ring, why on earth would they put it in print that they ever met at all? It's almost as puzzling as why they would continue keeping the case of their child's disappearance in the headlines after having gotten away with the perfect crime.
Far be it from me to use logic in this tawdry story of the visit to Freud's villa, however, sometimes logic tends to work better than unfounded insinuations.0 -
-
-
dark crystal wrote: »It's a rather transparent repeated attempt to suggest that they were all part of some seedy child sex ring cartel. Conspiracy theory 101.
A few problems with this particular attempted slur is that;
A) They had two meetings with this particular individual after their daughter's disappearance, whose alleged predilictions for underage girls was not known publicly at the time. This attempted slur on the McCanns is not concerned with showing they had any knowledge of this, either before or after the meetings, no, it is just put out there as more 'odd' (ugh) behaviour. The endless nudge, nudge, wink, wink, make up your own mind type thing that permeates these threads. If they were part of this seedy sex ring, why on earth would they put it in print that they ever met at all? It's almost as puzzling as why they would continue keeping the case of their child's disappearance in the headlines after having gotten away with the perfect crime.
Far be it from me to use logic in this tawdry story of the visit to Freud's villa, however, sometimes logic tends to work better than unfounded insinuations.
Another question to ponder was Frued part of the Madeline abduction ? He would of derived pleasure of having her parents in his company knowing he had information or an active part in her abduction.0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
She wandered out herself, something happened (car accident/paedo)dark crystal wrote: »It's a rather transparent repeated attempt to suggest that they were all part of some seedy child sex ring cartel. Conspiracy theory 101.
A few problems with this particular attempted slur is that;
A) They had two meetings with this particular individual after their daughter's disappearance, whose alleged predilictions for underage girls was not known publicly at the time. This attempted slur on the McCanns is not concerned with showing they had any knowledge of this, either before or after the meetings, no, it is just put out there as more 'odd' (ugh) behaviour. The endless nudge, nudge, wink, wink, make up your own mind type thing that permeates these threads. If they were part of this seedy sex ring, why on earth would they put it in print that they ever met at all? It's almost as puzzling as why they would continue keeping the case of their child's disappearance in the headlines after having gotten away with the perfect crime.
Far be it from me to use logic in this tawdry story of the visit to Freud's villa, however, sometimes logic tends to work better than unfounded insinuations.
Your language is so past loaded its bordering ridiculous. What motivates you to be a McCann evangelist? This isn't like making a murder where the suspect had a below par IQ or where the parents are being scape goated. It's a web of lies, mistruths and contradictions. The very best possible scenario is that they placed no value on Madelines life and put her to bed in an unlocked open street side bedroom. The worst is far far more grim. What could possibly motivate a person to defend completely negligent parents. Have you shared experience of some sort? Can you relate to the parents behavior. Love to hear your motivation. Its almost as strange as the McCanns themselves.0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
I know, sorry I wasn’t having a go at you I was agreeing to your suspicions on Freud and CB and having a go at people who ignore that kind of thing and focus on the parents for the silly reasons I mentioned
Kinda thought it was but just incase
Until it’s solved the parents will always be under suspicion cause with any crime it’s always the closest that are investigated first. 0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement